Misplaced Pages

Box-office bomb: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:34, 20 March 2009 edit71.198.79.127 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:59, 27 December 2024 edit undoBetty Logan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers78,481 edits Reverted 2 edits by 116.88.6.253 (talk): Not corroborated by source.Tags: Twinkle Undo 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Film industry term}}
{{wiktionary}}
{{For|the album|Box Office Bomb (album){{!}}''Box Office Bomb'' (album)}}
The phrase '''box office bomb''' refers to a ] for which the ] and ] costs greatly exceeded the ] retained by the ]. This should not be confused with instances when official figures show large losses, yet the movie is a financial success. (See ])
{{redirect|Bomb (film)|the 2015 documentary|The Bomb (film)}}
{{Use American English|date=April 2023}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2023}}


A '''box-office bomb'''{{efn|Also known as a '''box-office flop''', '''box-office failure''', or '''box-office disaster'''.}} is a film that is unprofitable or considered highly unsuccessful during its theatrical run. Although any film for which the combined production budget, marketing, and distribution costs exceed the revenue after release has technically "bombed", the term is more frequently used for major studio releases that were highly anticipated, extensively marketed, and expensive to produce, but nevertheless failed commercially.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.filmsite.org/greatestflops.html |title=Greatest Box-Office Bombs, Disasters and Flops |publisher=Filmsite.org |access-date=March 6, 2013}}</ref><ref name="cnbc.com">{{cite web|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2012/03/20/The-15-Biggest-Box-Office-Bombs.html |title=The 15 Biggest Box Office Bombs |publisher=CNBC.com |date=August 23, 2010 |access-date=March 6, 2013}}</ref> Originally, a "bomb" had the opposite meaning, referring instead to a successful film that "exploded" at the box office. The term continued to be used this way in the United Kingdom into the 1970s.<ref>{{cite magazine|magazine=]|title=English as British Speak It|url=https://archive.org/details/sim_variety_1970-04-29_258_11/page/172/mode/2up?view=theater|date=April 29, 1970|page=172|last=Pitman|first=Jack|access-date=June 15, 2024|via=]}}</ref>
A film's financial success is often measured by its ]. Studios expect that a film's "domestic" (which the American ] defines as the ] and ], and other film industries typically define as their home country) box office gross ] will exceed production costs. This does not make the film profitable: typically, the exhibiting theater keeps 45% of the gross, with the remainder paid to the studio as the rental fee. However, if a film has a higher domestic gross than its production and marketing costs, it will almost certainly turn a profit once the overseas gross is included.


==Possible success of flops== == Causes ==
=== Negative word of mouth ===
If a film recoups production and marketing costs, then it can be considered a success. Otherwise, if it does not do so by a significant margin, it is referred to as a ''box office bomb'', even though international distribution, sales to ], and ] releases often mean some films that are considered flops in North America eventually make a profit for their studios. An example is '']'', a ] featuring ]. It was a flop that became profitable for the studio years later when its ] status led to its sale to ] and its re-release in various video formats. The popularity (and profitability) of ] sales has increased this trend significantly, leading many to doubt the significance of US domestic grosses as a predictor of a film's overall success.
With the advent of ] platforms such as ] and ] in the 2000s, ] regarding new films is easily spread and has had a marked effect on box office performance. A film's ability or failure to attract positive or negative commentary can strongly impact its performance at the box office, especially on the opening weekend.<ref name=GreatCinemaDisruption>{{cite web|url=https://www.boxofficepro.com/a-century-in-exhibition-the-2010s-the-great-disruption/|title=A Century in Exhibition-The 2010s: The Great Disruption|date=August 27, 2021|access-date=January 17, 2022|publisher=boxofficepro.com}}</ref>


=== External circumstances ===
'']'', based on ] in ]'s '']'' series, is considered a flop in the U.S. due to its $180 million dollar budget coupled with New Line Cinema's decision to sell all of the international distribution rights, but the unique circumstances of its international success have made the film's overall success a point of contention; it is the first film ever to make more than $300 million internationally but less than $100 million in the United States. New Line studio co-head Michael Lynne (who has since resigned) said "The jury is still very much out on the movie..."<ref>{{cite news | author=Peter Sanders | url= | title=New Line and Director Settle 'Rings' Suit, Look to 'Hobbit' | publisher=] | date=2007-12-19 }}</ref>
Occasionally, films may underperform because of issues largely unrelated to the content of the film, such as the timing of the film's release. This was one of the reasons given for the commercial failure of '']'', ] follow-up to '']''. Owing to production delays, the film was not released until late 1916, when the ] it reflected had started to shift in favor of ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.filmsite.org/into.html|title=Intolerance (1916)|website=www.filmsite.org |access-date=November 7, 2017}}</ref> Another example is the 2015 docudrama about ] entitled '']''. A glowing portrayal of FIFA, which had mostly funded the film, ''United Passions'' was released in theaters in the United States at the same time ]. The film grossed only $918 at the US box office in its opening weekend.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.espnfc.com/fifa-world-cup/story/2496658/fifa-film-united-passions-the-worst-in-us-history|title=FIFA film 'United Passions' one of worst in U.S. box office history|date=June 18, 2015|publisher=]|access-date=June 18, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150618160721/http://www.espnfc.com/fifa-world-cup/story/2496658/fifa-film-united-passions-the-worst-in-us-history|archive-date=June 18, 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref>


