Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Caden: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactivelyContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:39, 19 May 2009 editDaedalus969 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,809 editsm ←Created page with '{{subst:Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Blank report template header}} ;Suspected sockpuppets * {{checkuser|1=Corpiestre}} <!--## Add further sockpuppets …'  Latest revision as of 04:11, 20 May 2009 edit undoSPCUClerkbot (talk | contribs)30,768 edits Archiving Caden's case 
(14 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
⚫ {{SPIarchive notice|Caden}}
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>
⚫ {{SPIarchive notice|Caden}}<br />{{SPIpriorcases}}
===== <big>Report date May 19 2009, 22:39 (UTC)</big>=====

{{SPIcat}}

;Suspected sockpuppets
* {{checkuser|1=Corpiestre}}
<!--## Add further sockpuppets if any, below these ##-->
This user shows up out of nowhere and starts defending the suspected sock master, who was previously blocked today, for a day.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 22:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

;Evidence submitted by ]
<!--## Sign below your evidence with 4 tilde characters "~~~~" ##-->


;Comments by accused parties &nbsp;&nbsp; <small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See ].''</span></small>
<!-- PLEASE NOTE: CheckUsers *will not* read excessively long arguments in this section. Please consider this when starting an argument with someone -->

;Comments by other users


;CheckUser requests
{{RFCU| E | No2ndletter | New }} &nbsp;&nbsp; <small>Requested by — ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 22:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC) </small>
<!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter and Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##-->
<!--## Codeletters are:
A - arbcom ban/remedy evasion
B - Ongoing serious pattern vandalism
C - Vote fraud, please wait until after vote closes
D - 3RR with socks
E - Evasion of community based bans or blocks
F - Other, please explain why a check should be run -->
<!--## Make sure your evidence explains why CheckUser is appropriate ##-->
CU is required as the block, or extention thereof, rests on these CU findings, in that, his block may remain the same, assuming this is just some random vandal that appears to have taken interest in him(I don't think this is likely, too many things don't add up), but to the point, if this suspected sock, is found to be a sock, further action needs to be taken in regards to the master account.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 22:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

;Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


;Conclusions


----

Latest revision as of 04:11, 20 May 2009

Caden

Caden (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Caden/Archive.