Misplaced Pages

User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:35, 9 March 2009 view sourceSadbuttrue92 (talk | contribs)338 edits →Question?← Previous edit Latest revision as of 00:13, 19 November 2024 view source MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,135,113 edits →ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{pp-protected|small=yes}}
{{notice|'''Note:''' I like to keep discussion threads together, so if you leave a message here I will usually respond here. If I have begun a discussion on your page, I'll see it if you respond there.

<small>A {{tl|ping}} would be appreciated if you reply at a later date. {{tl|Talkback}} notes here will generally not be needed.</small>

Note to '''new and non-logged-in editors''': Due to a long-term issue with vandalism, this talkpage has unfortunately had to be ]. If you need to contact me and can't post here, please just post your message on your own talkpage or the talkpage of the relevant article and add the code "<nowiki>{{ping|Future Perfect at Sunrise}}</nowiki>" to it, then I'll be sure to see it. }}

{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 250K |maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 16 |counter = 33
|minthreadsleft = 3 |minthreadsleft = 3
|minthreadstoarchive = 3 |minthreadstoarchive = 3
Line 10: Line 17:
{| class="infobox" width="315px" {| class="infobox" width="315px"
|- |-
! align="center" | ]<br />] ! align="center" | {{/Archives}}
|} |}
{{bots|deny=Sinebot}} {{bots|deny=SineBot}}
'''Note: If you leave a message here I will most often respond here'''


{{notice|Hello fellow Wikipedians, due to changed circumstances in my private and professional life I am currently hovering somewhere in between "busy in real life and may not respond quickly to inquiries" and "semi-retired". I'll probably be around from time to time, but please don't rely on me for quick admin action or the like, for the time being. All the best, – ] ] 05:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC) }}
== An image ==


Sorry to annoy you once more, but could you check out ? Part of the FUR says "It is of much lower resolution than the original" which is confusing considering the size. Also, the source seems to be a book published in Bulgaria in 1941, which wouldn't be a reliable source, would it? Thanks in advance, ''']]'''


== Invitation to participate in a research ==
== conflict with ] ==


Hello,
"Is it really so difficult to use a past tense?" This is unnecessary and unhelpful. Comments like these do nothing to help resolve your dispute, but instead are deliberately aggravating. So please avoid them in the future. --<font style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 10px;"><b>] ]</b></font> 15:04, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''.
:I'm not in a dispute with Rjecina, thank you very much; I'm engaged in admin work stopping some (unintentionally) disruptive editing. And "is it really so difficult?" was a genuine, polite question of interest. ] ] 15:30, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
== Infoboxes ==


The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] .
I think infoboxes do nothing but help an article and I put them on as many of my articles as there is a pertainant infobox. The only time I don't like them as much is when the article is really short and contains no information that is not in the infobox. ] (]) 05:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
:What's more, just take what Misplaced Pages ''is'', a quick, not guranteed to be accurate general reference site used by people who often do not wish to go in depth or college kids whose paper is due tomorrow and they've been out partying and need to do a last-minute half-assed job. ] (]) 05:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
:: LOL, yeah, "we call those people 'non-readers'", indeed. If you feel happy making Misplaced Pages accommodate kids who want to do a last-minute half-assed job, that's your choice. Me, I'd rather Misplaced Pages told such kids to f* off and do their homework. But more importantly, I think you are still mistaken: even if you want Misplaced Pages to help those kids, in many cases they'd still be better off reading the text lead than the box. Much of the material we have in infoboxes is of such a kind that you could actually take it in faster and easier from a well-written piece of prose. I believe it's a myth that tabulated boxes are generally easier to take in. If ] had wanted us to communicate in tabulated data sheets, he'd given us an inborn ability to parse disconnected shreds of information and category labels. He hasn't. Instead, he gave us an inborn ability to parse ]. ] ] 06:46, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
== Arvanitiko kefali ==


