Revision as of 10:08, 21 May 2009 editAdambro (talk | contribs)19,040 edits →Ongoing?: new section← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 00:13, 24 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,303,081 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "GA" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Scientology}}, {{WikiProject Internet culture}}, {{WikiProject Media}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion |
(143 intermediate revisions by 52 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
⚫ |
{{Skip to talk}} |
⚫ |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
⚫ |
|maxarchivesize = 250K |
|
|
|
{{Not a forum}} |
⚫ |
|counter = 3 |
|
|
|
{{Article history |
⚫ |
|minthreadsleft = 1 |
|
⚫ |
|algo = old(30d) |
|
⚫ |
|archive = Talk:Project Chanology/Archive %(counter)d |
|
⚫ |
}} |
|
|
{{skiptotoc}} |
|
|
{{notaforum}} |
|
|
{{talkheader}} |
|
|
{{ArticleHistory |
|
|
|action1=AFD |
|
|action1=AFD |
|
|action1date=28 January 2008 |
|
|action1date=28 January 2008 |
Line 49: |
Line 42: |
|
|currentstatus=GA |
|
|currentstatus=GA |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=GA|1= |
|
{{WikiProjectBanners |
|
|
|1 = {{WikiProject Scientology|class=GA|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Scientology|importance=Low}} |
|
|2 = {{WP Internet culture|class=GA|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Internet culture|importance=Mid}} |
|
|3 = {{WikiProject Media|class=GA|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Media|importance=Low}} |
|
⚫ |
}} |
|
|
{{To do}} |
|
⚫ |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
⚫ |
|maxarchivesize = 250K |
|
⚫ |
|counter = 3 |
|
⚫ |
|minthreadsleft = 4 |
|
⚫ |
|algo = old(30d) |
|
⚫ |
|archive = Talk:Project Chanology/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Etymology == |
⚫ |
{{to do}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Latest sock disruption == |
|
|
|
|
|
Apparently in addition to {{user|DavidYork71}}, we now have {{user|YesOn8}} using socks to disrupt this article: |
|
|
*{{user|Comparable2Allah}} |
|
|
*{{user|Helpur}} |
|
|
*{{user|CatUrineCuredMe}} |
|
|
*{{user|McCainSoulBro}} |
|
|
*{{user|QuaylePalin2012}} |
|
|
*{{user|SoothingDharma}} |
|
|
*{{user|Upperclear}} |
|
|
*{{user|ThankYouDianetics}} |
|
|
*{{user|PornAndPrawnExtravaganza}} |
|
|
*{{user|OngoingHow}} |
|
|
*{{user|1Bridge2FreeAll}} |
|
|
*{{user|HubbardTechGuardian}} |
|
|
*{{user|Bfair2mychurch}} |
|
|
*{{user|Sjbraden}} |
|
|
*{{user|67.222.12.152}} |
|
|
*{{user|68.184.150.94}} |
|
|
*{{user|81.241.176.23}} |
|
|
*{{user|220.233.172.193}} |
|
|
*{{user|123.2.123.220}} |
|
|
*{{user|194.54.88.40}} |
|
|
Some of the more recent socks used to revert to the same material in this article. More info , , ], and ]. ''']''' (]) 05:15, 21 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:This is an ongoing issue. If anybody else makes that same edit to this article, it is safe to assume that they are also either a sockpuppet or meatpuppet, and should be blocked. So if anyone is reading this and considering changing the article in that same way, then don't. You will be held accountable. <span style="font-family:Copperplate Gothic Bold">] <sup>]</sup></span> 05:20, 21 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::Agree with this comment by {{user|Firestorm}}. I am adding some more socks that have disrupted this article to the above list. ''']''' (]) 05:23, 21 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
Apparently at ], users investigating {{user|YesOn8}} also thought that YesOn8 was itself a sock of {{user|DavidYork71}}. ''']''' (]) 06:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:Added {{user|Sjbraden}} to above list - account was blocked by the same Checkuser that connected the {{user|YesOn8}} series of socks to {{user|DavidYork71}}. ''']''' (]) 00:14, 17 April 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==partyvan.info== |
|
|
partyvan.info isn't the wiki! It's a mirror for last measure! Edit it out <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 10:08, 15 May 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
:This is as per secondary sources. ''']''' (]) 16:06, 15 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Ongoing? == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can't see anything in the article about the etymology of the word "Chanology". Is it derived from 4chan/711chan? If so (or even if not), surely there's a reliable source somewhere that can be found for it? Not knowing where the name came from is a serious limitation of the article. ] (]) 13:19, 17 April 2022 (UTC) |
|
The old is it or isn't it ongoing question perhaps needs to be considered again unfortunately following {{User|HerrAdolf}}'s recent . I suppose we need to actually agree how we determine going forward whether the protest movement still exists or not. I'm inclined to suggest it does, a quick Google search turned up which clearly refers to an individual mentioned as being a member of "a group called Anonymous that protests Church of Scientology events" but I'd have to consider it in more detail. |
|
|
|
:I found it out by myself. ] (]) 18:32, 17 April 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit semi-protected|answered=yes}} |
|
However, when this edit is viewed in the context of this user's other edits I become more suspicious of their motives. For example , it does seem more appropriate to describe L. Ron Hubbard as "controversial" rather than "acclaimed". , I think Scientology is more widely considered to be "controversial" than "innovative" and , "controversial" would probably be a more widely accepted description of ] than "celebrated". ] (]) 10:08, 21 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
Please create an "Etymology" section at the top of the article, and add: |
|
|
:"The word "Chanology" is a ] of ] (the site where the project originated) and "Scientology."<ref>{{cite thesis |last=Huang |first=Juanjuan |date=2015 |title=Values and Symbolism in Anonymous’s Brand Identity |type=MA thesis |page=13 |publisher=Duke University |url=https://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/10161/10356/Values%20and%20Symbolism%20in%20Anonymous%27s%20Brand%20Identity.pdf |access-date=April 17, 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Olson |first1=Parmy |title=We Are Anonymous |date=2013 |publisher=Random House |isbn=9781448136155 |page=476 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ucE1AAAAQBAJ |access-date=April 17, 2022}}</ref> |
|
|
{{Reflist-talk}} |
|
|
Please also add {{'"}}Chanology" is a portmanteau of "chan" and "Scientology{{"'}} as the second sentence of the lead. ] (]) 18:32, 17 April 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:] '''Not done:''' The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to ]. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details.<!-- Template:ESp --> ] (]) 12:44, 27 April 2022 (UTC) |
I can't see anything in the article about the etymology of the word "Chanology". Is it derived from 4chan/711chan? If so (or even if not), surely there's a reliable source somewhere that can be found for it? Not knowing where the name came from is a serious limitation of the article. 2001:BB6:4713:4858:D58E:EA80:4B3D:5445 (talk) 13:19, 17 April 2022 (UTC)