Misplaced Pages

User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:10, 28 March 2009 view sourceCaspian blue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,434 edits →Your blocking of DJ Bungi: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 00:13, 19 November 2024 view source MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,133,069 edits →ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{pp-protected|small=yes}}
{{notice|'''Note:''' I like to keep discussion threads together, so if you leave a message here I will usually respond here. If I have begun a discussion on your page, I'll see it if you respond there.

<small>A {{tl|ping}} would be appreciated if you reply at a later date. {{tl|Talkback}} notes here will generally not be needed.</small>

Note to '''new and non-logged-in editors''': Due to a long-term issue with vandalism, this talkpage has unfortunately had to be ]. If you need to contact me and can't post here, please just post your message on your own talkpage or the talkpage of the relevant article and add the code "<nowiki>{{ping|Future Perfect at Sunrise}}</nowiki>" to it, then I'll be sure to see it. }}

{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 250K |maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 16 |counter = 33
|minthreadsleft = 3 |minthreadsleft = 3
|minthreadstoarchive = 3 |minthreadstoarchive = 3
Line 10: Line 17:
{| class="infobox" width="315px" {| class="infobox" width="315px"
|- |-
! align="center" | ]<br />] ! align="center" | {{/Archives}}
|} |}
{{bots|deny=Sinebot}} {{bots|deny=SineBot}}
'''Note: If you leave a message here I will most often respond here'''


{{notice|Hello fellow Wikipedians, due to changed circumstances in my private and professional life I am currently hovering somewhere in between "busy in real life and may not respond quickly to inquiries" and "semi-retired". I'll probably be around from time to time, but please don't rely on me for quick admin action or the like, for the time being. All the best, – ] ] 05:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC) }}
== An image ==


Sorry to annoy you once more, but could you check out ? Part of the FUR says "It is of much lower resolution than the original" which is confusing considering the size. Also, the source seems to be a book published in Bulgaria in 1941, which wouldn't be a reliable source, would it? Thanks in advance, ''']]'''


== Invitation to participate in a research ==
== ] ==


Hello,
Hi Katze, is it possible, because of permanent vandalism from IP-s this article to be semi-protected? ] (]) 13:18, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''.
Excuse me, what about my question? ] (]) 16:25, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
:Ah, sorry for not answering earlier. It didn't seem to rise to the levels of disruption that would justify protection, as far as I can see. ] ] 08:31, 22 March 2009 (UTC)


The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] .
== Sakis Rouvas ==


Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Hi there. I noticed that you edited the corresponding article a while back. Since then it has been re-expanded. His personal life section has been filled with tabloid gossip and I feel that this poses a gross ] violation. I have tried in vain to explain to this person what is wrong with what he is doing but he keeps reverting my edits and does not even seem to grasp the concept of reliable sources and NPOV. I have nor the time nor energy to keep this up. Could you please help? Best wishes, ] (]) 22:39, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


Kind Regards,
== Thanks! ==


]
Thank you for the quick block of ]. Since this kind of thing often sits in AIV for a while and I try my best to stay as far away from ANI as possible, I was afraid that I'd be reverting Copyvios all night :) Cheers! <font color="#330099" face="Cooper Black">] <sup>]</sup>/<small>]</small></font> 07:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC)


<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
== Request for unprotection ==
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 -->


==Happy Adminship Anniversary!==
- Just a heads up. A comment from the protecting admin weighing in about this one would be helpful. Cheers, ''']''' (]) 16:53, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->

{{ombox
== Opinion ==
| name = Happy Adminship

| image = ]
Can we have ] on unprotection request on Cham Albanians?] (]) 16:54, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
| imageright = ]

| style = border: 2px solid SlateBlue; background: linear-gradient(to right, #c5c5ec, #bfd1f2, #a9efea);
== Opinion ==
| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;

| plainlinks = yes
Can we have ] on unprotection request on Cham Albanians?] (]) 16:55, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
| text = <big>'''Happy adminship anniversary!'''</big><br />Hi Future Perfect at Sunrise! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your ]. Enjoy this special day! ] (]) 02:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

}}
== Back to NIR-Warrior? ==

Please see what ] is doing to ]. AddBOT seems to be restoring everything that has been cleaned up after the banned sock NIR-Warrior and his IP look-alikes ] and ] (I called your attention to these look-alikes ). Thank you. --] (]) 17:43, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

: LOL, a sockpuppet posing as a bot, that's a new one. He gets a point for inventiveness, at least. ] ] 17:49, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
::Thanks for your instant action. --] (]) 17:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


== Istanbul Pic ==

Hello, as you might have seen on the talk page of ], I am really a dumb when it comes to computers and so, can, you, or anyone you might know or recommend, help us on doing a NYC kind of montage that would please everyone?? (I opened the topic on the talk page, no one responded yet :( ).

Cheers! --] (]) 23:51, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

== "Rant" ==

is the second time you are dismissing my serious questions in my posts as a "rant" which deserves no reply. Straightforward question: Do you have any personal problem with me? Because it definitely looks like it when you are not responding to the essence of my post. (And btw, no, ] is a guideline, NOT a policy, so be a little more cautious). ]] 18:37, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

: No, I have no problem with you personally. You know I like you and I consider you my friend. But, I can't help it, I sometimes have this feeling in discussion with you, your logic simply evades me. I'm lost for words. It feels like arguing against a smokescreen. There are just too many loose ends and too many logical inconsistencies in your argument to address them all at once. I don't know where to start. Trying to address them would dissolve the whole argument into a hopeless tangle.
: It's different with Kekrops. He can be the most pig-headed wiki-lawyer the world has seen, but at least when debating with him I have the feeling there's some thread of coherence between us and we somehow seem to understand what the other is saying.
: Sorry if I offended you, but I can't help it, I really don't see how I could meaningfully respond to posts like that. ] ] 19:10, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

::Σταματήστε, θα δακρύσω. Τόση φιλία δεν την αντέχει ο ευαίσθητος συναισθηματικός μου κόσμος...&nbsp;<small>·<font color="black">]</font>·</small> 19:20, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

::Apology accepted and friendship mutual and appreciated. Now did you ever think there's nowhere to start from because there simply aren't any loose ends in my logic? I mean when someone disagrees with you, does he ''always'' have to be wrong? Please try re-reading my post a sentence at a time. The last time we disagreed on the exact same arguments, it was in the MOSMAC talkpage (which I was summarizing). But we respected each other's arguments then. What changed since? ]] 22:11, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
::: I did re-read your post, sentence by sentence. Sorry, but every single sentence is wrong. There isn't a single one that's salvagable. And yes, we've been through it all, and I haven't got anything more to say about them than what I said back then. Some of your arguments are really, forgive my frankness, laughable. ] ] 23:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
::::Maybe what is laughable is the idea that a mere disambiguation before a name is worth risking millions of lives. Maybe what is laughable is WP's priorities. Maybe what is laughable is the creation and the interpretation of certain tailor-made guidelines which were designed to serve the exact same purpose for years. Maybe what is laughable is me continuing to deal with all this appalling system here. But, surely, what is mostly laughable is that people of a high mental capacity tend to behave like a modern Socrates in supporting the system, despite it being evidently completely rotten. Although a Greek, I'd choose ] myself. ]] 23:55, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
::::: I throw up my hands in despair. If this topic is too hot for you to debate it reasonably, better not try. ] ] 07:15, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
::::::Hehe, I picture your gesture... I love it when Germans become passionate! You'll come around. You'll see. ]] 11:29, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
::::::: You are lucky you never saw me eating my hat in despair. I once had a real-to-life depiction of it here on Misplaced Pages. ] ] 11:31, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

== ] ==

FWIW, the entries use {{tl|vandal-s}}, not {{tl|userlinks}}. Also, you're not supposed to sign your post after an entry. Cheers, ]''']]]]''' 19:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

