Revision as of 14:02, 8 May 2009 editWikifan12345 (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers12,039 edits →Setting a common goal← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:05, 9 November 2024 edit undoTom.Reding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,843,373 editsm merge blp/living/activepol params into blp=activepol; cleanupTag: AWB | ||
(578 intermediate revisions by 54 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Skip to talk}} | ||
{{Talk header}} | |||
{{WikiProject Egypt|class=C|importance=Mid}} | |||
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=activepol|class=B|vital=yes|listas=Elbaradei, Mohamed|1= | |||
{{WPBiography | |||
{{WikiProject Biography |politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=low}} | |||
| living=yes | |||
{{WikiProject Egypt |importance=high}} | |||
| class=C | |||
{{WikiProject Iran |importance=}} | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Archives|search=yes| | |||
{{WikiProject Iran}} | |||
* ] <small>(June 2004–May 2009)</small> | |||
* ] <small>(May–July 2009)</small> | |||
}} | |||
{{Translated page|pl|Mohamed ElBaradei}} | |||
{{Translated page|ru|эль-Барадеи, Мохаммед}} | |||
__TOC__ | |||
== Name Stylization == | |||
The opening paragraph says "An Egyptian, ElBaradei prefers the Latin writing of his name to be spelled ElBaradei rather than hyphenated (El-Baradei)." The phrasing there suggests that not hyphenating his name is his preference is because he is Egyptian. I just don't know anything about how Egyptians sylize their names. If this is a common Egyptian practice, then I think the sentence works as is. If the linkage between stylization and being Egyptian is not appropriate, then I think we need a wording change. ] (]) 07:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I second this, as I came to this discussion page for the same question... -- ] (]) 16:53, 26 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Me too... ] (]) 01:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
The article says that his name in Arabic is Muḥammad al-Barādaʿī. What's the source for this? al-Barād'''i'''ʿī with an "i" after the "d", makes more sense both in terms of Arabic grammar and the representation of his name in English. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 02:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
Can someone knowledgeable of Arabic and IPA please add his name in IPA so that we can have an accurate pronunciation? ] (]) 22:12, 30 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
Right now, the IPA is added and you would notice that how his name is actually pronounced {{IPA|}} is different from how it is transliterated. <small>--] (]) 23:34, 9 February 2011 (UTC)</small> | |||
== Presidential election ambition == | |||
this should be included here. ] (]) 20:43, 19 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Italicizing the “the” in the names of newspapers == | |||
Recently I changed the text to conform to the ] recommendation (see ) that one should use lowercase and no italics for “the” in a newspaper title, even if it is part of the official title, while at the same time one should italicize the articles of non-English names of newspapers. So it would be “the ''New York Times''” and “the ''Washington Post''”, but “''Le Monde''.” | |||
I realize this is a bit nitpicking, but I'm bringing it up because within a couple of hours from my changes, someone reverted ''one'' of them back to italicizing the “the” in one of the mentions of the ''New York Times''. | |||
I did look for Misplaced Pages-specific guidelines on this issue, but couldn't find them. On the other hand, it is a general guideline of Misplaced Pages that within an article one should be consistent with style (see ]), so that either all the “the”s should be italicized, or none. | |||
On the other hand, it is ''not'' a ''general'' guideline of Misplaced Pages that styles of ''different'' articles should match; see ]. (This makes sense, since the editors of each article should be able to choose the style best suited to their particular topic.) For what it's worth, the Misplaced Pages article on the ] is not internally consistent itself on the issue of italicizing the “the”, so that sometimes it uses “''the Times''” and sometimes “the ''Times''.” | |||
Any thoughts? ] (]) 08:12, 31 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
:My main purpose was to replace the non-standard wiki-link {{#tag:nowiki|]}} with the standard {{#tag:nowiki|]}}. A recent editor inserted many links in the non-standard format and I was starting to fix it, but gave up after the first one. Perhaps someone can take up where I left off. | |||
:I don't particularly care if "The" is italicized, but it is part of the official name of the paper. 01:59, 1 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
O.K., I see—the point was to remove the underscores in the wikilink, as per the recommendation given ] (subsection “Link to another Wiki article”). I am indeed the guilty party for putting the underscores, and so I will fix it. | |||
As far as italicizing the “the.” Yes, it is part of the official name of the newspaper, but the ] says that it nevertheless should ''not'' be capitalized (CMOS 16th edition, 8.168); see for their reasoning. | |||
Of course, we are not ''obliged'' to follow the CMOS on this issue, or on any other issue; we are only obliged to be internally consistent. But it ''is'' a widely-used style, and they put a lot of thought into their recommendations. So, absent objections from you or others, I'll try to make the article compliant with it whenever possible. ] (]) 15:49, 1 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
Update: I've removed the underscores from all the wikilinks. ] (]) 17:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
== More nitpicking issues: the “the” and the wikilinks == | |||
Still using “the ''New York Times''” as an example, and at the risk of sounding over-the-board nitpicking: in addition to the issue of whether the “the” should be italicized, which I've discussed in the section “]” above, there is also the issue of whether the “the” should be included in any wikilinks. In other words, should it be “],” or “the ]”? | |||
I think that if the “the” is not italicized, then it should ''not'' be included in the wikilink. On the other hand, if we should decide that the “the” which is part of the official name of the newspaper should be italicized after all, then that “the” should also be included in the wikilink. | |||
So, given the way things stand right now, the correct form would be “the ].” ] (]) 17:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Degree == | |||
The article indicates that ElBaradei earned a PhD from the NYU School of Law. Can someone verify this? I'm not aware of any US law school that grants a PhD; normally, the highest advanced degree awarded by such an institution is the JSD/SJD. NYU law school currently grants a JSD. Is it possible that ElBaradei either (a) earned a PhD from the NYU graduate school or (b) earned a JSD from the law school? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 02:28, 1 February 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:I don't know how things stood in ElBaradei's time, but currently the NYU School of Law offers a J.D.-Ph.D. dual degree with The law and society program; see , which links . ] (]) 18:06, 1 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
:Update: His degree is indeed J.S.D. I have two strong sources for this: | |||
::1. the entry for his thesis in the NYU library catalog; see . The thesis is cataloged as “Thesis (S.J.D.)--New York University, 1974.” | |||
::2. The index to vol. 60 of New York University Law Review (60 N.Y.U. L. Rev. i 1985). His name is listed under “Adjunct Associate Professors” as “Mohamed M. El Baradei, LL.B., LL.M., J.S.D.” The access to New York University Law Review is not public, but google does find his entry: just google "Mohamed M. El Baradei, LL.B., LL.M., J.S.D.", like . | |||
So his degree is ], a research doctorate in law, which, of course, makes it the law equivalent of a Ph.D. The biographies at the and at the both include the (word-for-word) same sentence, “He gained a Bachelor´s degree in Law in 1962 at the University of Cairo, and a Doctorate in International Law at the New York University School of Law in 1974,” which is correct, since J.S.D. is indeed a doctorate. Someone has already modified the article so that it says J.S.D. rather than Ph.D., though without giving a source, which I guess I can add now. ] (]) 12:22, 2 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Muslim brotherhood == | |||
Someone should update the article regarding his recent endorsement by the Muslim brotherhood. The article currently indicates they are still feuding <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 05:31, 2 February 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:He did not endorse the Brotherhood, but accepted it as a part of Egypt's political landscape. <span style="border:1px solid;color:#000085"> ] ] </span> 05:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
::Cs32en, the unsigned author above stated that El Baradei was endorsed '''BY''' the Muslim Brotherhood. This is vastly different than him giving an endorsement '''TO''' the Muslim Brotherhood. I think the unsigned author's point is especially valid... According to an article published 01 Feb 2011 in Foreign Affairs Journal, "the Muslim Brotherhood poised to gain influence in Egypt" . --] (]) 04:56, 3 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
=== Arabic/Foreign language sources === | |||
Naturally I'm in favor of more documentation as opposed to less, but could we get an english-language source concerning ElBaradei's presidential prospects? It strikes me as a very important/relevant aspect of the article, and for the only source backing it up (currentily no. 69; Masrawy.com) to be not in english strikes me as awkward given that the readership on en.wiki tends to be english speaking. Per ], non-english sources should at least be translated... Also, wouldn't confirmed news that ElBaradei is running for president appear in US/UK/other english-lanauage press? Related to this last point, I added a current events tag to sec 5.2, possible presidential candidacy ] (]) 04:02, 7 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Gorge Soros and International Crisis Group== | |||
{{archive box|]}} | |||
* There are rumors that he is member of a group that is paid by George Soros. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 06:24, 21 June 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:* Why is Soros' association with the International Crisis Group mentioned twice in the opening section? It doesn't seem directly relevant to an introduction to ElBaradei.] (]) 01:32, 21 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
:* How is the info relevant? and why does need a section by itself? I have also been noticing the article have been vandalized a lot lately as well -- ] (]) 00:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
==File:Elbaradei.png Nominated for Deletion== | |||
{| | |||
|- | |||
| ] | |||
| An image used in this article, ], has been nominated for deletion at ] in the following category: ''Media without a source as of 20 December 2011'' | |||
;What should I do? | |||
''Don't panic''; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. | |||
* If the image is ] then you may need to upload it to Misplaced Pages (Commons does not allow fair use) | |||
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no ] then it cannot be uploaded or used. | |||
''This notification is provided by a Bot'' --] (]) 16:10, 21 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Mediation== | |||
|} | |||
==Prime Minister== | |||
OK, I see you are both happy for me to mediate. One question before we start, as I don't like making assumptions. Is there just the one IP editor involved in the discussion? ] (]) 23:15, 30 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
He is set to be inaugurated tomorrow (7 July 2013) so naming him PM now is premature. ] (]) 18:02, 6 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
:Egypt is just covered in fog-of-war right now. I'm seeing reports on Twitter from credible sources now that no decision has been made on naming ElBaradei as prime minister. It's El-Beheiry all over again. -] (]) 21:28, 6 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
:Yes.--] (]) 01:24, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks Kudzu1, so the information turned out to be wrong in the first place. ] (]) 19:15, 7 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
== surname : El Baradei, ElBaradei, el-Baradei == | |||
OK. We can get started then. I'm going to archive this page first for ease of editing. Any useful discussion can be brought back out. | |||
Wouldn't it be better to write El Baradei or el-Baradei (instead of ElBaradei)? ] (]) 21:09, 6 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
# Agree to mediation as a method for resolving this dispute {{done}} | |||
:Sorry, I was wrong. The famous politician himself writes his name ElBaradei ... let's do same. ] (]) 21:32, 6 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
# Elicit participation from other users {{done}} | |||
::Well, in fact the politician has been writing his surname ElBaradei for several years - but perhaps we should not do it. I think most international administrations will use two words, for him and every person of his family: El Baradei. ] (]) 06:58, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
# Agree on the process {{done}} | |||
::Two words would fit better, see Misplaced Pages: Turkish: El Baradey, Russian: эль-Барадеи, German: el-Baradei, French: El Baradei. So please give us the space (punctuation) ... ] (]) 07:06, 10 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
