| Revision as of 05:36, 21 April 2009 editDayewalker (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers14,182 edits →Rv: Cmt.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:06, 27 February 2022 edit undoSuperMarioMan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators60,937 editsm Reverted edits by 45.16.168.201 (talk) to last version by The InteriorTag: Rollback | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Retired}} | |||
| Welcome to my page, and go Celtics! Leave a message for me below, and I'll respond on this page unless you ask otherwise. | |||
| It's been about eight months since I posted the reasons I've become disillusioned with this place , and in that time I think I've wandered back over here to make about a hundred edits total, and absolutely nothing of any substance. I should probably go ahead and make this official, and quit wasting my time. The problems I talked about on my user page are all still there, and things seem to have gotten worse. There's no leadership here, only chaos. And ], nor does it work to entice me to volunteer my services for free. | |||
| Just so everyone will know, on June 29, 2008, I was given the Rollback tool by admin ] for help in vandal-fighting. I will also use this tool to revert, on sight, the edits of blocked wikipedia users. If you have a question about my use of rollback, it was probably in one of these situations. Any other questions, leave them here on my talk page. Thanks! ] (]) 22:11, 30 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| For those of you watching from over there, after more than ten thousand edits here, I've finally been immortalized at an anti-Misplaced Pages website. Finally! Some recognition from the dark side! My RFA is linked there, along with a disparaging quote from (yet another) user who commented on my RFA to rip me, refused a request for diffs, and then got indef blocked and hasn't been seen or heard from since. Thanks, guys. Those are definitely the users of vast integrity and worthy contributions who should be noted in pull quotes. Oh, and judging from the style of writing, it's posted on the site by someone who certainly appears to be the latest incarnation of a user blocked across multiple areas of the Misplaced Pages Foundation for being a nutball. | |||
| If you are an IP and cannot post on this page, it has been semi-protected. Admins regularly semi-protect this page against IPs who come here to disrupt. Please leave a message on the talk page for the article you'd like to discuss. I'd suggest registering an account, it makes everything easier. | |||
| Well, that's certainly one for the resume. I can't tell you how much this means to me, to finally receive the scorn I deserve from a website that's the Gold Standard of bitterness. I can now retire happily. I am somebody, dammit! | |||
| == Thank you... == | |||
| Love to all, and good luck in the future. | |||
| ...for your kind words. We'll see how things go in a few months. You're right that some (somewhat over 50 percent) "get me", whereas the other group is ''"stuck"'' with me. >:) I was accused of not taking wikipedia or the nomination seriously. I didn't quite say this, but I hinted at it, a quote (as I recall it, anyway) from '']'', where the annoying space station manager Nilz Baris (], an excellect character actor in his day) is accusing Kirk of not being serious about the ] project. Kirk retorts to Baris that he takes the project ''very'' seriously, and that "It's ''you'' I do not take seriously!" Think that would have helped? Maybe not. :) ] <sup>'']''</sup> 01:35, 14 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Sincerely, | |||
| == Our buddy's at it again... == | |||
| ] (]) 04:47, 11 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == |
==Enjoy== | ||
| the Summer. Kick back, watch BB15, take a break. I may run the gauntlet soon and I appreciate the warnings. Best to you. ```]<small>]</small> 18:55, 11 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == Dawn Wells == | ||
| Thanks for the revert ! --] (]) 18:35, 16 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks again . My wife and I actually got to eat kangaroo while vacationing in Australia in 2002. It is actually a rather delicious red meat, especially when cooked medium rare and served with a fine merlot! --] (]) 03:36, 20 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Heh, no problems. I took from the tone of his comment that it was probably one of those you wouldn't remind having removed. Take care! ] (]) 03:41, 20 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Remember when you were totally lying about your reasons for keeping marijuana out of the Dawn Wells article? In the end you lost, and I won. Ah, good times. ] ] 03:54, 18 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you again, sir ! Not sure which blocked user he was a sock of, but I see that he was blocked just four minutes after registering. — ] (]) 17:49, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| : |
: Hmm. I don't remember that. I do remember you being weirdly obsessed with inserting negative detail into the page of a quasi-celebrity, so much so that even years later after I've left the project you come back as a grave-dancing asshole to trumpet how you "won." Not so good times. ] (]) 05:42, 19 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ::Looks like, despite your years of work here, you never understood that negative yet true information belongs in Misplaced Pages right next to the positive yet true information, ] from it as you tried to do. ] (]) 14:52, 28 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Photo consensus discussion at ]== | |||
| == Consensus == | |||
| Hi. Can you offer your opinion regarding the Infobox photo discussion ? Thanks. ] (]) 19:16, 28 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :We tried to talk to you, but now you've been reported to the edit war board. So long. ] (]) 04:12, 18 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| == "no one will hold it against you." == | |||
