Misplaced Pages

:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:51, 17 November 2005 view source212.205.76.134 (talk) ← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:34, 12 January 2025 view source Cyberbot I (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors1,721,254 edits Clerking main page and moving requests to appropriate subpages.Tag: Manual revert 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{noadminbacklog}}<!-- Do not hide or modify this, a bot named "Cyberbot I" will manage it automatically.--><noinclude><!-- Please put protection templates *inside* the noinclude, because this page is transcluded. -->{{Short description|Wikimedia noticeboard for requesting protection of pages}}{{/Header}}{{Floating link|class=sysop-show|Administrator instructions|Administrator instructions}}{{pp-move-indef|small=yes}}{{#ifeq:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|autoconfirmed|{{pp|1=vandalism|action=edit|small=yes|expiry=}}}}<!-- Put interwikis at the Wikidata entry and categories in /Header instead of this page -->
{{Shortcut|]<br />]}}
__FORCETOC__</noinclude><!-- Do not hide or modify this, a bot named "Cyberbot I" will manage it automatically-->
This page is for requesting that a page or image be '''protected''' or '''unprotected''', including '''page-move protection'''.
<!-- DO NOT EDIT THIS PAGE. The formatting is enforced by Cyberbot. To make changes, please contact Cyberpower678. -->


<!-- Please copy the following example code to add a new entry at the bottom of the correct subpage:
If you would like to request a page be protected or unprotected, please list it (and sign the request) at the ''top'' of the current requests section below, with the reason that it needs protecting or unprotecting. Before you do so, however, consult ] for details on the purpose of protecting pages and the guidelines concerning page protection.
=== ] ===
* {{pagelinks|Example}} ~~~~
-->


== Current ] in protection level ==
Only consider protection as an option that is necessary in order to resolve your problem and that the only solution that will assist in the solution of the problem is protection. Sometimes the problem will go away after a week or so.
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Button protect}}{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Increase}}
<!-- DO NOT PUT NEW REQUESTS HERE. GO TO THE SUBPAGE ABOVE -->


== Current ] in protection level ==
After a page has been protected, it is listed on ] with a short description indicating why it was protected. Further discussion should take place on the Talk page of the article. '''This is not the place to discuss or dispute articles, users, or policies.'''
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Button unprotect}}{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Decrease}}
<!-- DO NOT PUT NEW REQUESTS HERE. GO TO THE SUBPAGE ABOVE -->


== Current ] to a protected page ==
When submitting a request for page unprotection, you may want to consider the reason given for protection at ] (or lack thereof).
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Button edit}}{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Edit}}
<!-- DO NOT PUT NEW REQUESTS HERE. GO TO THE SUBPAGE ABOVE -->


== Handled requests ==
'''Administrators''': When you have fullfilled or rejected a request, please note your actions (or reasons for not acting) and, optionally, remove the request Leaving a note on the talk page of the article and/or on the talk page of the user(s) requesting protection might be good, as well.
''A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at ].''

== Current requests for protection==
:''Please place new requests '''at the top.'''''

<!-- Please only edit below this line. -->

===]===
The page will undoubtedly be a continued source of biased, nationalistic edits, just like one I had to remove a moment ago. In its current form, the page is objective and respects the current naming dispute, and is of course useful for someone wanting fair information on the country, and shouldn't become an extension of an ongoing argument.] 06:10, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

:The page is already protected against moves. I don't see a huge edit war over the last few days. Going to hold off for now. --]<sup>]</sup> 08:08, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

===]===
Persistent edit warring and POV pushing involving several editors. Mediation appears to be ineffective. Arbitration has been requested, however, the request for arbitration appears to have incensed some editors to push their POV even more. I think a page lock would cool things off until arbcom can accept or reject the request for arbitration. ] 05:10, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

:Protected. Will unprotect once things cool off. -]]]] 05:19, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

===]===
Persistent reversion of page by one user plus probable sockpuppets, to a previous version, despite consensus for need for cleanup. ] 01:17, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
:Protected, and I've left a message on the IP user's talk page to come discuss the changes he's seeking. &middot; ]<sup>]</sup> 01:48, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

