| Revision as of 09:58, 18 April 2009 view sourceWikifan12345 (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers12,039 edits →Opinion of the UNRWA: MoS← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:11, 6 November 2014 view source Jackmcbarn (talk | contribs)31,380 edits fix double redirect per protected edit request | ||
| (56 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| '''James G. Lindsay''' is an ] attorney specializing in security and ]. For twenty years he worked in the ] of the ], with assignments in the Internal Security, Appellate and Asset Forfeiture Sections.<ref name="bio1"></ref> Between 1985 and 1994, he was seconded to the ] in ], as the force counsel for legal and treaty affairs. <ref></ref> In 2000, he retired from the Justice Department to join the ] in ]. He was the legal advisor and general counsel for the UNRWA from 2002 to 2007. He oversaw all legal activities, from aid contracts to relations with ], ], ], ], and the ].<ref></ref> | |||
| Lindsay is currently an Aufzien fellow at the ], focusing on ] issues and UN humanitarian assistance. <ref name="bio1" /> | |||
| == Military service and education == | |||
| Lindsay served as an infantry officer in the ] from 1968 to 1970. <ref name="bio1" /> He earned a ] from the ] and a master's degree in Southeast Asian history from the ]. <ref name="bio1" /> | |||
| ==Opinion of the UNRWA== | |||
| In January 2009, Lindsay published a 80-page critique of the organization, regarding its history, conduct, and involvement within the ].<ref name="fixing)></ref> | |||
| In the report, Lindsay refers to ], former Commissioner-General to the UNRWA, who in 2004 said, "I am sure there are ] members on the UNRWA payroll and I don't see that as a crime. Hamas as a political organization does not mean that every member is a ] and we do not do political vetting and exclude people from one persuasion as against another." <ref></ref> | |||
| According to the '']'', Lindsay appears concerned about the lack of accountability within the organization.<ref name="ties"></ref> Quoting the report, he claims, "Over the course of its long history, UNRWA has rarely been the subject of comprehensive external evaluation, and virtually nothing has been written on the organization's strategy and operations by a senior staff member with knowledge of how UNRWA actually works."<ref name="exec"></ref> Lindsay further comments on the Hamas involvement within the organization, "UNRWA has taken very few steps to detect and eliminate terrorists from the ranks of its staff or its beneficiaries, and no steps at all to prevent members of terrorist organizations such as Hamas from joining its staff."<ref name="ties" /> | |||
| Lindsay has also expressed concern about the ] relationship with the organization: "The United States, despite funding nearly 75 percent of UNRWA’s initial budget and remaining its largest single country donor, has mostly failed to make UNRWA reflect U.S. foreign policy objectives. UNRWA initially served U.S. humanitarian purposes, but in later years often clashed with U.S. policies." Even though the US was the UNRWA's largest donor, it "did not support the ] to within Israel's pre-1967 border." He believes that as the largest donor, "the US should do more to push for changes within UNRWA, including a return to a needs-based operation."<ref name="exec" /> | |||
| The majority of Lindsay's report however focused on operational suggestions to de-politicize and change the organization's mission and to reduce the list of 4.5 million refugees. In ], where 2 million Palestinian refugees live, all but 167,000 have citizenship, and are fully eligible for government services including education and health care. Lindsay says, "To continue to call citizens of recognized states refugees is suspect and suggests that the agency's continued existence is due at least in part to political purposes, even though UNRWA was not designed as a political organization." He continues, "The decision to allow for a growing refugee population had become a political statement that fostered and supported the Palestinian demand to return to Israel, <ref name="ties" /> | |||
| Lindsay also offers suggestions to improve the conditions of the organization: "UNRWA should halt its one-sided political statements and limit itself to comments on ] issues; take additional steps to ensure the agency is not employing or providing benefits to terrorists and criminals; and allow the ] (UNESCO), or some other neutral entity, to provide balanced and discrimination-free textbooks for UNRWA schools."<ref name="exec" /> | |||
| ==UNRWA response== | |||
| Chris Gunness, a spokesman for the UNRWA<ref></ref>, said "The report makes selective use of source material and fails to paint a truthful portrait of UNRWA and its operations today and does not detail the organizations three year process of reform. For all these reasons, UNRWA rejects the article and its findings and is preparing a detailed response to it." | |||
| In an rejoinder approved by the ], Dr. Maya Rosenfeld, a research fellow of Harry S. Truman Research Institute at the ] in ], criticizes the report: "We argue that Lindsay's recommendations stem from the prejudiced political stand of the author with respect to the ] and the Palestinian refugee problem rather than from a research-based evaluation of UNRWA's performance in the past and present." She adds, "The attack against UNRWA appears to be led and conducted by ultra-right wing oriented research centers and media agencies in Israel and by their counterpart pro-Israel foundations and lobby organizations in the US, and is addressed primarily to the US administration." <ref></ref> | |||
| ==References== | |||
| {{reflist}} | |||
| ==See also== | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| {{DEFAULTSORT:Lindsay, James G.}} | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
Latest revision as of 04:11, 6 November 2014
Redirect to: