Revision as of 06:41, 5 April 2009 editRjanag (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users58,857 edits converting {{citation}} to {{cite web}}. if you want to use quotes instead of italics, this is probably the best way to do it. (EDIT CONFLICT)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:04, 28 December 2024 edit undo190.188.44.232 (talk)No edit summary | ||
(577 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|2001 aviation accident between aircraft of the US and China}} | |||
{{Infobox Military Conflict | |||
{{For|the earlier incident|1954 Cathay Pacific Douglas DC-4 shootdown}} | |||
|conflict=Hainan Island incident | |||
{{Use mdy dates|date=March 2019}} | |||
|image=] | |||
{{Infobox military conflict | |||
|caption=The damaged EP-3 on the ground on Hainan Island | |||
| conflict = Hainan Island incident | |||
|partof= | |||
| partof = | |||
|date=April 1, 2001 | |||
| image = EP-3 Hainan Island 2001.jpg | |||
|place=], China and the ] | |||
| image_size = 300px | |||
|result= American crew detained, later released. One J-8 pilot ]. | |||
| caption = The damaged EP-3 on the ground on Hainan Island. | |||
|combatant1={{flagicon|China}} China | |||
| date = {{date range|2001|04|01|2001|04|11}} | |||
|combatant2={{flagicon|United States}} United States | |||
| place = ], ], ] | |||
|commander1= | |||
| result = American crew detained, later released; one Chinese J-8 pilot ] and presumed dead | |||
|commander2= | |||
| territory = | |||
|strength1=2 ] aircraft | |||
| combatant1 = {{flag|United States}} | |||
|strength2=1 ] | |||
| combatant2 = {{flag|China}} | |||
|casualties1=1 J-8 collided, pilot missing and presumed killed in action. | |||
| commander1 = {{flagdeco|United States}} ] | |||
|casualties2=1 EP-3 heavily damaged, crash-landed, and crewmembers were detained for 10 days | |||
* Lt. ] | |||
| commander2 = {{flagdeco|China}} ] | |||
* Lt. Cdr. Wang Wei † | |||
| units1 = | |||
| units2 = | |||
| strength1 = 1 ] ] aircraft | |||
| strength2 = 2 ] aircraft | |||
| casualties1 = {{ubl|1 EP-3E damaged and captured|24 aircrew captured and detained}} | |||
| casualties2 = {{ubl|1 J-8 destroyed|1 pilot missing, presumed dead}} | |||
| casualties3 = | |||
| notes = | |||
| campaignbox = | |||
}} | }} | ||
On April 1, 2001, a ] between a ] ] signals ] and a ] (PLAN) ] ] ] ] resulted in an ] between the United States and China called the '''Hainan Island incident'''. | |||
The '''Hainan Island incident''' was a ten-day ] between the United States and the People's Republic of China (PRC) that resulted from a mid-air collision between a ] EP-3E ARIES II ] aircraft and a ] ] interceptor on April 1, 2001. | |||
The EP-3 was operating about {{convert|70|mi|km}} away from the Chinese island of ] when it was intercepted by two J-8 fighters. A collision between the EP-3 and one of the J-8s caused the death of a Chinese pilot, while the EP-3 was forced to make an ] on Hainan. The 24 crew were detained and interrogated by the Chinese authorities until a letter of apology was issued by the United States Government. It was the first foreign policy crisis in the presidency of ]. | |||
The ] was flying over the South China sea at a point roughly midway between ] and the ] when it was intercepted by two J-8II fighters. A collision between the EP-3 and one of the J-8s caused damage to the EP-3 and the loss of the J-8 and its pilot. The EP-3 was forced to make an emergency landing on Hainan without permission from the PRC, and its 24 crew members were detained and interrogated by Chinese authorities until a statement was delivered by the United States government regarding the incident. The ambiguous phrasing of the statement allowed both countries to save face and defused a potentially volatile situation.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Tapper |first1=Jake |last2=Lindsey |first2=Daryl |last3=Montgomery |first3=Alicia |title=War of words |url=https://www.salon.com/2001/04/12/china_28/ |website=] |access-date=September 28, 2010 |language=en |date=April 13, 2001 |archive-date=August 6, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220806144552/https://www.salon.com/2001/04/12/china_28/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="wiley1">{{cite journal|title = Culture and apology: The Hainan Island incident|year =2001|doi =10.1111/1467-971X.00222|last1 =Zhang|first1 =Hang|journal =World Englishes|volume =20|issue =3|pages =383–391}}</ref> | |||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
This sea area includes the ], which are claimed by the PRC and several other countries. It is one of the most strategically sensitive areas in the world.<ref name="Brookes102">{{Harvnb|Brookes|2002|p=102}}</ref> | |||
The United States and China disagree on the legality of the overflights by U.S. naval aircraft of the area where the incident occurred. This part of the ] comprises part of China's exclusive economic zone based on the ]. China is a signatory to this Convention and while the United States is not, according to naval officials it "operate...within the provisions of the Law of the Sea Convention in every area related to navigation."<ref>, retrieved April 4, 2009</ref> Part V, Article 58 of the Convention states in relation to exclusive economic zones that: "all States...enjoy...the freedoms...of navigation and overflight," but notes that "States shall...shall comply with the laws and regulations adopted by the coastal State...in so far as they are not incompatible with this Part." <ref>{{cite web |title = United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea|url = http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm|publisher = ]| accessdate = March 24, 2009}}</ref> China interprets the Convention as allowing it to preclude other nations' military operations within this area, while the United States maintains that the Convention grants free navigation for all countries' aircaft and ships, including military aircraft and ships, within a country's exclusive economic zone. | |||
The United States and the People's Republic of China disagree on the legality of the overflights by U.S. naval aircraft of the area where the incident occurred. This part of the ] comprises part of the PRC's exclusive economic zone based on the ] (UNCLOS) and the Chinese claim that the Paracel Islands belong to China. This claim was acknowledged by Vietnam in 1958 but it has since reversed itself to contest the claim after the end of the ] in 1975. The United States remains neutral in this dispute, but patrols the sea regularly with naval ships and airplanes, during what it terms ] operations. The PRC interprets the convention as allowing it to preclude other nations' military operations within this area, but the United States does not recognize China's claim for the Paracel Islands and maintains that the Convention grants free navigation for all countries' aircraft and ships, including military aircraft and ships, within a country's exclusive economic zone.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-13748349 |work=BBC News |title=Why is the South China Sea contentious? |date=12 July 2016 |access-date=March 30, 2020 |archive-date=October 17, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131017162612/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-13748349 |url-status=live }}</ref> Although the United States is not party to UNCLOS, it has accepted and complies with nearly all of the treaty's provisions.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Almond |first1=Roncevert Ganan |url=https://thediplomat.com/2017/05/u-s-ratification-of-the-law-of-the-sea-convention/ |work=] |title=U.S. Ratification of the Law of the Sea Convention |date=May 24, 2017 |access-date=March 30, 2020 |archive-date=August 6, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220806144553/https://thediplomat.com/2017/05/u-s-ratification-of-the-law-of-the-sea-convention/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
China's ] force is based at Hainan.<ref>{{cite web |title = Wuhu Airbase|url = http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/wuhu.htm|publisher = globalsecurity.org| accessdate = March 21, 2009}}</ref> The island also houses a large ] facility which tracks U.S. activity in the area and monitors traffic from commercial communications satellites.<ref>{{cite web |title = Lingshui Air Base|url = http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/lingshui.htm|publisher = globalsecurity.org | accessdate = March 21, 2009}}</ref> As early as May 22, 1951, Hainan was targeted at the behest of U.S. Naval Intelligence for ] surveillance overflights, using ]s based at ] in Hong Kong.<ref>Peebles, Curtis, ''Shadow Flights: America's Secret Air War Against the Soviet Union'': Presidio Press, 2001. pp. 16-18 ISBN 0-89141-768-0</ref> This sea area includes the ], which are claimed by China and several other nations. It is one of the most strategically sensitive areas in the world.<ref name="Brookes102">{{Harvnb|Brookes|2002|p=102}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
== In the air == | |||
