| Revision as of 07:54, 5 March 2009 editJack Merridew (talk | contribs)34,837 edits del← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:31, 19 May 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''redirect to ]'''. Transwiki can still be performed. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 03:31, 8 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|F}} | |||
| :{{la|Third Robotech War}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Third Robotech War}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| Fails ] and ]. Article can be transwikied to and . ] (]) 04:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | Fails ] and ]. Article can be transwikied to and . ] (]) 04:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small><small>—— |
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small><small>—— ] <sup style="font-family:Verdana;">'''(])'''</sup> 04:30, 3 March 2009 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Delete''' – pretty blatant failure of ]. No notability asserted either through any sources independent of the topic. — |
*'''Delete''' – pretty blatant failure of ]. No notability asserted either through any sources independent of the topic. — ] <sup style="font-family:Verdana;">'''(])'''</sup> 04:30, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' - Excessive and crufty ] sourced entirely from ]. Spectacularly fails our requirements for ] and ]. ] |
*'''Delete''' - Excessive and crufty ] sourced entirely from ]. Spectacularly fails our requirements for ] and ]. ] ] 05:36, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Transwiki''' to suggested locations, and '''redirect''' to ] ] (]) 06:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | *'''Transwiki''' to suggested locations, and '''redirect''' to ] ] (]) 06:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment''' this article is a plot summary of '''season three''' of ] ] (]) 06:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' this article is a plot summary of '''season three''' of ] ] (]) 06:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Line 15: | Line 21: | ||
| :*'''Comment''' ] trumps ]. --''']''' (]) 23:22, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | :*'''Comment''' ] trumps ]. --''']''' (]) 23:22, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Fails ] and ]. In-universe original research. At most deserves mention in an article about the fictional work in which it appears. Lacks independent and reliable coverage in its own right. ] (]) 05:39, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Fails ] and ]. In-universe original research. At most deserves mention in an article about the fictional work in which it appears. Lacks independent and reliable coverage in its own right. ] (]) 05:39, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' ] trumps ]. If you don't like reading about this key aspects of an immensely popular and influential work, then aren't likely to ever find the article to begin with, and can simply ignore it. There is no reason to delete it. It does not help the wikipedia at all to destroy articles like this. ]''' 03:26, 5 March 2009 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' ] trumps ]. If you don't like reading about this key aspects of an immensely popular and influential work, then aren't likely to ever find the article to begin with, and can simply ignore it. There is no reason to delete it. It does not help the wikipedia at all to destroy articles like this. ] 03:26, 5 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. Entirely plot summary and in-universe information for a non-notable fictional topic which has not received substantial in reliable secondary sources. ] <small>(])</small> 03:59, 5 March 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. Entirely plot summary and in-universe information for a non-notable fictional topic which has not received substantial in reliable secondary sources. ] <small>(])</small> 03:59, 5 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Delete Cruft''' per the usual reasons elucidated by the above dels. ] 07:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC) | * '''Delete Cruft''' per the usual reasons elucidated by the above dels. ] 07:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' as lacking real-world notability. ] (]) 20:14, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' marginally referenced (and then only substantiating plot claims) in-universe plot summary for non-notable fictional event. --] (]) 15:23, 7 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Merge all''' to ], apparently the parent with all these separately sent to AFD; | |||
| **] | |||
| **] | |||
| **] | |||
| **] | |||
| **] | |||
| :There seems to have been no effort to actually discuss merging usable content which may be the best solution. Looking at each AfD separately it wasn't clear they were related. Merging seems to make sense. ] 18:46, 7 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' The war on cruft never ends.--] (]) 23:55, 7 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 19:31, 19 May 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Robotech Wars . Transwiki can still be performed. MBisanz 03:31, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Third Robotech War
- Third Robotech War (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP: Fiction and WP: Notability. Article can be transwikied to here and here. SkyWalker (talk) 04:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. —— sephiroth bcr 04:30, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete – pretty blatant failure of WP:NOT#PLOT. No notability asserted either through any sources independent of the topic. — sephiroth bcr 04:30, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - Excessive and crufty plot summary sourced entirely from primary sources. Spectacularly fails our requirements for reliable sources and notability. Reyk YO! 05:36, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Transwiki to suggested locations, and redirect to Robotech Wars 76.66.193.90 (talk) 06:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Comment this article is a plot summary of season three of Robotech 76.66.193.90 (talk) 06:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete or Transwiki To in-Universe and the approach for an anime summary as Real life military event is BAD. --KrebMarkt 07:59, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Transwiki to the Robotech Wikia and then delete. One of the more gross violations of WP:NOT#PLOT. The article also has issues with WP:V and WP:NOR. --Farix (Talk) 21:32, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep This article is an accurate summary of the Third Robotech Saga television series. Robotech was one of the earliest and most important extrapolation of Japanese anime to a western audience. The article is sourced from the television series as well as the Robotech Novels. It should not be deleted.(Hyperionsteel (talk) 23:10, 3 March 2009 (UTC))
- Comment WP:NOT trumps WP:ILIKEIT. --Farix (Talk) 23:22, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Fails Notability and WP:FICTION. In-universe original research. At most deserves mention in an article about the fictional work in which it appears. Lacks independent and reliable coverage in its own right. Edison (talk) 05:39, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep WP:SENSE trumps wikilawyering. If you don't like reading about this key aspects of an immensely popular and influential work, then aren't likely to ever find the article to begin with, and can simply ignore it. There is no reason to delete it. It does not help the wikipedia at all to destroy articles like this. Dream Focus 03:26, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Entirely plot summary and in-universe information for a non-notable fictional topic which has not received substantial in reliable secondary sources. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 03:59, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Cruft per the usual reasons elucidated by the above dels. Jack Merridew 07:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete as lacking real-world notability. Stifle (talk) 20:14, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete marginally referenced (and then only substantiating plot claims) in-universe plot summary for non-notable fictional event. --EEMIV (talk) 15:23, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Merge all to Robotech Wars, apparently the parent with all these separately sent to AFD;
- There seems to have been no effort to actually discuss merging usable content which may be the best solution. Looking at each AfD separately it wasn't clear they were related. Merging seems to make sense. -- Banjeboi 18:46, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete The war on cruft never ends.--Sloane (talk) 23:55, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.