== NIR-Warrior2 ==

I was wondering if you would take a look at this user, as you have blocked the initial user in the past, who then performed a huge edit on the ] page with a rather threatening explanation. I don't want to start an edit war, but as you have experience with this user, I was hoping you'd take a look at his/her activity. ] (]) 20:21, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

== PD review ==

See ]. <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 01:40, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
:left question for you there. <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 09:50, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

== Arbitration enforcement ==

I agree entirely with your comment about Kekrops needing a topic ban - he has clearly violated the arbitration sanctions in this case (see ] in particular). I've therefore proposed a topic ban at ]. Your views would be welcome. -- ] (]) 09:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

== Dear, ==

I am sorry that it’s about two years that you deal with a text of “Eagle’s wing” magazine, pretending that it is too much tendentious but in fact the pages of this magazine are used often as references even from your encyclopedia. I am saying, “dear”, because it can’t be different. This magazine is really the only information source for the Cham problem, which is a big problem for the international justice and politics, not only for Albania. In these conditions, notwithstanding the deletion of this article from your pages, it will remain a source of references for everybody who wants to know more about the Cham Albanians. You have to know that with your action you have caused trouble to a big community of writers, journalists, artists etc. If you had had the good desire, you would have edited the page, as you did with Bilal Xhaferri’s page. And you wouldn’t delete it completely. If something tendentious was in it, you had to edit it. I think that it’s in your honor to review this severe attitude and find the way that even “Eagle’s magazine” can be viewed in the pages of your encyclopedia. In this way you will respect the fifty years work of the dissident Cham intellectuals.
Respectfully
Xanxari en.
March 26, 2009

--] (]) 12:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

: Look, I have no problem if you can write a decent little article on that thing. Under the following conditions:
:# Convincing references to ''neutral'' third-party sources talking ''about'' that journal, documenting that it is notable
:# No text copied from elsewhere
:# No ] language boosting the importance of the journal artificially
:# No tendentious wording promoting the political ideas expressed by the journal
:Can you do that? It's really not that hard, you know. And please stop spamming links to non-notable sites into other articles. ] ] 13:12, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

== Again, once more, ... ==

Can you take a look on ] and ], sourced material has been removed, the user has broken 3RR (not me this time, surprisingly) and he refuts to WP guidelines, missinterpreting them.] (]) 16:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

:Semi-protection has expired and the game started again, anons attacking as always. Are you going to do something?] (]) 19:43, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

::Please can you answer me on the five annon war in Markos Botsaris? And by the way, please can you take part in the talk page in my dispute with Kapnisma?] (]) 22:40, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


== ? ==

Hi Future, how about this edit? ] (]) 06:36, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Do we have now two articles: ] and ], or what? ] (]) 06:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

== Racist ==

Thank you for confirming that Misplaced Pages is racist against Macedonians, nothing was conducted to punish ΚΕΚΡΩΨ, and there is a reason behind that. ] (]) 06:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

== Dear ==

User:Future_Perfect,

According to your words we put again “Eagle’s wing” magazine in the pages of the encyclopedia, yesterday on 26 March with the changes you recommend to us. Surprisingly today it has been deleted again by the administrator: http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Woohookitty. This history it’s about two years going on without any valid reason. As we agreed yesterday, this magazine represents a big Albanian community, in need, which is almost equal with Kosovo population. It represents even the Albanian communities in Kosovo, Montenegro, Macedonia and USA. This is the unique magazine that is used as a reference source for the problems of these communities. And it has more reason to be displayed in the pages of your encyclopedia than being deleted. It makes favors to you encyclopedia because it is widely read. We will put again the material in your pages and we hope to find again your support to avoid its deletion again. Regarding the references sources we will try to fulfill them, following your conditions. Again I repeat you that this is an article widely read and it does a favor to your encyclopedia.
Respectfully
Xanxari en.
March 27, 2009