A PRC ] force is based at Hainan.<ref>{{cite web|title = Wuhu Airbase|url = http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/wuhu.htm|publisher = globalsecurity.org|access-date = March 21, 2009|archive-date = August 24, 2021|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210824163819/https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/wuhu.htm|url-status = live}}</ref> The island also houses a large ] facility that tracks civil and military activity in the area and monitors traffic from commercial communications satellites.<ref>{{cite web|title = Lingshui Air Base|url = http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/lingshui.htm|publisher = globalsecurity.org|access-date = March 21, 2009|archive-date = August 6, 2022|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20220806144859/https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/lingshui.htm|url-status = live}}</ref> The United States has long kept the island under surveillance; on May 22, 1951, for example, ] ] based at Hong Kong's ] flew ] missions at the behest of U.S. naval intelligence.<ref>Peebles, Curtis, ''Shadow Flights: America's Secret Air War Against the Soviet Union'': Presidio Press, 2001. pp. 16–18 {{ISBN|0-89141-768-0}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
The EP-3 (BuNo ''156511''), assigned to Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron One (VQ-1, "World Watchers"), had taken off as Mission PR32 from ] in ], Japan. At about 09:15 local time, toward the end of the EP-3's six-hour ] mission, two Chinese J-8s from Lingshui airfield, on the Chinese island of ], approached the EP-3 as it flew at {{convert|22000|ft|m}} and {{convert|180|kn|mph}}, on a heading of 110°, about {{convert|70|mi|km}} away from the island. One of the J-8s (''81192''), piloted by ] Wang Wei,<ref>{{Citation | publisher = Key Publishing| location = Stamford, Lincolnshire | title = Air Forces Monthly | date = May 2001 | volume = 158 | page = 4}}</ref><ref>{{Citation | title = Air Forces Monthly | publisher = Key Publishing| location = Stamford, Lincolnshire | date = June 2001 | volume = 159 | page =79}}</ref> made two close passes to the EP-3. On the third pass, it collided with the surveillance aircraft. The J-8 broke into two pieces, while the EP-3's ] detached completely and its No. 1 (outer left) propeller was severely damaged. ] and altitude data were lost, the aircraft depressurized, and an ] became wrapped around the tailplane. The J-8's tail fin struck the EP-3's left ] forcing it fully upright, and causing the U.S. plane to roll to the left at 3–4 times its normal maximum rate.<ref name="Brookes102"/> | |||
==In the air== | |||
] | |||
On April 1, 2001, the EP-3 (BuNo ''156511''), assigned to Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron One (VQ-1, "World Watchers"), had taken off as Mission PR32 from ] in ], Japan. At about 9:15 a.m. local time, toward the end of the EP-3's six-hour ] mission, it was flying at {{convert|22000|ft|m}} and {{convert|180|kn|mph km/h}}, on a heading of 110°, about {{convert|70|mi|km}} away from the island. Two Chinese J-8s from Hainan's Lingshui airfield approached. One of the J-8s (''81194''),<ref>{{cite news |title=不是81192号:中美撞机事件王伟烈士座机到底是哪架 |url=http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/jssd/2017-04-04/doc-ifycwymx3653549.shtml |access-date=2 May 2023 |agency=新浪军事 |publisher=Sina |date=April 4, 2017 |archive-date=April 12, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170412143402/http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/jssd/2017-04-04/doc-ifycwymx3653549.shtml |url-status=live }}</ref> piloted by ] Wang Wei,<ref>{{Cite magazine| publisher = Key Publishing| location = Stamford, Lincolnshire| magazine = Air Forces Monthly|date=May 2001| issue = 158| page = 4}}{{full citation needed|date=July 2024}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine| magazine = Air Forces Monthly| publisher = Key Publishing| location = Stamford, Lincolnshire| date = June 2001| issue = 159| page =79}}{{Full citation needed|date=July 2024}}</ref> made two close passes to the EP-3. On the third pass, it collided with the larger aircraft. The J-8 broke into two pieces; the EP-3's ] detached completely and its No. 1 (outer left) propeller was damaged severely. Airspeed and altitude data were lost, the aircraft depressurized, and an antenna became wrapped around the ]. The J-8's tail fin struck the EP-3's left ], forcing it fully upright, and causing the U.S. aircraft to roll to the left at three to four times its normal maximum rate.<ref name="Brookes102"/><ref name="Intercept" >{{cite web |url=https://theintercept.com/2017/04/10/snowden-documents-reveal-scope-of-secrets-exposed-to-china-in-2001-spy-plane-incident/ |title=Snowden Documents Reveal Scope of Secrets Exposed to China in 2001 Spy Plane Incident |first=Kim |last=Zetter |date=April 10, 2017 |access-date=April 11, 2017 |website=] |archive-date=July 18, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220718185514/https://theintercept.com/2017/04/10/snowden-documents-reveal-scope-of-secrets-exposed-to-china-in-2001-spy-plane-incident/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
The impact sent the EP-3 into a 30° dive at a bank angle of 130°, almost inverted. It dropped {{convert|8000|ft|m}} in 30 seconds, and fell another {{convert|6000|ft|m}} before the pilot, ] ], got the EP-3's wings level and the nose up.<ref name="findarticles.com">{{cite web | title = Lt. Shane Osborn: looking at a miracle | url = http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0IAX/is_6_85/ai_110732276 | publisher = Naval Aviation News | date = September–October 2003 | accessdate = March 24, 2009}}</ref> In a September 2003 article in ''Naval Aviation News'', Osborn said that once he regained control of the plane he "called for the crew to prepare to bail out."<ref name="findarticles.com"/> He then managed to control the aircraft's descent by using emergency power on the working engines, such that an emergency landing on Hainan became a possibility.<ref>{{Harvnb|Brookes|2002|p=103}}</ref> | |||
] ''81192'', a different aircraft piloted by Lt Cdr Wang Wei in an earlier altercation with an American EP-3E.]] | |||
For the next 26 minutes the crew of the EP-3 carried out an emergency plan which included destroying sensitive items on board the aircraft, such as electronic equipment related to intelligence gathering, documents and data. Part of this plan involved pouring freshly-brewed hot coffee into ]s and ]s.<ref>{{Harvnb|Brookes|2002|p=104}}</ref> | |||
The impact sent the EP-3 into a 30° dive at a bank angle of 130°, almost inverted. It dropped {{convert|8000|ft|m}} in 30 seconds, and fell another {{convert|6000|ft|m}} before the pilot, ] ], got the EP-3's wings level and the nose up.<ref name="NAN">{{cite news|title=Lt. Shane Osborn: looking at a miracle |url=http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/2000s/2003/so03/osborn.pdf |publisher=Naval Aviation News |date=September–October 2003 |access-date=September 27, 2011 |first=Jim |last=Turnbull |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130513020628/http://www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/2000s/2003/so03/osborn.pdf |archive-date=May 13, 2013 }}</ref> In a September 2003 article in ''Naval Aviation News'', Osborn said that once he regained control of the aircraft, he "called for the crew to prepare to bail out".<ref name="Intercept" /><ref name="NAN"/> He then managed to control the aircraft's descent by using emergency power on the working engines, allowing him to plan an emergency landing on Hainan.<ref>{{Harvnb|Brookes|2002|p=103}}</ref> | |||
] |
] | ||
The EP-3 made an unauthorized emergency landing at Lingshui airfield, after at least 15 ]s had gone unanswered, with the ] selected on the ]. It landed at {{convert|170|kn|mph}}, with no ], no ], and a damaged left ], weighing {{convert|108000|lb|kg}}. Following the collision, the failure of the nose cone had disabled the No. 3 (inner right) engine, and the No. 1 propeller could not be ], leading to increased drag on that side. There was no working ] or ], and Osborn used full right aileron during the landing. Meanwhile, the surviving Chinese interceptor had landed there 10 minutes earlier.<ref>{{Harvnb|Brookes|2002|p=109}}</ref> | |||
For the next 26 minutes, the crew of the EP-3 performed an emergency plan which included destroying sensitive items aboard the aircraft, such as electronic equipment related to intelligence-gathering, documents and data. Part of this plan involved pouring freshly brewed coffee into disk drives and motherboards and using an axe from the plane's survival kit to destroy hard drives.<ref>{{Harvnb|Brookes|2002|p=104}}</ref> The crew had not been formally trained on how to destroy sensitive documents and equipment, and so improvised. As a result of the destruction, the plane's interior was later described as resembling "the aftermath of a frat party".<ref name="Intercept" /> | |||
Lt. Cdr. Wang was seen to eject after the collision, but the Pentagon said that the damage to the underside of the EP-3 could mean that the cockpit of the Chinese fighter jet was crushed, making it impossible for the pilot to survive.<ref>{{cite web | title = Chinese Plane Flew Too Close | url = http://www.taiwandc.org/latimes-2001-01.htm | last = Richter | first = Paul | publisher = taiwandc.org | date = April 6, 2001| accessdate = March 24, 2009}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Brookes|2002|p=108}}</ref> Wang's body was never recovered and he was declared dead. | |||