| I took a little vacation from editing. I'm leaving the "retired" up for another day or two for reasons I'll explain later. :) I'm also going to temporarily roll back your nice note. Don't take offense. :) ] <sup>'']''</sup> ] 03:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :No problems, I know how that kind of thing goes. ], and all that. ] (]) 03:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Dayewalker - you have requested talk pages over email, so here it is. When an initiator and instigator of disruptive editing pre-emptively filed a plaintiff action against me, successfully manipulating Misplaced Pages admins into finishing a fight he started by having me blocked, you declared "no one will hold it against you." Now, probably the same editor using ip address verses wiki username has done the same thing. That is, initiate and instigate with hypocritical behavior and then pre-emptively start plaintiff action manipulating admins into a false sense that they are innocent actors because they are the first to file plaintiff action. Sure enough, wikipedia admin ] used the prior block to say "he/she is no stranger to controversy" proving your statement "one will hold it against you" completely and utterly wrong. | |||
| == ANI == | |||
| Just thought I would point out you have been proven wrong. To my surprise I find your userpage with a long diatribe using users block history to hold things for or against others. | |||
| A matter you have been involved with is under discussion .— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 05:57, 29 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| It is an interesting trick. Pick a fight with an editor, coax them into defending themselves the same way they are attacked, manipulate admins into punishing the defendant, and viola, editors such as Dayewalker will join in beating up the defendant. Clearly a weakness of Misplaced Pages.] (]) 08:41, 9 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Hey. (forgot to post new section) == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Under your definition I can't tell people about who or what is happening to me? I did not personally attack anyone in my "manifesto" and like I said someone who was being really uptight with me I called juvenile and that was the "personal attack". Listen, I get the language police thing, even though I have been called practically every name in the book yet I have never tried to block people for saying, as wikidemon just did, that I "am ridiculous (which is tame compared to other comments) That comment, would have got me blocked if I had said it to wikidemon. But, I get that now and I understand they are waiting for me to react so that they can block me for calling their actions "juvenile" or what have you. However, I was not using my talk page to attack people I was explaining my situation and i was blocked not for personal attacks but for a "rant". Also, look at my current photo agenda discussion section at Obama. that was just closed off and labeled a rant. I can't very well move on when it is still occurring. ] (]) 21:57, 29 March 2009 (UTC)JohnHistory | |||
| :You can try and make your case, but you have to realize that when people take the time to look at your block history and the circumstances around it, they may not agree with you. The best thing to do is just to forget about the past and try and get along with everyone in the future. ] (]) 23:15, 29 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| == ], again == | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692203726 --> | |||
| Hey Dayewalker, just a heads up that the edit-warring might kick off again at Siena College - do you have any suggestions on how to calm things down? --] (]) 16:00, 2 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==HI== | |||
| Just saying HI to all of you ] (]) 18:02, 3 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == WTF? == | |||
| why did you revert my removal of biased unreliablie info on Sean Hannity? That shit was sourced by unreliable information? ] (]) 22:30, 6 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Because the information was properly sourced and unbiased. If you have a problem with it, I'd suggest bringing up a discussion on the talk page. Probably it would be better if you didn't start the discussion with "WTF?" also. ] (]) 23:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Criticism of Yahoo!== | |||
| ], ] was NOT ]. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 00:05, 7 April 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :Ha-HA. ] (]) 00:10, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::For users unable to retrieve their invaluable files it is not so funny.--] (]) 01:34, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::My sarcastic comment was not directed at anyone who lost files, rather it was at the above user's sidestep of the initial points. ] (]) 01:38, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Initial points? The only dispute is about Yahoo! Briefcase being closed 1 day earlier. "After this date , you will be unable to access Yahoo! Briefcase." That is pretty misleading announcement.--] (]) 01:43, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| http://help.yahoo.com/l/uk/yahoo/briefcase/closing/eol01.html --] (]) 01:45, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :As you've been informed before, wikipedia is based on material verified by ]. Your paragraph was not, and was removed by several editors. The source you're using simply states the day the service was to end, and that there appears to be an error on the day of the week specified. That doesn't mean anything untoward happened, that has to be proved through proper sources. Please discuss the changes on the talk pages and try and gain consensus. ] (]) 01:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| The source I am using is the service provider, and that should be the most proper source, rather than source of misleading announcements. On the internet you will find dozens of complaints by affected users. --] (]) 01:59, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't think you understand sourcing. Please check out ] for details on what constitutes a reliable source, and how to properly source something on wikipedia. If you have any complaints from affected users that have been covered by reliable sources, please bring them up. ] (]) 02:02, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| I am convinced it needs no further proof that the quote is "false or misleading representation about goods or services". --] (]) 02:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Of course '''you're''' convinced. Misplaced Pages, however, has standards. I've reported you to the edit war board, hopefully they'll be able to show you that wikipedia has ways that things are done to establish verifiability. ] (]) 02:28, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Why?== | |||
| why was I blocked, I DIDN'T DO ANY THING WRONG?! I read the rules and noting in them say I can get to know every one. I just tried to make some friends and then i am grated whit a ban. I was told Misplaced Pages users were nice be from what I have seen that is beginning to appear to be a lie a blatant lie! SO GOOD BYE WIKIPEDIA JURKS! <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:18, 8 April 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :Adios. Fare thee well. ] (]) 19:45, 8 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Planecrash111 == | |||
| NO! I wasn't talking to you there..i was talking to randomguy. I didn't even do play by play. I added the stats after he was taken out of the ballgame which isn't play by play. Misplaced Pages was acting up before that.(] (]) 20:29, 11 April 2009 (UTC)) | |||
| :Regardless, the stats aren't official. I've responded on your talk page, and at ANI. ] (]) 21:02, 11 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| The sites don't edit it until the end day so we simply add his original strikeout total with the amount that he got during the game...its not hard.(] (]) 21:20, 11 April 2009 (UTC)) | |||
| :It's ], and there's no reason to do it. Misplaced Pages is not in any ], it's better to wait for ] to get the information correct. ] (]) 21:22, 11 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::MLB.com updates after game completion... Player pages are linked at the bottom of every wiki page. If only Planecrash would bother to double check it first and realize his math is almost always wrong.... And it would be nice if he could update all of the stats in the infobox... and the current up-to-date date. ] (]) 22:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Apologies == | |||
| I was simply trying to clarify the points on the page, not argue. I must plead ignorance of how the procedure works. Why should I be blocked for a 3RR violation I did not commit? Thank you. ] (]) 04:13, 14 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :An admin will investigate the situation and determine if one or both parties were edit warring. If you'd like to make a short rebuttal on the page, that's understandable, but trust me, admins really don't care too much for it when a dispute spills over onto their page. Good luck! ] (]) 04:17, 14 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Apologies aside, I think it's pretty obvious you broke the spirit of the rule with your reverts, and you are edit warring as much as you claim I am. Does that help explain things? ] (]) 04:18, 14 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Speedy == | |||
| I don't see why not. I've re-added speedy tags before. But seriously, it's a blatant hoax. ] and his otters • <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 21:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Syed Ahmed == | |||
| Your edit to ]'s profile is under dispute resolution. Please would you confine commments to discussion, talk or relevant forums until the matter is resolved. I believe wiki policy is clear on the issue of questionable sources and defamatory material. I do not want an edit war, but please note that 3RR does not apply in this case. Thank you. ] (]) 03:35, 21 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't see anywhere where it is under dispute resulution, nor do I see where 3RR would not apply in this case. You have posted nothing on the talk page of the article in regards to this particular piece of information. ] (]) 03:57, 21 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Rv == | |||
| The reason for reversion on WP:WQA is given here: . Not sure which is correct...] (]) 05:28, 21 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Ah, I see. The explanation should have been given before the action, that would have made much more sense. It doesn't do you any harm to post it at WQA, but now seeing where you are, NCM is right, it might not be much help, either. Probably the best place to post for admin attention would be at ]. | |||
| :I won't delete your WQA posting, but if you want to, you can go right ahead. If you have any further questions, just drop me a line. Good luck! ] (]) 05:36, 21 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:06, 27 February 2022
Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.It's been about eight months since I posted the reasons I've become disillusioned with this place , and in that time I think I've wandered back over here to make about a hundred edits total, and absolutely nothing of any substance. I should probably go ahead and make this official, and quit wasting my time. The problems I talked about on my user page are all still there, and things seem to have gotten worse. There's no leadership here, only chaos. And chaos does not work for the New York Yankees, nor does it work to entice me to volunteer my services for free.
For those of you watching from over there, after more than ten thousand edits here, I've finally been immortalized at an anti-Misplaced Pages website. Finally! Some recognition from the dark side! My RFA is linked there, along with a disparaging quote from (yet another) user who commented on my RFA to rip me, refused a request for diffs, and then got indef blocked and hasn't been seen or heard from since. Thanks, guys. Those are definitely the users of vast integrity and worthy contributions who should be noted in pull quotes. Oh, and judging from the style of writing, it's posted on the site by someone who certainly appears to be the latest incarnation of a user blocked across multiple areas of the Misplaced Pages Foundation for being a nutball.
Well, that's certainly one for the resume. I can't tell you how much this means to me, to finally receive the scorn I deserve from a website that's the Gold Standard of bitterness. I can now retire happily. I am somebody, dammit!
Love to all, and good luck in the future.
Sincerely,
Dayewalker (talk) 04:47, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Enjoy
the Summer. Kick back, watch BB15, take a break. I may run the gauntlet soon and I appreciate the warnings. Best to you. ```Buster Seven Talk 18:55, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Dawn Wells
Remember when you were totally lying about your reasons for keeping marijuana out of the Dawn Wells article? In the end you lost, and I won. Ah, good times. —Prhartcom (talk) 03:54, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm. I don't remember that. I do remember you being weirdly obsessed with inserting negative detail into the page of a quasi-celebrity, so much so that even years later after I've left the project you come back as a grave-dancing asshole to trumpet how you "won." Not so good times. Dayewalker (talk) 05:42, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- Looks like, despite your years of work here, you never understood that negative yet true information belongs in Misplaced Pages right next to the positive yet true information, WP:NOTCENSORED from it as you tried to do. Prhartcom (talk) 14:52, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Photo consensus discussion at Talk:Rick Remender
Hi. Can you offer your opinion regarding the Infobox photo discussion here? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 19:16, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
"no one will hold it against you."
Dayewalker - you have requested talk pages over email, so here it is. When an initiator and instigator of disruptive editing pre-emptively filed a plaintiff action against me, successfully manipulating Misplaced Pages admins into finishing a fight he started by having me blocked, you declared "no one will hold it against you." Now, probably the same editor using ip address verses wiki username has done the same thing. That is, initiate and instigate with hypocritical behavior and then pre-emptively start plaintiff action manipulating admins into a false sense that they are innocent actors because they are the first to file plaintiff action. Sure enough, wikipedia admin User:Waggers used the prior block to say "he/she is no stranger to controversy" proving your statement "one will hold it against you" completely and utterly wrong.
Just thought I would point out you have been proven wrong. To my surprise I find your userpage with a long diatribe using users block history to hold things for or against others.
It is an interesting trick. Pick a fight with an editor, coax them into defending themselves the same way they are attacked, manipulate admins into punishing the defendant, and viola, editors such as Dayewalker will join in beating up the defendant. Clearly a weakness of Misplaced Pages.Mormography (talk) 08:41, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)