# Set behavioral conditions for participation {{done}} | |||
# Set a common goal - ] | |||
# Make a plan for how to get to that goal (the next 4 points could be that plan) | |||
# Agree on the policies that are relevant to this article | |||
# Draw up a rough article outline (maybe just section headings and what relative size they should be) | |||
# Work through sections one by one using the common goal as a yardstick to check against | |||
# Repeat until finished | |||
== Prime Minister? == | |||
==Discussion on the process== | |||
They denied The News about Baradei being a Prime Minister . | |||
This is my suggested means of reaching a resolution. Make changes as you see fit until we're all happy. ] (]) 02:04, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
No agreement yet about The New Prime Minister . <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
== External links modified == | |||
## Elicit participation from other users | |||
## Set behavioral conditions for participation | |||
## Set a common goal | |||
## Make a plan for how to get to that goal (the next 4 points could be that plan) | |||
## Agree on the policies that are relevant to this article | |||
## Draw up a rough article outline (maybe just section headings and what relative size they should be) | |||
## Work through sections one by one using the common goal as a yardstick to check against | |||
## Repeat until finished | |||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
:I thought we could make it clear that this should be done in a reasonably step-by-step manner, and that it also might make sense to solicit input from other editors as well to arrive at a better conclusion and to try to avoid a back-and-forth.--] (]) 02:08, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Absolutely. I suspect others may be less interested in turning up until step 5, but feel free to invite anyone. ] (]) 02:14, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::Solicit input from editors outside of the dispute? I disagree. I believe all users involved in the mediation must have an edit history or be an administrator/requested neutral opinion (by mediator)/editors who belong to related boards. But allowing opinions from random users would likely turn this into a POV match up, especially when most of them don't know the lengthy history behind this dispute. ] (]) 02:15, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::Kevin - a fair warning. The above IP, as well as the other 72 IP, have been involved in prior disputes with me. I would hate to see "friendly" users endorsing x side solely based on their POV or collective agreement on other articles. This is very common in controversial Israel/Palestinian/Middle Eastern articles. Therefore, I believe involvement of "invited" users would influence the integrity of the mediation. ] (]) 02:21, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::::Edit: If editors were to be invited, I believe Kevin should be the one to submit requests. We as disputing editors should not be allowed to ask for opinions from friendly users. ] (]) 02:23, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::(edit conflict)I'll keep an eye on any excessive POV problems, and will deal with them as required. At this point the history of the dispute is less important that getting the content right, and so long as they are neutral other editors could be quite helpful. ] and ] have been involved here, and may have useful opinions. ] (]) 02:25, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::::I've invited the 2 editors I noted. I don't see many others who have been involved here recently. If we reach any points where agreement cannot be reached, other opinions can be sought as needed. ] (]) 02:29, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::::::There opinion might be useful but there involvement was minor. I don't think Nathan even edited the article. edit: And Nathan sided with the IP, though I might have to look at the discussion archive. I sent you a message, I think it is important. ] (]) 02:41, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::Every editor's opinion is important, and we should not be resistant to those who might help. Everyone is going to take a side at some point, so I don;t see that as a particular problem. It is important that we focus on the content (when we reach that point). ] (]) 02:45, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::::::That's fine but I don't want to see users aside from yourself eliciting friendly editors to opinion stack. We can't be naive, there is a mountain of evidence that supports similar incidents on wikipedia. ] (]) 03:27, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes: | |||
Any thoughts on the rest of the process? ] (]) 03:37, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120131184526/http://www.voanews.com/english/archive/2008-09/2008-09-10-voa37.cfm to http://www.voanews.com/english/archive/2008-09/2008-09-10-voa37.cfm | |||
:] was also involved in a fair amount of the previous discussion, but I suppose someone else can invite him if they want.--] (]) 15:10, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know. | |||
I was invited to join this process. I don't expect to be heavily involved, but may chime in occasionally. ] (]) 06:38, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Anyways, I was happy with the rest of the process for resolution if everyone else was.--] (]) 15:23, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}} | |||
An outline of the problems I've identified: | |||
Cheers. —]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">]:Online</sub></small> 09:37, 30 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
* There is a statement in the archives that ElBaradei's earlier terms need expanded coverage, and no one disagreed. | |||
* Everyone seems to agree that "Criticism of..." sections are substandard and should be avoided. | |||
* We argued over a POV tag, held an RfC, and the consensus of the RfC was clearly that a POV tag was inappropriate in the abscence of a specific ''POV'' problem. I realize that Wikifan disagrees with this outcome. | |||
* There has been discussion about the editing history of the article and other conduct. I think we should leave this stuff behind - we should avoid assigning blame or throwing accusations unless it becomes absolutely necessary, and to me it seems like we are still at the point where dispensing with that for now might allow a consensus form of the article to emerge. | |||
== External links modified == | |||
In terms of core problems, what am I missing? ]] <sup>(formerly Avruch)</sup> 21:55, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
I'll be brief: | |||
I have just modified 5 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: | |||
*Fix the over-dependence on extremely unreliable sources. | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110218084354/http://www.iaea.org/About/dg/elbaradei/biography.html to http://www.iaea.org/About/dg/elbaradei/biography.html | |||
*Reduce balancing criticisms with non-notable figures. | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060627092823/http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Booklets/Nobel/nobelfund0506.pdf to http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Booklets/Nobel/nobelfund0506.pdf | |||
*End excluding RS while merging questionable sources to support facts (this is a major issue and could potentially lead to a libel accusation.) | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110510005822/http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/statements/2008/ebsp2008n008a.html to http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/Statements/2008/ebsp2008n008a.html | |||
*Reduction of IAEA/Me general mantra to counter specific claims. I.e, x says x about ME. Countered with a general opinion from ME. Unless ME responds directly, we can't continue to couch in general responses. We could potentially counter every accusation with a statement made by ME years before or years after. | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110314144824/http://www.masrawy.com/News/Egypt/Politics/2011/march/7/barad3i_president.aspx to http://www.masrawy.com/News/Egypt/Politics/2011/march/7/barad3i_president.aspx | |||
*Reduce awards section. No BLP has such a lengthy award section. Nobel is fine, a little mention on the honorary degrees, but everything else is non-notable. Some BLPs have hundreds of awards, but we don't include all of them. And like I said before, the awards were a direct copy and paste from the IAEA. Even in the same order. | |||
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.worldcat.org/title/age-of-deception-nuclear-diplomacy-in-treacherous-times/oclc/669754790%26referer%3Dbrief_results | |||
*Re-organize sections. Axe "first term, second term, third term etc.." | |||
*Edit according to strict ] standards, specifically the three core principals: ], ], and ]. Those should be the first pages we go to during disputes. No more "I don't like." A POV consensus cannot replace basic BLP laws. | |||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. | |||
That's all for now. ] (]) 22:37, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} | |||
:That all sounds reasonable as far as it goes. I did see you and the IPer discussing the sourcing issue; personally, I would exclude both Xinhua and VoA ''and'' severely limit any use of opinion columns (op-ed is sort of a NY Times-specific phrase that refers to a position in the physical paper, interesting fact). Xinhua and VoA are mouthpieces - intended to present the government view of the world. While the BBC is government sponsored, it differs from the other two in that the editorial control is independent - more analogous to NPR, really. I try not to rely on opinion columns because they present the imprimatur of an organization known as a reliable source but typically undergo only the most basic fact-checking (dates, names, events). In other forums there have been many discussions on sources that are reliable for some purposes but not as reliable for others; newspapers are a case on point, because the scrutiny on reporting (which has the reputation of the paper behind it) is much, much greater than that for opinions. ]] <sup>(formerly Avruch)</sup> 22:56, 1 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Editorials from reliable sources are valuable in BLPs. There is no rule endorsing the idea that they should be excluded. I understand the resistance since there is a mountain of not-so-pleasant criticisms, but we can't simply exclude them because of that. Xinhua isn't just a mouth piece, it's communist propaganda. Period. VoA isn't in the same league, but again its reliability is questionable because it is financed and run by the US government. BBC is subsidized by the British government but not administrated by it (supposedly.) Whatever factual inaccuracies notable journalists make in editorials is totally and completely irrelevant. Just like an inaccuracy or disputed evidence from ME, Rice, George Bush, Osama Bin Laden, we can include it if it comes from a reliable source. We of course quote in the context that it is x person's commentary, and not "this are the facts, says x." ME is a controversial figure. Similar BLPS: ] and ] both include editorial references. Plus, the claim of reliability ultimately rested on a users "opinion" of the editorial, and not actually wiki policy. However, the real problem is the complete and total omission of notable facts. 4 paragraphs on IAEA spin and ME pimping is not particularly notable. Coverage on Israel, Iran, and especially the United States must be merged, and should be the primary focus. We need information prior to 2007, barely anything has happened since then. ] (]) 00:25, 2 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::There were plenty of other sources which reported the same thing as Xinhua and Voice of America, so I think it would be very easy to just change where the ref tags point to while leaving the verifiable content the same. I believe the inclusion of the op-eds is different, specifically when the op-ed contains basic mistakes within it and has claims which aren't repeated in any other reliable sources. Are we to the point of discussing problems with the article yet? I was thinking we should identify some basic guidelines first.--] (]) 17:53, 2 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::::No there weren't. Notice the previous versions, very few paragraphs sentences had more than one source. I can post the diff if you like. I've directed you to several similar BLPs that rely on editorials for commentary. All are from reliable sources, mostly ]. Whether you identify "mistakes" is again, totally, 100%, completely, absolutely '''irrelevant'''. Unless they are totally erroneous, like ME is a ] from ] who works for the ], we can include it, especially if it's from a reliable source. Seeing as how the article relied on unreliable sources so disturbingly before, I think at this point any claim against excluding reliable sources shouldn't be taken very seriously. Kevin said to focus on the article rather than the individual, but I have to post this. Here you couch in a totally unreliable source by a non-notable Iranian doctor: . Why do you demand we axe Jpost/NY but allow silly books from Iranian doctors? I'm sorry if you don't like the criticism, I've seen your edits and I know how you want the article. That is fine, I'm willing to collaborate. But Jpost, NY, CNN, any site with editorials all fall under basic BLP guidelines. I've identified 3. I can post more BLPs that have editorials, some with mistakes (oh noes!). Can we get to the article now? ] (]) 19:53, 2 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::::I was pointing out that there are plenty of other sources which do contain the exact same material, and that the statements are not subjective assertions but verifiable statements of fact.--] (]) 16:23, 3 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 23:12, 2 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
If we are agreed on the next steps, then setting behavioral conditions is next, then set a common goal. Are we agreed enough on the process to move on? ] (]) 00:18, 3 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
::What are we agreeing on? Several of us have identified problems as you requested, but a consensus has not been reached. I'm just not familiar with the process so pardon my ignorance. ; D ] (]) 05:15, 3 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::What I wanted to get sorted out first was a plan for how we will resolve the dispute, rather than how we will fix the article. I know it seems slow and you want to get to the article, but I have a reason for doing this. For weeks you have been disagreeing on virtually everything, and I want to get you working on something collaboratively before getting to the details of the article, where the real differences lie. What I want to agree on next is the numbered plan above. ] (]) 21:23, 3 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
== External links modified == | |||
Here's a problem I've identified. The organization of the article around ElBaradei's three terms is artificial. Better to organize around prominent issues, in a more or less chronological sequence: | |||
*Iraq | |||
*North Korea | |||
*Iran | |||
*Libya (maybe) | |||
*Multilateral Control of the Fuel Cycle | |||
*Nuclear Disarmament (maybe) | |||
Some have suggested adding Israel and Pakistan to the list. I don't see a significant functional role for ElB in those countries. ] (]) 21:14, 3 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
::good list. I think Israel could be merged with Iran. ME made an attempt to categorize the state with Iran's nuclear program. There was never an investigation, but it did get a significant amount of media coverage. Currently the IP has reported me for personal attacks or something, . This is a serious hindrance to the mediation process. We all agreed previous disputes would not be brought up (I could have just as well posted an incident report for the IP). Anyone who has an opinion feel free to add. :D ] (]) 21:44, 3 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
I have just modified 12 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: | |||
===Getting back on track=== | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101213215723/http://achievement.org/autodoc/page/elb0int-2 to http://www.achievement.org/autodoc/page/elb0int-2 | |||
To get back on track, I would like you both to either suggest changes to the numbered steps above, or tell me you are happy and we can move on. All this discussion on the content is useful, but premature. I am as keen as you all to get to the article, but am a firm believer in having a plan of action first. ] (]) 22:50, 3 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091210121221/http://www.iaea.org/OurWork/SV/Safeguards/sg_protocol.html to http://www.iaea.org/OurWork/SV/Safeguards/sg_protocol.html | |||
::At this point I more concerned about a potential block because of the noticeboard report filed by the IP. If and when that is cleared up, then the mediation should continue. Since you are leading the mediation perhaps you could suggest a speedy close at the noticeboard? It could take over a week before a decision is made. I don't want to get blocked mid-discussion here. ] (]) 23:15, 3 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110327164706/http://www.iop.harvard.edu/Multimedia-Center/All-Videos/Nonproliferation-Arms-Control-Challenges-Opportunities2 to http://www.iop.harvard.edu/Multimedia-Center/All-Videos/Nonproliferation-Arms-Control-Challenges-Opportunities2 | |||
:::No-one is going to block you as a result of that discussion. I <s>can probably close</s> have closed the discussion there. ] (]) 23:27, 3 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111102123438/http://www.mohamedelbaradei.com/ to http://www.mohamedelbaradei.com/ | |||
::::Ok thanks. Shall we proceed? ] (]) 23:43, 3 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110218084447/http://www.iaea.org/About/dg/elbaradei/index.html to http://www.iaea.org/About/dg/elbaradei/index.html | |||
:::::Yes please. ] (]) 00:51, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110109053326/http://www.achievement.org/autodoc/page/elb0int-1 to http://www.achievement.org/autodoc/page/elb0int-1 | |||
::::::I'm happy with the list above..--] (]) 03:01, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110128223517/http://www.cfr.org/publication/20680/paul_c_warnke_lecture_on_international_security.html to http://www.cfr.org/publication/20680/paul_c_warnke_lecture_on_international_security.html | |||
:::::::OK. I'll amend the list at the very top and start the next section. ] (]) 03:35, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091111084006/http://dostor.org/ar/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=37149&Itemid=28 to http://dostor.org/ar/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=37149&Itemid=28 | |||
::::::::I have no objection to any of the proposed rules/goals. Ultimately the goal is to have a better article, but I agree that the immediate goal is to get out of the rut of having extended arguments over its content. ] (]) 21:06, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091112114138/http://dostor.org/ar/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=37392&Itemid=28 to http://dostor.org/ar/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=37392&Itemid=28 | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091111084137/http://dostor.org/ar/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=37337&Itemid=30 to http://dostor.org/ar/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=37337&Itemid=30 | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130131070752/http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5h80sbKbk5fAiPIdKZurx96kdnVWw to https://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5h80sbKbk5fAiPIdKZurx96kdnVWw | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101112141040/http://aljarida.com/aljarida/Article.aspx?id=139001 to http://www.aljarida.com/aljarida/Article.aspx?id=139001 | |||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. | |||
==Behavior during mediation== | |||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} | |||
#Refrain from commenting on other's motives, biases etc. | |||
#Avoid characterizations of arguments made by others (i.e. "XYZ's opinion is ridiculous") | |||
#Leave the past behind. Nothing good can come from dredging up history we are all aware of. | |||
#Make a good faith attempt to understand the positions of others. | |||
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 15:14, 7 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
== Egypt's savior? == | |||
We've probably dealt with most of this anyway, but this is my view. Please add or edit as required. ] (]) 03:35, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:This looks good to me.--] (]) 12:57, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Hi. It should be mentioned that he is a potential savior of Egypt. ] (]) 23:06, 30 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