Kind Regards,
Maybe you`re right, I am :-). The prob is that a souliot salad cannot be eaten. Of course they maybe treated as Albanians and Greeks too, but only as an Albanian community, which was finally hellenized. And they were hellenized, when the hellenization (i.e. national consciousness) existed, i.e. only after the Greek independence, i.e. when the term Souliot had no logical sense, cause they were integrated in the mainstream culture, and had no conection with Souli. Thus, they cannot be neither Greek-Albanians, nor Greeks and Albanians, but just ''Souliot'' Albanians, who became ''Hellenized Souliot Albanians'', and who finally became ''Arvanites'', long after seizing to be Souliotes (inhabitants of Souli, or some generations after).] (]) 16:34, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


]
:Nah, that's not quite true. There are plenty of sources that were already calling them "Greeks" before 1821. The Pouqeville travel report being a case in point. The Orthodox faith and the cultural and political stance that implied was linked to "being Greek" strongly enough that they were routinely perceived as Greeks by foreign observers at least. ] ] 16:39, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
::Primary sources? They are plenty primary sources that does not distinct them from Albanians (). Do not forget that Greeks was also a ], so primary sources lack reliability. Secondary sources, dispute each other on calling the Albanians or Greek Albanians, or Hellenized Albanians, but never as non-Albanians. Hellenization has started as a process long after dyafotisi, and as such, Souliotes could not be Hellenized at the time that they were in Souli. If they were they would not be part of the Albanian regiment of the French Army, but they would be part of the Greek regiment, wouldn`t they?] (]) 16:46, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 -->
::: Nope, they were part of the Albanian regiment obviously because they were Albanian-speaking. What I'm saying is just: whatever it was that "Greek" meant at the time (and it may not have been the same thing we mean by that term today), the Souliots were perceived as being part of it in some significant way. But who says we should treat them as "non-Albanians", anyway? Now you are falling into the same silly either-or trap as the other guys.
::: A.: They were both X and Y at the same time.
::: B.: No, you're wrong, they were Y!!!
::: C.: No, you're wrong, they were X!!!
::: A.: D'oh.
::: ] ] 16:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


==Happy Adminship Anniversary!==
No, I am not falling in that trap. I just do not understand what ''both X and Y'' means. You say that they were Greeks, without the todays meaning (e.g. just Orthodox, who were called Greeks not per ethnicity but per religion), but if this is an argument, we should treat ] page to as that. I am just saying that they are X and became Y, when Y`s national culture existed, I am not saying that their descendants are not Greeks, I am saying that Souliotes (Marko Botsari et al) were Albanians, maybe{{ref}} influenced by Greek culture, but of course Albanians, as their mother tongue was Albanian and the period that they lived had no "nations", but just "ethnicities".] (]) 17:12, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->

{{ombox
: I still maintain you are committing the same kind of error as the other guys on that discussion page. They insist that only the present-day meaning of the term "Albanian" counts, that the Souliotes weren't Albanian in ''that'' sense, so they can't be called by that name. You, in contrast, insist that only the present-day meaning of the term "Greek" counts, that the Souliotes weren't Greek in ''this'' sense, and that we therefore can't call them thus. You are both reifying a modern construct and projecting it back into a different time period – in both cases, with the result of finding that it can't apply.
| name = Happy Adminship
: In reality, a concept of "Greekness" did exist in the 18th century. It was not 100% identical to the present-day concept. It was a complex mixture of linguistic, cultural, political and religious criteria. Despite not being 100% identical to today's concept of Greek nationality, it morphed into the latter during the 19th century. You are now demanding that we should totally ignore the earlier concept and treat it as a mere misnomer. That's wrong, I think, and it's not what the literature does. ] ] 18:22, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
| image = ]

| imageright = ]
== Side-conversation carry-over ==
| style = border: 2px solid SlateBlue; background: linear-gradient(to right, #c5c5ec, #bfd1f2, #a9efea);

| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
I thought I'd take a few moments to respond to the side conversation that we're having over at AN/I, as this might be a better place to discuss what we're discussing.
| plainlinks = yes
Yep, I get that AN/I does not have moderators, and that's for a good reason. I apologise if I came across as trying to give my comments more weight than others, as that was not my intention. As a matter of fact, admin comments should have more weight than others there, so I kind of disagree when you say that "nobody's voice is special", but my disagreement actually gives ''your'' voice more weight. My choice of font color also goes to those same ends, in that it is meant to convey that I am ''not'' an admin (yet, hopefully one day eventually!), but I do fulfill a specialized role within the community. I'm a mediator. I purposefully place myself in a "buffer-zone" between other editors, attempting to be careful ''not'' to take sides in a dispute, and hopefully helping the opposing sides come to an agreeable solution, or at the very least, a "happy medium".
| text = <big>'''Happy adminship anniversary!'''</big><br />Hi Future Perfect at Sunrise! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your ]. Enjoy this special day! ] (]) 02:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
No, I don't take myself ''too'' seriously, but I do ''what'' I do with a sense of dedication. (If you're not going to try to do it right, then why try to do it at all?) ] (]) 21:10, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
}}

== Crisis ==

Geia sou Fut! Do you think it's a coincidence that... "]" and "]" are the same word in Greek? Boo! Hope it hasn't affected you... ]] 21:32, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
: Well, apart from the fact that all the investment funds are down... at least my workplace hasn't burnt down yet. That's something. Public sector gets affected only indirectly and with some delay, I guess. ] ] 21:52, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

== Userbox/userboxes ==

What's wrong with having that redirect to wp:userboxes; bloody tons of pages redirect to their Misplaced Pages: counterpart. ] (]) 22:57, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

:], for example, is even a soft redirect. ] (]) 23:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

::It redirects to bloody Wikimedia; so it's (according to you) even more heinous than a cross-link, it links to another bloody site; a sister site, but another site just the same. ] (]) 23:01, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

== Cross-namespaces ==

I support cross-namespaces; what the Hell can they hurt? Nothing. They can help, though. For example, unless you alter your search preferences, which you have to be a member to do; the msajority of users aren't; many non-cross-namespaced things such as userbox will not even show up in the bloody search results. Daniel Christensen (talk) 23:05, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

== ? ==

Have you seen the citations?] (]) 00:11, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

If not here are some more:

The Macedonian language in the development of the Slavonic literary languages B Koneski - 1968 - Kultura

A diachronic interpretation of Macedonian verbal morphology MJ Elson - 1990 - Edwin Mellen Press

Two typological gaps in stress systems: arguments from early language acquisition S Peperkamp, E Dupoux - 2000

Macedonian as an Ausbau language OM Tomic - Pluricentric Languages: Differing Norms in Different Nations, 1992 - Mouton De Gruyter

] (]) 00:14, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

:ok so I guess I can proceed with my addition on the ]] (]) 00:19, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

: I haven't read the references, if that's what you mean. But I can see it's some highly specialist, technical literature on a very narrow topic regarding a minor structural property, of the phonetic details of word stress. That's just a tiny detail, and doesn't warrant mentioning in the lead. We also don't know if those study are actually saying it is more similar to Polish than to any other Slavic language, or if the study just picked those language pairs as arbitrary representative examples of what could also be found in other languages. It is in no way comparable in significance to the very salient fact of immediate relation with Serbocroatian and Bulgarian. ] ] 00:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
:: (after ec): The new refs you posted here seem to have nothing to do with Polish at all, or do they? ] ] 00:23, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

:::: I don't know which but I can guess you're either a person who doesn't have a clue about Linguistics (not likely) or you don't know where to search for book content. All the books included in this list as well as the sources put in the article provide evidence which support or back the connection of word stress between Polish and the Slavomacedonian language. It's in my view an important find that further proves that there was indeed one common Slavic Dialect (]) that was originally spoken by the slavic tribes that emigrated to Europe during the migration age.] (]) 23:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

