Revision as of 01:16, 3 April 2009 view sourceNug (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers22,427 edits →Regarding reversions made on April 2 2009 to Finnish Anti-Fascist Committee← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:55, 11 December 2024 view source Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,067 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Nug/Archive 3) (bot | ||
(828 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<br /><div style="text-align: center; width: 60%; margin: auto; padding: 1em; border: {{{border|solid 2px gold}}}; letter-spacing: {{{spacing|28px}}}; background-color: {{{bgcolor|black}}}; color: {{{fgcolor|white}}}; font-weight: bold;">{{{1|WIKIPEDIA}}}</div><br /> | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
|maxarchivesize = 128K | |||
- | |||
|counter = 1 | |||
- | |||
|algo = old(30d) | |||
<div style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold;">{{{2|This user has grown tired of the battleground bullshit...{{#if:{{{date|}}}| as of {{{date}}}|}}.}}}</div> | |||
|archive = User talk:Martintg/Archive %(counter)d | |||
}} | |||
'''Welcome!''' | |||
<br /> | |||
Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place <code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code> on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! ] | |||
{{archive box|auto=yes}} | |||
== Express Your opinion, please == | |||
* ] - attacked article, voting for deleting debate is going on page http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Red_army_crimes_in_Estonia | |||
*] | |||
{{unsigned|ttturbo}} | |||
== The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009) == | |||
The ''']''' of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 23:01, 3 March 2009 (UTC)</small> | |||
== 20 SS Division == | |||
Hi I have removed your last dit from the article as the links are already there in the info box and the body oof the article --] (]) 19:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election == | |||
The ] selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up ] by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 19:37, 8 March 2009 (UTC)</small> | |||
== Fresh pigs on the Pigcam == | |||
You might appreciate . It's got quite a number of pigs on right now. ]<sub>]</sub> 22:59, 20 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Another wildlife camera is in the news: . A ] has been caught on camera stealing one of the owl's eggs. ]<sub>]</sub> 15:51, 23 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Military history WikiProject coordinator election == | |||
The ] election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please ] by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 01:37, 21 March 2009 (UTC)</small> | |||
== Caution == | |||
If a user asks you to stay away from their talk page, you should consider that an absolute request. If you experience problems with that user requiring discussion, go to ] or ] and ask uninvolved editors for help. Further cornering of editors on their own talk pages may result in sanctions, especially if the dispute involves Eastern Europe or any other area under ]. Thank you. ] <sup>]</sup> 15:36, 21 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:??? Your "caution" comes almost three days after my on Russavia's talk page on March 18, in which I was attempting to resolve the issue of Russavia's increasingly strident editing. What are you doing here? ] (]) 20:36, 21 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::I am responding to a request for sanctions at ]. It has come out that you posted to Russavia's talk page after he asked you not to. That's a clear line we want to avoid crossing again. Thanks. ] <sup>]</sup> 23:43, 21 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::Well your response is misplaced. As I said, my last comment on Russvia's talk page was three days before your "caution" and two days before someone else made a complaint about Russavia's continued unprovoked incivil behaviour in a report to ], to which you refer. incivility and personal attacks for which he was clearly warned previously not to engage. I have reopened the ] report as I will be presenting evidence with diffs showing these attacks were unprovoked. ] (]) 06:11, 22 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::: Did you post to Russavia's talk page after he asked you not to? Yes or no? ] <sup>]</sup> 14:19, 22 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Notability== | |||
Hi. Regarding this PROD removal:. That link does not establish notability. Per ], " If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article." The link you provided () is not an independent secondary source, so it does establish notability. The topic of Estonia-Chile relation may yet turn out to be notable, but we need better sources. ] <sup>]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-1.040ex;">]</sub> 04:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Fair enough, however looks like some else is expanding that topic, let's see where it leads. Estonia-Iceland relations is definitely notable for the reasons stated. ] (]) 04:22, 28 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Well i just AfDed it (]) before noticing that someone had come along and started working on it. Anyways, there are 5 days before the AfD closes, that should be plenty of time for interested editors to dig up sources, assuming there are good sources out there. Cheers. ] <sup>]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-1.040ex;">]</sub> 04:31, 28 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
== No Ethnic EPithets == | |||
Hi, | |||
you might have seen the discussion at . Apparently, this sort of thing is surprisingly common on Misplaced Pages -- advocates of all sorts of weird ideas like to brand people who dare to counter them as being of "that other ethnicity". This kind of dog-whistle classification of sources into "good sources of unspecified ethnicity" and "evil sources of that other ethnicity" runs counter to the spirit of ] and, since it requires the editors to research the source's ethnicity, also ] -- but it seems Misplaced Pages doesn't have a policy that would explicitly prohibit it. We should have such a policy, perhaps named ] for 'No Ethnic EPithets'. | |||
Do you think you could draw up a proposal? ]<sub>]</sub> 07:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:You make a very good point. I will draft a proposal and drum up some discussion. ] (]) 09:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Reverts == | |||
