Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Long Island Ping Pong League: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:44, 28 April 2009 editTide rolls (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled219,196 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 07:44, 10 April 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(27 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. ''']''' (]) 13:03, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|Category}}


:{{la|Long Island Ping Pong League}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|Long Island Ping Pong League}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
Line 20: Line 27:
*'''Delete all.''' I would understand if it were a matter of the league not maintaining a web presence of its own, but here, there is not even a blog entry. --<span style="background:#CC1010;color:#FFA0A0">'''&nbsp;Blanchardb'''&nbsp;</span>-<small><sup><span style="color:#A62428">]•]•]</span></sup></small>- timed 22:42, 28 April 2009 (UTC) *'''Delete all.''' I would understand if it were a matter of the league not maintaining a web presence of its own, but here, there is not even a blog entry. --<span style="background:#CC1010;color:#FFA0A0">'''&nbsp;Blanchardb'''&nbsp;</span>-<small><sup><span style="color:#A62428">]•]•]</span></sup></small>- timed 22:42, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


* '''Delete all''' Per ] and only refs given were a non-working link and to the related WP articles. ]] 22:44, 28 April 2009 (UTC) * '''Delete all''' Per ] and only refs given were a non-working link and to the related WP articles. ]] 22:44, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' all, I too just wasted a few minutes checking this. Give the creator a strong warning and block them if there is an attempt at re-creation. ]. ] (]) 00:06, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
*'''Comment.''' I just gave the author of these articles a level 3 warning for removing AfD tags and blanking this page. --<span style="background:#CC1010;color:#FFA0A0">'''&nbsp;Blanchardb'''&nbsp;</span>-<small><sup><span style="color:#A62428">]•]•]</span></sup></small>- timed 01:51, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
*<small>I reverted this comment, not realizing the creator legitimately wanted to be heard (he had, for one edit, attributed his own comment to {{user|Cunard}}):</small>
*'' '''Keep''' - League of AMATEUR players. Association is not major, but verifiable by referenced sites. Some articles are mid-construction, refs coming soon. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->.''
:--<span style="background:#CC1010;color:#FFA0A0">'''&nbsp;Blanchardb'''&nbsp;</span>-<small><sup><span style="color:#A62428">]•]•]</span></sup></small>- timed 02:13, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
* <s>'''Keep All''' - Please do not revert updates to articles which contain references. Furthermore, via wikipedia and an under-construction website, this league is gaining web presence. This is no hoax, the league is legitimate. Although the league originated in 2007, it's journey onto the internet began but a few days ago. Along with the wiki entry comes a website, in which all LPL entries are being referenced toward. Thank you. -Joreiley<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->.</s>
::Please don't vote more than once. Your opinion is already expressed :) . <span style="font-family:terminal">]]</span> 01:58, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
:'''Comment''' either reliable sources exist or they don't and right now there is no evidence that any exist. The only reference on any of these articles is to a half created personal website, not exactly a reliable source. If not a hoax, its at least an attempt to promote something that doesn't meet ] via Misplaced Pages. If this league does exist and does get the kind of significant coverage required of all wikipedia articles at some point in the future then articles can be created then.--] (]) 06:19, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', it's a bunch of kids playing ping pong in their basements, and calling it a "league". ] (]) 13:02, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete all'''. No proof of existence, let alone ]. Probable hoax, but even if not, fails the ]. --]<sup><small>(])</small></sup> 13:47, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete all''' - at best, not notable. ] (]) 16:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
*'''Keep all''' - According the article's history, articles are being updated continuously by its creator-- i say keep it, the main site speaks for itself, the article just needs some fine-tuning (obv. refs) . ] (]) 16:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC) <small>— ] (] • ]) has made ] outside this topic. {{ #if: | The preceding ] comment was added at {{{2}}} (UTC).}}</small>
:'''Comment''' frequent updates or not, the concern that this is a hoax still has not been resolved.--] (]) 01:16, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 07:44, 10 April 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 13:03, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Long Island Ping Pong League

Long Island Ping Pong League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This league appears to be a hoax. I've done several searches for sources and have been unable to verify its existence. This league is in the United States, a country that has a large presence on the Internet, so the lack of sources on the topic indicates that this league, and its related tournaments, are hoaxes. Cunard (talk) 22:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

I am nominating the following related articles because they are tournaments that are part of this league:

I am also nominating the following category:

Cunard (talk) 22:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete all - no references, I'm not finding anything to indicate they exist. Only G hits are to these wikipedia articles. Thankfully the nav boxes at the bottom haven't actually been created yet.--RadioFan (talk) 22:35, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete all. I would understand if it were a matter of the league not maintaining a web presence of its own, but here, there is not even a blog entry. -- Blanchardb -- timed 22:42, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete all Per RadioFan and only refs given were a non-working link and to the related WP articles. Tiderolls 22:44, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete all, I too just wasted a few minutes checking this. Give the creator a strong warning and block them if there is an attempt at re-creation. WP:MADEUP. Drawn Some (talk) 00:06, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment. I just gave the author of these articles a level 3 warning for removing AfD tags and blanking this page. -- Blanchardb -- timed 01:51, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
  • I reverted this comment, not realizing the creator legitimately wanted to be heard (he had, for one edit, attributed his own comment to Cunard (talk · contribs)):
  • Keep - League of AMATEUR players. Association is not major, but verifiable by referenced sites. Some articles are mid-construction, refs coming soon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joreiley (talk • contribs) .
-- Blanchardb -- timed 02:13, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep All - Please do not revert updates to articles which contain references. Furthermore, via wikipedia and an under-construction website, this league is gaining web presence. This is no hoax, the league is legitimate. Although the league originated in 2007, it's journey onto the internet began but a few days ago. Along with the wiki entry comes a website, in which all LPL entries are being referenced toward. Thank you. -Joreiley—Preceding unsigned comment added by Joreiley (talk • contribs) .
Please don't vote more than once. Your opinion is already expressed :) . flaminglawyer 01:58, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Comment either reliable sources exist or they don't and right now there is no evidence that any exist. The only reference on any of these articles is to a half created personal website, not exactly a reliable source. If not a hoax, its at least an attempt to promote something that doesn't meet notability guidlines via Misplaced Pages. If this league does exist and does get the kind of significant coverage required of all wikipedia articles at some point in the future then articles can be created then.--RadioFan (talk) 06:19, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Comment frequent updates or not, the concern that this is a hoax still has not been resolved.--RadioFan (talk) 01:16, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.