Osborn made an unauthorized emergency landing at Lingshui airfield, after at least 15 ]s had gone unanswered, with the ] selected on the ]. It landed at {{convert|170|kn|mph km/h}}, with no ], no ], and a damaged left ], weighing {{convert|108000|lb|kg}}. After the collision, the failure of the nose cone had disabled the No. 3 (inner right) engine, and the No. 1 propeller could not be ], resulting in increased drag on that side. There was no working ] or ], and Osborn used full right aileron during the landing. The surviving Chinese interceptor had landed there 10 minutes earlier.<ref>{{Harvnb|Brookes|2002|p=109}}</ref> | |||
=== Cause of collision === | |||
Both the cause of the collision and the assignment of blame were disputed. The American government claimed that the Chinese jet bumped the wing of the larger, slower, and less maneuverable EP-3. The U.S. released video footage from previous missions which revealed that American reconnaissance crews had previously been intercepted by Lt. Cdr. Wang. During one such incident, he was shown approaching so close that his ] address could be read from a sign that he was holding up. Based on the account of Wang Wei's ], the Chinese government stated that the American plane "veered at a wide angle towards the Chinese", in the process ramming the J-8.<ref name="Brookes107">{{Harvnb|Brookes|2002|p=107}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/1275404.stm | title = Chinese jet 'snapped in two' | publisher = ]| date = April 13, 2001| accessdate = March 13, 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url = http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/04/01/us.china.plane.03/ | title = U.S. aircraft collides with Chinese fighter, forced to land | publisher = ] | date = April 1, 2001| accessdate = March 13, 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | last = Richter | first = Paul | url = http://www.taiwandc.org/latimes-2001-01.htm | title = Chinese Plane Flew Too Close | publisher = taiwandc.org | date = April 6, 2001| accessdate = March 13, 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=3&art_id=qw987678182850P610 | title = China says video shows US plane caused crash | publisher = iol.co.za | date = April 19, 2001| last = Eckert | first = Paul | accessdate = March 13, 2009}}</ref> | |||
Wang was seen to eject after the collision, but the Pentagon said that the damage to the underside of the EP-3 could mean that the cockpit of the Chinese fighter jet was crushed, making it impossible for the pilot to survive.<ref>{{cite web| title = Chinese Plane Flew Too Close| url = http://www.taiwandc.org/latimes-2001-01.htm| last = Richter| first = Paul| publisher = taiwandc.org| date = April 6, 2001| access-date = March 24, 2009| archive-date = March 30, 2010| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100330073830/http://www.taiwandc.org/latimes-2001-01.htm| url-status = live}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Brookes|2002|p=108}}</ref> Wang's body was never recovered, and he was presumed dead. | |||
== On the ground == | |||
For 15 minutes after landing, the U.S. aircraft crew continued to destroy sensitive items and data on board the aircraft, as per ] protocol. They disembarked from the plane after soldiers looked through windows, pointed guns, and shouted through ]. The Chinese offered them water and cigarettes. Kept under close guard, they were taken to a military barracks at ] where they were interrogated for two nights before being moved to a lodge at ], the island's main city. They were treated well in general, but were interrogated at all hours, and so suffered from ]. They found the un-Westernized ] unpalatable as it included fish heads, but this later improved. Guards gave them ] and an English-language newspaper. To pass the time and keep spirits up, Lts. Honeck and Vignery worked up humorous routines based on the television shows '']'', '']'' and '']''. These were performed as they went to meals, the only time they were together. They gradually developed good relations with their guards, with one guard inquiring of them the lyric for the song "]" by the ].<ref>{{Harvnb|Brookes|2002|p=105}}</ref> | |||
===Cause of collision=== | |||
Three U.S. diplomats were sent to Hainan to meet the crew and assess their conditions, and to negotiate their release. They were first allowed to meet with the crew three days after the collision. U.S. officials complained at the slow pace of the Chinese decision.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/us-diplomats-meet-with-spy-plane-crew-753137.html | title = US diplomats meet with spy plane crew | publisher = '']'' | date = April 3, 2001| accessdate = March 24, 2009}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
Both the cause of the collision and the assignment of blame were disputed: | |||
*The U.S. government stated that the Chinese jet bumped the wing of the larger, slower, and less maneuverable EP-3. After returning to U.S. soil, the pilot of the EP-3, Lt. Shane Osborn, was allowed to make a brief statement in which he said that the EP-3 was on autopilot and in straight-and-level flight at the time of the collision. He stated that he was just "guarding the autopilot" in his interview with '']''.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220802020618/https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/china/interviews/osborn.html |date=August 2, 2022 }}, retrieved August 28, 2009.</ref> The U.S. released video footage from previous missions which revealed that American reconnaissance crews had previously been intercepted by the same aircraft.<ref name="Hotdog video">{{cite news|last1=Kates|first1=Brian|title=U.S. Blames China's Hot-dogging Pilots Harassment in Midair Seen as Cause of Crash|url=http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/u-s-blames-china-hot-dogging-pilots-harassment-midair-crash-article-1.915724|access-date=December 5, 2016|work=New York Daily News|date=April 14, 2001|archive-date=August 27, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170827165605/http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/u-s-blames-china-hot-dogging-pilots-harassment-midair-crash-article-1.915724|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
*The Chinese government stated that, according to Wang Wei's ], the American aircraft "veered at a wide angle towards the Chinese", in the process ramming the J-8.<ref name="Brookes107">{{Harvnb|Brookes|2002|p=107}}</ref><ref name="Chinese jet 'snapped in two'">{{cite news| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/1275404.stm| title = Chinese jet 'snapped in two'| work = ]| date = April 13, 2001| access-date = March 13, 2009| archive-date = March 14, 2003| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20030314235001/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/1275404.stm| url-status = live}}</ref><ref name="archives.cnn.com">{{cite news|url=http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/04/01/us.china.plane.03/ |title=U.S. aircraft collides with Chinese fighter, forced to land |publisher=CNN |date=April 1, 2001 |access-date=March 13, 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081211063330/http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/04/01/us.china.plane.03/ |archive-date=December 11, 2008 }}</ref><ref name="Richter">{{cite web| last = Richter| first = Paul| url = http://www.taiwandc.org/latimes-2001-01.htm| title = Chinese Plane Flew Too Close| publisher = taiwandc.org| date = April 6, 2001| access-date = March 13, 2009| archive-date = March 30, 2010| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100330073830/http://www.taiwandc.org/latimes-2001-01.htm| url-status = live}}</ref><ref name="Eckert">{{cite web| url = https://www.iol.co.za/news/world/china-says-video-shows-us-plane-caused-crash-64570| title = China says video shows US plane caused crash| publisher = iol.co.za| date = April 19, 2001| last = Eckert| first = Paul| access-date = March 13, 2009| archive-date = February 10, 2023| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230210175604/https://www.iol.co.za/news/world/china-says-video-shows-us-plane-caused-crash-64570| url-status = live}}</ref> | |||
Neither claim can be verified since the Chinese government did not release data from the ]s of either aircraft, both of which are in its possession.<ref name="Brookes107"/><ref name="Chinese jet 'snapped in two'"/><ref name="archives.cnn.com"/><ref name="Richter"/><ref name="Eckert"/> | |||
The 24 crew-members (including three women<ref>{{Harvnb|Brookes|2002|p=101}}</ref>) were detained until April 11, shortly after the U.S. issued the "letter of the two sorries" to the Chinese. The Chinese military boarded the plane and thoroughly stripped and examined the aircraft's equipment. Reliable sources have speculated that the crew were only partially successful in their destruction of the on-board data and technology, although no official information has been released.<ref>{{Harvnb|Brookes|2002|p=110}}</ref> | |||
== |
==On the ground== | ||
For 15 minutes after landing, the EP-3 crew continued to destroy sensitive items and data on board the aircraft, as per protocol. They disembarked from the aircraft after soldiers looked through windows, pointed guns and shouted through bullhorns. The Chinese offered them water and cigarettes. Guarded closely, they were taken to a military barracks at ] where they were interrogated for two nights before being moved to lodgings in ], the provincial capital and largest city on the island. They were generally treated well. However, they were interrogated at all hours and thus suffered from lack of sleep. They found the Chinese food unpalatable as it included fish heads, but this later improved. Guards gave them decks of cards and an English-language newspaper. To pass the time and keep spirits up, Lts. Honeck and Vignery worked up humorous routines based on the television shows '']'', '']'' and '']''. These were performed as they went to meals, the only time they were together. They gradually developed good relations with their guards, with one guard inquiring of them the lyrics for the song "]" by the ].<ref>{{Harvnb|Brookes|2002|p=105}}</ref> | |||