Sometimes, a film's performance may be adversely affected by national crisis or a disaster, such as the ] in 2001, ] in 2017, and the ] in 2020–2021.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://variety.com/2017/film/news/box-office-hitmans-bodyguard-annabelle-creation-mayweather-mcgregor-hurricane-harvey-1202539879/|title=Box Office Disaster: Lackluster Releases, Mayweather-McGregor, Hurricane Harvey Create Slowest Weekend in Over 15 Years|last=Kelley|first=Seth|date=August 27, 2017|work=Variety|access-date=November 9, 2017 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.boxofficeguru.com/091701.htm |title=Weekend Box Office |publisher=Boxofficeguru.com |date=September 17, 2001 |access-date=December 8, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| last= Erlichman| first= Jon| date= March 13, 2020| title= Box office bomb: COVID-19's impact on the movie theatre business| url= https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/box-office-bomb-covid-19-s-impact-on-the-movie-theatre-business-1.1405416| work= ]| access-date = March 17, 2020}}</ref>
==Different standards of success==
Different genres of film are subject to different standards of success. For example, ] typically have higher production and promotion costs than ]. Typically, the most notorious flops are summer ], which often entail huge costs to produce and face a highly competitive market. Advertising costs are not included in a movie's production costs, and can make a bomb more harmful to the studio.


=== High production costs ===
==Studios pushed into financial ruin==
In extreme cases, a single film's poor performance can push a studio into ] or equivalent financial ruin, as happened with ] ('']''), ] ('']''), ] ('']''), ] ('']''), ] ('']'') and ] (''])''. Some have changed a company's agenda, such as ]' decision to make only 3-D animation, which stemmed from the disasters of '']'' and '']'' (however, this decision was reversed a few years later). Others have prevented companies from wanting to explore certain genres such as the horror-comedy, with attempts to revive the genre with films like ]' '']''. '']'' was seen as a significant factor in influencing ] decision to take direct control of ]<ref></ref>. In 2001 ] released its first movie, '']'', an animated motion picture based on the world-famous ] series. However, the movie was the second-biggest animated box office bomb in cinema history, losing over $120 million dollars and bankrupting the company, which led to a merger with rival company Enix (See ]).


In evaluating box-office gross numbers, it is important to keep in mind that not all money is returned to the film studio. Some of the gross is kept by the film exhibitors and the film distributor. The scratch formula for making a rough estimate of a studio's portion of the gross is that the studio usually gets half.<ref name="Hornaday">{{cite news |last1=Hornaday |first1=Ann |title=We're awash in box-office statistics. But what do the numbers really mean? |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/were-awash-in-box-office-statistics-but-what-do-the-numbers-really-mean/2018/04/05/87adf58a-38d7-11e8-8fd2-49fe3c675a89_story.html |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=April 5, 2018}}</ref>
==Negative word of mouth==
{{Unreferenced section|date=June 2008}}
During the 1980s cinemas started to drop movies that suffer a poor opening weekend. This made the performance of a film on its opening weekend much more crucial to its perception. With the growth of the Internet during the 1990s, chat rooms and websites such as ] enable negative ] to spread rapidly.


A large budget can cause a film to fail financially, even when it performs reasonably well at the box office; 1980's '']'', for example, exceeded its planned production schedule by three months,<ref>{{Cite web |url= https://www.filminquiry.com/the-production-of-heavens-gate/|title=Unmaking of an Epic – The Production of Heaven's Gate| website= filminquiry.com | first= Alexander |last= Miller| date= April 27, 2015 |access-date=November 7, 2017| df=dmy-all}}</ref> causing its budget to inflate from $12&nbsp;million to $44&nbsp;million.<ref>{{cite news|last=Burr|first=Ty|title=Ty Burr revisits 'Heaven's Gate'|date=November 24, 2012|newspaper=]|url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/arts/2012/11/24/burr-revisits-heaven-gate/km6gp1cBbxY75qxWrFs6tM/story.html|access-date=January 13, 2020|archive-date=December 8, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181208124051/https://www.bostonglobe.com/arts/2012/11/24/burr-revisits-heaven-gate/km6gp1cBbxY75qxWrFs6tM/story.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> The film only earned $3.5&nbsp;million at the box office.<ref>{{cite web|title=Heaven's Gate (1980)|url=https://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=heavensgate.htm|website=]|access-date=January 13, 2020}}</ref>
==Lack of promotion==

