| Revision as of 19:37, 1 March 2009 editCerejota (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,178 edits Notification: Speedy deletion nomination of Hamas’ termination of spies active during the 2008-2009 Gazan-Israeli conflict. (TW)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:35, 3 January 2025 edit undoCactusisme (talk | contribs)102 edits →Hello!!!: ReplyTag: Reply | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{talkpage}} | |||
| {{/archivelist}} | {{/archivelist}} | ||
| {{administrator}} | |||
| {|align="centre" | |||
| |{{editabuselinks}} | |||
| |} | |||
| __TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| {{clear}} | |||
| == |
== You missed == | ||
| … the master of {{noping|Abu4real1995}}: {{noping|Joseph4real1995}}. Best, ] 13:13, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I would like to know why "Xmortis" was deleted as a non-notable event in Cambridge, MA. The event was created after Hell which was a very notable goth night at "Manray" nightclub in Cambridge, MA. Xmortis continues to this day. Many articles have been written that reference Xmortis. Xmortis creators had a hand in creating the Miss Gothic Massachusetts competition in Cambridge. What else needs to be done to prove that Xmortis is worthy of an entry? | |||
| ⚫ | : No, I blocked the account, and then unblocked it following an unblock request. ] (]) 13:15, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| morbidiqua@gmail.com <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 16:53, 27 February 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ::Well, after the unblock request was accepted, they’ve gone to nominate articles that I created (possibly because I filed the SPI). I don’t think that that sort of editing is considered as good-faith editing; it is disruptive at best. Best, ] 11:29, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ::: I have re-blocked them. ] (]) 16:57, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| == Assistance == | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| "I am writing to request assistance regarding recent edits to the "Lovely Runner" article. editor Paper90ll has repeatedly removed information regarding ] achievment at the Asia Artist Awards. Despite these reversions, the user continued to rollback the changes and tagging me ] ]. I would appreciate guidance on how to resolve this ongoing dispute and ensure that the article accurately reflects the subject matter." ] (]) 13:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ==AfD nomination of Patrick Delahanty== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.<!-- Template:Adw --> ] (]) 04:17, 28 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :@] As I had reply to ] at their talk page on the same cross-posted topic. It's truly lovely to have ] and ] to start 2025. On '']'', ] that removed "{{tq|Material that fails verification be removed}}" per ] with "{{tq|WP:VERIFY, WP:OR, WP:SYNTH}}" in the edit summary however so lovely we have ] that apparently by following VERIFY, OR, SYNTH was ASPERSIONS as "{{tq|WP:BITE WP:FAITH}}"??? On the same article, the inline citation 48 nor 49 doesn't explicity stated that it's awarded for ''Lovely Runner'' either, further evidencing that my edit was aligned with Misplaced Pages's policies. On ], believed to be related to ] which our dear editor couldn't give me any acceptable neutral explanation to restore their preferred layout and also likely related to ] reverting their incorrect updates to the Infobox's count by going against the ]. In addition, rather perplexing that it was such a thing to discuss first for non-controversial edits when the edits made were per ] and didn't requires ]. Lastly, where exactly was the ASPERSIONSly the ] violations and/or "edit warring" violation on either articles??? I would pretty much like you as an administrator to give me an reasonable explanation on such behaviour otherwise this behaviour would continue by going around administrator's talk page and cross-posting the same topic. '''<span style="color:#f535aa">—</span> 🎉🎆 ] 🎆🎉 <span style="color:#f535aa">(] • ])</span>''' 13:38, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ==Image deletion question== | |||
| Why was ] deleted? No notice, that I saw, was given and the rationale is a bit vague. Simply correcting the fair use rationale could fix the problem. Please explain. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 04:52, 28 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ::: I agree with Aoidh's . ] (]) 18:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :Hi BQZip01, a disputed fair use tag was added by Angr on 17 February, which indicated that "not one of the articles where this image is used has any critical commentary about this statue itself. It is used merely for decoration and does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the articles; it thus fails ] in all articles where it is used." ] (]) 12:33, 28 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| ::Couldn't disagree more. Each one of the articles (especially the 12th Man article) had text describing and asserting the importance of the statue. The image itself was not copyrighted, but the subject certainly was. The only thing I ask is that you restore the image and submit it to ]. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 01:58, 1 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, PhilKnight, | |||