Our flying pig reported you for 3RR on JB and Safka. This is a mistake, I believe, but you may wish to revert yourself for the time being. ] (]) 21:58, 1 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Pigs are both ] and ], and they never ]. Are you sure you haven't made a mistake? ]<sub>]</sub> 10:42, 2 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::Sure, pigs are tasty (though maybe not for Risto Abdullah), my English sucks, I meant something else. I meant our beloved eliminationists. I seem to remember that "he has a history of treating Misplaced Pages as a battleground" sounded threatening some time ago, alas, the times have long passed, which, of course, doesn't make their activity here more acceptable. Well, I am not a very honest person either, so it won't be long before they eliminate themselves, given their track record of outing, edit-warring, POV-pushing and incivility. As to the pathetic propaganda, with such friends as финский ученый Йохан Бекман, who needs enemies? He is just a worsened mirror image of the "one-man disinformation bureau", who doesn't even emit ionizing radiation and is thus plainly boring if taken seriously. ] (]) 12:22, 2 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::I think shunning is the most appropriate course of action here, let it start, and it will soon take on global dimensions. If they try to start RfAr (let alone RfA, which one of them has long dreamt of :)), they'll get what they deserve. As to their edit-warring, there is no reason to worry, Sander's tool (the public watchlist, I mean) proved to be invaluable (is it updated?), and the WikiProject Estonia is still more or less on the wheels, as I see. ] (]) 20:46, 2 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::BTW, you are most certainly wrong that the IP is not JB, but I won't insist on this, let's make the life simpler :) He is at work again. Ok, let's wait a bit. ] (]) 20:59, 2 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
== User notice: temporary 3RR block == | |||
<div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;"> | |||
==Regarding reversions made on ] ] to ]== | |||
<div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{#if:|a period of '''{{{time}}}'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for violating the ]{{#if:| at ]}}. Please be more careful to ] or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below. {{#if:|] (]) 21:36, 2 April 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> The duration of the is 24 hours. ] (]) 21:36, 2 April 2009 (UTC)</div> | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
|archiveheader = {{aan}} | |||
|maxarchivesize = 100K | |||
|counter = 3 | |||
|minthreadsleft = 0 | |||
|algo = old(7d) | |||
|archive = User talk:Nug/Archive %(counter)d | |||
}} | |||
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn | |||
|target=/Archive index | |||
|mask=/Archive <#> | |||
|leading_zeros=0 | |||
|indexhere=yes}} | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
{{unblock|This block appears to be punitive. I self-reverted my last edit at 15:06, 1 April 2009 and haven't edited the article in over 24 hours since. ] (]) 21:49, 2 April 2009 (UTC)}} | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" |{{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|]|]}} | |||
: This is the 4th revert for which you were blocked. If you self-reverted it, you certainly didn't mark it as such (you don't seem to be in the habit of marking your reverts with "rv": this is bad). Which one do you mean? ] (]) 22:00, 2 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Modest Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For tweaking the Infobox template in a way that unambiguously states the results of the dissolution of the Soviet Union | |||
|} | |||
] (]) 21:56, 16 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
== {{Wikiproject Prussia Invite}} == | |||
::I was referring to my last edit in the article, in which I revert myself after I was informed on my talk of a 3RR report, I assumed this was at issue. The article in question was subject to an intense BRD cycle, so I don't see how the first alleged revert was in fact a revert. I am surprised at the block, given the apparent consensus amongst the other editors, even Russavia, that there was no violation. In any case I have not edited the article in over 24 hours, so is this block punitive? ] (]) 22:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
] (]) | |||
::I don't see how the second and third alleged reverts are related. ] (]) 22:24, 2 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:SovietStory.gif== | |||
Your first revert re-introduces ''and the prospective Finnish Islamic Party represented by''. This seems clear enough. Why am I interested in Russavia's opin ion of this matter? ] (]) 22:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned non-free use-notice --> --] (]) 04:07, 6 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:How many edits are there in between this alleged first revert and the previous instance of it? I've gone back at least a dozen edits and still can't find it. So how are the and alleged reverts are related to each other and the text ''"and the prospective Finnish Islamic Party represented by"'' you claim was re-introduced as the first revert exactly? Given my track record and formerly clean block log, you may have given me the benefit of the doubt and issued a warning instead, remembering your rather than precipitously after input from just one side. As I said, the article in question had not been edited for quite a while, I stopped as soon as I became aware of the situation so this block comes across as punitive rather than preventative. ] (]) 22:24, 2 April 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:55, 11 December 2024
- -
This user has grown tired of the battleground bullshit....
The Modest Barnstar | ||
For tweaking the Infobox template in a way that unambiguously states the results of the dissolution of the Soviet Union |
Robert McClenon (talk) 21:56, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
== Just copy the source code and paste it on the talk page of the user you wish to invite.
This user has been invited WikiProject Prussia please consider checking us out. |
==
Orphaned non-free image File:SovietStory.gif
Thanks for uploading File:SovietStory.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:07, 6 December 2024 (UTC)