--] (]) 11:23, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

: Well, couple of things:
:# Your page still contained a huge lot of unsourced assertions, a good bit of tendentious wording (though not as bad as before), and basically no sourcing whatsoever with respect to the notability of the whole thing. You need ''independent'' neutral sources for that, and you need to refer to them in support of every individual piece of information.
:# I haven't checked to what extent the new text was free of copyright violations. Given the past history, this will require some checks. Please keep in mind that it is also ''not'' okay to take an existing Albanian text from somewhere else and translate it into English; that's still a copyright violation.
:# The article was still in very poor English.
:# You evidently are associated with that organisation and are here to advocate for it. Please see our guideline on ], regarding legitimate and illegitimate behaviour of editors under such conditions. If your magazine is truly notable, then somebody other than you will certainly want to create an article on it sooner or later. If nobody has felt the need for that yet, maybe that's truly a sign it isn't that notable after all?
: In sum, I strongly recommend you should ''not'' re-create the page at this point. If you truly feel you can meet the conditions, you are free to create a draft in your own user space (e.g. at ]), and I'll have a look at it later.
: By the way, why are your talking of yourself as "we"? Is your account used by more than one person? Please be aware that this is not allowed here. Each user should have their own individual account at all times. ] ] 11:38, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
::Just chiming in here to say that I am more than willing to help Xanxari en. with the English in his/her draft if they would like. I think the language barrier is playing a major role here. But yes, I deleted it again for the reasons you stated here. --] <sup>]</sup> 11:42, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

== Dear ==

At first I want to say you that I am from Kosovo and for this reason I have the right to protect an Albanian magazine that has treated the Kosovo problem too. Speaking the Albanian language, I have the right to display this article because an Albanian will put it in the encyclopedia. I have contributed too much in the encyclopedia pages of the Albanian language and I know more than anybody else the Kosovo problem, the Cham problem and other Albanian problems. Being a good connoisseur of these problems I can bring more precise arguments that honor the encyclopedia. My contributions in the English language in this encyclopedia maybe are few for the little time we have collaborated but they are more precise because of my knowledge. I think that in this article I fulfill an emptiness of this encyclopedia for the Cham problem. And I think that the article is really neutral. I can say that are many references sources in the Albanian language for this magazine but they are too little in English, and you see this through Google.

Dear, you say in your page that you speak the German language and you have knowledge in other languages too. As a German speaking person I want to remind you that the Germans are the best albanologs for a hundred year period. I am surprised by the fact that you, as A German, don’t have the power to admit an article from Albania and for sake of the truth you could edit it (where necessary) and this would be in your honor. I don’t know any German who is such a little well-wisher toward the Albanians. This make me suspect that maybe you are not the one you declare. Maybe I am wrong.

Once again I am doing a pray to your conscience to view you attitude toward this article. It’s surprising that you raise too many doubts for such a simple article! I can respond to this fact with a proverb that is said in Kosovo and Albania: “The tree that produces fruits is more hit with stones than the one who doesn’t.” I am saying that you didn’t keep the promise you made me. The writing doesn’t have any conflict of interests, it doesn’t violated the copy right too. I don’t know if there is any conflict of interests if a German writes something about Germany or an English man writes something about Britain.

I don’t want to last this discussion because I think that even though you accept this article you will stimulate another administrator to delete it. However I can tell you that the Cham problem will find a solution even though you stop this article with every kind of justifications. If you have the desire you can edit this article where necessary and this could be a noble action.
Waiting for your positive reaction

Respectfully

Xanxari, from Kosovo.
--] (]) 13:44, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

== Question ==

Hi Fut. I noticed that Lord Byron had written that Souliotes were Albanians, in . I know that Byron is not a RS, but giving the fact that he had known well the region and both Albanians and Greeks, and that he was a friend of Botsaris and later a leader of the Botsaris clan, I wonder if he could be included in the article?] (]) 16:14, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

