| Revision as of 19:41, 23 May 2009 editNcmvocalist (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,127 editsm delete← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:35, 6 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (17 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| ⚫ | ===]=== | ||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''DELETE per some combination of SNOW, SPEEDY and BLP'''. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:54, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| I have taken the step of applying ] rather sooner than normal as there is no indication that the article meets criteria for inclusion in Misplaced Pages, ]. It is a biography of a living person that entirely lacks references, and there is contentious material in the history of the article and the talk page. Also noted, the subject has asked more than once for this to be deleted. Under the combined weight of circumstances, deletion is clearly justifiable. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ===]=== | ||
| <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Boothroyd}}</ul></div> | <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Boothroyd}}</ul></div> | ||
| :{{la|David Boothroyd}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|David Boothroyd}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| Non-notable, lack of sourcing. Does not meet our present notability standards for inclusion as a ]. Last AFD was nearly four years ago. < |
Non-notable, lack of sourcing. Does not meet our present notability standards for inclusion as a ]. Last AFD was nearly four years ago. ]/] 19:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom. ''']'''] 19:36, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nom and the subject wants it that way. ''']'''] 19:36, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| * Delete. Should, in my mind, be deleted immediately for his sake. ]] 19:37, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | * Delete. Should, in my mind, be deleted immediately for his sake. ]] 19:37, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| * Delete per nom; |
* Delete per nom; and per Nathan. Too many problems. ] (]) 19:40, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Comment'''. The subject repeats his request made four years ago for deletion. ] (]) 20:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Delete''' - although I am concerned with the nom and the timing of it, the subject has expressed interest in deletion and a google search found only a few entries, most no longer than two or three lines and from primary sources, with little news to justify keeping an article against the subject's will. ] (]) 20:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' per nom. --]|] 20:40, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Delete'''; per suggestions of questionable notability (above) and the subject's that the article be removed. ] 20:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 09:35, 6 February 2023
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE per some combination of SNOW, SPEEDY and BLP. Jehochman 20:54, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
I have taken the step of applying WP:SNOW rather sooner than normal as there is no indication that the article meets criteria for inclusion in Misplaced Pages, WP:CSD#A7. It is a biography of a living person that entirely lacks references, and there is contentious material in the history of the article and the talk page. Also noted, the subject has asked more than once for this to be deleted. Under the combined weight of circumstances, deletion is clearly justifiable. Jehochman 20:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
David Boothroyd
AfDs for this article:- David Boothroyd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable, lack of sourcing. Does not meet our present notability standards for inclusion as a WP:BLP. Last AFD was nearly four years ago. rootology/equality 19:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and the subject wants it that way. Syn 19:36, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Should, in my mind, be deleted immediately for his sake. Nathan 19:37, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; and per Nathan. Too many problems. Ncmvocalist (talk) 19:40, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment. The subject repeats his request made four years ago for deletion. DavidBoothroyd (talk) 20:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - although I am concerned with the nom and the timing of it, the subject has expressed interest in deletion and a google search found only a few entries, most no longer than two or three lines and from primary sources, with little news to justify keeping an article against the subject's will. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Conti|✉ 20:40, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete; per suggestions of questionable notability (above) and the subject's request that the article be removed. AGK 20:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.