| I saw that you closed this SPI case but the main sockmaster, Tuwintuwin, wasn't blocked at all. Was this an oversight? Just wondering as I've run into their editing this evening. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 08:19, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| :I just saw that they were indefinitely blocked but were unblocked only 3 days later! <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 08:22, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Arjayay and DH85868993 keeps reverting my edits. == | |||
| ::::That's all I ask. Thanks! <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 08:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Hello. First of all, I wanted to say I'm really sorry for my wrongdoings. Second, the two users keep reverting my edits for "Nurburgring". I put the correct info for the Nordscheliefe section, but the two keep reverting it. Click this link and you will see that my info is correct: Anyway, please stop them from putting wrong data. Thank you, and again, I'm sorry. ] (]) 17:49, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Um...you've orphaned the image. Could you please go back and restore the image on the appropriate pages? If it is orphaned, it is also eligible for deletion. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 19:33, 1 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| : You should use the talk page - ] - to establish ], and not ]. ] (]) 18:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ==User 68.218.209.5== | |||
| ::Okay. Thank you. And again, I'm sorry. ] (]) 18:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| I know it's an IP address. I guess this should not be about punishment or retribution. But 31 hours as a suspension for that vitriol? Seems you have been merciful in the extreme. ] (]) 19:45, 28 February 2009 (UTC) Stan | |||
| == Hello!!! == | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| I was wondering how to archive stuff? And can you also mentor me as en wiki is different from simple en wiki? ] <sup>]</sup> <sup>]</sup> 08:40, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'll go take it up with the author. Thanks. Best to you. ] (]) 19:52, 28 February 2009 (UTC) Stan | |||
| : Hi Cactusisme, you seem to have figured out how to archive stuff based on your user talk page. I don't mentor users, I suggest you find someone at ]. ] (]) 11:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == J+S ArbCom case == | |||
| ::Alright, thanks!! ] <sup>]</sup> <sup>]</sup> 11:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::How about the bot? ] <sup>]</sup> <sup>]</sup> 11:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Phil, (cc'd to ChrisO) | |||
| ⚫ | ::: Sorry, I don't understand the question "How about the bot?" ] (]) 11:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| ::::@] Archiving bot ] <sup>]</sup> <sup>]</sup> 11:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| In the upcoming ], I'm worried will be used again to ]. Since 1) Elonka it was based on a misunderstanding on her part and 2) she promised to lift or at least reduce it after one week, then forgot about it and went on a Wikibreak, and 3) the stated infraction was first changed, then never specified beyond a vague ''"based on the recent pattern of reverts, and working your way through several Israel-Palestine articles and making Samaria-related reverts"'', and 4) the only two Samaria-related reverts I had made in the preceding week were in order to fix problems with claims that were either unsourced or sourced exclusively with , I wonder if and where I can appeal to have the ban lifted? ] (]) 08:28, 1 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: I have never used an archiving bot, so I am not the right person to ask. ] (]) 11:45, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Anyone you know who uses it? ] <sup>]</sup> <sup>]</sup> 11:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| :::::::: Looking at ] {{u|Rosguill}} uses archivebot and is currently accepting adoptees. You could try them. ] (]) 12:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::ok ] <sup>]</sup> <sup>]</sup> 12:35, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks, I'll try that. ] (]) 08:36, 1 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::Success! :) ] ] (]) 11:42, 1 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Speedy deletion of ]== | |||
| ] Please do not move pages to nonsensical titles. It is considered ]. If you would like to learn more about moving pages, please see the ] on this subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the Misplaced Pages. Thank you. | |||
| If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact ] to request that they ] the page or have a copy emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-pagemove-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 19:37, 1 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:35, 3 January 2025
 Archives |
|---|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118
|
| edit |
You missed
… the master of Abu4real1995: Joseph4real1995. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 13:13, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- No, I blocked the account, and then unblocked it following an unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 13:15, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well, after the unblock request was accepted, they’ve gone to nominate articles that I created (possibly because I filed the SPI). I don’t think that that sort of editing is considered as good-faith editing; it is disruptive at best. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 11:29, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I have re-blocked them. PhilKnight (talk) 16:57, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- Well, after the unblock request was accepted, they’ve gone to nominate articles that I created (possibly because I filed the SPI). I don’t think that that sort of editing is considered as good-faith editing; it is disruptive at best. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 11:29, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Assistance