Three U.S. diplomats were sent to Hainan to meet the crew, assess their conditions and to negotiate the crew's release. The diplomats were first allowed to meet with the crew three days after the incident. U.S. officials complained about China's delays in this regard.<ref>{{cite news| url = https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/us-diplomats-meet-with-spy-plane-crew-753137.html| title = US diplomats meet with spy plane crew| newspaper = ]| date = April 3, 2001| access-date =March 24, 2009 | location=London}}{{dead link|date=August 2021|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> | |||
The 24 crew members (21 men and 3 women)<ref>{{Harvnb|Brookes|2002|p=101}}</ref> were detained for 10 days in total and were released soon after the U.S. issued the "letter of the two sorries" to the Chinese. The crew was only partially successful in their destruction of classified material. Some of the material they failed to destroy included ], ] manuals, and the names of ] employees.<ref name="Intercept" /> Some of the captured computers contained detailed information for processing PROFORMA communications from ], ], ], ] and other countries.<ref name="Intercept" /> The plane also carried information on the emitter parameters for U.S.-allied ] systems worldwide.<ref name="Intercept" /> China also discovered that the United States could track ] ] via signal transmission.<ref name="Intercept" /> | |||
==Letter of the two sorries== | |||
{{Wikisource|Letter of the two sorries}} | {{Wikisource|Letter of the two sorries}} | ||
The "Letter of the two sorries"<ref>{{cite news | url=http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0104/11/bn.24.html | work=CNN | title=China Promises Releases of U.S. Crewmembers | date=April 11, 2001 | access-date=October 1, 2010 | archive-date=March 8, 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308002959/http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0104/11/bn.24.html | url-status=live }}</ref> was the letter delivered by the United States Ambassador ] to ] ] of the People's Republic of China to end the incident. Upon delivery of the letter, China released the detained crew and eventually returned the disassembled aircraft.<ref name="Brookes107"/> The letter stated that the United States was "very sorry" for the death of Chinese pilot Wang Wei ({{lang|zh-hans|王伟}}) and was "very sorry" the aircraft entered China's airspace, additionally apologizing because its landing did not have "verbal clearance".<ref>Lindsey, Daryl et al. " {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308151350/https://www.salon.com/2001/04/12/china_28/ |date=March 8, 2021 }}". Salon.com, April 12, 2001, retrieved on March 21, 2009</ref> The United States stated that it was "not a letter of apology"–as then characterized by state-owned Chinese media outlets–but that instead it was "an expression of regret and sorrow".<ref name="wiley1"/> China had originally asked for an apology, but the U.S. explained, "We did not do anything wrong, and therefore it was not possible to apologize".<ref>{{cite web |url = http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Bush+pleased+by+release+of+U.S.+crew+from+China-a073374676 |title = Bush pleased by release of U.S. crew from China |access-date = October 3, 2010 |archive-date = March 7, 2022 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20220307121039/https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Bush%20pleased%20by%20release%20of%20U.S.%20crew%20from%20China-a073374676 |url-status = live }}</ref> | |||
The "Letter of the two sorries" was the letter delivered by the United States Ambassador ] to ] ] of the People's Republic of China to defuse the incident. The delivery of the letter led to the release of the U.S. crew from Chinese custody, as well as the eventual return of the disassembled plane.<ref name="Brookes107"/> | |||
There was further debate over the exact meaning of the Chinese translation issued by the U.S. Embassy. A senior administration official was quoted as saying "What the Chinese will choose to characterize as an apology, we would probably choose to characterize as an expression of regret or sorrow".<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2001/04/12/81342| title=China, US agree on freeing plane crew| work=Taipei Times| date=April 12, 2001| access-date=March 21, 2009| archive-date=May 13, 2021| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210513151807/https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2001/04/12/81342| url-status=live}}</ref> Chinese President ] accepted the expression of "very sorry" as consistent with the formal apology that China had sought, and so China released the Americans thereafter.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last=Zhao |first=Suisheng |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781503634152 |title=The Dragon Roars Back: Transformational Leaders and Dynamics of Chinese Foreign Policy |date=2023 |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-5036-3415-2 |location=Stanford, California |pages=64 |doi=10.1515/9781503634152 |access-date=January 4, 2023 |archive-date=April 13, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230413153307/https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781503634152/html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
The letter stated that the United States was "very sorry" for the death of Chinese pilot Wang Wei, and "We are very sorry the entering of China's airspace and the landing did not have verbal clearance ...".<ref> Lindsey, Daryl et al. . Salon.com, April 12, 2001, retrieved on March 21, 2009</ref> | |||
==Aftermath== | |||
There was further debate over the exact meaning of the Chinese translation issued by the U.S. Embassy. A senior administration official was quoted as saying "What the Chinese will choose to characterize as an apology, we would probably choose to characterize as an expression of regret or sorrow."<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2001/04/12/81342 | title=China, US agree on freeing plane crew | work=Taipei Times | date=April 12, 2001 | accessdate=March 21, 2009}}</ref> | |||
<!--] Removed pending clarification on the FAC page--> | |||
The crew of the EP-3 was released on April 11, 2001, and returned to their base at ] via ], where they were subject to two days of debriefings.<ref name="Brookes107"/> The pilot, Lt. ], was awarded the ] for "heroism and extraordinary achievement" in flight. The J-8B pilot, Wang Wei, was posthumously honored in China as a "Guardian of Territorial Airspace and Waters".<ref name="Brookes107"/> His widow received a personal letter of condolence from US President ].<ref>{{cite news| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/s/w_asia/1268184.stm| title = US spy crew 'in excellent health{{'-}}| work = BBC Online| date = April 9, 2001| access-date = March 13, 2009| archive-date = May 26, 2004| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20040526090704/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/s/w_asia/1268184.stm| url-status = dead}}</ref> | |||
] Curtis Towne.]] | |||
== Aftermath == | |||
U.S. Navy engineers said the EP-3 could be repaired in 8–12 months,<ref>{{cite news| title = Spy plane might not fly home| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1341332.stm| work = BBC Online| date = May 20, 2001| access-date = March 13, 2009| archive-date = August 6, 2022| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20220806144900/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1341332.stm| url-status = live}}</ref> but China refused to allow it to be flown off Hainan island. The disassembled aircraft was released on July 3, 2001, and was returned to the United States by the Russian airline ] in two ]s.<ref>{{cite news| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/1380725.stm| title = Russians to fly out spy plane| work = BBC Online| date = June 10, 2001| access-date = March 13, 2009| archive-date = October 18, 2002| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20021018180454/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/1380725.stm| url-status = live}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | last = Osborn | first = Shane | title = Born to Fly: The Untold Story of the Downed American Reconnaissance Plane | publisher = Broadway Books | date =2001 | isbn = 0-7679-1111-3}}</ref> Repairs were performed at Lockheed Martin in ], for reassembly and to make it flightworthy again. The aircraft was then flown to ] in ] for missionization as they were the main provider of EP-3 maintenance and modernization at the time.<ref>{{cite magazine |title=The U.S. Navy EP-3 recovered from Hainan Island, China, has been delivered to Dobbins AFB at Marietta, Ga. |url=https://aviationweek.com/awin/us-navy-ep-3-recovered-hainan-island-china-has-been-delivered-dobbins-afb-marietta-ga |access-date=August 26, 2019 |magazine=] |date=July 9, 2001 |language=en |archive-date=October 11, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221011230708/https://aviationweek.com/awin/us-navy-ep-3-recovered-hainan-island-china-has-been-delivered-dobbins-afb-marietta-ga |url-status=live }}</ref> The aircraft returned to duty prior to 2013.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHRU6Qg98sk |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211221/yHRU6Qg98sk |archive-date=2021-12-21 |url-status=live|title=US Navy 156511 EP-3 Go Around Portland Airport (PDX)}}{{cbignore}}</ref> | |||
] Curtis Towne.)]] | |||
<!--] Removed pending clarification on the FAC page--> | |||
The crew of the EP-3 was released on April 11, 2001, and returned to their base at ] via ], Hawaii, where they were subject to two days of intense debriefings, followed by a hero's welcome.<ref name="Brookes107"/> The pilot, Lt. ], was awarded the ] for "heroism and extraordinary achievement" in flight, while the J-8 pilot, Lt. Cdr. Wang Wei, was posthumously honored in China as a "Guardian of Territorial Airspace and Waters".<ref name="Brookes107"/> His widow received a personal letter of condolence from President ].<ref>{{cite web | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/s/w_asia/1268184.stm | title = US spy crew 'in excellent health | publisher = BBC Online | date = April 9, 2001| accessdate = March 13, 2009}}</ref> | |||
In addition to paying for the dismantling and shipping of the EP-3, the United States paid US$34,567 for the 11 days of food and lodging supplied by the Chinese government to the aircraft's crew.<ref>{{cite news |last=Mufson |first=Steven |url=http://www.chron.com/news/nation-world/article/U-S-to-pay-China-34-567-related-to-spy-plane-2054396.php |title=US to pay China $34,567 related to spy plane incident |newspaper=The Washington Post |publisher=Hearst Newspapers |date=August 10, 2001 |access-date=July 15, 2016 |archive-date=August 6, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220806144553/https://www.chron.com/news/nation-world/article/U-S-to-pay-China-34-567-related-to-spy-plane-2054396.php |url-status=live }}</ref> The Chinese had demanded one million dollars compensation from the U.S. for the lost J-8 and their pilot, but this was refused without further negotiations. | |||
U.S. Navy engineers said the EP-3 could be repaired in 8–12 months,<ref>{{cite web | title = Spy plane might not fly home | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1341332.stm | publisher = BBC Online | date = May 20, 2001| accessdate = March 13, 2009}}</ref> but China refused to allow it to be flown off Hainan island. The disassembled aircraft was released on July 3, 2001, and was returned to the United States by the Russian company Polyot in an ].<ref>{{cite web | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/1380725.stm | title = Russians to fly out spy plane | publisher = BBC Online | date = June 10, 2001| accessdate = March 13, 2009}}</ref> It was eventually reassembled and returned to duty. | |||
The incident occurred ten weeks after George W. Bush's presidential inauguration and was his first foreign policy crisis. Both countries were criticized after the event: the Chinese for making a bluff which was called without any real concessions from America other than the "Letter of the two sorries"; and the U.S. first for being insensitive immediately after the event and later for issuing the letter rather than being more oppositional.<ref>{{cite news| url = http://www.economist.com/agenda/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_VSGTDP| title = Chinese poker| newspaper = The Economist| date = April 17, 2001| access-date = March 13, 2009| archive-date = February 25, 2021| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210225010048/https://www.economist.com/?story_id=E1_VSGTDP| url-status = live}}</ref> The United States tried to be conciliatory in order to try to avoid Chinese objections to U.S. foreign policy, which became more important after the ] and at the beginning of the ].<ref>{{Cite book|last=Henriksen|first=Thomas H.|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781009053242/type/book|title=America's Wars: Interventions, Regime Change, and Insurgencies after the Cold War|date=2022-01-31|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-1-009-05324-2|edition=1|doi=10.1017/9781009053242.005|s2cid=245269947|access-date=February 4, 2022|archive-date=August 2, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220802044357/https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/americas-wars/0EF1A3F2EDA536EAD994C59057E6E273|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
In addition to paying for the dismantling and shipping of the EP-3, the United States paid for the 11 days of food and lodging supplied by the Chinese government to the aircraft's crew, in the amount of $34,000. The Chinese had demanded one million dollars compensation from the U.S. for the lost J-8 and their pilot, but this was declined and no further negotiations were held. One Republican congressman, ], described the episode as "communist piracy" and Chinese demands for compensation as "the deluded daydreams of a despotic regime".<ref>{{cite web | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/1483201.stm | title = China paid $34,000 over spy plane | publisher = BBC Online | date = August 9, 2001| accessdate = March 13, 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.law.nyu.edu/idcplg?IdcService=GET_FILE&dDocName=ECM_DLV_015782&RevisionSelectionMethod=LatestReleased | title = International Law and Justice Working Papers | publisher = ILJ Working Paper | date = December 2006| format = RTF | accessdate = March 13, 2009}}</ref> | |||
Among the Chinese public, the incident created ] and increased feelings of ].<ref name=":0" /> Despite the fact that the destroyed aircraft carried the serial number 81194, footage of Lt Cdr Wang Wei piloting airplane J-8B bearing serial number 81192 in a similar incident earlier in the year was popularized and became a national icon for both the PLANAF and the Chinese nation.{{citation needed|date=September 2024}} | |||
The incident took place ten weeks after the inauguration of George W. Bush as president and was his first foreign policy crisis. Both sides were criticized following the event; the Chinese for making a bluff which was called without any real concessions from the American side other than the "Letter of the two sorries", and the Americans both for being too harsh and insensitive immediately after the event, and then later for issuing the letter rather than taking a harder line.<ref>{{Citation | title = ]| publisher = Economist Publishing| location = London | date = April 17, 2001 | volume = | page =}}</ref> | |||
After the collision, China's briefly lessened aggressiveness in monitoring of reconnaissance flights.<ref>{{cite news| last = Ellison| first = Michael| url = https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/jul/30/china.usa| title = China eases spy plane surveillance| work = ]| date = July 30, 2001| access-date = March 13, 2009| location = London| archive-date = August 6, 2022| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20220806144858/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/jul/30/china.usa| url-status = live}}</ref> Flights of U.S. surveillance aircraft near the Chinese coastline continued as before the incident.<ref>{{cite news|last=Martin |first=Dan |url=https://news.yahoo.com/china-tells-us-halt-spy-plane-flights-report-061346358.html |title=China tells US to halt spy plane flights |work=Yahoo! News |date=July 27, 2011 |access-date=August 21, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110822165923/http://news.yahoo.com/china-tells-us-halt-spy-plane-flights-report-061346358.html |archive-date=August 22, 2011 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-usa-spy-idUSTRE76Q3YK20110727?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews |title=China protests U.S. spy flights near its coast |work=Reuters |date=July 27, 2011 |access-date=August 21, 2011 |first=Ben |last=Blanchard |archive-date=March 12, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170312143330/http://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-usa-spy-idUSTRE76Q3YK20110727?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Following the collision, China's monitoring of reconnaissance flights was less aggressive.<ref>{{cite web | last = Ellison | first = Michael | url = http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/jul/30/china.usa | title = China eases spy plane surveillance | publisher = '']'' | date = July 30, 2001| accessdate = March 13, 2009}}</ref> | |||
Hainan is currently the home of the PLAN ], an underground facility |
