Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Anton Zilwicki: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 10:45, 16 April 2009 editJulesH (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users5,584 edits →Anton Zilwicki ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 06:03, 3 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk \| contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB
(12 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
			:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
			<!--Template:Afd top

			Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

			The result was '''Merge''' to ]. ] 05:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
	===]===		===]===
	{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD\|F}}

	:{{la\|Anton Zilwicki}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>		:{{la\|Anton Zilwicki}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
Line 9:		Line 15:
	*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] 07:58, 16 April 2009 (UTC)</small>		*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] 07:58, 16 April 2009 (UTC)</small>
	*'''Merge''' any relevant content to ], as standard practice for non-notable characters in notable works would suggest. ] (]) 10:45, 16 April 2009 (UTC)		*'''Merge''' any relevant content to ], as standard practice for non-notable characters in notable works would suggest. ] (]) 10:45, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
			*'''Delete'''- more rubbish from the big huge walled garden of Honorcruft. This article has no sources beyond, presumably, the ] so fails ], and this character seems to be an exceedingly minor one. There is no call for a stand-alone article on this guy, and he's already mentioned in sufficient detail at the ]. ] ] 22:49, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
			*'''Delete''' no independent reliable sources establish notability of any sort for this character independent from the work of fiction it inhabits.] (]) 23:16, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
			*'''Merge''' to the list of characters, as one of the central characters in a series of novels (Wages of Sin). ] (]) 05:21, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
			*'''Delete''' as above. No assertion of real-world notability. ] (]) 17:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
			*'''merge''' Minor characters are not worth whole articles except in the very most important fictions, and this is not really one. Primary sources do fine for such content, and in fact are preferred for straightforward things related to plot. ''']''' (]) 21:09, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
			*'''Question''' How many books or other media was this character featured in, and to what extent?] 04:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
			*'''Answer''' no reliable independent sources address that issue, the crux of the problem here. We'd have to trust an obsessive fan to read all of the books and ancillary material, and make lists, and then take his word for it. And why? So we can categorize something that has no demonstrated (via reliable independent sources) notability in the Reality-verse.] (]) 13:44, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
			*'''Merge''' to ] ] (]) 15:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
			*'''Merge and redirect''' to ]. --] (]) 18:14, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

			:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 06:03, 3 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to List of Honorverse characters. Nakon 05:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Anton Zilwicki

Non-notable, unsourced, in-universe, plot summary; tagged over a year ago for clean-up and no resolution of concerns. Jack Merridew 07:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Delete as nom. Cheers, Jack Merridew 07:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 07:58, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 07:58, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Merge any relevant content to List of Honorverse characters, as standard practice for non-notable characters in notable works would suggest. JulesH (talk) 10:45, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete- more rubbish from the big huge walled garden of Honorcruft. This article has no sources beyond, presumably, the books themselves so fails WP:N, and this character seems to be an exceedingly minor one. There is no call for a stand-alone article on this guy, and he's already mentioned in sufficient detail at the List of Honorverse characters. Reyk _YO! 22:49, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete no independent reliable sources establish notability of any sort for this character independent from the work of fiction it inhabits.Bali ultimate (talk) 23:16, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Merge to the list of characters, as one of the central characters in a series of novels (Wages of Sin). 70.29.213.241 (talk) 05:21, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Delete as above. No assertion of real-world notability. Eusebeus (talk) 17:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
merge Minor characters are not worth whole articles except in the very most important fictions, and this is not really one. Primary sources do fine for such content, and in fact are preferred for straightforward things related to plot. DGG (talk) 21:09, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Question How many books or other media was this character featured in, and to what extent? Dream Focus 04:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Answer no reliable independent sources address that issue, the crux of the problem here. We'd have to trust an obsessive fan to read all of the books and ancillary material, and make lists, and then take his word for it. And why? So we can categorize something that has no demonstrated (via reliable independent sources) notability in the Reality-verse.Bali ultimate (talk) 13:44, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Merge to List of Honorverse characters Edward321 (talk) 15:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Merge and redirect to List_of_Honorverse_characters#Zilwicki_to_Zrubek. --EEMIV (talk) 18:14, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.