===]===
Persistent, juvenile vandalism from several anonymous editors. ] 19:09, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
:Protected. &middot; ]<sup>]</sup> 01:33, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

===]===
The <nowiki>{{Infobox Company}}</nowiki> template is used in more than 1,120 articles. The current template, layout and variables, should be considered '''stable''' given the lack of revolutionary activity. In order to prevent costly tampering of one of the most popular and widely used templates in Misplaced Pages, I recommend the template be permanently locked &mdash; at least, until a consensus is reached for administration of significant changes to the template. The version of the template that should be protected is Thank you. ] 16:03, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

: Please reach an agreement with the other editor, and stop edit warring. --]|] 10:56, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

::Also, please don't label edits as "vandalism" when they are not. Thanks. --]<sup>]</sup> 12:30, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

===] (again)===
Sorry, folks, but he (Igor Bogdanov, one of the subjects of the article) continues to repeatedly vandalize the article. This time he is spoofing WP admins like G-man or Snowspinner (and earlier Fred Bauder). Again, why not protect the article for a while, unprotect it for a short period of time allowing for legitimate edits (and more vandalism from the subject of the article), clean out the vandalism and POV edits, and reprotect it for another period of time? Protecting this article from the tenatious and repeated vandalism of Igor Bogdanov is very costly in hours of time of the admins and legitimate editors of Misplaced Pages. I realize that WP likes to keep the articles in an editiable state, but we first need to ride this out, so that the subject of the article (who is clearly a narcissist and doesn't like to read unflattering facts about himself, and is also banned from WP) might evenutally go away. ] 19:23, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

:OK done, it should probably be left protected for a week this time. ]</font> 19:45, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
::Strongly disagree with a week-long vandalism protection - vprotects should never be that long. ] 23:23, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

::Have you seen the edit history?. These guys dont give up. ] 01:48, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

If they don't give up then protection is inappropriate. Use reversion instead, to enable editing to proceed. I've unprotected as it's already been protected for about two days. --]|] 10:53, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

===]===
Assorted edit wars between Georgian nationalists and anyone else who wanders by. Recent features include repeated removal of the dispute tag, despite the fact that there's rather clearly a dispute. The problem is unlikely to go away given that one participant declared "I WILL REMOVE DISPUTE TAGS". ] 05:01, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

:Not going to do anything for now. If this goes back to where it was, let us know. --]<sup>]</sup> 10:56, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

::It's back to where it is. I will protect it. --]<sup>]</sup> 12:47, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

===]===
I've copied a very longwinded justification of one side of the content dispute from her to ] as it doesn't really seem to belong here. I hope the disputants will come back when they've made up their minds what they want. On the face of it there doesn't seem to be a good reason to protect the article. --]|] 10:36, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Dear administrators,
I notice that since November 11th the D&N page has remained virtually unchanged with some minor improvements for which the administrators and other users should be thanked. The essence of the dispute was concentrated, at the end, on whether two members of the IAB (Bookchin and Castoriadis) should have special treatment with separate paragraphs dedicated to them, as opposed to the simple mentioning of the names of the rest. It seemed clear to everybody that both for reasons of principle (it is not right to discriminate in favour of two members just because a biased user thinks so) and for reasons of historical accuracy aptly exposed by the founder of the journal at:



there should simply be a list of names of all the IAB members. However, the biased user with the pseudonym Paul Cardan reappeared today and returned the disputed paragraphs. I therefore think that unless the administrators can produce a satisfactory explanation as to why the historical reasons and reasons of principle mentioned should be ignored, the page should be protected in the form it was finalised by SarekOfVulcan 15:59, 15 November 2005 ]

== Current requests for unprotection==
:''Please place new requests '''at the top.'''''

===]===

I'm not sure how long a page is protected after people are temporarily blocked from editing the page, but could that page be unprotected? The info being added after it was locked has been erroneous. ] 02:58, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

:I will unlock it, but I will put it on my watchlist. If it needs to be reprotected, please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks. --]<sup>]</sup> 08:28, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

I have to agree... The wrestler "Superstar" Billy Graham performing Eddie's funeral service??? Hadn't this guy heard of the great evangelist Billy Graham...? Sorry but that's laughable...



===]===

Should Misplaced Pages's highest-profile article be protected? The vandalism isn't THAT big of a deal. Does Misplaced Pages stand for nothing? ] 23:57, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Excuse, me but why should every other article except this one be allowed protection. You hypocritical left-wingers make no sense.. you'd be up in arms if it was your precious John Kerry's article... or abortion rights for lesbians...

: Unprotected. But as a matter of historical fact I think you'll find if you check that this article is seldom protected, although it is one of the most heavily vandalised. It's an article that attracts a lot of vandalism, but it's also on many watchlists. See ]. --]|] 10:08, 17 November 2005 (UTC)



===]===

This page should use a different protection template; right now a talk page is telling people to go to the talk page's talk page to resolve a dispute on the talk page. And, yes, clicking on "discussion page" gets one to ]. Sort of like that ]. :) Maybe ] would work better, especially if BigDaddy777 or others are vandalizing the page in question. ] 05:27, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

:I agree with you. I'll change the tag to the rarely used protection tag that says why the page is being protected. And I'll remove the talk talk page. Otherwise, we would then need to protect THAT page and could end up with multiple talk talk pages. --]<sup>]</sup> 08:16, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:34, 12 January 2025

Wikimedia noticeboard for requesting protection of pages "WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions, Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission, or Misplaced Pages:Random page patrol.
Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles,
content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Skip to requests for protection
    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit
    this header: viewedit


    Archiving icon
    Archives

    2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection Shortcuts

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    List of Stranger Things episodes

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- Alex_21 TALK 00:58, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

    DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:21, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

    Jatki language

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A number of IPs and sockpuppets have been disruptively editing this and several other pages for which I am requesting semi-page protection. I'm pretty sure it's the same person, because as soon as one is blocked, another reinstates the same changes. (Always about substituting Punjabi for other languages or cultures, such as Saraiki.). Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:32, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

    User(s) blocked: 93.150.224.0/20 (talk · contribs). Blocked IP range for 1 month. — Newslinger talk 03:37, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
    Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:37, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
    Thanks very much for doing these, Newslinger - much appreciated. Here's hoping the pest loses interest after a couple of weeks! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 04:28, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
    No problem! If the disruptive editing does reoccur, please submit another report. IP range blocks tend to be more effective than page protection when many articles are affected, so if any future disruptive editing comes from an IP address that looks close to one of the previously blocked IP addresses, a report on the vandalism noticeboard might be the best solution. — Newslinger talk 04:36, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
    Thanks - I have reported some of the individual IPs, and someone did block some related to a sockpuppet account, I think. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 04:42, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

    Caribbean Hindustani

    Reason: User is changing sources and including fictional names to spread his propaganda by giving false information. Adrikshit (talk) 02:33, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

    DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I will be giving them a CTOPS alert. Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

    Alpha Centauri

    Reason: Pending Changes for some time - Over the last year, it seems like there has been a fairly substantial amount of IP vandalism, but I don't think it's quite enough for semi-protection. 2601:343:4100:1E90:B913:2CAA:C102:E92A (talk) 03:51, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not really much editing to begin with over the past year. Daniel Case (talk) 03:54, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

    List of people from Richmond Hill, Ontario

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EggRoll97 03:58, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

    Peter Yarrow

    Reason: Ongoing excessive editing of criminal conviction section nearly a week after his death. Misplaced Pages is not the news nor the morality police. 💥Casualty 04:45, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

    Pericles Abbasi

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent disruptive editing as experienced in the past. Marincyclist (talk) 04:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Shortcuts

    Yoon Suk Yeol

    Temporary pending changes protection: Reduce the protection to pending changes, as all vandals that triggered the temporary semi-protection are all ip users. It would be greatly appreciated if the semi-protection is reduced to pending changes for the remainder of the duration. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 18:57, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

    Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
    Further information: Misplaced Pages:Edit requests


    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Archive.