"I am writing to request assistance regarding recent edits to the "Lovely Runner" article. editor Paper90ll has repeatedly removed information regarding Lovely Runner achievment at the Asia Artist Awards. Despite these reversions, the user continued to rollback the changes and tagging me Ultraviolet Rollback. I would appreciate guidance on how to resolve this ongoing dispute and ensure that the article accurately reflects the subject matter." Puchicatos (talk) 13:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @PhilKnight As I had reply to Aoidh at their talk page on the same cross-posted topic. It's truly lovely to have WP:ASPERSIONS and WP:PERSONALATTACKS to start 2025. On Lovely Runner, my edit that removed "
Material that fails verification be removed
" per WP:VERIFY with "WP:VERIFY, WP:OR, WP:SYNTH
" in the edit summary however so lovely we have this edit by our dear editor that apparently by following VERIFY, OR, SYNTH was ASPERSIONS as "WP:BITE WP:FAITH
"??? On the same article, the inline citation 48 nor 49 doesn't explicity stated that it's awarded for Lovely Runner either, further evidencing that my edit was aligned with Misplaced Pages's policies. On List of awards and nominations received by Byeon Woo-seok, believed to be related to this discussion which our dear editor couldn't give me any acceptable neutral explanation to restore their preferred layout and also likely related to this edit reverting their incorrect updates to the Infobox's count by going against the documentation. In addition, rather perplexing that it was such a thing to discuss first for non-controversial edits when the edits made were per WP:BOLD and didn't requires WP:CONSENSUS. Lastly, where exactly was the ASPERSIONSly the WP:3RR violations and/or "edit warring" violation on either articles??? I would pretty much like you as an administrator to give me an reasonable explanation on such behaviour otherwise this behaviour would continue by going around administrator's talk page and cross-posting the same topic. — 🎉🎆 Paper9oll 🎆🎉 (🔔 • 📝) 13:38, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I agree with Aoidh's comments. PhilKnight (talk) 18:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Tuwintuwin/Archive
Hello, PhilKnight,
I saw that you closed this SPI case but the main sockmaster, Tuwintuwin, wasn't blocked at all. Was this an oversight? Just wondering as I've run into their editing this evening. Liz 08:19, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- I just saw that they were indefinitely blocked but were unblocked only 3 days later! Liz 08:22, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Arjayay and DH85868993 keeps reverting my edits.
Hello. First of all, I wanted to say I'm really sorry for my wrongdoings. Second, the two users keep reverting my edits for "Nurburgring". I put the correct info for the Nordscheliefe section, but the two keep reverting it. Click this link and you will see that my info is correct: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsLi7HgSuhI Anyway, please stop them from putting wrong data. Thank you, and again, I'm sorry. 2603:8000:99F0:93A0:9932:FB79:1D30:444B (talk) 17:49, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- You should use the talk page - Talk:Nürburgring - to establish consensus, and not edit war. PhilKnight (talk) 18:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Okay. Thank you. And again, I'm sorry. 2603:8000:99F0:93A0:9932:FB79:1D30:444B (talk) 18:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello!!!
I was wondering how to archive stuff? And can you also mentor me as en wiki is different from simple en wiki? Cactus🌵 08:40, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Cactusisme, you seem to have figured out how to archive stuff based on your user talk page. I don't mentor users, I suggest you find someone at Misplaced Pages:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area/Adopters. PhilKnight (talk) 11:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Alright, thanks!! Cactus🌵 11:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- How about the bot? Cactus🌵 11:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't understand the question "How about the bot?" PhilKnight (talk) 11:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- @PhilKnight Archiving bot Cactus🌵 11:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- I have never used an archiving bot, so I am not the right person to ask. PhilKnight (talk) 11:45, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Anyone you know who uses it? Cactus🌵 11:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Looking at Misplaced Pages:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area/Adopters Rosguill uses archivebot and is currently accepting adoptees. You could try them. PhilKnight (talk) 12:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Anyone you know who uses it? Cactus🌵 11:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- I have never used an archiving bot, so I am not the right person to ask. PhilKnight (talk) 11:45, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- @PhilKnight Archiving bot Cactus🌵 11:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't understand the question "How about the bot?" PhilKnight (talk) 11:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)