== Germany article ==

You have removed major longterm established content from a FA article without discussion. Be reminded
that this violates several Misplaced Pages guidelines and policies. ] (]) 19:25, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
: For Chrissake, give it up already. You've had several blocks for stubborn edit-warring. It's patently obvious that you'll soon get another. ] ] 19:27, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

You call Upholding the quality and long-established content of one of most read and highest rated articles edit warring, interesting. So far, your account has not contributed a single argument during several discussions and still you are reverting or deleting. There are many editors and administrators who would not hesitate to call your actions disruptive. ] (]) 19:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
: Then report me. Have fun. ] ] 19:41, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

== Please ==

Can you take a look in ], there is ], who only reverts with nonsense edit summaries.] (]) 20:25, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

== h kanvassismos ==

, ... ''']]''' 22:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


== Reverts ==
:No different from really. By the way, what's with the dodgy Greek?&nbsp;<small>·<font color="black">]</font>·</small> 14:52, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
:: Not quite; notification in neutral fora is generally encouraged, individual notification is more problematic. But as long as it's only two or three people it's hardly actionable anyway – we all know that the real canvassing is going on behind the scenes. ] ] 14:58, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
:::Indeed. A few fresh faces on your side of the fence, I see. Still, the opposing side's national talk page is hardly a neutral forum.&nbsp;<small>·<font color="black">]</font>·</small> 15:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
:::: I would be grateful if you could reign in your narcissistic urge to fiddle around with your own postings in multiple updates at least when you are on my talk page. ] ] 15:44, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
:::::Πω πω, νευράκια...&nbsp;<small>·<font color="black">]</font>·</small> 15:47, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
:Hopefully there hasn't been any kind of misunderstanding, but at any rate my response in Greek under his invitation reads: "Thanks for stopping by, but I am no longer active". That's just for the record... On a side note, this bit "...the kind of ideological baggage that Greek people are unfortunately so obsessed with" ! was really uncalled for. Some kind of temporary Furor Germanicus I hope--] (]) 17:07, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
:: Sorry Giorgo, but I stand by that statement. Individuality of independent personalities notwithstanding (and you know in what esteem I have you), there is such a thing as collective traits characteristic of a group. And here we have such a one, if there ever was one. There is a certain stance towards the M. issue that is collectively characteristic of the Greek Wikipedian community in general (as the editing disputes of the last years amply demonstrate), just as it is collectively characteristic of the Greek nation as a political body in much the same way (as the political events demonstrate). That such a collective stance exists is, I think, undeniable; that it is best characterised as ideological obsession is my personal well-considered opinion. ] ] 19:15, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


If I come across one of their additions to RSN would it be helpful if I pinged you? -- <small>LCU</small> ''']''' <small>''«]» °]°''</small> 20:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
== too much of a block ==
: Thanks, but I guess it's enough to get them reverted promptly – if they then start revert-warring it back in, there should be enough admin eyeballs on that page to push the block button eventually, right? It doesn't have to be always me. That person is a pest (I suppose you're familiar with their ]?), thanks for helping deal with them. ] ] 23:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
::I looked it up after their recent posts, I'll keep an eye out for them. -- <small>LCU</small> ''']''' <small>''«]» °]°''</small> 23:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)


== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research ==
Your of 85.75.0.0/16 has blocked nearly half of Greece (Otenet) and large parts of US (Virginia, etc), as well as some users in Germany and Switzerland. Maybe it's time to unblock this range and only block more specific IPs? ] (]) 23:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


Hello,
:A /16 block is effectively blocking 65,534 ips. This seems like more of victory for the vandal than it does for Misplaced Pages. ] 23:53, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
:: Hmm, I wasn't aware it was also blocking IPs outside Greece. From I thought it was all OTENet. Have there been concrete reports of collateral damage?
:: The alternative is for me to routinely semiprotect every page I edit – preemptively, even before the vandal strikes. At this point, I am no longer even willing to wait till he does; it's become too much of a nuisance. Blocking single IPs has no effect at all, he can hop from one to the next within a minute. ] ] 00:18, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
::: Excuse me, did you just say above that you deliberately blocked the largest Greek internet provider, coincidentally just at the same time when a poll is running where Greek people are likely to vote against your opinion?--] (]) 02:53, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
:::: It's a soft-block on anonymous users. Anon IPs don't vote in polls, so it makes no difference to that case. It's because of a particularly nasty vandal, it's been in place on and off, for quite a while, without any reports of serious collateral damage that I'm aware of. There's never been much constructive anon editing from that range anyway; most non-logged-in activity from there has always been just vandalism. And if you really think harm is being done, go and tell that to the vandal (you know who). ''He'' is harming fellow Greek users, not I. ] ] 06:52, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
:::::Who is it? Not all of us have a penchant for IT forensics.&nbsp;<small>·<font color="black">]</font>·</small> 14:53, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
:::::: Former {{user|Walnutjk}} (see e.g. ]) ] ] 14:56, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ].
== ] - the other sources check ==


Take the survey ''''''.
You had said:


Kind Regards,
..."As for the other sources, the real ones, I'm only slowly picking up on them. I have neither much time nor easy technical access to most of this material; given the tendency of tendentious and distorting quotation I've witnessed here (see Levene, for the umpteenth time), I'm not willing to give any premature comment or endorsement to any contention based on mere lists of names"


]
That was more than 2 weeks ago. Please define "slowly". ]] 01:04, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
: A certain other case has been forcing me to direct my attention to dealing with argumentative smokescreens elsewhere, so I'm afraid I haven't got much energy left for that one right now. ] ] 06:53, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 -->


== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
==Bothering you agian==
Sorry for bothering you again, but I think you have to see ], an ongoing discussion, which in my opinion is just references against assumptions. Can I have your ] in the last comments in there? Thanks, ] (]) 14:18, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
== Muscovite evading block again ==
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
At ], you blocked Muscovite99 a further 2 months for evading a block he was currently under. An IP editor has now made the same edits that were made (). This edit was made by ], and it should be noted that he was also found to be socking on ruwiki (]) with 62.118.179.117 and 62.118.179.115. A further block, if not indef, is now in order here I think? --] <sup>]</sup> 20:06, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
== Your blocking of DJ Bungi ==


</div>
I only know his food images, but your accusation of him violating copy right on the images is wrong. I left my rationale on Commons, so lease compare the image "carefully" and lift his block.--] 20:10, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 -->

Latest revision as of 00:13, 19 November 2024

Note: I like to keep discussion threads together, so if you leave a message here I will usually respond here. If I have begun a discussion on your page, I'll see it if you respond there.

A {{ping}} would be appreciated if you reply at a later date. {{Talkback}} notes here will generally not be needed.

Note to new and non-logged-in editors: Due to a long-term issue with vandalism, this talkpage has unfortunately had to be semi-protected. If you need to contact me and can't post here, please just post your message on your own talkpage or the talkpage of the relevant article and add the code "{{ping|Future Perfect at Sunrise}}" to it, then I'll be sure to see it.

Archive
Archives


Hello fellow Wikipedians, due to changed circumstances in my private and professional life I am currently hovering somewhere in between "busy in real life and may not respond quickly to inquiries" and "semi-retired". I'll probably be around from time to time, but please don't rely on me for quick admin action or the like, for the time being. All the best, – Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Misplaced Pages globe and sysop mopHappy adminship anniversary!
Hi Future Perfect at Sunrise! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC) 		Party popper emoji

Reverts

If I come across one of their additions to RSN would it be helpful if I pinged you? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 20:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, but I guess it's enough to get them reverted promptly – if they then start revert-warring it back in, there should be enough admin eyeballs on that page to push the block button eventually, right? It doesn't have to be always me. That person is a pest (I suppose you're familiar with their LTA entry?), thanks for helping deal with them. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
I looked it up after their recent posts, I'll keep an eye out for them. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 23:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)