| Revision as of 20:00, 17 November 2005 edit136.159.208.28 (talk) see talk← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:40, 6 September 2024 edit undoXqbot (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,319,594 editsm Bot: Fixing double redirect from Israeli West Bank barrier to West Bank barrierTag: Redirect target changed | ||
| (267 intermediate revisions by 93 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| '''Apartheid wall''' is a term sometimes used to describe the ] by its opponents. They refer to it this way because they argue that: | |||
| {{R from alternative name}} | |||
| The extension of the barrier into the ] isolates Palestinian communities and consolidates the annexation of Palestinian land by ]. The barrier, it is argued, is part of a "long-term policy of occupation, discrimination and expulsion," which effectively constitutes a form of ]. {{fn|1}} Although the Israeli government cites security concerns as the rationale for the construction of the barrier, the barrier also serves to separate, isolate and disenfranchise an entire people. Moreover, its current route on confiscated Palestinian land suggests that there are motives involved which go beyond security. This is corroborated by Israeli ] groups such as ] and more recently by the Israeli State Prosecution itself (referring only to the part built beyond the ]). | |||
| {{R from non-neutral name}} | |||
| It is estimated that 16% of the Palestinians in the West Bank live on what will become the Israeli side of the barrier, and it is feared that they will eventually be expelled or forced to migrate. | |||
| Defenders of the barrier reject both the "Apartheid" and "wall" designations, arguing that: | |||
| * Only seven percent of the barrier is ]ed, 93% is ]d. | |||
| * The goal of ]s was to eliminate the rights of the majority ]n black population, while the goal of the barrier is to protect Israeli civilians from ] infiltration and attack. | |||
| * The ] ruled that the barrier is indeed defensive and accepted the Israeli claim that the route is based on security considerations . | |||
| * Apartheid was a system established to disenfranchise citizens, based on ], from their own country; however, ] Palestinians were never citizens of Israel, and ]s and Palestinians are not ] distinct. | |||
| * The barrier is clearly not intended to separate Jews from ]s, as over 1 million Arabs on the "Israeli" side of the barrier are full citizens of Israel, and constitute 15% of ]. | |||
| * Apartheid involved the forced removal of about 1.5 million South Africans to bantustans, but the barrier causes no ]. None of the 10,000 Palestinians (0.5%) who will be left on the Israeli side of the barrier (based on the latest February, 2005 route) will be forced to migrate. | |||
| * South African ] did not seek the destruction of South Africa, but merely the reformation of the government; however, the majority of Palestinians in the territories dispute Israel's right to exist. | |||
| * Bantustans were created in order to force legal borders; however, the barrier is a temporary defensive measure, not a border, and therefore can be dismantled if appropriate. | |||
| * Apartheid was an outgrowth of ], ] policy; Israel's Jewish population consisted mostly of ] with a ] to the land. | |||
| * If this separation barrier is an expression of apartheid, then any number of ] around the world must also meet that definition. | |||
| ==Notes== | |||
| {{fnb|1}} ''Peace under fire : Israel/Palestine and the International Solidarity Movement'', ed. Josie Sandercock, et al. New York: Verso, 2004, p. 192. | |||
| ] | |||
Latest revision as of 20:40, 6 September 2024
Redirect to:
- From an alternative name: This is a redirect from a title that is another name or identity such as an alter ego, a nickname, or a synonym of the target, or of a name associated with the target.
- This redirect leads to the title in accordance with the naming conventions for common names to aid searches and writing. It is not necessary to replace these redirected links with a piped link.
- If this redirect is an incorrect name for the target, then {{R from incorrect name}} should be used instead.
- From a non-neutral name: This is a redirect from a title that contains a non-neutral, pejorative, controversial, or offensive word, phrase, or name. It leads to the target page in accordance with Misplaced Pages naming conventions for neutrality in page titles and can help writing and searches. Normally, these redirected links should be replaced with links that go directly to the target page.