Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/List of Jewish bankers: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:57, 17 November 2005 editQuillercouch (talk | contribs)1,634 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:36, 26 April 2024 edit undoJonesey95 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, Template editors370,750 editsm Fix Linter errors. More needed. Leaving font tags for bots. 
(17 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the debate was '''delete'''. (75% delete from 30 votes, and 10 keep votes). - ] 01:50, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
non-encyclopedic listcruft with little hope of ever becoming comprehensive or maintanable → ] {<font face="arial, helvetica" size=0><sup>]</sup></font><font face="arial, helvetica">ł</font><font face="arial, helvetica" size=0><sub>]</sub></font>} 12:37, 13 November 2005 (UTC) non-encyclopedic listcruft with little hope of ever becoming comprehensive or maintanable → ] {<font face="arial, helvetica" size=0><sup>]</sup></font><font face="arial, helvetica">ł</font><font face="arial, helvetica" size=0><sub>]</sub></font>} 12:37, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete or speedy delete''': This isn't just a case of lack of comprehensiveness. This is another one of those "let's list the Jews" things that ''certain people'' are forever engaging in. Of evil intent, evil effect, and misbegotten impetus. ] 13:28, 13 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete or speedy delete''': This isn't just a case of lack of comprehensiveness. This is another one of those "let's list the Jews" things that ''certain people'' are forever engaging in. Of evil intent, evil effect, and misbegotten impetus. ] 13:28, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' Should not breakdown lists by category generally ] ] 14:19, 13 November 2005 (UTC) * '''Delete''' Should not breakdown lists by category generally ] ] 14:19, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. --]<sup><small>( ] | ])</small></sup> 14:24, 13 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per nom. --]<sup><small>( ] | ])</small></sup> 14:24, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' - ill-intended ] 14:31, 13 November 2005 (UTC) * '''Delete''' - ill-intended ] 14:31, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' listcruft with malicious intent. --] 14:35, 13 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete''' listcruft with malicious intent. --] 14:35, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' to ]</i> '''Delete''' as conspiracycruft, possibly with malicious intent. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 14:49, 13 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Redirect''' to ] '''Delete''' as conspiracycruft, possibly with malicious intent. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 14:49, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', listcruft. —] 15:06, 13 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete''', listcruft. —] 15:06, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' ] 15:38, 13 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete''' ] 15:38, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
Line 14: Line 20:
****It's already been tried: ]. The verdict was "keep". &mdash; ] <small>]</small> 18:21, 13 November 2005 (UTC) ****It's already been tried: ]. The verdict was "keep". &mdash; ] <small>]</small> 18:21, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. The logical conclusion of this practice is ] and ]. ] 16:33, 13 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. The logical conclusion of this practice is ] and ]. ] 16:33, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
**I should get started on ], then. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 16:37, 13 November 2005 (UTC) **I should get started on ], then. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 16:37, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
***Better not create ]. Unemployed people are unlikely to deserve an article, and listing non-existing articles which will never be created (or cannot be created) is cause for deletion. - ]|] 09:48, 14 November 2005 (UTC) ***Better not create ]. Unemployed people are unlikely to deserve an article, and listing non-existing articles which will never be created (or cannot be created) is cause for deletion. - ]|] 09:48, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
****Well, thank you for that advice. In return, might I interest you in a slice of ]? - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 15:24, 14 November 2005 (UTC) ****Well, thank you for that advice. In return, might I interest you in a slice of ]? - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 15:24, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', per above arguments. ] 17:11, 13 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete''', per above arguments. ] 17:11, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
*<s>'''Delete''' &mdash; Inconsequential list. &mdash; ] 17:22, 13 November 2005 (UTC)</s> *<s>'''Delete''' &mdash; Inconsequential list. &mdash; ] 17:22, 13 November 2005 (UTC)</s>
Line 29: Line 35:
*'''Delete''' per Durova ] | ] 23:40, 13 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per Durova ] | ] 23:40, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. File under "who cares?" listcruft. Impossible maintain and could potentially have thousands of entries, most of whom would be relinked. I'd give careful consideration to the lists under ] too, the concept of which I find vaguely offensive. (I know it survived an AFD, but I think it should be revisited). If someone really wants to pigeonhole people by their religion, there are categories for that sort of thing. ] 04:14, 14 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. File under "who cares?" listcruft. Impossible maintain and could potentially have thousands of entries, most of whom would be relinked. I'd give careful consideration to the lists under ] too, the concept of which I find vaguely offensive. (I know it survived an AFD, but I think it should be revisited). If someone really wants to pigeonhole people by their religion, there are categories for that sort of thing. ] 04:14, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. This makes as much sense as a ], or a ]. ] (] <small>], ], ], <font color=green>]</font> ]</small>) 07:57, 14 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. This makes as much sense as a ], or a ]. ] (] <small>], ], ], ] ]</small>) 07:57, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. But someone's gotta make ]. - ] ] 08:06, 14 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. But someone's gotta make ]. - ] ] 08:06, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. While all you politically-correct sheep are jumping off a