Hainan is currently the home of the ] (PLAN) ], an underground facility capable of supporting nuclear ]s.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2008/04/new-chinese-ssbn-deploys-to-hainan-island-naval-base.php|title=New Chinese SSBN Deploys to Hainan Island|date=April 24, 2008|access-date=March 21, 2009|publisher=]|archive-date=January 18, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130118124907/http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2008/04/new-chinese-ssbn-deploys-to-hainan-island-naval-base.php|url-status=live}}</ref> During March 2009, Chinese ships and aircraft approached the ], an ] of the U.S. Navy while operating {{convert|75|mi|km}} south of Hainan. Pentagon officials characterized the actions as "aggressive" and "harassment".<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna29623425| title = Officials: Ship in China spat was hunting subs| publisher = ]| date = March 10, 2009| access-date = March 28, 2009| archive-date = August 3, 2017| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170803212151/http://www.nbcnews.com/id/29623425| url-status = live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/09/us.navy.china/index.html| title=Pentagon says Chinese vessels harassed U.S. ship| publisher=CNN| date=March 9, 2009| access-date=August 4, 2010| archive-date=August 1, 2022| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220801194706/http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/09/us.navy.china/index.html| url-status=live}}</ref> In August 2014, the U.S. protested when a Chinese ] came within {{convert|10|meter|ft|-1}} of a patrolling ] aircraft and performed aerobatic maneuvers including a barrel roll.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-28905504|title=BBC News – US accuses China fighter of reckless mid-air intercept|date=August 23, 2014|work=]|access-date=August 23, 2014|archive-date=August 6, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220806144859/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-28905504|url-status=live}}</ref> In May 2016, the U.S. protested when two Shenyang J-11BH aircraft reportedly came within {{convert|15|meter|ft|-1}} of a U.S. EP-3 on "a routine" patrol approximately {{convert|50|mi|km}} east of Hainan Island. China responded by demanding an end to U.S. surveillance near China.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-southchinasea-china-usa-idUSKCN0YA0QX|title=BBC News – China demands end to U.S. surveillance after aircraft intercept|date=May 19, 2016|work=]|access-date=May 20, 2016|archive-date=August 6, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220806144552/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-southchinasea-china-usa-idUSKCN0YA0QX|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
{{Portal|China}} | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
== |
==Further reading== | ||
{{Commons category|Hainan Island incident}} | |||
===Notes=== | |||
* Garver, John W. "Sino-American relations in 2001: the difficult accommodation of two great powers." ''International Journal'' 57.2 (2002): 283–310. | |||
{{reflist|2}} | |||
* {{Cite book| last = Osborn| first = Shane| title = Born to Fly: The Untold Story of the Downed American Reconnaissance Plane| year = 2001| publisher = Broadway| isbn = 0-7679-1111-3| url-access = registration| url = https://archive.org/details/borntoflyuntolds00osbo}} | |||
== |
== References == | ||
{{refbegin}} | |||
* {{Citation | last = Brookes | first = Andrew | authorlink = Andrew Brookes | title = Destination Disaster | pages = 101–110 | publisher = Ian Allan | year = 2002 | isbn = 0-7110-2862-1}} | |||
{{refend}} | |||
== |
=== Citations === | ||
{{Reflist|30em}} | |||
* {{Citation | last = Osborn | first = Shane | title = Born to Fly: The Untold Story of the Downed American Reconnaissance Plane | year = 2001 | publisher = Broadway | isbn = 0-7679-1111-3}} | |||
== |
=== Sources === | ||
{{Refbegin}} | |||
{{Commonscat|Hainan Island incident}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last = Brookes |first = Andrew |author-link = Andrew Brookes|title = Destination Disaster |pages = 101–110 |publisher = Ian Allan |year = 2002 |isbn = 0-7110-2862-1 }} | |||
* | |||
{{Refend}} | |||
* | |||
* | |||
{{Aviation incidents and accidents in 2001}} | |||
* | |||
{{Aviation accidents and incidents in China}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
{{coord|17.6056|111.3611|type:event_globe:earth_region:CN|display=title}} | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 02:04, 28 December 2024
2001 aviation accident between aircraft of the US and China For the earlier incident, see 1954 Cathay Pacific Douglas DC-4 shootdown.
Hainan Island incident | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The damaged EP-3 on the ground on Hainan Island. | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
United States | China | ||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
|
| ||||||
Strength | |||||||
1 EP-3E signals intelligence aircraft | 2 Shenyang J-8II aircraft | ||||||
Casualties and losses | |||||||
|
|
The Hainan Island incident was a ten-day international incident between the United States and the People's Republic of China (PRC) that resulted from a mid-air collision between a United States Navy EP-3E ARIES II signals intelligence aircraft and a Chinese Air Force J-8 interceptor on April 1, 2001.
The EP-3 was flying over the South China sea at a point roughly midway between Hainan Island and the Paracel Islands when it was intercepted by two J-8II fighters. A collision between the EP-3 and one of the J-8s caused damage to the EP-3 and the loss of the J-8 and its pilot. The EP-3 was forced to make an emergency landing on Hainan without permission from the PRC, and its 24 crew members were detained and interrogated by Chinese authorities until a statement was delivered by the United States government regarding the incident. The ambiguous phrasing of the statement allowed both countries to save face and defused a potentially volatile situation.
Background
This sea area includes the South China Sea Islands, which are claimed by the PRC and several other countries. It is one of the most strategically sensitive areas in the world.
The United States and the People's Republic of China disagree on the legality of the overflights by U.S. naval aircraft of the area where the incident occurred. This part of the South China Sea comprises part of the PRC's exclusive economic zone based on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and the Chinese claim that the Paracel Islands belong to China. This claim was acknowledged by Vietnam in 1958 but it has since reversed itself to contest the claim after the end of the Vietnam War in 1975. The United States remains neutral in this dispute, but patrols the sea regularly with naval ships and airplanes, during what it terms freedom of navigation operations. The PRC interprets the convention as allowing it to preclude other nations' military operations within this area, but the United States does not recognize China's claim for the Paracel Islands and maintains that the Convention grants free navigation for all countries' aircraft and ships, including military aircraft and ships, within a country's exclusive economic zone. Although the United States is not party to UNCLOS, it has accepted and complies with nearly all of the treaty's provisions.
A PRC Sukhoi Su-27 force is based at Hainan. The island also houses a large signals intelligence facility that tracks civil and military activity in the area and monitors traffic from commercial communications satellites. The United States has long kept the island under surveillance; on May 22, 1951, for example, RAF Spitfire PR Mk 19s based at Hong Kong's Kai Tak Airport flew photo-reconnaissance missions at the behest of U.S. naval intelligence.
In the air
On April 1, 2001, the EP-3 (BuNo 156511), assigned to Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron One (VQ-1, "World Watchers"), had taken off as Mission PR32 from Kadena Air Base in Okinawa, Japan. At about 9:15 a.m. local time, toward the end of the EP-3's six-hour ELINT mission, it was flying at 22,000 feet (6,700 m) and 180 knots (210 mph; 330 km/h), on a heading of 110°, about 70 miles (110 km) away from the island. Two Chinese J-8s from Hainan's Lingshui airfield approached. One of the J-8s (81194), piloted by Lt. Cdr. Wang Wei, made two close passes to the EP-3. On the third pass, it collided with the larger aircraft. The J-8 broke into two pieces; the EP-3's radome detached completely and its No. 1 (outer left) propeller was damaged severely. Airspeed and altitude data were lost, the aircraft depressurized, and an antenna became wrapped around the tailplane. The J-8's tail fin struck the EP-3's left aileron, forcing it fully upright, and causing the U.S. aircraft to roll to the left at three to four times its normal maximum rate.
The impact sent the EP-3 into a 30° dive at a bank angle of 130°, almost inverted. It dropped 8,000 feet (2,400 m) in 30 seconds, and fell another 6,000 feet (1,800 m) before the pilot, Lt. Shane Osborn, got the EP-3's wings level and the nose up. In a September 2003 article in Naval Aviation News, Osborn said that once he regained control of the aircraft, he "called for the crew to prepare to bail out". He then managed to control the aircraft's descent by using emergency power on the working engines, allowing him to plan an emergency landing on Hainan.
For the next 26 minutes, the crew of the EP-3 performed an emergency plan which included destroying sensitive items aboard the aircraft, such as electronic equipment related to intelligence-gathering, documents and data. Part of this plan involved pouring freshly brewed coffee into disk drives and motherboards and using an axe from the plane's survival kit to destroy hard drives. The crew had not been formally trained on how to destroy sensitive documents and equipment, and so improvised. As a result of the destruction, the plane's interior was later described as resembling "the aftermath of a frat party".
Osborn made an unauthorized emergency landing at Lingshui airfield, after at least 15 distress signals had gone unanswered, with the emergency code selected on the transponder. It landed at 170 knots (200 mph; 310 km/h), with no flaps, no trim, and a damaged left elevator, weighing 108,000 pounds (49,000 kg). After the collision, the failure of the nose cone had disabled the No. 3 (inner right) engine, and the No. 1 propeller could not be feathered, resulting in increased drag on that side. There was no working airspeed indicator or altimeter, and Osborn used full right aileron during the landing. The surviving Chinese interceptor had landed there 10 minutes earlier.
Wang was seen to eject after the collision, but the Pentagon said that the damage to the underside of the EP-3 could mean that the cockpit of the Chinese fighter jet was crushed, making it impossible for the pilot to survive. Wang's body was never recovered, and he was presumed dead.
Cause of collision
Both the cause of the collision and the assignment of blame were disputed:
- The U.S. government stated that the Chinese jet bumped the wing of the larger, slower, and less maneuverable EP-3. After returning to U.S. soil, the pilot of the EP-3, Lt. Shane Osborn, was allowed to make a brief statement in which he said that the EP-3 was on autopilot and in straight-and-level flight at the time of the collision. He stated that he was just "guarding the autopilot" in his interview with Frontline. The U.S. released video footage from previous missions which revealed that American reconnaissance crews had previously been intercepted by the same aircraft.
- The Chinese government stated that, according to Wang Wei's wingman, the American aircraft "veered at a wide angle towards the Chinese", in the process ramming the J-8.
Neither claim can be verified since the Chinese government did not release data from the flight recorders of either aircraft, both of which are in its possession.
On the ground
For 15 minutes after landing, the EP-3 crew continued to destroy sensitive items and data on board the aircraft, as per protocol. They disembarked from the aircraft after soldiers looked through windows, pointed guns and shouted through bullhorns. The Chinese offered them water and cigarettes. Guarded closely, they were taken to a military barracks at Lingshui where they were interrogated for two nights before being moved to lodgings in Haikou, the provincial capital and largest city on the island. They were generally treated well. However, they were interrogated at all hours and thus suffered from lack of sleep. They found the Chinese food unpalatable as it included fish heads, but this later improved. Guards gave them decks of cards and an English-language newspaper. To pass the time and keep spirits up, Lts. Honeck and Vignery worked up humorous routines based on the television shows The People's Court, Saturday Night Live and The Crocodile Hunter. These were performed as they went to meals, the only time they were together. They gradually developed good relations with their guards, with one guard inquiring of them the lyrics for the song "Hotel California" by the Eagles.
Three U.S. diplomats were sent to Hainan to meet the crew, assess their conditions and to negotiate the crew's release. The diplomats were first allowed to meet with the crew three days after the incident. U.S. officials complained about China's delays in this regard.
The 24 crew members (21 men and 3 women) were detained for 10 days in total and were released soon after the U.S. issued the "letter of the two sorries" to the Chinese. The crew was only partially successful in their destruction of classified material. Some of the material they failed to destroy included cryptographic keys, signals intelligence manuals, and the names of National Security Agency employees. Some of the captured computers contained detailed information for processing PROFORMA communications from North Korea, Russia, Vietnam, China and other countries. The plane also carried information on the emitter parameters for U.S.-allied radar systems worldwide. China also discovered that the United States could track People's Liberation Army Navy submarines via signal transmission.
Letter of the two sorries
The "Letter of the two sorries" was the letter delivered by the United States Ambassador Joseph Prueher to Foreign Minister Tang Jiaxuan of the People's Republic of China to end the incident. Upon delivery of the letter, China released the detained crew and eventually returned the disassembled aircraft. The letter stated that the United States was "very sorry" for the death of Chinese pilot Wang Wei (王伟) and was "very sorry" the aircraft entered China's airspace, additionally apologizing because its landing did not have "verbal clearance". The United States stated that it was "not a letter of apology"–as then characterized by state-owned Chinese media outlets–but that instead it was "an expression of regret and sorrow". China had originally asked for an apology, but the U.S. explained, "We did not do anything wrong, and therefore it was not possible to apologize".
There was further debate over the exact meaning of the Chinese translation issued by the U.S. Embassy. A senior administration official was quoted as saying "What the Chinese will choose to characterize as an apology, we would probably choose to characterize as an expression of regret or sorrow". Chinese President Jiang Zemin accepted the expression of "very sorry" as consistent with the formal apology that China had sought, and so China released the Americans thereafter.
Aftermath
The crew of the EP-3 was released on April 11, 2001, and returned to their base at Whidbey Island via Honolulu, Hawaii, where they were subject to two days of debriefings. The pilot, Lt. Shane Osborn, was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for "heroism and extraordinary achievement" in flight. The J-8B pilot, Wang Wei, was posthumously honored in China as a "Guardian of Territorial Airspace and Waters". His widow received a personal letter of condolence from US President George W. Bush.
U.S. Navy engineers said the EP-3 could be repaired in 8–12 months, but China refused to allow it to be flown off Hainan island. The disassembled aircraft was released on July 3, 2001, and was returned to the United States by the Russian airline Polet in two Antonov An-124 Ruslans. Repairs were performed at Lockheed Martin in Marietta, Georgia, for reassembly and to make it flightworthy again. The aircraft was then flown to L3 in Waco, Texas for missionization as they were the main provider of EP-3 maintenance and modernization at the time. The aircraft returned to duty prior to 2013.
In addition to paying for the dismantling and shipping of the EP-3, the United States paid US$34,567 for the 11 days of food and lodging supplied by the Chinese government to the aircraft's crew. The Chinese had demanded one million dollars compensation from the U.S. for the lost J-8 and their pilot, but this was refused without further negotiations.
The incident occurred ten weeks after George W. Bush's presidential inauguration and was his first foreign policy crisis. Both countries were criticized after the event: the Chinese for making a bluff which was called without any real concessions from America other than the "Letter of the two sorries"; and the U.S. first for being insensitive immediately after the event and later for issuing the letter rather than being more oppositional. The United States tried to be conciliatory in order to try to avoid Chinese objections to U.S. foreign policy, which became more important after the September 11 attacks and at the beginning of the War on Terror.
Among the Chinese public, the incident created negative feelings towards the United States and increased feelings of Chinese nationalism. Despite the fact that the destroyed aircraft carried the serial number 81194, footage of Lt Cdr Wang Wei piloting airplane J-8B bearing serial number 81192 in a similar incident earlier in the year was popularized and became a national icon for both the PLANAF and the Chinese nation.
After the collision, China's briefly lessened aggressiveness in monitoring of reconnaissance flights. Flights of U.S. surveillance aircraft near the Chinese coastline continued as before the incident.
Hainan is currently the home of the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) Hainan Submarine Base, an underground facility capable of supporting nuclear ballistic missile submarines. During March 2009, Chinese ships and aircraft approached the USNS Impeccable, an ocean surveillance ship of the U.S. Navy while operating 75 miles (121 km) south of Hainan. Pentagon officials characterized the actions as "aggressive" and "harassment". In August 2014, the U.S. protested when a Chinese Shenyang J-11BH came within 10 meters (30 ft) of a patrolling Boeing P-8 Poseidon aircraft and performed aerobatic maneuvers including a barrel roll. In May 2016, the U.S. protested when two Shenyang J-11BH aircraft reportedly came within 15 meters (50 ft) of a U.S. EP-3 on "a routine" patrol approximately 50 miles (80 km) east of Hainan Island. China responded by demanding an end to U.S. surveillance near China.
See also
Further reading
- Garver, John W. "Sino-American relations in 2001: the difficult accommodation of two great powers." International Journal 57.2 (2002): 283–310. online
- Osborn, Shane (2001). Born to Fly: The Untold Story of the Downed American Reconnaissance Plane. Broadway. ISBN 0-7679-1111-3.
References
Citations
- Tapper, Jake; Lindsey, Daryl; Montgomery, Alicia (April 13, 2001). "War of words". Salon. Archived from the original on August 6, 2022. Retrieved September 28, 2010.
- ^ Zhang, Hang (2001). "Culture and apology: The Hainan Island incident". World Englishes. 20 (3): 383–391. doi:10.1111/1467-971X.00222.
- ^ Brookes 2002, p. 102
- "Why is the South China Sea contentious?". BBC News. July 12, 2016. Archived from the original on October 17, 2013. Retrieved March 30, 2020.
- Almond, Roncevert Ganan (May 24, 2017). "U.S. Ratification of the Law of the Sea Convention". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on August 6, 2022. Retrieved March 30, 2020.
- "Wuhu Airbase". globalsecurity.org. Archived from the original on August 24, 2021. Retrieved March 21, 2009.
- "Lingshui Air Base". globalsecurity.org. Archived from the original on August 6, 2022. Retrieved March 21, 2009.
- Peebles, Curtis, Shadow Flights: America's Secret Air War Against the Soviet Union: Presidio Press, 2001. pp. 16–18 ISBN 0-89141-768-0
- "不是81192号:中美撞机事件王伟烈士座机到底是哪架". Sina. 新浪军事. April 4, 2017. Archived from the original on April 12, 2017. Retrieved May 2, 2023.
- Air Forces Monthly. No. 158. Stamford, Lincolnshire: Key Publishing. May 2001. p. 4.
{{cite magazine}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help) - Air Forces Monthly. No. 159. Stamford, Lincolnshire: Key Publishing. June 2001. p. 79.
{{cite magazine}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help) - ^ Zetter, Kim (April 10, 2017). "Snowden Documents Reveal Scope of Secrets Exposed to China in 2001 Spy Plane Incident". The Intercept. Archived from the original on July 18, 2022. Retrieved April 11, 2017.
- ^ Turnbull, Jim (September–October 2003). "Lt. Shane Osborn: looking at a miracle" (PDF). Naval Aviation News. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 13, 2013. Retrieved September 27, 2011.
- Brookes 2002, p. 103
- Brookes 2002, p. 104
- Brookes 2002, p. 109
- Richter, Paul (April 6, 2001). "Chinese Plane Flew Too Close". taiwandc.org. Archived from the original on March 30, 2010. Retrieved March 24, 2009.
- Brookes 2002, p. 108
- Frontline interview with Shane Osborn Archived August 2, 2022, at the Wayback Machine, retrieved August 28, 2009.
- Kates, Brian (April 14, 2001). "U.S. Blames China's Hot-dogging Pilots Harassment in Midair Seen as Cause of Crash". New York Daily News. Archived from the original on August 27, 2017. Retrieved December 5, 2016.
- ^ Brookes 2002, p. 107
- ^ "Chinese jet 'snapped in two'". BBC Online. April 13, 2001. Archived from the original on March 14, 2003. Retrieved March 13, 2009.
- ^ "U.S. aircraft collides with Chinese fighter, forced to land". CNN. April 1, 2001. Archived from the original on December 11, 2008. Retrieved March 13, 2009.
- ^ Richter, Paul (April 6, 2001). "Chinese Plane Flew Too Close". taiwandc.org. Archived from the original on March 30, 2010. Retrieved March 13, 2009.
- ^ Eckert, Paul (April 19, 2001). "China says video shows US plane caused crash". iol.co.za. Archived from the original on February 10, 2023. Retrieved March 13, 2009.
- Brookes 2002, p. 105
- "US diplomats meet with spy plane crew". The Independent. London. April 3, 2001. Retrieved March 24, 2009.
- Brookes 2002, p. 101
- "China Promises Releases of U.S. Crewmembers". CNN. April 11, 2001. Archived from the original on March 8, 2021. Retrieved October 1, 2010.
- Lindsey, Daryl et al. "War of words Archived March 8, 2021, at the Wayback Machine". Salon.com, April 12, 2001, retrieved on March 21, 2009
- "Bush pleased by release of U.S. crew from China". Archived from the original on March 7, 2022. Retrieved October 3, 2010.
- "China, US agree on freeing plane crew". Taipei Times. April 12, 2001. Archived from the original on May 13, 2021. Retrieved March 21, 2009.
- ^ Zhao, Suisheng (2023). The Dragon Roars Back: Transformational Leaders and Dynamics of Chinese Foreign Policy. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. p. 64. doi:10.1515/9781503634152. ISBN 978-1-5036-3415-2. Archived from the original on April 13, 2023. Retrieved January 4, 2023.
- "US spy crew 'in excellent health'". BBC Online. April 9, 2001. Archived from the original on May 26, 2004. Retrieved March 13, 2009.
- "Spy plane might not fly home". BBC Online. May 20, 2001. Archived from the original on August 6, 2022. Retrieved March 13, 2009.
- "Russians to fly out spy plane". BBC Online. June 10, 2001. Archived from the original on October 18, 2002. Retrieved March 13, 2009.
- Osborn, Shane (2001). Born to Fly: The Untold Story of the Downed American Reconnaissance Plane. Broadway Books. ISBN 0-7679-1111-3.
- "The U.S. Navy EP-3 recovered from Hainan Island, China, has been delivered to Dobbins AFB at Marietta, Ga". Aviation Week & Space Technology. July 9, 2001. Archived from the original on October 11, 2022. Retrieved August 26, 2019.
- "US Navy 156511 EP-3 Go Around Portland Airport (PDX)". Archived from the original on December 21, 2021.
- Mufson, Steven (August 10, 2001). "US to pay China $34,567 related to spy plane incident". The Washington Post. Hearst Newspapers. Archived from the original on August 6, 2022. Retrieved July 15, 2016.
- "Chinese poker". The Economist. April 17, 2001. Archived from the original on February 25, 2021. Retrieved March 13, 2009.
- Henriksen, Thomas H. (January 31, 2022). America's Wars: Interventions, Regime Change, and Insurgencies after the Cold War (1 ed.). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781009053242.005. ISBN 978-1-009-05324-2. S2CID 245269947. Archived from the original on August 2, 2022. Retrieved February 4, 2022.
- Ellison, Michael (July 30, 2001). "China eases spy plane surveillance". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on August 6, 2022. Retrieved March 13, 2009.
- Martin, Dan (July 27, 2011). "China tells US to halt spy plane flights". Yahoo! News. Archived from the original on August 22, 2011. Retrieved August 21, 2011.
- Blanchard, Ben (July 27, 2011). "China protests U.S. spy flights near its coast". Reuters. Archived from the original on March 12, 2017. Retrieved August 21, 2011.
- "New Chinese SSBN Deploys to Hainan Island". Federation of American Scientists. April 24, 2008. Archived from the original on January 18, 2013. Retrieved March 21, 2009.
- "Officials: Ship in China spat was hunting subs". NBC News. March 10, 2009. Archived from the original on August 3, 2017. Retrieved March 28, 2009.
- "Pentagon says Chinese vessels harassed U.S. ship". CNN. March 9, 2009. Archived from the original on August 1, 2022. Retrieved August 4, 2010.
- "BBC News – US accuses China fighter of reckless mid-air intercept". BBC Online. August 23, 2014. Archived from the original on August 6, 2022. Retrieved August 23, 2014.
- "BBC News – China demands end to U.S. surveillance after aircraft intercept". Reuters. May 19, 2016. Archived from the original on August 6, 2022. Retrieved May 20, 2016.
Sources
- Brookes, Andrew (2002). Destination Disaster. Ian Allan. pp. 101–110. ISBN 0-7110-2862-1.
17°36′20″N 111°21′40″E / 17.6056°N 111.3611°E / 17.6056; 111.3611
Categories:- Espionage scandals and incidents
- China–United States military relations
- Signals intelligence
- Aviation accidents and incidents in China
- Aviation accidents and incidents in 2001
- United States Navy in the 21st century
- Diplomatic incidents
- 2001 in China
- 2001 in the United States
- Conflicts in 2001
- Military history of Hainan
- George W. Bush administration controversies
- Accidents and incidents involving United States Navy and Marine Corps aircraft
- Lockheed P-3 Orion
- April 2001 events in Asia
- Espionage in China
- April 2001 events in China
- Accidents and incidents involving the Lockheed L-188 Electra