::I'm not sure about leaving the past behind. Obviously rehashing past arguments is unproductive, but if the arguments were about something, we should perhaps crystallize that something rather than exclude it from discussion. ] (]) 21:08, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::I should clarify, I'm not talking about useful content discussions, just the "he said this in March" kind of thing. ] (]) 22:17, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
== External links modified (February 2018) == | |||
OK. Now what? ] (]) 20:13, 5 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:As soon as Wikifan12345 says he is happy with these guidelines we can move on. ] (]) 21:26, 5 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Yes I agree with the terms. Can we extend the lock? ] (]) 22:50, 6 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::I've extended for a month. ] (]) 23:04, 6 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
== Setting a common goal == | |||
I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: | |||
I'd like some input from the parties here before I make any suggestions here. ] (]) 23:05, 6 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110511133419/http://www.bundespraesident.de/Reden-und-Interviews/Reden-Horst-Koehler-,12213.662472/Visionaer-fuer-eine-Menschheit.htm to http://www.bundespraesident.de/Reden-und-Interviews/Reden-Horst-Koehler-,12213.662472/Visionaer-fuer-eine-Menschheit.htm | |||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. | |||
Substantively, I'd like to see the article become more | |||
*balanced, with a focus on factual narrative but a minor admixture of favorable and unfavorable commentary. | |||
*historically representative, addressing the key issues ElBaradei was actively involved in, e.g.: | |||
**Iraq | |||
**Iran | |||
**Libya | |||
**Multilateral Nuclear Arrangements for control of the nuclear fuel cycle | |||
**Nuclear nonproliferation and disarmament | |||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} | |||
Procedurally, I'd like to see flexibility from editors, particularly on the selection of sources of commentary. ] (]) 21:47, 7 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Flexible is relative. If commentaries fall under BLP guidelines, such as verifiability and reliable sources, they should be included. Only when commentary is redundant, encourages undue weight, and/or not notable should we consider exclusion. I think rules-of-editing need to be established pronto. Major edits and deletions should be preceded by collaborative discussion that follows strict BLP rules. | |||
E.g: Opinion/personal POV < guidelines. Not sure how important MNA and NND is. This article '''is''' about ME. ] (]) 01:35, 8 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 13:27, 3 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
Can you guys see a way to word this goal as a single sentence (or two), remembering that the ultimate goal is to serve our readers? ] (]) 03:03, 8 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:How about: To have a historically representative and balanced biography of ElBaradei which is in line with Misplaced Pages content policies and guidelines.--] (]) 12:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Yeah, historically representative and balanced biography that is dependent on '''reliable sources''' and is edited according to the '''3 core principals of BLP'''. Period. "Balance" can be debated and argued forever, which is why wikipedia policies exist - to serve as a reminder about what should be in the article and how it should be written. Hopefully we all agree on this. ] (]) 14:01, 8 May 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 12:05, 9 November 2024
Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mohamed ElBaradei article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2 |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives |
This article contains a translation of Mohamed ElBaradei from pl.wikipedia. |
This article contains a translation of эль-Барадеи, Мохаммед from ru.wikipedia. |
Name Stylization
The opening paragraph says "An Egyptian, ElBaradei prefers the Latin writing of his name to be spelled ElBaradei rather than hyphenated (El-Baradei)." The phrasing there suggests that not hyphenating his name is his preference is because he is Egyptian. I just don't know anything about how Egyptians sylize their names. If this is a common Egyptian practice, then I think the sentence works as is. If the linkage between stylization and being Egyptian is not appropriate, then I think we need a wording change. Jordanp (talk) 07:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- I second this, as I came to this discussion page for the same question... -- megA (talk) 16:53, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Me too... СЛУЖБА (talk) 01:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
The article says that his name in Arabic is Muḥammad al-Barādaʿī. What's the source for this? al-Barādiʿī with an "i" after the "d", makes more sense both in terms of Arabic grammar and the representation of his name in English. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.186.215.227 (talk) 02:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Can someone knowledgeable of Arabic and IPA please add his name in IPA so that we can have an accurate pronunciation? scazza (talk) 22:12, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Right now, the IPA is added and you would notice that how his name is actually pronounced is different from how it is transliterated. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 23:34, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Presidential election ambition
this should be included here. Mohamed Magdy, Thank You! (talk) 20:43, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Italicizing the “the” in the names of newspapers
Recently I changed the text to conform to the Chicago Manual of Style recommendation (see here) that one should use lowercase and no italics for “the” in a newspaper title, even if it is part of the official title, while at the same time one should italicize the articles of non-English names of newspapers. So it would be “the New York Times” and “the Washington Post”, but “Le Monde.”
I realize this is a bit nitpicking, but I'm bringing it up because within a couple of hours from my changes, someone reverted one of them back to italicizing the “the” in one of the mentions of the New York Times.
I did look for Misplaced Pages-specific guidelines on this issue, but couldn't find them. On the other hand, it is a general guideline of Misplaced Pages that within an article one should be consistent with style (see here), so that either all the “the”s should be italicized, or none.
On the other hand, it is not a general guideline of Misplaced Pages that styles of different articles should match; see here. (This makes sense, since the editors of each article should be able to choose the style best suited to their particular topic.) For what it's worth, the Misplaced Pages article on the New York Times is not internally consistent itself on the issue of italicizing the “the”, so that sometimes it uses “the Times” and sometimes “the Times.”
Any thoughts? Reuqr (talk) 08:12, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
- My main purpose was to replace the non-standard wiki-link ] with the standard ]. A recent editor inserted many links in the non-standard format and I was starting to fix it, but gave up after the first one. Perhaps someone can take up where I left off.
- I don't particularly care if "The" is italicized, but it is part of the official name of the paper. 01:59, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
O.K., I see—the point was to remove the underscores in the wikilink, as per the recommendation given here (subsection “Link to another Wiki article”). I am indeed the guilty party for putting the underscores, and so I will fix it.
As far as italicizing the “the.” Yes, it is part of the official name of the newspaper, but the Chicago Manual of Style says that it nevertheless should not be capitalized (CMOS 16th edition, 8.168); see here for their reasoning.
Of course, we are not obliged to follow the CMOS on this issue, or on any other issue; we are only obliged to be internally consistent. But it is a widely-used style, and they put a lot of thought into their recommendations. So, absent objections from you or others, I'll try to make the article compliant with it whenever possible. Reuqr (talk) 15:49, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Update: I've removed the underscores from all the wikilinks. Reuqr (talk) 17:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
More nitpicking issues: the “the” and the wikilinks
Still using “the New York Times” as an example, and at the risk of sounding over-the-board nitpicking: in addition to the issue of whether the “the” should be italicized, which I've discussed in the section “Italicizing the “the” in the names of newspapers” above, there is also the issue of whether the “the” should be included in any wikilinks. In other words, should it be “the New York Times,” or “the New York Times”?
I think that if the “the” is not italicized, then it should not be included in the wikilink. On the other hand, if we should decide that the “the” which is part of the official name of the newspaper should be italicized after all, then that “the” should also be included in the wikilink.
So, given the way things stand right now, the correct form would be “the New York Times.” Reuqr (talk) 17:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Degree
The article indicates that ElBaradei earned a PhD from the NYU School of Law. Can someone verify this? I'm not aware of any US law school that grants a PhD; normally, the highest advanced degree awarded by such an institution is the JSD/SJD. NYU law school currently grants a JSD. Is it possible that ElBaradei either (a) earned a PhD from the NYU graduate school or (b) earned a JSD from the law school? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.248.248.215 (talk) 02:28, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- I don't know how things stood in ElBaradei's time, but currently the NYU School of Law offers a J.D.-Ph.D. dual degree with The law and society program; see here, which links here. Reuqr (talk) 18:06, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- Update: His degree is indeed J.S.D. I have two strong sources for this:
- 1. the entry for his thesis in the NYU library catalog; see here. The thesis is cataloged as “Thesis (S.J.D.)--New York University, 1974.”
- 2. The index to vol. 60 of New York University Law Review (60 N.Y.U. L. Rev. i 1985). His name is listed under “Adjunct Associate Professors” as “Mohamed M. El Baradei, LL.B., LL.M., J.S.D.” The access to New York University Law Review is not public, but google does find his entry: just google "Mohamed M. El Baradei, LL.B., LL.M., J.S.D.", like so.
So his degree is Doctor of Juridical Science, a research doctorate in law, which, of course, makes it the law equivalent of a Ph.D. The biographies at the IAEA and at the Nobel prize site both include the (word-for-word) same sentence, “He gained a Bachelor´s degree in Law in 1962 at the University of Cairo, and a Doctorate in International Law at the New York University School of Law in 1974,” which is correct, since J.S.D. is indeed a doctorate. Someone has already modified the article so that it says J.S.D. rather than Ph.D., though without giving a source, which I guess I can add now. Reuqr (talk) 12:22, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Muslim brotherhood
Someone should update the article regarding his recent endorsement by the Muslim brotherhood. The article currently indicates they are still feuding — Preceding unsigned comment added by TMV943 (talk • contribs) 05:31, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
- He did not endorse the Brotherhood, but accepted it as a part of Egypt's political landscape. Cs32en Talk to me 05:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
- Cs32en, the unsigned author above stated that El Baradei was endorsed BY the Muslim Brotherhood. This is vastly different than him giving an endorsement TO the Muslim Brotherhood. I think the unsigned author's point is especially valid... According to an article published 01 Feb 2011 in Foreign Affairs Journal, "the Muslim Brotherhood poised to gain influence in Egypt" (Click HERE). --Lacarids (talk) 04:56, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Arabic/Foreign language sources
Naturally I'm in favor of more documentation as opposed to less, but could we get an english-language source concerning ElBaradei's presidential prospects? It strikes me as a very important/relevant aspect of the article, and for the only source backing it up (currentily no. 69; Masrawy.com) to be not in english strikes me as awkward given that the readership on en.wiki tends to be english speaking. Per WP:NOENG, non-english sources should at least be translated... Also, wouldn't confirmed news that ElBaradei is running for president appear in US/UK/other english-lanauage press? Related to this last point, I added a current events tag to sec 5.2, possible presidential candidacy RideABicycle (talk) 04:02, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Gorge Soros and International Crisis Group
- There are rumors that he is member of a group that is paid by George Soros. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.74.166.222 (talk) 06:24, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Why is Soros' association with the International Crisis Group mentioned twice in the opening section? It doesn't seem directly relevant to an introduction to ElBaradei.J'onn J'onzz (talk) 01:32, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- How is the info relevant? and why does need a section by itself? I have also been noticing the article have been vandalized a lot lately as well -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 00:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Elbaradei.png Nominated for Deletion
An image used in this article, File:Elbaradei.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 20 December 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:10, 21 December 2011 (UTC) |
Prime Minister
He is set to be inaugurated tomorrow (7 July 2013) so naming him PM now is premature. The Big Hoof! (talk) 18:02, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
- Egypt is just covered in fog-of-war right now. I'm seeing reports on Twitter from credible sources now that no decision has been made on naming ElBaradei as prime minister. It's El-Beheiry all over again. -Kudzu1 (talk) 21:28, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks Kudzu1, so the information turned out to be wrong in the first place. The Big Hoof! (talk) 19:15, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
surname : El Baradei, ElBaradei, el-Baradei
Wouldn't it be better to write El Baradei or el-Baradei (instead of ElBaradei)? 79.251.108.152 (talk) 21:09, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, I was wrong. The famous politician himself writes his name ElBaradei ... let's do same. 79.251.108.152 (talk) 21:32, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
- Well, in fact the politician has been writing his surname ElBaradei for several years - but perhaps we should not do it. I think most international administrations will use two words, for him and every person of his family: El Baradei. 91.61.223.141 (talk) 06:58, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
- Two words would fit better, see Misplaced Pages: Turkish: El Baradey, Russian: эль-Барадеи, German: el-Baradei, French: El Baradei. So please give us the space (punctuation) ... 91.61.223.141 (talk) 07:06, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Prime Minister?
They denied The News about Baradei being a Prime Minister . No agreement yet about The New Prime Minister . — Preceding unsigned comment added by CaeserKaiser (talk • contribs)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Mohamed ElBaradei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120131184526/http://www.voanews.com/english/archive/2008-09/2008-09-10-voa37.cfm to http://www.voanews.com/english/archive/2008-09/2008-09-10-voa37.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —Talk to my owner:Online 09:37, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Mohamed ElBaradei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110218084354/http://www.iaea.org/About/dg/elbaradei/biography.html to http://www.iaea.org/About/dg/elbaradei/biography.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060627092823/http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Booklets/Nobel/nobelfund0506.pdf to http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Booklets/Nobel/nobelfund0506.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110510005822/http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/statements/2008/ebsp2008n008a.html to http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/Statements/2008/ebsp2008n008a.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110314144824/http://www.masrawy.com/News/Egypt/Politics/2011/march/7/barad3i_president.aspx to http://www.masrawy.com/News/Egypt/Politics/2011/march/7/barad3i_president.aspx
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.worldcat.org/title/age-of-deception-nuclear-diplomacy-in-treacherous-times/oclc/669754790%26referer%3Dbrief_results
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 12 external links on Mohamed ElBaradei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101213215723/http://achievement.org/autodoc/page/elb0int-2 to http://www.achievement.org/autodoc/page/elb0int-2
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091210121221/http://www.iaea.org/OurWork/SV/Safeguards/sg_protocol.html to http://www.iaea.org/OurWork/SV/Safeguards/sg_protocol.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110327164706/http://www.iop.harvard.edu/Multimedia-Center/All-Videos/Nonproliferation-Arms-Control-Challenges-Opportunities2 to http://www.iop.harvard.edu/Multimedia-Center/All-Videos/Nonproliferation-Arms-Control-Challenges-Opportunities2
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111102123438/http://www.mohamedelbaradei.com/ to http://www.mohamedelbaradei.com/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110218084447/http://www.iaea.org/About/dg/elbaradei/index.html to http://www.iaea.org/About/dg/elbaradei/index.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110109053326/http://www.achievement.org/autodoc/page/elb0int-1 to http://www.achievement.org/autodoc/page/elb0int-1
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110128223517/http://www.cfr.org/publication/20680/paul_c_warnke_lecture_on_international_security.html to http://www.cfr.org/publication/20680/paul_c_warnke_lecture_on_international_security.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091111084006/http://dostor.org/ar/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=37149&Itemid=28 to http://dostor.org/ar/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=37149&Itemid=28
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091112114138/http://dostor.org/ar/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=37392&Itemid=28 to http://dostor.org/ar/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=37392&Itemid=28
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091111084137/http://dostor.org/ar/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=37337&Itemid=30 to http://dostor.org/ar/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=37337&Itemid=30
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130131070752/http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5h80sbKbk5fAiPIdKZurx96kdnVWw to https://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5h80sbKbk5fAiPIdKZurx96kdnVWw
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101112141040/http://aljarida.com/aljarida/Article.aspx?id=139001 to http://www.aljarida.com/aljarida/Article.aspx?id=139001
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:14, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Egypt's savior?
Hi. It should be mentioned that he is a potential savior of Egypt. 41.248.219.212 (talk) 23:06, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mohamed ElBaradei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110511133419/http://www.bundespraesident.de/Reden-und-Interviews/Reden-Horst-Koehler-,12213.662472/Visionaer-fuer-eine-Menschheit.htm to http://www.bundespraesident.de/Reden-und-Interviews/Reden-Horst-Koehler-,12213.662472/Visionaer-fuer-eine-Menschheit.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:27, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Categories:- Biography articles of living people
- Active politicians
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-5 vital articles in People
- B-Class vital articles in People
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Egypt articles
- High-importance Egypt articles
- WikiProject Egypt articles
- B-Class Iran articles
- Unknown-importance Iran articles
- WikiProject Iran articles
- Pages translated from Polish Misplaced Pages
- Pages translated from Russian Misplaced Pages