::::: I'm not going to run searching through half a dozen specialist works in a wild search for something that ''might'' be relevant to your idiosyncratic ideas just on your say-so. You'll have to give some concrete information about what precisely each of these works says, where it says it, and in what way you think it is relevant to the issue. I can't see any indication that you read and understood what I wrote in my last posting either. And: ''"important find that further proves that there was indeed one common Slavic Dialect"''? That there was a Common Slavic is universally accepted, completely trivial and not in need of "important finds" to back it up. It's also in no way directly relevant to the status of Macedonian specifically. And you have given no evidence that whatever those similarities are are in fact interpreted as significant evidence about the genetic status of Macedonian.
::::: If you seriously think those points are important for the article, why don't you first write a brief passage about what those supposed similarities actually are, and what reliable sources say about their significance, and put that somewhere where it might belong, in the body text? Once you've done that, we can start considering if it's important enough to be mentioned also in the lead. I doubt that it will though.
::::: By the way, I'll also repeat my request for you to create a user account. You said the other day you don't want to get caught up in discussions, but here we are, having one. If you want to have a sustained presence on Misplaced Pages and engage in disputes, not creating an account is really a very unconstructive thing to do, and may reflect badly on your reputation as a good-faith contributor. ] ] 06:40, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

:::::: Quote: "I'm not going to run searching through half a dozen specialist works in a wild search for something that ''might'' be relevant to your idiosyncratic ideas just on your say-so." You're obviously not interested enough on what the heck you're doing in wikipedia so why don't you call it quits. Ok Ok relax you're the big admin here so your "say-sos" and idiosyncratic ideas are much more important than anybody else... apparently...] --> ] !!!] (]) 14:21, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

::::::: For the last time, get yourself an account, or stay away from my page. Following your antics across all these IPs is tiresome. ] ] 14:26, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

== ] ==

You win. (I lay my king down, and resign.) It's all on my user page, should you wish to read it. Again, I apologize. ] (]) 08:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

:Huh? I'm honestly sorry if I offended you, but I really don't see why you should feel that way. My remark was a simple polite request regarding an editing practice of yours that was rather unusual in that forum, nothing more. ] ] 09:31, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

== Is this... ==

...? ''']]''' 11:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
:Yep. Unmistakable. ] ] 11:39, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

== Peer review ==

I have asked a peer review about Cham Albanians. ].] (]) 16:23, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

== Long time no see ==

Although I am no longer active in wikipedia, I just saw you were looking for ''Ο ελληνισμός τον 19ο αιώνα''. I have the book somewhere and I' ll try and send you the excerpts you asked for one of the following days. Nowadays I visit the place ever so rarely but I am always happy to oblige with sources. Εύχομαι να τα περνάτε καλά εκεί πάνω στα βόρεια κλίματά σου.--] (]) 20:53, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

:Hey, thanks, that'd be great! A pity you're not around more often. Hope everything is okay at home? ] ] 22:24, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

== Greek Genocide. ==

Hi Fut.

I would appreciate a comment to what I have written .

Regards, --] (]) 20:54, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

== Dick ==

Thou dick, I fuck thee with sword for all hate that thou hast toward me. - Penguin Eater/Wikinger. ] (]) 09:36, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
[[File:Penguin, Strait of Magellan.jpg|thumb|right|250px|This user is sore afraid.
----
"Have you future? NO! Are you perfect? NO! Will Sun obey you rising at your command? NO! '''SUN WILL BURN YOU ALIVE NOW!!!'''" ]]

== Scanned and sent... ==

The file exceeded the 100kb alloted to email attachments and I had to send it through YOUSENDIT. If it is not too much of a trouble notify me when you receive it. The complete bibliographical reference is: Βασίλης Κ. Γούναρης, Σύνοικοι, θυρωροί και φιλοξενούμενοι: Διερευνώντας τη "μεθόριο" του ελληνικού και του αλβανικού έθνους κατά τον 19<sup>ο</sup> αιώνα, σσ. 38-54 στο Παντελής Βουτούρης - Γιώργος Γεωργής (επίμ.) "Ο Ελληνισμός στον 19<sup>ο</sup> αιώνα: ιδεολογικές και αισθητικές αναζητήσεις", Αθήνα 2006, ISBN 960-03-3945-7. I'll send you a proper email when I find some time--] (]) 17:27, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

:Thanks, got it. Very interesting stuff! Thank you for your efforts. ] ] 18:03, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
:Sorry for my erratic interventions but since there has been so much debate about the Souliotes it is high-time somebody pointed out to all participants that the summum opus on the topic is Βάσω Ψιμούλη, "Σούλι και Σουλιώτες", Αθήνα 2006 (A doctoral thesis actually). The bibliographical note at the end of the work is quite exhaustive - if any of the interested parties would care for further reading. --] (]) 11:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

== Souliotes (once more) ==

I think that it is clear enough from the sources we have, that Souliotes were ''ethnic'' Albanians, with a regional identity, which later became integrated into the Greek ''nation''. Do you think that this can be a NPOV sentence for the lead?] (]) 12:40, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

: No need to push it, in my view. I'm still quite satisfied with the "Greek-Albanian" compound, and I'll be happy as long as that solution doesn't again get ripped apart by the usual tug-of-war from both sides. Heh, it's ''my'' solution, after all, so it must obviously be the best. ;-) (Let me tell you, I can be an Arvanitiko kefali too, if need be.) ] ] 12:44, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

::I am sorry, but Greek-Albanian, is just a ''satisfaction for both sides'' and not a real argument. It is only one single author who says it, while the rest say the opposite. So, it is your solution, but for sure it is not the best, it is a ''compromise'' and not an ''encyclopedic view''. I am glad that you are an Arvanitiko kefali, cause I love speaking with ''my inmates'' :-)] (]) 12:51, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

::I want just your opinion, cause I am really confused. What makes us keep the version that you introduced, and not change it as I proposed, except the noise of editors? Every source that speaks about ethnicity, say that they were Albanians, which were integrated into the Greek society and nation, a single source that speaks about nationality says that they were Greeks, and all conclude that they had a regional identity. I mean I just cannot understand what and why. Friendly, ] (]) 16:23, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

== In response to your question ==

No, I am not affiliated with either group. ] (]) 15:13, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

== Croatia ==

Because in my mind you are "king" of ] can you please explain me that Germans during Holocaust have been only small children compared to Croats ??

I am saying this because more Croatia WWII related articles are having more Holocaust template of Germany WWII articles ?--] (]) 17:14, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
: That's not something I have any opinion on, and certainly not something that ARBMAC enforcement should influence. This needs to be negotiated between legitimate contributors. I'd ask you to please try to separate your content disputes from admin enforcement issues better. I know you have serious problems with genuine harassment from banned users and all that, but please don't mix such complaints with complaints about perceived content bias. ] ] 17:20, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

== maybe ==

sorry, but seeing this shit, i am just outraged.] (]) 20:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

== Well ==

Thank you. Regards, ] (]) 23:04, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

== Map with unclear origin ==

Hi, Future. There is a new map ] on the article ] represented as ''Ethnic map of the Balkans (1897), showing the Macedonians as a separate people''. In file history is written: ''The nations of the Balkan peninsula in the late 19th century'',''' Source: Pallas Nagy Lexikon, 1897'''. However there is another map original on Misplaced Pages: ] with Source: Pallas Nagy Lexikon, 1897, with shows Macedonians as Bulgarians. On the site does not exist such a map as the first one. I think this is late Hungarian map, probably after WWI as the Licensing of the first map is copyright violation and the source is not real. Excuse me, can you solve this casus? ] (]) 09:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
: If you allow me to join in, I don't think it's post-WWI because it has ''Ozmánok'' ("Ottomans") instead of ''Törökök'' ("Turks"). The weird way it treats Serbs and Macedonians in Vardar Macedonia made me think it's post-Balkan Wars but before the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire, that is 1913–1923, but it has ''Törökország'' written over Macedonia, so it must be before the Balkan Wars. ''Kelet–Rumelia'' shouldn't be taken as a sign of pre-1885, ''de jure'' Eastern Rumelia existed until 1908. It ''might'' be 1897, although the colours look a bit too vivid and the quality of execution is higher than that of the other map we have. And they don't look like they come from the same source, not just because of the different way they treat the population in Macedonia... Weird. '']]]'' 09:37, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
: Both maps were uploaded by the same user, ]. Can you ask him where he got them from? ] ] 17:27, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


== wiki matters == == Reverts ==


If I come across one of their additions to RSN would it be helpful if I pinged you? -- <small>LCU</small> ''']''' <small>''«]» °]°''</small> 20:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Do you know the history of this tag on articles? "This page is currently protected, and can be edited only by administrators". When was it first introduced? Who can introduce the tag? I think there are developments to make this 'power' more wide spread. thanks. ] (]) 12:43, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
: ''"This page has been protected so that only administrators can edit it."'' is the automatic notice you get when you open the edit window for a page that is ]. Protection is one of the special "admin buttons", and rules for its use are explained at the link above. The feature has been around for pretty much forever, as far as I know, and I'm not aware of any major changes in its application. There are also a number of protection-related tags, like {{tl|pp-dispute}}. They can technically be introduced by any user, but have no technical effect on their own; they are mere notifications. ] ] 17:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC) : Thanks, but I guess it's enough to get them reverted promptly – if they then start revert-warring it back in, there should be enough admin eyeballs on that page to push the block button eventually, right? It doesn't have to be always me. That person is a pest (I suppose you're familiar with their ]?), thanks for helping deal with them. ] ] 23:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
::I looked it up after their recent posts, I'll keep an eye out for them. -- <small>LCU</small> ''']''' <small>''«]» °]°''</small> 23:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)


== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research ==
== map ==


Hello,
Hi, fut., i see that in ] Corfu is included in Epirus. As far as I know, Corfu was never and is not part of Epirus. Can you reedit it please?] (]) 12:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ].
== A proposal ==


Take the survey ''''''.
Please can you see the proposal I have made in ] page.] (]) 15:53, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


Kind Regards,
== Thank you ==


]
Your friendly advice and kind comments are greatly appreciated. Thanks again. Ευχαριστώ πολύ. Τάσος (] <small>]</small> 20:16, 8 March 2009 (UTC))


<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
== Question? ==
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 -->


== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
Am I right on sources provided by Sthenel on ], please check them once, cause I don`t want to stop "holding my horses"-:). Also I responded to you on ], it seemed that you did not understand what I was proposing. Can I have your thoughts?] (]) 21:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
:So I guess I am right on Souliotes:-) For sure I am in Chameria too, but I have not made my self clear yet, my f... bad English:-)] (]) 10:18, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
== attitude problem ? ==


If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
, , , ,


</div>
I would suggest that you do something about your nerves ... anywayz I'd like to inform you that I'm going to make some corrections on this article as the anonymous user said: adding unreferenced material and {{or}} to an article does not improve it nor does it make it clearer so auf wiedersehen. --] (]) 16:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 -->

Latest revision as of 00:13, 19 November 2024

Note: I like to keep discussion threads together, so if you leave a message here I will usually respond here. If I have begun a discussion on your page, I'll see it if you respond there.

A {{ping}} would be appreciated if you reply at a later date. {{Talkback}} notes here will generally not be needed.

Note to new and non-logged-in editors: Due to a long-term issue with vandalism, this talkpage has unfortunately had to be semi-protected. If you need to contact me and can't post here, please just post your message on your own talkpage or the talkpage of the relevant article and add the code "{{ping|Future Perfect at Sunrise}}" to it, then I'll be sure to see it.

Archive
Archives


Hello fellow Wikipedians, due to changed circumstances in my private and professional life I am currently hovering somewhere in between "busy in real life and may not respond quickly to inquiries" and "semi-retired". I'll probably be around from time to time, but please don't rely on me for quick admin action or the like, for the time being. All the best, – Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Misplaced Pages globe and sysop mopHappy adminship anniversary!
Hi Future Perfect at Sunrise! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC) 		Party popper emoji

Reverts

If I come across one of their additions to RSN would it be helpful if I pinged you? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 20:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, but I guess it's enough to get them reverted promptly – if they then start revert-warring it back in, there should be enough admin eyeballs on that page to push the block button eventually, right? It doesn't have to be always me. That person is a pest (I suppose you're familiar with their LTA entry?), thanks for helping deal with them. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
I looked it up after their recent posts, I'll keep an eye out for them. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 23:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)