Misplaced Pages

:Featured article criteria: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:32, 11 March 2009 view sourceSandyGeorgia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors278,959 edits Not necessary, doesn't add clarity← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:45, 13 August 2024 view source Daask (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers31,559 edits Update link to Misplaced Pages:Content assessment/A-Class criteria
(176 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>{{short description|List of requirements for featured articles}}
<noinclude>__NOTOC__ __NOTOC__
{| style="float:right; padding:1em; border:1px solid #A3B1BF; background-color:#E6F2FF; margin:0 0 0.5em 1em;" {| style="float:right; padding:1em; border:1px solid #A3B1BF; background-color:#E6F2FF; margin:0 0 0.5em 1em;"
|{{Shortcut|WP:WIAFA|WP:FACR|WP:FA?}} |{{Shortcut|WP:FA?|WP:FACR|WP:WIAFA|WP:FACRITERIA}}
{{fapages}} {{FApages}}
|}</noinclude> |}</noinclude>
A ] exemplifies our very best work and features professional standards of writing, presentation and sourcing. In addition to meeting the ] for all Misplaced Pages articles, it has the following attributes. A ] exemplifies Misplaced Pages's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the ] for all Misplaced Pages articles, it has the following attributes.
<ol>
#It is—
<li id="1">It is:
#*(a) '''well-written:''' its prose is engaging, even brilliant, and of a professional standard;
<ol STYLE="list-style-type: lower-alpha">
#*(b) '''comprehensive:''' it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
<li id="1A">'''well-written''': its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;</li>
#*(c) '''factually accurate:''' claims are ] against ], accurately represent the relevant body of published knowledge, and are supported with specific evidence and external citations; this requires a "References" section in which sources are listed, complemented by inline citations ];
<li id="1B">'''comprehensive''': it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;</li>
#*(d) '''neutral:''' it presents views ]; and
<li id="1C">'''well-researched''': it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are ] against high-quality ] and are supported by inline citations ];</li>
#*(e) '''stable:''' it is not subject to ongoing ] and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process.
<li id="1D">'''neutral''': it presents views ];</li>
#It follows the ], including the provision of:
<li id="1E">'''stable''': it is not subject to ongoing ] and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and</li>
#*(a) '''a lead'''—a concise ] that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
<li id="1F">'''compliant with ]''' and free of ] or ].</li>
#*(b) '''appropriate structure'''—a system of hierarchical ] and a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents; and
</ol></li>
#*(c) '''consistent citations'''—where required by Criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using either footnotes <small>(<nowiki><ref>Smith 2007, p. 1.</ref></nowiki>)</small> or Harvard referencing <small>(Smith 2007, p. 1)</small> (see ] for suggestions on formatting references; for articles with footnotes, the ] format is recommended).
<li id="2">It follows the ], including the provision of:
#'''Images.''' It has ] that follow the ] and other media where appropriate, with succinct ] and ]. ] images or media must satisfy the ] and ].
<ol STYLE="list-style-type: lower-alpha">
#'''Length.''' It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail (see ]). <noinclude>
<li id="2A">'''a lead''': a concise ] that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;</li>
{{-}}
<li id="2B">'''appropriate structure''': a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical ]; and</li>
<li id="2C">'''consistent citations''': where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see ] for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.</li>
</ol></li>
<li id="3">'''Media.''' It has ] and other media, where appropriate, with succinct ] <!-- brief and useful ] when feasible, --> and ]. Images follow the ]. ] images or media must satisfy the ] and ].</li>
<li id="4">'''Length.''' It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses ] where appropriate.</li>
</ol><noinclude>


==See also== ==See also==
{{FAPath}} {{FAPath}}
*] * ]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]


===Advice from Wikipedians=== ===FA, A-class and GA===
* ]
*]
* ]
*]
* ]
*]
*]
*]
*]


===Other featured-content criteria===
==Notes==
* ]
{{reflist}}
* ]

* ]
==References==

* Smith, Jane (2007). ''The Book of Examples''. New York: Best Publishers, Inc.


] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
</noinclude> </noinclude>

Latest revision as of 16:45, 13 August 2024

List of requirements for featured articles
Shortcuts

Featured content:

Featured article candidates (FAC):

Featured article review (FAR):

Today's featured article (TFA):

Featured article tools:

A featured article exemplifies Misplaced Pages's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Misplaced Pages articles, it has the following attributes.

  1. It is:
    1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
    2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
    3. well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
    4. neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias;
    5. stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
    6. compliant with Misplaced Pages's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing.
  2. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of:
    1. a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
    2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and
    3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
  3. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.
  4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.

See also

The path to a featured article

FA, A-class and GA

Other featured-content criteria

Categories: