| Revision as of 18:04, 22 November 2005 editReddi (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users58,350 edits move up comment with others ... strike out← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:37, 24 June 2024 edit undoBorsoka (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users44,601 edits →FAR notice: new sectionTag: New topic | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | __NOTOC__ | ||
| {| cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" style="background: #F1F1DE; border: 1px solid #CC9; padding: 5px; font-size: 80%;" | |||
| <center> | |||
| |- style="text-align: center;" | |||
| ⚫ | ---- | ||
| | style="background: #CCC;" |''I am intermittently inactive''. | |||
| <big>If a ] prevents you from improving Misplaced Pages, ''']'''.</big><br> | |||
| |- | |||
| <small><small>]</small></small><br> | |||
| | colspan="3" |'''NOTE''': ''Status is currently offline for the foreseeable future. Comments may not be answered in short order. This does not imply the violation of any of the Misplaced Pages policies. I sign on infrequently.'' | |||
| '']'' | |||
| ⚫ | ---- | ||
| ''I currently access wikipedia through various friends and public sources. I will be on from time to time ... just adding content. Any and all criticism, comment, and feedback welcomed''. ] 18:52, 31 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | '''Put new comments ]'''<br> | ||
| |} | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ]'''".]] | |||
| ⚫ | From time to time I'll respond here and delete the |
||
| ''Past discussion can be seen through the '' | ''Past discussion can be seen through the '' | ||
| </center> | </center> | ||
| <div style="align: center; padding: 1em; border-width: 4px; border-style: groove; border-color: lightblue; background-color: #eee"> | |||
| ⚫ | __NOTOC__ | ||
| ⚫ | ---- | ||
| =Responses= | =Responses= | ||
| {{not around|3=December 2017}} | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | ---- | ||
| ==Talk:Plasma cosmology== | |||
| <strike>Please explain your recent revert in terms of the edits that were explained on the page. Thank you. --] 20:06, 21 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| "Please do not feed the trolls". |
]'''".]] | ||
| ==='']''=== | |||
| ⚫ | ; | ||
| ⚫ | =New criticism, comments, and feedback= | ||
| Three reverts without making an appearance on the Talk page is heavy stuff. Can you explain yourself? --] 21:05, 21 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ''From time to time I'll respond here and delete the old content; see history if you want the archive''. ] 22:50, 27 August 2017 (UTC) | ||
| <br style="clear:both;"> | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| : ''I will 'deny' discuss request on edits with trolls'' .... I may discuss it with other editors that are not "apologists" (such as Joker and Joshua) or evanglists for whatever viewpoint they hold (which may include you, Art ... but I have not had much interaction with you) and I ''have'' lost faith with the other editor, '''primarily because of personal attacks thrust upon me by the editor (and other violations of the ''Writers' rules of engagement'')'''. He has also gone out of his way to work against a consensus. I ''try not'' to ''revert the same page more than three times on the same day'', but there is nothing "heavy" about that ... and this is clearly within the acceptable policies of Misplaced Pages. Sincerely, ] 15:52, 22 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| <strike>:I am considering a User:RfC against you for your conduct with regards to this matter. Art Carlson will let me know shortly. You can avoid this simply by responding on the ] page. Thanks, --] 20:58, 21 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| <blockquote>'''] / single primary source public domain source material, not a real thing. Also self promotion of one editors book.'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| <strike>Please respond to your RfC here ]. Thanks, ] 22:18, 21 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| <strike> Hi, Reddi. I have begun the process of arbitration since you have made it clear you will not engage me. You can read about it here: ]. Thanks, --] 18:00, 22 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 16:21, 8 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == User:Elerner RfC == | |||
| == FAR notice == | |||
| I have added a request for comment on Eric Lerner's editing, at ]. You may want to look at it if you have a spare moment, since your views are probably quite different from mine. –] 00:46, 22 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].<!--Template:FARMessage--> ] (]) 03:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | = |
||
Latest revision as of 03:37, 24 June 2024
If a rule prevents you from improving Misplaced Pages, ignore it.
By all means break the rules, and break them beautifully, deliberately and well. That is one of the ends for which they exist ...
Pedantry and mastery are opposite attitudes toward rules. To apply a rule to the letter, rigidly, unquestioningly, in cases where it fits and in cases where it does not fit, is pedantry ... To apply a rule with natural ease, with judgment, noticing the cases where it fits, and without ever letting the words of the rule obscure the purpose of the action or the opportunities of the situation, is mastery.
Put new comments below
Past discussion can be seen through the History page
Responses
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Reddi has not edited Misplaced Pages since December 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
So Long, and Thanks for all the comments
New criticism, comments, and feedback
From time to time I'll respond here and delete the old content; see history if you want the archive. J. D. Redding 22:50, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Telegeodynamics
The article Telegeodynamics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:NOTMIRROR / single primary source public domain source material, not a real thing. Also self promotion of one editors book.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 16:21, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
FAR notice
I have nominated Middle Ages for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Borsoka (talk) 03:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Categories: