| Revision as of 22:18, 23 March 2009 editJehochman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,281 edits →re WP:AE: reply to LHvU← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:35, 19 November 2024 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,374,779 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Jehochman/Archives 25. (BOT) | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Inline image | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |image = File:Naturhistorisk Privatundervisning.jpg | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 150K | |||
| | |
|size = 500px | ||
| |align = center | |||
| |algo = old(7d) | |||
| |alt = Placeholder alt text | |||
| |archive = User talk:Jehochman/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| |fullwidth = yes | |||
| |capcenter = yes | |||
| |caption = <br/>{{big|{{big|"Hold on, I zoned out for a minute. Which one of you was the Icewhiz sock again?"}}}}{{small|]}} | |||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{AutoArchivingNotice|age=7|target=./Archive {{CURRENTMONTHABBREV}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}|dounreplied=yes|index=./Archive index|bot=MiszaBot}} | |||
| <!--my archives are messed up so I have removed the links. They might be fixed some day--> | |||
| <div class="plainlinks" style=" | |||
| {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | |||
| background-color: {{{bgcolor|#BBDDFF}}}; | |||
| |archiveprefix=User talk:Jehochman/Archives | |||
| {{#if:{{{extra-style|}}}|{{{extra-style}}};}} | |||
| |format= %%i | |||
| {{#if:{{{width|}}}|width: {{{width}}};}} | |||
| |age=168 | |||
| border: 1px solid RoyalBlue; | |||
| |minkeepthreads=1 | |||
| {{#if:{{{border-color|}}}|border-color: {{{border-color}}};}} | |||
| |maxarchsize=350000 | |||
| {{#if:{{{color|}}}|color: {{{color}}};}} | |||
| |numberstart=25 | |||
| font-weight: bold; | |||
| |header={{aan}} | |||
| margin: 2em 0 1em; | |||
| |archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}</nowiki> | |||
| padding: .5em 1em; | |||
| }} | |||
| vertical-align: middle; | |||
| clear: both; | |||
| __TOC__ | |||
| "> | |||
| {| style="background: transparent;" valign="middle" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| | | |||
| Please leave a . | |||
| # I generally prefer to keep conversations on the page where they start. | |||
| # Please follow ]'s advice, "Omit needless words!" | |||
| # Unblocks: If I block a user, any administrator is free to refactor the block unless I have specifically requested contacting me first. | |||
| # I may remove comments posted here if no response is needed, or if I respond elsewhere. | |||
| |}</div> | |||
| {{TOCright}} | |||
| == Another sockpuppetry accusation == | |||
| Hi Jehochman. I've been accused of sockpuppetry again, now at ]. Apparently a user recently mentioned the URL of my website in their sandbox and this has automatically triggered someone to accuse me of being a sockpuppet of that user. As you suggested on my talk page last time, I've mentioned on the SSP and on the talk page of the user who accused me that they can contact you as you are familiar with my situation. Just thought I should let you know I've mentioned your name. Thanks, ] (]) 17:04, 16 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Xiutwel and 9/11 Arbcom == | |||
| . ] (]) 00:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == SEO again == | |||
| Is the title the main determinant in article rank? ''']''' ('']'') 06:26, 19 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| : The title is a big factor, but not the only one. The three largest factors, in no particular order are: title, quantity and quality of links pointing to a page, and anchor text of those links. Note that both internal and external links count. One of the best ways to help a page rank better is to use good anchor text in the menus that appear on every page of a site. Consider a hypothetical site where the menu item "Red Lederhosen" is linked to a page titled "Red Lederhosen". If this page also has a heading "Red Lederhosen" and includes the words red and lederhosen throughout the text at a somewhat natural frequency, this page is likely to rank well for that phrase. ] <sup>]</sup> 15:05, 21 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == AE == | |||
| Hi Jehochman! Thank you for your comments. I made the following points in AE, with supporting diffs: | |||
| #R. has been previously included in the list of bans in this arbitration case for harassing another user. | |||
| #He made an uncivil comment about D. approximately a month ago. | |||
| #He has been officially warned by an uninvolved administrator for misbehavior after that. | |||
| #He continue making uncivil comments at different pages. | |||
| Which point(s) do you disagree with? If this is the last point, I would be happy to provide more diffs with his inappropriate comments made during the last 1-2 months, not mentioning things he did earlier. Sorry for pushing this issue. It would be fine if this only involved me. But this became an issue for others as well.] (]) 14:57, 21 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| : I don't disagree with any points, but I wish that your initial diffs did not include those from the user's own talk page. If you stick to article talk pages, your case is stronger. Additionally, I do not think it helps your cause when Digwuren pops in and throws barbs without shedding additional light on the matter. He should read ]. ] <sup>]</sup> 15:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::I still believe you have nothing against Digwuren personally . I observed some of your actions in the past and agree with most of them and especially your support of ]. However, I respectfully disagree with you in this case. If you agree with all my points above, R. should receive ''at least'' a warning from you. Plain and simple. But instead you issued a warning to D. who ''evidently'' (see first dif in this AE) was a victim of an offensive comment by R. at the first place. Last (most recent) comment by R. was also against ]. He ''repeateadly'' called D. ] ("nobody"). Thanks.] | |||
| == You're invited! == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Meetup/NYC/Invite/March 2009}}<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 19:25, 21 March 2009 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == WP:V == | |||
| I hope you don't mind. I your edit at WP:V. I think is generally an improvement, but I re-inserted "postings", and represented the meaning of "and similar sources" with "etc." to leave it open-ended. <span style="color:Purple; font-size:19pt;">☺</span>] (]) 23:48, 21 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| : Thanks! ] <sup>]</sup> 23:50, 21 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::And thank you for your positive response, which made me very happy! By the way, (and here I hope you have lots of ]) I'm looking for people to join a ] to encourage people to help clear the new pages patrol backlog. <span style="color:Orangered; font-size:11pt;">☺</span>] (]) 17:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == I really could use your opinion at ] == | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| This editor keeps reverting back to their preferred version without comments as far as I've seen. So I reverted requesting it to be taken to talk. Now, should I self revert? I used the edit summary and not talk so was I wrong? I would appreciate your input on this. I will self revert if you say so since I trust your judgements. Thanks again for your advice and/or help. --]] 11:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| :Update, I don't have to self revert, the editor already did almost immediately but I would still like your opinion on this. Plus this editor has to be way past ] by now. Thanks, --]] 11:41, 23 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == re ] == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| Following a noticeboard comment, I have decided to see if I can help on the above board. I plan to read a lot, then make a few comments and subsequently move toward getting more involved (providing I feel I am able to contribute.) Since you have a high workload, perhaps because of your commitment to the board, I am going to increase it by asking you to keep an eye on me and let me know if I am misunderstanding situations or making inappropriate edits - hopefully in the long run I can then take some of the workload upon myself; and if you do need another opinion on any matter and there does not appear to by any other third party available, please let me know. See you around, I trust. ] (]) 21:33, 23 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| : Thank you very much. In several recent cases I was loathe to place a sanction because participation was so low. If I have to decide something myself, it must be clear. The more thoughtful, uninvolved opinions, the better. ] <sup>]</sup> 22:18, 23 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 02:35, 19 November 2024
"Hold on, I zoned out for a minute. Which one of you was the Icewhiz sock again?"Source
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)