Promotion is one of the factors in a film's success. The dark comedy '']'' was not promoted because New World did not have enough money for advertising. Other studios do not promote films on purpose. {{Fact|date=August 2008}} ] released many animated films but did not put out promotion. {{Fact|date=August 2008}} Many of the films include ''], ], ], ], ], ], ]'', '']''. The films, however, garnered later praise, such as ''Phantasm'' and ''Iron Giant''. Films targeted at mature audiences such as '']'' and '']'' have also performed poorly due to lack of promotion.
For the 2005 film '']'', its budget ballooned to $281.2&nbsp;million for production, distribution, and other expenses.<ref name="Sahara expenses LATimes" /> The film earned $119&nbsp;million in theaters and $202.9&nbsp;million overall with television and other subsidies included, resulting in a net loss of $78.3&nbsp;million.<ref name="Sahara expenses LATimes">{{cite web|date= April 15, 2007|title= $78&nbsp;million of red ink?|last=Bunting| first=Glenn F. |work=]| url= https://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-movie15apr15-story.html |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20140507124536/https://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-movie15apr15-story.html |archive-date= May 7, 2014|url-status= live |access-date= January 13, 2020| df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| first= Glenn F. |last= Bunting| url= https://www.latimes.com/la-fi-sahara5mar05-2007-story.html |title= Jurors hear tales of studio maneuvering| work= Los Angeles Times| date= March 5, 2007| publisher= | url-status= live| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090327110637/https://articles.latimes.com/2007/mar/05/business/fi-cussler5| archive-date= March 27, 2009| access-date= August 4, 2021| df=dmy-all}}</ref> In 2012, Disney reported losses of $200&nbsp;million on ''].'' The film had made a considerable $234&nbsp;million worldwide, but this was short of its $250&nbsp;million budget plus worldwide advertising.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-17442200 | work=bbc.co.uk| publisher= BBC News | title=John Carter flop to cost Walt Disney $200m | date=March 20, 2012| df=dmy-all}}</ref>

The 2007 film '']'' had a production budget of $200&nbsp;million. To be able to fund the film, ] had to sell all of the film's international distribution rights to various film distributors around the world. The film underperformed domestically, but was an international success; New Line Cinema did not have a cut of the international box office. These events were major factors in New Line Cinema becoming a division of ].<ref name=StudioBankruptingBombs>{{Cite web|url=https://www.universityfox.com/stories/failed-movies-that-singlehandedly-put-their-studios-out-of-business/|title=Failed Movies That Singlehandedly Put Their Studios Out of Business|website=University Fox|date=December 12, 2019|access-date=February 2, 2022|archive-date=May 9, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190509150910/https://www.universityfox.com/stories/failed-movies-that-singlehandedly-put-their-studios-out-of-business/|url-status=dead}}</ref>

== Recovery ==
Films initially thought of as "flops" may recover income elsewhere. Several films have underperformed in their countries of origin, but have been sufficiently successful internationally to recoup losses or even become financial successes.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Mendelson|first1=Scott|title='Pacific Rim' And More Domestic "Flops" That Became Global Hits|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2013/09/02/pacific-rim-and-more-domestic-flops-that-became-global-hits/|work=Forbes|access-date=August 19, 2015}}</ref> Films may also recover money through international distribution, sales to ], distribution outside of cinemas, and releases on ].<ref>{{cite web|title=11 Beloved Movies That Were Box Office Flops|url=http://mentalfloss.com/article/59990/11-beloved-movies-were-box-office-flops|publisher=Mental Floss|access-date=August 19, 2015}}</ref> The 1995 post-apocalyptic action film '']'' was the most expensive film ever made at the time after undergoing significant production difficulties. While it performed relatively well in the US box office, it did not initially turn a profit and became known as a box-office flop. International box-office takings and video sales led it to turn a profit.<ref>{{cite web |first=Mike Jr. |last=Fleming |title=Isn't It Time To Take 'Waterworld' Off The All-Time Flop List? |date=August 7, 2013 |website=]|url=https://deadline.com/2013/08/isnt-it-time-to-take-waterworld-off-the-all-time-flop-list-557797/ |access-date=August 13, 2013}}</ref> In 2023, '']'', which underperformed at the box office, was given a ] insurance payout, which amounted to £57 million ($71 million).<ref>{{Cite news |last=Black |first=Christian |date=2023-09-10 |title=Mission possible as Paramount Pictures wins £57m Covid payout |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/mission-possible-as-paramount-pictures-wins-57m-covid-payout-dwn8wsjqr |access-date=September 11, 2023 |work=The Times |language=en |archive-date=September 10, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230910045802/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/mission-possible-as-paramount-pictures-wins-57m-covid-payout-dwn8wsjqr |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=McPherson |first=Chris |date=2023-09-12 |title='Mission: Impossible - Dead Reckoning's Profits Boosted By $71 Million Insurance Payout bringing The Total box office to 637.1 Million. |url=https://collider.com/mission-impossible-insurance-payout-71-million/ |access-date=September 14, 2023 |work=Collider |language=en |archive-date=September 14, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230914004555/https://collider.com/mission-impossible-insurance-payout-71-million/ |url-status=live }}</ref>

Other films have succeeded long after cinema release by becoming ]s or being re-evaluated over time. High-profile films fitting this description include '']'',<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/film/vertigo-from-box-office-flop-to-greatest-film-of-all-time-1.3561982|title=Vertigo: From box-office flop to 'greatest film of all time'|newspaper=The Irish Times}}</ref> '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'',<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/59990/11-beloved-movies-were-box-office-flops|title=11 Beloved Movies That Were Box Office Flops|date=November 10, 2015|website=Mental Floss}}</ref> '']'',<ref>{{Cite web|date=May 5, 2021|title=Why Shawshank Redemption Was A Box Office Failure (Despite Its Popular Legacy)|url=https://screenrant.com/shawshank-redemption-movie-box-office-bomb-fail-reasons/amp/|access-date=November 29, 2021|website=ScreenRant|language=en-US}}</ref> '']'',<ref>{{Cite web |last=Thompson |first=Simon |title='You Don't Nomi' Explores 'Showgirls,' The Cult Classic Box Office Bomb |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/simonthompson/2020/06/07/you-dont-nomi-explores-showgirls-the-cult-classic-box-office-bomb/ |access-date=2024-06-27 |website=Forbes |language=en}}</ref> '']'',<ref>{{cite news |last1=Lim |first1=Dennis |title=Forget Rule No. 1: Still Talking About 'Fight Club' |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/08/movies/homevideo/08lim.html |access-date=July 24, 2019 |newspaper=The New York Times |date=November 6, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120310035311/http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/08/movies/homevideo/08lim.html |archive-date=March 10, 2012 |url-status=live }}</ref> '']'',<ref>{{Cite web |date=2020-10-01 |title=The Real Reason John Carpenter's The Thing Flopped At The Box Office |url=https://www.looper.com/254509/the-real-reason-john-carpenters-the-thing-flopped-at-the-box-office/ |access-date=2023-06-20 |website=Looper |language=en-US}}</ref> and '']'',<ref>{{Cite web |last=Laman |first=Lisa |date=2023-04-05 |title=How 'Scott Pilgrim' Went From Box Office Bomb to Pop Culture Touchstone |url=https://collider.com/scott-pilgrim-movie-cult-classic/ |access-date=2024-01-11 |website=Collider |language=en}}</ref> each of which initially lost money at the box office but has since become popular.

== Studio failure ==
It is common for a single film's lackluster performance to push its studio into the red, in the sense of recording a net loss on its ]. In extreme cases, a bomb may push its studio into ] or ]. Examples of this include ] (''Heaven's Gate'')<ref>{{cite news |last1=Welkos |first1=Robert W. |title='Heaven's Gate': The film flop that reshaped Hollywood |url=https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-heavens-gate-flop-archive-20040612-snap-story.html |access-date=December 25, 2018 |work=]}}</ref> and ] ('']'').<ref>{{cite news |last1=Sterngold |first1=James |title=Debacle on the High Seas |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1996/03/31/movies/debacle-on-the-high-seas.html |access-date=December 25, 2018 |work=The New York Times |date=March 31, 1996}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Largest box office loss |url=https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/69937-largest-box-office-loss |access-date=July 17, 2019 |work=] |date=April 30, 2012}}</ref> ''The Golden Compass'' was a success at the international box office and grossed $372&nbsp;million worldwide; nonetheless, its underperformance at the box office in North America was seen as a significant factor in influencing the decision by Warner Bros. Pictures to take direct control of New Line Cinema.<ref>{{cite web |last=Davis |first=Erik |url=http://blog.moviefone.com/2008/02/28/breaking-new-line-cinema-says-goodbye/ |title=Breaking: New Line Cinema Says Goodbye! |publisher=Cinematical.com |date=February 28, 2008 |access-date=December 8, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121028005801/http://blog.moviefone.com/2008/02/28/breaking-new-line-cinema-says-goodbye/ |archive-date=October 28, 2012 |url-status=dead }}</ref>

In 2001, ], a division of ], released its only film, '']''. It received mixed reviews from critics and failed to recover its $145&nbsp;million cost. Following the film's struggles, Square Pictures did not make any more films<ref name=briscoe>{{cite news|title='Final Fantasy' studio to fold|work=]|date=February 1, 2002|last=Briscoe|first=David|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/final-fantasy-studio-to-close-9276846.html|access-date=June 2, 2019}}</ref> and is now a consolidated subsidiary of ] as ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.square-enix.com/jp/ir/e/data/ar/download/20070831en.pdf|title=Square-Enix Co, LTD. Annual Report 2007|pages=29, 30, 53|access-date=March 5, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090325013141/http://www.square-enix.com/jp/ir/e/data/ar/download/20070831en.pdf|archive-date=March 25, 2009|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2011, '']'' was the last film released by ] before ]'s stake got absorbed by ImageMovers to a loss of nearly $140&nbsp;million&nbsp;– the largest box-office bomb of all time in ] terms. Regardless of this loss, the decision to close the production company had been made a year prior to the film's release.<ref name="deadline">{{cite news | first=Nikki | last=Finke | url=https://deadline.com/2010/03/disney-closing-zemeckis-digital-studio-in-2011-28214/ | title=Disney Closing Zemeckis' Digital Studio | website=Deadline Hollywood | date=March 12, 2010 | access-date=November 21, 2010}}</ref>


== Independent films == == Independent films ==
Recently, the independent movie '']'' made just $30 at the box office. The film, with a budget of $1.2 million and starring ] and ], may owe its tiny revenue to its limited box office release&nbsp;&mdash; just six days in a single theater in ], for the purpose of meeting ] requirements, rather than to attract viewers.<ref name="CHUD">{{cite news The 2006 independent movie '']'' made just $30 at the US box office. With a budget of $1.2&nbsp;million and starring ] and ], its tiny revenue is due to its limited box-office release&nbsp;– just six days in a single theater in ] for the purpose of meeting ] requirements&nbsp;– rather than its ability to attract viewers.<ref name="CHUD">{{cite news| last = Faraci| first = Devin| title = What if they released a movie and nobody came?| work = CHUD.com| date = December 31, 2006| url = http://www.chud.com/8378/WHAT-IF-THEY-RELEASED-A-MOVIE-AND-NOBODY-CAME/| access-date = January 2, 2007| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110607011632/http://www.chud.com/8378/WHAT-IF-THEY-RELEASED-A-MOVIE-AND-NOBODY-CAME/| archive-date = June 7, 2011| url-status = dead}}</ref><ref name="EW">{{cite magazine| title = The Strange and Twisted Tale of&nbsp;... The Movie That Grossed $30.00| url = https://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20011268,00.html| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070225095732/http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20011268,00.html| url-status = dead| archive-date = February 25, 2007| access-date = January 24, 2008| magazine=Entertainment Weekly| first=Rob|last=Brunner| date=February 9, 2007}}</ref> According to co-star ], it sold six tickets, two of which were to cast members.<ref name="Guardian">{{cite news| last = Mueller| first = Andrew| title = This Film Is Absolute Dross&nbsp;– People Are Going to Love It!| work = ]| date= January 16, 2007| url = https://www.theguardian.com/film/2007/jan/15/features.features11| access-date = January 15, 2007| location=London}}</ref>

| last = Faraci
Previously, the 2000 British film '']'' had become notorious for taking in less than £100 (~$150<ref name=MeasuringWorth>{{cite web |first=Lawrence H. |last=Officer |title=Dollar-Pound Exchange Rate From 1791: 2000–2002 |publisher=] |url=http://www.measuringworth.com/datasets/exchangepound/result.php?year_source=2000&year_result=2002 |access-date=November 9, 2017}}</ref>) at the box office.<ref name="twitch">{{cite news| last = logboy| title= Offending Angels. £70k Budget, £89 Box Office. 8 DVD Sales to Double its Taking| work = Twitch.net| date= February 3, 2006| url = http://twitchfilm.com/news/2006/02/offending-angels-70k-budget-89-box-office-8-dvd-sales-to-double-its-takings.php| access-date = January 16, 2007| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110524001729/http://twitchfilm.com/news/2006/02/offending-angels-70k-budget-89-box-office-8-dvd-sales-to-double-its-takings.php| archive-date = May 24, 2011 | url-status= dead
| first = Devin
}}</ref> It had a £70,000 (~$105,000<ref name=MeasuringWorth />) budget but was panned by critics, including the ], who called it a "truly awful pile of garbage",<ref name="BBC">{{cite news| last = Russell| first = Jamie| title = Offending Angels (2002)| work = ]| date= April 10, 2002| url = http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2002/04/10/offending_angels_2002_review.shtml| access-date = January 16, 2007 }}</ref> and '']'', who called it "irredeemable".<ref name="Total Film">{{cite news| last = Harley| first = Kevin| title = Offending Angels review| work = ]| date= May 2002| url = https://www.gamesradar.com/offending-angels-review/| access-date = June 15, 2021 }}</ref>
| title = What if they released a movie and nobody came?

| work = ]
In 2011, the film '']'' opened to just $11 at the US box office. It played in only one theater.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Worst Movie Ever! (2011) |url=https://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=worstmovieever.htm |publisher=] |access-date=August 25, 2011}}</ref>
| date= 2006-12-31

| url = http://chud.com/news/8378
== See also ==
| accessdate = 2007-01-02 }}</ref><ref name="EW">{{cite news
{{portal|Film}}
| title = The Strange and Twisted Tale of&nbsp;... The Movie That Grossed $30.00
* ]
| url = http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20011268,00.html
* ]
| accessdate = 2008-01-24 }}</ref> According to director Leo Grillo, it sold six tickets, two of which were to cast members.<ref name="Guardian">{{cite news

| last = Mueller
== Notes ==
| first = Andrew
{{Notelist}}
| title = This film is absolute dross&nbsp;&mdash; people are going to love it!
| work = ]
| date= 2007-01-16
| url = http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,1990417,00.html
| accessdate = 2007-01-15 }}</ref>


== References ==
Previously, a British film ('']'') became notorious because it took (depending on the sources) £89 <ref name="twitch">{{cite news
{{Reflist}}
| last = logboy
| first =
| title = Offending Angels. £70k Budget, £89 Box Office. 8 DVD Sales to Double its Takings
| work = Twitch.net
| date= 2006-02-03
| url = http://www.twitchfilm.net/archives/005008.html
| accessdate = 2007-01-16 }}</ref> or £79 <ref name="IMDB">*{{imdb title|id=0288144|title=Offending Angels}}</ref> at the box office. It had a £70,000 budget but was panned by critics including the ], who called it a "truly awful pile of garbage",<ref name="BBC">{{cite news
| last = Russell
| first = Jamie
| authorlink = Jamie Russell
| title = Offending Angels (2002)
| work = ]
| date= 2002-04-10
| url = http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2002/04/10/offending_angels_2002_review.shtml
| accessdate = 2007-01-16 }}</ref> and '']'', who called it "Irredeemable".<ref name="Total Film">{{cite news
| last = Harley
| first = Kevin
| title = Offending Angels film review
| work = ]
| date= 2002-05
| url = http://www.totalfilm.com/cinema_reviews/offending_angels
| accessdate = 2007-01-16 }}</ref>
{{-}}
===Publicly financed films===
The critically acclaimed Canadian film '']'' (2000) took in about C$1,000 at the box office due to an extremely limited release in the year 2001. The movie was exhibited in only one theater in Toronto for exactly one week. Costing C$2 million, the ''Law of Enclosures'' won three ] nominations, including nods to its stars ] and ]. (Fletcher won.) The film was publicly financed due to Canadian legislation mandating the production of "Canadian-content" films to compete with product imported from the United States, which dominates the Canadian box office. Despite the praise and the participation of the Oscar-nominated Polley, a major movie star in Canada, the film was a flop at the box office, and was not released on to DVD.


==See also== == External links ==
{{Wiktionary|box-office bomb|flop}}
*]
*
*]
*
*]


{{Film box office}}
==References==
{{reflist}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Box Office Bomb}}
] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 17:59, 27 December 2024

Film industry term For the album, see Box Office Bomb (album). "Bomb (film)" redirects here. For the 2015 documentary, see The Bomb (film).

A box-office bomb is a film that is unprofitable or considered highly unsuccessful during its theatrical run. Although any film for which the combined production budget, marketing, and distribution costs exceed the revenue after release has technically "bombed", the term is more frequently used for major studio releases that were highly anticipated, extensively marketed, and expensive to produce, but nevertheless failed commercially. Originally, a "bomb" had the opposite meaning, referring instead to a successful film that "exploded" at the box office. The term continued to be used this way in the United Kingdom into the 1970s.

Causes

Negative word of mouth

With the advent of social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter in the 2000s, word of mouth regarding new films is easily spread and has had a marked effect on box office performance. A film's ability or failure to attract positive or negative commentary can strongly impact its performance at the box office, especially on the opening weekend.

External circumstances

Occasionally, films may underperform because of issues largely unrelated to the content of the film, such as the timing of the film's release. This was one of the reasons given for the commercial failure of Intolerance, D. W. Griffith's follow-up to The Birth of a Nation. Owing to production delays, the film was not released until late 1916, when the widespread antiwar sentiment it reflected had started to shift in favor of American entry into World War I. Another example is the 2015 docudrama about FIFA entitled United Passions. A glowing portrayal of FIFA, which had mostly funded the film, United Passions was released in theaters in the United States at the same time FIFA's leaders were under investigation for fraud and corruption. The film grossed only $918 at the US box office in its opening weekend.

Sometimes, a film's performance may be adversely affected by national crisis or a disaster, such as the September 11 attacks in 2001, Hurricane Harvey in 2017, and the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020–2021.

High production costs

In evaluating box-office gross numbers, it is important to keep in mind that not all money is returned to the film studio. Some of the gross is kept by the film exhibitors and the film distributor. The scratch formula for making a rough estimate of a studio's portion of the gross is that the studio usually gets half.

A large budget can cause a film to fail financially, even when it performs reasonably well at the box office; 1980's Heaven's Gate, for example, exceeded its planned production schedule by three months, causing its budget to inflate from $12 million to $44 million. The film only earned $3.5 million at the box office.

For the 2005 film Sahara, its budget ballooned to $281.2 million for production, distribution, and other expenses. The film earned $119 million in theaters and $202.9 million overall with television and other subsidies included, resulting in a net loss of $78.3 million. In 2012, Disney reported losses of $200 million on John Carter. The film had made a considerable $234 million worldwide, but this was short of its $250 million budget plus worldwide advertising.

The 2007 film The Golden Compass had a production budget of $200 million. To be able to fund the film, New Line Cinema had to sell all of the film's international distribution rights to various film distributors around the world. The film underperformed domestically, but was an international success; New Line Cinema did not have a cut of the international box office. These events were major factors in New Line Cinema becoming a division of Warner Bros. Pictures.

Recovery

Films initially thought of as "flops" may recover income elsewhere. Several films have underperformed in their countries of origin, but have been sufficiently successful internationally to recoup losses or even become financial successes. Films may also recover money through international distribution, sales to television syndication, distribution outside of cinemas, and releases on home media. The 1995 post-apocalyptic action film Waterworld was the most expensive film ever made at the time after undergoing significant production difficulties. While it performed relatively well in the US box office, it did not initially turn a profit and became known as a box-office flop. International box-office takings and video sales led it to turn a profit. In 2023, Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One, which underperformed at the box office, was given a COVID-19 insurance payout, which amounted to £57 million ($71 million).

Other films have succeeded long after cinema release by becoming cult films or being re-evaluated over time. High-profile films fitting this description include Vertigo, Blade Runner, The Wizard of Oz, It's a Wonderful Life, Citizen Kane, The Shawshank Redemption, Showgirls, Fight Club, The Thing, and Scott Pilgrim vs. the World, each of which initially lost money at the box office but has since become popular.

Studio failure

It is common for a single film's lackluster performance to push its studio into the red, in the sense of recording a net loss on its income statement. In extreme cases, a bomb may push its studio into bankruptcy or closure. Examples of this include United Artists (Heaven's Gate) and Carolco Pictures (Cutthroat Island). The Golden Compass was a success at the international box office and grossed $372 million worldwide; nonetheless, its underperformance at the box office in North America was seen as a significant factor in influencing the decision by Warner Bros. Pictures to take direct control of New Line Cinema.

In 2001, Square Pictures, a division of Square, released its only film, Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within. It received mixed reviews from critics and failed to recover its $145 million cost. Following the film's struggles, Square Pictures did not make any more films and is now a consolidated subsidiary of Square Enix as Visual Works. In 2011, Mars Needs Moms was the last film released by ImageMovers Digital before Disney's stake got absorbed by ImageMovers to a loss of nearly $140 million – the largest box-office bomb of all time in nominal dollar terms. Regardless of this loss, the decision to close the production company had been made a year prior to the film's release.

Independent films

The 2006 independent movie Zyzzyx Road made just $30 at the US box office. With a budget of $1.2 million and starring Tom Sizemore and Katherine Heigl, its tiny revenue is due to its limited box-office release – just six days in a single theater in Dallas for the purpose of meeting Screen Actors Guild requirements – rather than its ability to attract viewers. According to co-star Leo Grillo, it sold six tickets, two of which were to cast members.

Previously, the 2000 British film Offending Angels had become notorious for taking in less than £100 (~$150) at the box office. It had a £70,000 (~$105,000) budget but was panned by critics, including the BBC, who called it a "truly awful pile of garbage", and Total Film, who called it "irredeemable".

In 2011, the film The Worst Movie Ever! opened to just $11 at the US box office. It played in only one theater.

See also

Notes

  1. Also known as a box-office flop, box-office failure, or box-office disaster.

References

  1. "Greatest Box-Office Bombs, Disasters and Flops". Filmsite.org. Retrieved March 6, 2013.
  2. "The 15 Biggest Box Office Bombs". CNBC.com. August 23, 2010. Retrieved March 6, 2013.
  3. Pitman, Jack (April 29, 1970). "English as British Speak It". Variety. p. 172. Retrieved June 15, 2024 – via Internet Archive.
  4. "A Century in Exhibition-The 2010s: The Great Disruption". boxofficepro.com. August 27, 2021. Retrieved January 17, 2022.
  5. "Intolerance (1916)". www.filmsite.org. Retrieved November 7, 2017.
  6. "FIFA film 'United Passions' one of worst in U.S. box office history". ESPN. June 18, 2015. Archived from the original on June 18, 2015. Retrieved June 18, 2015.
  7. Kelley, Seth (August 27, 2017). "Box Office Disaster: Lackluster Releases, Mayweather-McGregor, Hurricane Harvey Create Slowest Weekend in Over 15 Years". Variety. Retrieved November 9, 2017.
  8. "Weekend Box Office". Boxofficeguru.com. September 17, 2001. Retrieved December 8, 2011.
  9. Erlichman, Jon (March 13, 2020). "Box office bomb: COVID-19's impact on the movie theatre business". BNN Bloomberg. Retrieved March 17, 2020.
  10. Hornaday, Ann (April 5, 2018). "We're awash in box-office statistics. But what do the numbers really mean?". The Washington Post.
  11. Miller, Alexander (27 April 2015). "Unmaking of an Epic – The Production of Heaven's Gate". filminquiry.com. Retrieved 7 November 2017.
  12. Burr, Ty (November 24, 2012). "Ty Burr revisits 'Heaven's Gate'". The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on December 8, 2018. Retrieved January 13, 2020.
  13. "Heaven's Gate (1980)". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved January 13, 2020.
  14. ^ Bunting, Glenn F. (15 April 2007). "$78 million of red ink?". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 7 May 2014. Retrieved 13 January 2020.
  15. Bunting, Glenn F. (5 March 2007). "Jurors hear tales of studio maneuvering". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 27 March 2009. Retrieved 4 August 2021.
  16. "John Carter flop to cost Walt Disney $200m". bbc.co.uk. BBC News. 20 March 2012.
  17. "Failed Movies That Singlehandedly Put Their Studios Out of Business". University Fox. December 12, 2019. Archived from the original on May 9, 2019. Retrieved February 2, 2022.
  18. Mendelson, Scott. "'Pacific Rim' And More Domestic "Flops" That Became Global Hits". Forbes. Retrieved August 19, 2015.
  19. "11 Beloved Movies That Were Box Office Flops". Mental Floss. Retrieved August 19, 2015.
  20. Fleming, Mike Jr. (August 7, 2013). "Isn't It Time To Take 'Waterworld' Off The All-Time Flop List?". Deadline Hollywood. Retrieved August 13, 2013.
  21. Black, Christian (September 10, 2023). "Mission possible as Paramount Pictures wins £57m Covid payout". The Times. Archived from the original on September 10, 2023. Retrieved September 11, 2023.
  22. McPherson, Chris (September 12, 2023). "'Mission: Impossible - Dead Reckoning's Profits Boosted By $71 Million Insurance Payout bringing The Total box office to 637.1 Million". Collider. Archived from the original on September 14, 2023. Retrieved September 14, 2023.
  23. "Vertigo: From box-office flop to 'greatest film of all time'". The Irish Times.
  24. "11 Beloved Movies That Were Box Office Flops". Mental Floss. November 10, 2015.
  25. "Why Shawshank Redemption Was A Box Office Failure (Despite Its Popular Legacy)". ScreenRant. May 5, 2021. Retrieved November 29, 2021.
  26. Thompson, Simon. "'You Don't Nomi' Explores 'Showgirls,' The Cult Classic Box Office Bomb". Forbes. Retrieved June 27, 2024.
  27. Lim, Dennis (November 6, 2009). "Forget Rule No. 1: Still Talking About 'Fight Club'". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 10, 2012. Retrieved July 24, 2019.
  28. "The Real Reason John Carpenter's The Thing Flopped At The Box Office". Looper. October 1, 2020. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
  29. Laman, Lisa (April 5, 2023). "How 'Scott Pilgrim' Went From Box Office Bomb to Pop Culture Touchstone". Collider. Retrieved January 11, 2024.
  30. Welkos, Robert W. "'Heaven's Gate': The film flop that reshaped Hollywood". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved December 25, 2018.
  31. Sterngold, James (March 31, 1996). "Debacle on the High Seas". The New York Times. Retrieved December 25, 2018.
  32. "Largest box office loss". Guinness World Records. April 30, 2012. Retrieved July 17, 2019.
  33. Davis, Erik (February 28, 2008). "Breaking: New Line Cinema Says Goodbye!". Cinematical.com. Archived from the original on October 28, 2012. Retrieved December 8, 2011.
  34. Briscoe, David (February 1, 2002). "'Final Fantasy' studio to fold". The Independent. Retrieved June 2, 2019.
  35. "Square-Enix Co, LTD. Annual Report 2007" (PDF). pp. 29, 30, 53. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 25, 2009. Retrieved March 5, 2009.
  36. Finke, Nikki (March 12, 2010). "Disney Closing Zemeckis' Digital Studio". Deadline Hollywood. Retrieved November 21, 2010.
  37. Faraci, Devin (December 31, 2006). "What if they released a movie and nobody came?". CHUD.com. Archived from the original on June 7, 2011. Retrieved January 2, 2007.
  38. Brunner, Rob (February 9, 2007). "The Strange and Twisted Tale of ... The Movie That Grossed $30.00". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on February 25, 2007. Retrieved January 24, 2008.
  39. Mueller, Andrew (January 16, 2007). "This Film Is Absolute Dross – People Are Going to Love It!". The Guardian. London. Retrieved January 15, 2007.
  40. ^ Officer, Lawrence H. "Dollar-Pound Exchange Rate From 1791: 2000–2002". MeasuringWorth. Retrieved November 9, 2017.
  41. logboy (February 3, 2006). "Offending Angels. £70k Budget, £89 Box Office. 8 DVD Sales to Double its Taking". Twitch.net. Archived from the original on May 24, 2011. Retrieved January 16, 2007.
  42. Russell, Jamie (April 10, 2002). "Offending Angels (2002)". BBC. Retrieved January 16, 2007.
  43. Harley, Kevin (May 2002). "Offending Angels review". Total Film. Retrieved June 15, 2021.
  44. "The Worst Movie Ever! (2011)". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved August 25, 2011.

External links

Box office
Topics
Highest-grossing
General
Animated
By genre
By origin
By region
By person
Records
Awards
Websites
Other
Related
Categories: