| Revision as of 16:01, 17 April 2009 editSticky Parkin (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers8,432 edits →Block has been reviewed at ANI: sorry← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:35, 24 November 2015 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,133,069 edits →ArbCom elections are now open!: new section | ||
| (27 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Archive box|]<br>}} | {{Archive box|]<br>}} | ||
| ==Blackest Night #6== | |||
| Thank you for telling me! I had no idea that the issue wasn't supposed to be released until Wednesday. I'll revert those changes now. -] (]) 17:52, 24 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == Re: Thank you == | |||
| It's no problem, I spent about an hour trying to figure it out when I archived for the first time. I had no idea how subpages worked back then. No worries about the Pokemon article either, we've all made honest mistakes like that before. ] (]) 18:42, 9 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :If the consensus is once again to keep it at WrestleMania XXV and he moves it anyways, then yes I will report him. He used to be such a good editor. '''<span style="border: 2px Maroon solid;background:#4682B4;font-family: Monotype Corsiva">] ]</span>''' 19:11, 15 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==I reverted your edit== | |||
| Neutrally, I find that a disambig page is vital in this particular situation. Thus, I reverted your change. I just wanted to ask why it is that you want the page to remain a redirect since you really haven't given a reason. On a side note, I would also like to point out that you appear to have broken the ] As a result, you could be blocked for reverting. Anyway, just a heads up. <sup>--]]--</sup> 03:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| == Blocked == | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692071653 --> | |||
| is entirely unacceptable. Accusing editors of being terrorists is so much beyond the pale I'm amazed you weren't blocked already. Consider yourself done with Misplaced Pages. | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been '''blocked indefinitely''' from editing in accordance with ] for {{#if:repeated and egregious ] (including but not limited to baseless accusations of harassment and ad hominem attacks) and relentless ]|'''repeated and egregious ] (including but not limited to baseless accusations of harassment and ad hominem attacks) and relentless ]'''|repeated ]}}. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our ] first. {{#if:|<font color="32CD32">'']''</font> <font color="4682B4"><sup>(] ])</sup></font> 08:32, 16 April 2009 (UTC)|}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block3 -->] | |||
| -<font color="32CD32">'']''</font> <font color="4682B4"><sup>(] ])</sup></font> 08:32, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=It was a joke besides that previously the editor that blocked me has been harrasing my page anyways. I stopped reverting the edits once I saw that enough editors thought it should be there and I went to the page and put in my part on the discussion. To Block me indef is unfair as I havent really done anything wrong besides jokingly calling someone a terrorist. It was a joke grow up and take off the indef part if you want to block me fine but not permanently thats just not fair.|decline=The admin who blocked you has been warning you of potential consequences should your behavior continue. When it did, you were blocked. Calling people terrorists is ''not'' funny, and obviously . Edit warring is similarly unacceptable; when you are reverted, you discuss it then, you do not continue to revert and call others vandals. I'd suggest you take a look at ] before your next appeal - your request will not be accepted so long as you tell us to "grow up." ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 16:02, 16 April 2009 (UTC)}} | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|Ok let me put it another way maybe it wasnt funny to some people I thought it was if I offended somebody then I am truly sorry. I have been trying to do better with the edit warring I really have and I honestly thought it was just somebody vandalising the page if you will take a look at the history there has been alot of it on there lately and there is a big war going on on the page right now. I dont want to be blocked from editing I like wikipedia and I know Im not perfect but nobody is. Block me but dont Ban me thats all Im asking for.|decline=This is not a refusal to unblock you, I'm just removing this template until you find someone willing to mentor you. Follow the instructions below; when you've found someone, put up a new unblock template so we know you've answered. ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 04:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)}} | |||
| == Block has been reviewed at ANI == | |||
| See the thread at ], opened by Jeremy to seek review of his own action. ] (]) 16:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :There is discussion underway about the possibility of your being unblocked. One of the items that has been suggested is that you enroll either in ] or ]. Would you be agreeable to enrolling in one of those programs? ] (]) 17:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| absolutely I would I dont fully know how to do some stuff on here and it would help me.] (]) 17:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :The blocking admin has agreed to unblock you, with the proviso that the next edit-war or accusation you make will be your last. I have to agree. We cannot allow anyone to continue disruptive behavior indefinitely. However, there does seem to be some consensus to give you one last, and I mean ''last'', chance, but I sincerely hope neither I nor MelicansMatkin come to regret giving it to you. The one question that comes to mind to me is whether you would feel more comfortable enrolling in the ] or ] program, and that decision is up to you. I do believe the blocking admin might want a formal answer from you here before agreeing to unblock, so I believe we are all awaiting your response. Thank you. ] (]) 21:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::What is the deal with you, LifeStroke420? I have watched your progress ever since I posted on your page a while ago. I don't understand why you continue to be "disruptive". Perhaps a mentor or being adopted would help. ] adopts people with good success, I believe. I very much hope you give adoption a try. Regards, —] (]) 23:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::Once you find someone willing to adopt or mentor you, tell me whom it is on this talk page and I'll unblock you. -<font color="32CD32">'']''</font> <font color="4682B4"><sup>(] ])</sup></font> 02:18, 17 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| How do I do that if im blocked?] (]) 03:47, 17 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :You are still able to email people by clicking the "Email this user" link in the toolbox to the left of their userpage. To do so, you will need to enable and confirm your own email address within ]. ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 03:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Hi LifeStroke, I am an ] and if you would like any sort of help, I am willing to adopt. But you have to really want to make a go of it here.:) ] ] 12:29, 17 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Also, MelikansMatkin and myself have agreed to offer you a joint adoption/mentorship. If you would prefer that option, just say as much here and which option (adoption or mentorship) you prefer. ] (]) 12:46, 17 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yes, sorry John, Mattisse suggested it on my talk, and I'd not cauught up with the AN/I thread before I offered.:) ] ] 16:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:35, 24 November 2015
 Archives |
Blackest Night #6
Thank you for telling me! I had no idea that the issue wasn't supposed to be released until Wednesday. I'll revert those changes now. -Hooliganb (talk) 17:52, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)