cliff, trying to outdo one another (without actually having visited the main-page list), you failed to realize that this was but one of a series of lists of Jewish notables. It appears to be maintained by Jews and is well-organized, and the persons in the list are "bankers of notabiliy," such as founders of historic firms like Salomon, and most from the 1800's. If it were a conspiracy list, wouldn't it be targeting present-day bankers? So, you sheep can go jump off a cliff, having voted prejudicially without first investigating the case.] 09:39, 14 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Keep'''. While all you politically-correct sheep are jumping off a cliff, trying to outdo one another (without actually having visited the main-page list), you failed to realize that this was but one of a series of lists of Jewish notables. It appears to be maintained by Jews and is well-organized, and the persons in the list are "bankers of notabiliy," such as founders of historic firms like Salomon, and most from the 1800's. If it were a conspiracy list, wouldn't it be targeting present-day bankers? So, you sheep can go jump off a cliff, having voted prejudicially without first investigating the case.] 09:39, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
Line 45: Line 51:
*'''Keep but drastic overhaul''' I see no reason to assume any more sinister intent than I had when I have started similar lists. However, the article as it stands is dreadful. It doesn't seem to list the Rothschilds, and it's full of red links. ] 20:38, 15 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Keep but drastic overhaul''' I see no reason to assume any more sinister intent than I had when I have started similar lists. However, the article as it stands is dreadful. It doesn't seem to list the Rothschilds, and it's full of red links. ] 20:38, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
**The reason to assume sinister intent is because "Jewish bankers" have long been one of the primary boogeymen of anti-zionism. → ] {<font face="arial, helvetica" size="0"><sup>]</sup></font><font face="arial, helvetica">ł</font><font face="arial, helvetica" size="0"><sub>]</sub></font>} 12:04, 17 November 2005 (UTC) **The reason to assume sinister intent is because "Jewish bankers" have long been one of the primary boogeymen of anti-zionism. → ] {<font face="arial, helvetica" size="0"><sup>]</sup></font><font face="arial, helvetica">ł</font><font face="arial, helvetica" size="0"><sub>]</sub></font>} 12:04, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
***'''Comment''' There is the saying, "assumptions make asses of us all." We should not "assume" bias without first checking the facts. Checking the facts finds that the list was created in a context of a myriad of occupations, by a person who identifies themself by a Jewish name. No actual evidence of an "attack" is offered. Arniep,on Nov 18, nominated all the "list of Jewish.." for deletion; not surprisingly,those such as "List of Jewish superheroes" were being "kept" while "List of Jewish criminals" was being "deleted." A computer would not have known the difference. Also, by itself a "list of Jewish bankers" might be "sinister," but this list was not by itself, it was with a collection of lists. Thus, what we have here is nothing more than an exercise in political correctness; the bias is caused by the lens we choose to view the list in, not anything that the list "gives" us. ] 21:20, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per everyone above ] 12:15, 16 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per everyone above ] 12:15, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Categorize''' members of the list to ''Category:Bankers'' and ''Category:Jewish '' according to nationality, then '''delete''' the list, so no information is actually lost. {{User:Freakofnurture/sig}} 14:28, 16 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Categorize''' members of the list to ''Category:Bankers'' and ''Category:Jewish '' according to nationality, then '''delete''' the list, so no information is actually lost. &mdash; <b><i>]</i> <small>(<span class="plainlinks"></span>)</small></b> 14:28, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', because I do, in fact, assume sinister intent in this case (in addition to the utter uselessness of such lists in general). ] 19:28, 16 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete''', because I do, in fact, assume sinister intent in this case (in addition to the utter uselessness of such lists in general). ] 19:28, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - see my comments on ] - ] 09:33, 17 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Keep''' - see my comments on ] - ] 09:33, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - silly, possible bad faith, useless. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 11:15, 17 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete''' - silly, possible bad faith, useless. ] ] 11:15, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' this list seems to have been created in good faith by ] who seems to have contributed to many jewish lists including ], which I doubt someone with ill intent would bother doing. ] 12:02, 17 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Keep''' this list seems to have been created in good faith by ] who seems to have contributed to many jewish lists including ], which I doubt someone with ill intent would bother doing. ] 12:02, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' ] 12:42, 17 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Keep''' ] 12:42, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' I abhor the attitude that Jews aren't allowed the same self-identity as anyone else. - ] 12:57, 17 November 2005 (UTC) *'''Keep''' I abhor the attitude that Jews aren't allowed the same self-identity as anyone else. - ] 12:57, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
* <s>'''Delete'''</s> '''Keep'''. I thought it had been possibly in 'bad faith' but Arniep pointed me to ]'s page who created many of the lists & it seems to be ok. ] 14:18, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' for the many reasons stated above ] 18:01, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. I'm all for a ] with criteria such as founders or presidents of notable banks. To have a ''List of Jewish bankers'' smells of boosting stereotypes or ethnic pride. ] 00:26, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' or '''Moove'''. see ] --]] 03:52, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Many many red-links. As for Poetlister's comment: Misplaced Pages isn't a place for ''anyone'' to "self-identify"&mdash;it's an encyclopedia. -- ] 04:19, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
***'''Comment'''
*'''Delete'''. ] 18:26, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

Just proving my point, someone (Arniep) nominated a whole "list of" Jewish. Not surprisingly, the "List of Jewish Criminals" is going down in flames, while most of the rest are "speedy keep." In fact, one person who voted against "List of Jewish Bankers" voted FOR some of the other lists. This merely proves my point that reactionary politically-correct bias is operating here...I'm sure a court of law would find that since these lists were created by the same user, who has shown an intent not of anti-Semitism but Jewish identity (being Jewish), taken as a whole the lists should be equal. Remember, DISCRIMINATION is picking out one thing and applying different standards.] 09:36, 18 November 2005 (UTC)


List of Jewish American academics
List of Jewish American business figures
List of Jewish American political figures
List of Jewish American scientists
List of Jewish American show business figures
List of Jewish American sport figures
List of Jewish American writers
List of Jewish Americans
List of Jewish Fellows of the Royal Society
List of Jewish Members of the National Academy of Engineering
List of Jewish Recipients of National Medal of Technology
List of Jewish bankers
List of Jewish criminals
List of Jewish publishers
List of Jews
List of Jews in business
List of Jews in law

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>

Latest revision as of 16:36, 26 April 2024

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. (75% delete from 30 votes, and 10 keep votes). - Mailer Diablo 01:50, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

List of Jewish bankers

non-encyclopedic listcruft with little hope of ever becoming comprehensive or maintanable → Ξxtreme Unction {łblah} 12:37, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Just proving my point, someone (Arniep) nominated a whole "list of" Jewish. Not surprisingly, the "List of Jewish Criminals" is going down in flames, while most of the rest are "speedy keep." In fact, one person who voted against "List of Jewish Bankers" voted FOR some of the other lists. This merely proves my point that reactionary politically-correct bias is operating here...I'm sure a court of law would find that since these lists were created by the same user, who has shown an intent not of anti-Semitism but Jewish identity (being Jewish), taken as a whole the lists should be equal. Remember, DISCRIMINATION is picking out one thing and applying different standards.Ryoung122 09:36, 18 November 2005 (UTC)


List of Jewish American academics List of Jewish American business figures List of Jewish American political figures List of Jewish American scientists List of Jewish American show business figures List of Jewish American sport figures List of Jewish American writers List of Jewish Americans List of Jewish Fellows of the Royal Society List of Jewish Members of the National Academy of Engineering List of Jewish Recipients of National Medal of Technology List of Jewish bankers List of Jewish criminals List of Jewish publishers List of Jews List of Jews in business List of Jews in law

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.