| Revision as of 18:24, 15 March 2009 editCoppertwig (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,256 edits →Comment: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:17, 19 November 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,136,056 edits →ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
| (101 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for January 16== | |||
| == Edit-warring == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Water fluoridation opposition|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <font face="jokerman">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 21:38, 1 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :You've gone to 4 reverts in only about half an hour. Please self-revert your most recent edit in respect of the ]. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 21:44, 1 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are ], since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].)</small> | |||
| :] ( | ) | |||
| ::added links pointing to ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ] | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:40, 16 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == UTI == | |||
| Hey Tremello, thanks for the links. I was working from the abstract, but I hadn't seen the other page you provided. I like of the UTI section. We did a good job working together to present a high quality synopsis of the study. I'm still not too sure about the breast feeding sentence though. I agree that it is practically useful, but it seems more like advice than something that should be in an encyclopedic article. Let me know what you think. Kindest regards, <font face="Palatino Linotype" size="2.5" color="##00008C">]</font> 18:50, 10 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2019 election voter message == | |||
| == Good faith == | |||
| Hey Tremello, the debate is getting a bit intense over at ], and I wanted to let you know that my responses are in no way meant to be critical to you as an editor, or as a person. We have some disagreements (probably less than it seems), but I respect your point of view. Regards, <font face="Palatino Linotype" size="2.5" color="##00008C">]</font> 13:23, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> | |||
| == Me again == | |||
| <tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| I think your previous edit was a huge improvement. I was just trying to remove a few superfluous words. All of the relevant info remained. For example, what's the substantial difference between this: | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| :''Little smegma is produced in childhood; production increases during adolescence. When the boy reaches sexual maturity the function of smegma for lubrication assumes its full value. From middle-age on, production starts to decline and in old age virtually no smegma is produced.'' | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| and this: | |||
| </td></tr> | |||
| </table> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=926750292 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| :''Some researchers have claimed that smegma production is greatest between the ages of 20 and 40, when a man is most sexually active.''? | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| 1. It doesn't present Wright's hypothesis as fact (which, at least according to the citation, it isn't). | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| 2. It is much more concise. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| Maybe "filler" was a poor word choice. Sorry if you found it offensive. Oh well, either way the article is much better than it was before. Also, I agree, we should both do a better job of using the talk page.... <font face="Palatino Linotype" size="2.5" color="##00008C">]</font> 22:02, 6 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| == Re-write of HIV section == | |||
| </div> | |||
| Trem, check out the proposed re-write of the HIV over section at ]. Thanks, <font face="Palatino Linotype" size="2.5" color="##00008C">]</font> 00:45, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 --> | |||
| Really good work here : ] ] (]) 01:11, 30 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Good move == | |||
| Hey Tremello, I agree with your move of "Genital integrity" to "Opposition to circumcision." The article had/has very little info about woman. It also doesn't seem to cover more radical alterations of male genitalia, such as sub-incision and testicle crushing. <font face="Palatino Linotype" size="2.5" color="##00008C">]</font> 20:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Current 3RR violation on Medical analysis of circumcision == | |||
| You may not have realized it, but you are actually currently in violation of ] on ] and cannot self-revert as someone else has editied after you: | |||
| * | |||
| #11:45, September 23, 2008 | |||
| #11:54, September 23, 2008 | |||
| #12:41, September 23, 2008 | |||
| #12:53, September 23, 2008 | |||
| I personally am not going to block you now, but please remember ] and try and work out the issues on the talk page. This does not mean that another sysop may feel the same way, and of course, further reversions may result in measures taken to protect the project. Thanks! -- ] (]) 17:58, 23 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Ok. Then try not to ignore what I say in the future. ] (]) 18:18, 23 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Nothing to do with ignoring, Tremello, we are having a difference of opinion as to the optimal way to section the article. Respectful dialogue is the only way any compromise will be reached. Also, please rememberthat ] is just as an important pillar in wikipedia as is ]. Thank you. -- ] (]) 18:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Comment == | |||
| <small>Re the last sentence : please comment on content, not on the contributors.</small> I've given similar messages to ] and ]. <span style="color:Orangered; font-size:1.5em;">☺</span> ] (]) 12:27, 29 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks! == | |||
| ... for formatting references at ]. I was going to do that one of these days but never seem to find the time. <span style="color:Green; font-size:1.5em;">☺</span> ] (]) 00:49, 5 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Bleustein== | |||
| '' According to Jakew's reasoning only later studies of the same series need to be cited. I hope he isn't selective in that. I think it is the same series the abstracts (2003) and (2005) seem very similar. So it makes sense to just use the larger sample(2005). Tremello22 (talk) 22:56, 17 October 2008 (UTC)'' | |||
| :Good call! Thanks for the clarification. <font face="Palatino Linotype" size="2.5" color="##00008C">]</font> 23:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Comment == | |||
| <small>Re message where you said, ''"There is only so many wikipedia rules you can use as a get-around before it gets obvious that the medical benefits of circumcision are presented way out of context. I think secretly , you know this"'': Please ].</small> <span style="color:Red; font-size:1.5em;">☺</span> ] (]) 23:44, 17 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Another thing: Re edit: Please don't simply delete information when you're unable to access the full text of the article (as opposed to just the abstract) to verify whether it accurately reflects what's in the source. Instead, you can place a template such as {{tl|Verify source}} to request that someone obtain the article and check. (I'm not sure whether there's a more specific template for that, but I think that one would do.) There is no requirement that sources for Misplaced Pages articles be available online; in fact, one could argue that it's more useful to the reader to supply information that can't easily be found online. Thanks. <span style="color:Purple; font-size:1.5em;">☺</span> ] (]) 16:29, 18 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Often when I delete information from an article for any reason, I quote the deleted information on the talk page, to assist any other editors who might come along months later and want to put the information back in for some reason. It takes work to generate information, and editors differ in opinions as to what's valuable, so it's helpful to indicate it on the talk page when deleting something. I won't claim I necessarily always do this and depending on the amount of information being deleted it may not always be necessary. However, I just explained some of my edits , for example. <span style="color:Red; font-size:1.5em;">☺</span> ] (]) 16:59, 18 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::<small>Re "I think I have a good handle on your views on circumcision" : please comment on content, not on the contributor. Thanks, <span style="color:Blue; font-size:15pt;">☺</span>] (]) 14:28, 24 January 2009 (UTC)</small> | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Hi Tremello, | |||
| I'm thinking about preparing a ] to get some more input on the proposed additions to ], as unfortunately it seems that we're having difficulty finding an acceptable compromise. In order to be fair to your proposal, I wondered if you'd mind adding refs and so on to your proposed text? Thanks, ] (]) 00:00, 21 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Image vandalizing== | |||
| ] Thank you for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your image was inserted successfully {{#if:|into ],}} and has been ] or removed. Please use ] for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the ] if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-image1} --> | |||
| <font face="Old English Text MT" size="3px" bgcolor="black"><span style="background-color: black;">] ]</span></font> 09:36, 12 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :It was not my image, was it? Quit your threatening tone. ] (]) 09:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::It was a level 1 warning, hardly threatening. One more revert and you'll be in contempt of the 3-revert rule, at which point I will have to report you. <font face="Old English Text MT" size="3px" bgcolor="black"><span style="background-color: black;">] ]</span></font> 09:47, 12 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Ok, well this isn't over. I know i am in the right here. please discuss on ] ] (]) 09:49, 12 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Lol, this Isn't an argument. It's simple. Revert it once more, and you'll be in non-compliance with the TRR. <font face="Old English Text MT" size="3px" bgcolor="black"><span style="background-color: black;">] ]</span></font> 10:00, 12 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: It seems like an argument to me. I disagree with your edit. You have just removed perfectly informative images without consensus. You haven't even given a good reason. I have attempted to explain my problems with your edit on the penis talk page, you have yet to respond. ] (]) 10:03, 12 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::With all due respect, I already explained my reasoning when I originally replaced the image. It's a failure on your part to read it thoroughly. <font face="Old English Text MT" size="3px" bgcolor="black"><span style="background-color: black;">] ]</span></font> | |||
| :::::::And actually, I did respond to you on ] (]). <font face="Old English Text MT" size="3px" bgcolor="black"><span style="background-color: black;">] ]</span></font> 10:24, 12 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Comment == | |||
| Re your comment : In this comment you seem to be experiencing some frustration with Jakew's behaviour. Unfortunately, I don't understand what behaviour of Jakew's is leading to this frustration. Let me know if you'd like to discuss this further. <small>Re the word "hypocritical" in that comment: please comment on content, not on the contributor.</small> <span style="color:Green; font-size:11pt;">☺</span>] (]) 18:24, 15 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:17, 19 November 2024
Disambiguation link notification for January 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- This Is Tom Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Lulu, Jack Jones, Nancy Wilson, John Davidson, Paula Kelly, The Committee, Davy Jones, Georgia Brown and Oliver
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)