Misplaced Pages

Nazism in relation to other concepts: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:14, 27 November 2005 editJmabel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators90,290 edits Nazism and religion: copy edits← Previous edit Latest revision as of 09:19, 17 February 2024 edit undoJay (talk | contribs)Administrators36,407 edits Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 8#Nazism in relation to other concepts closed as retarget (XFDcloser)Tag: New redirect 
(88 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Nazism}} #REDIRECT ]
This article is about '''] in relation to other concepts'''. Specifically, it discusses the relationships between Nazism and ], ], ] and ].


{{Rcat shell|
== Nazism and religion ==
{{R to section}}

}}
The relationship between ] has provoked both curiosity and controversy over the years, as has the relationship between Nazism and ].

Hitler and other Nazi leaders clearly made use of both Christian and ] symbolism and emotion in propagandizing the Germanic public, and it remains a matter of controversy whether Hitler believed himself a Christian, a ], or something else entirely. Some historians have typified Hitler as a ]ist or ]ist, whereas other writers have utilized Nazism's occasional outward use of Christian doctrine, regardless of what its inner-party mythology may have been. The existence of a Ministry of Church Affairs, instituted in ] and headed by ], was hardly recognized by ideologists such as ] and by other political decision-makers.

The existence of ties between Nazism and Protestantism has been hotly debated for decades. One difficulty is that ''Protestantism'' includes a vast number of religious bodies many of whom had little relation to each other. Added to that, Protestantism tends to allow more variation among individual congregations then Catholicism or Eastern Orthodox Christianity, which makes statements about "official positions" of denominations problemattic. Still, many Protestant organizations or denominations were solidly opposed the Nazism and died fighting it. The forms or offshoots of Protestantism that advocated pacificism, anti-nationalism, or racial equality tended to oppose in the strongest terms. Prominent Protestant, or Protestant offshoot, groups known for their efforts against Nazism include the ] and the ]. Many of their members died in the camps or struggled fiercely against the Nazis.

Yet Protestants voted for Hitler more then non-Protestants. Different German states possessed regional social variations as to class densities and religious denomination (see Jackson J. Spielvogel, ''Hitler and Nazi Germany'' ISBN: 0131898779; books like Richard Steigmann-Gall ''The Holy Reich: Nazi Conceptions of Christianity, 1919-1945'' ISBN:0521823714 allege a linkage between several Protestant churches and Nazism, the main aspect Hitler's citing anti-Semitic pamphlets by ] and accusations that the Lutheran establisment supported Hitler). The small Methodist population at times was deemed foreign, so felt the urge to be "more German than the Germans" to avoid suspicion, just as happened to assist the rightward drift of the Roman Catholic ]. Methodist Bishop ] toured the U.S. on Hitler's behalf to protect his church, but in private letters indicated he feared or hated Nazism and so retired to Switzerland. Methodist Bishop ] took a far more collaborationist position that included apparently sincere support for Nazism. He stated that "The Lord blesses every step that Hitler takes" and as late as ] hoped to alienate Americans from ] whom he called an ally of "Bolshevism.". He felt that serving the Reich was both a patriotic duty and a means of advancement. To show his gratitude, Hitler made a gift of 10,000 marks in ] to a Methodist congregation to purchase an organ.
Outside of Germany, Melle's views were overwhelmingly rejected by most Methodists.
The leader of pro-Nazi segment of Baptists was Paul Schmidt. Hitler also led to the unification of Pro-Nazi Protestants in the ] which was led by ]. The idea of such a "national church" was possible in the history of mainstream German Protestantism, but National Churches devoted primarily to the state were generally forbidden among the ], ], and in ].

The nature of the Nazi Party's relations with the ] is also complicated. Before Hitler rose to power, many Catholic priests and leaders vociferously opposed Nazism from on the grounds of its incompatibility with Christian morals. Nazi Party membership was forbidden until the takeover and a policy reversal. Church hopes of a Christian alignment to the beneficial aspects they saw in national socialism continued (according to ], at his later trial) until 1936. Then Pope ] issued the ] ] (1937) condemning Nazi ideology. There was strong protest among Catholics, and various other Christians, against the ] programs <!-- is this parenthesized word intended as a citation? Can someone make it clearer?-->(Spielvogel), but equally the Catholic Church facilitated the race registration program which fed the Holocaust with targets. In Nazi Germany, all known political dissenters were imprisoned, and many priests were sent to the concentration camps for their opposition, including the parson of the Berlin Cathedral ]. (Among the punished priests were ] persecuted for their nationality.) However, Hitler was never ] by the Catholic Church and several Catholic bishops in Germany or Austria are recorded as encouraging prayers of support for "The Führer", and the original accord with the ] proscribed, any political character to the priesthood , allowed thereto. <!-- this last line or so is incoherent. -->

<!-- "Difficult" for whom? This reads like editorializing-->
Difficult in retrospect is that the Vatican pontificate headed by ] and ] remained circumspect about the national-scale race hatred before 1937. A statement by Pius XI on 8 Sept 1938 spoke of the "inadmissability" of anti-semitism, but Pius XII is criticised <!-- lacks agency, criticized by whom? --> for leaving the Jewish people unspecified ever by actual name. Pius XII continued this silence even when it is estimated <!-- by whom, and "estimated" is an odd word here--> he had intelligence about about the scale of the Holocaust. Pius XI 's quick approving comments praising Hitler on April 10 <!--what year?--> are held <!-- by whom? And the rest of this sentence is a mess--> as the template of initial Church, at best, confusion. Contradiction between the 1938 statement and the approbation of 1933, as if Pius XI were not able to estimate the degree of Hitlerism's <!-- Is that a neologism? Why not "Nazism's"? --> hostility to Christianity may show that he had been persuaded to attempt appeasement through the ]. <!-- ... and then this really wanders into POV territory --> The evolution of the Vatican's understanding is either weak and slow, or culpable. The former is not supportable, because there was a radical reversal of strong German episcopal condemnation prior to this date. The latter encompasses serious allegation of political collusion , made in prevention of German Communism. <!-- what on earth does this next phrase mean? --> The defences are vocal, too, and rest on the premise that speaking the name would have made it worse for the Jews. The allegation at its worst, in contrary, even suggests a dual approbation of both anti-communism and anti-semitism. There is full record of priestly Christian conduct contradicting the higher quietude by brave devotion to humanity .

Tangential to the more extreme collaborationist accusations regarding Jesuitical and other church factions, is the characterisation that Nazism actively based itself on a similar pontifical structure and corps of functionaries, and fully considered itself as the church of the future in effective replacement of Catholicism, and in a unification of ] since divided at the Protestand Reformation. The official re-entry of the Holy See into accord with the German State is same large motive for the pontifical delusion, seeking institutionalised recognition lost since the reformationary religious divide.
As Nazism continued to rule Germany, for many people it became a kind of religion in and of itself, sometimes called ], and sometimes associated with ].

== Nazism and fascism ==

The term ''Nazism'' is often used interchangeably with '']'', but this usage is controversial. Some use the word Fascism (spelled with a capital ''F''), only to describe Italian Fascism, while generic ''fascism'' (spelled with a small ''f'') may include many different movements, in many different countries.

Nazism and Italian Fascism both employed a similar style of ], including military parades and uniforms, and the ]. The ideologies of both ostensibly included an extreme ] and a rebirth of their own nation to some former, past state of national greatness. Both movements, when in power, also put in place totalitarian governments that pursued wars of expansion.

There were also many important differences between the two movements. For example, racism was central to Nazism but of less significance in Italian Fascism. Fascist Italy did not adopt ] until it followed Hitler's example.

== Nazism and socialism ==
{{totallydisputed}}

Nazism is an abbreviation for "]", and Nazi leaders described their ideology as ]. Thus, a number of people believe that Nazism was a form of socialism, or that there are similarities between Nazism and socialism. This correlation has been rejected to by virtually all who consider themselves socialist in any sense other than "national socialism", then and now.

It has for example been argued that the Nazi ], large ] projects, demand for ], and state interventions such as the National Labour Law of January 20, 1934 are indicative of socialism.

Much depends on the definition that one chooses to give to the term "socialism". Definitions of socialism can range from the very restrictive to the very broad.

Under a philosophical definition of Socialism - for example one stating that only a system adhering to the principles of ] can qualify as socialist - there is a well-defined gap between Nazism and socialism. Nazi leaders were opposed to the ] idea of ] and opposed the idea that capitalism should be abolished and that workers should control the ]. For those who consider class conflict and the abolition of capitalism as essential components of socialism, these factors alone are sufficient to categorize "National Socialism" as non-socialist.

For socialists who consider ] a core tenet of socialism, Nazism is often seen as a polar opposite of their views. ] argued that there was an important distinction between the policies of ] and those of the ] or the ]: while they were all arguably totalitarian, and all had their idea of what kind of parasitic classes or races society ought to be rid of, Levi saw the Nazis assigning a place given by birth (since one is born into a certain race), while the Soviets and Chinese determined their enemies according to their social position (which people may change within their life). There are many other philosophical differences betwen Nazism and Marxism.

There were however ideological shades of opinion within the Nazi Party, particularly before their seizure of power in 1933, but a central tenet of the party was always the ''leader principle'' or ]. The Nazi Party did not have party congresses in which policy was deliberated upon and concessions made to different ]s. What mattered most was what the leader, ], thought and decreed. Those who held opinions which were at variance with Hitler's either learned to keep quiet or were ]d, particularly after ]. This is comparable to the behavior of certain ]s such as that of ] in the ] or ] in ].

Under an economic definition - for example one stating that socialism is any economic system based on extensive ] of the economy and ] over the ] - the distinction becomes less clear. Advocates of the view that Nazism was a typical instance of socialism often hold a broad definition of socialism; for example, they may argue that many forms of ] by the government necessarily constitute socialist policy.

Industries and trusts were not nationalised in Nazi Germany, with the exception of private rail lines (nationalised in the late 1930s to meet military contingencies). The only private holdings that were expropriated were those belonging to ]s. These holdings were then sold or awarded to businessmen who supported the Nazis and satisifed their ethnic and racial policies. Military production and even film production remained in the hands of private industries whilst serving the Nazi government, and many private companies flourished during the Nazi period. The Nazis never interfered with the profits made by such large German firms as ], ], and ].

Nevertheless, efforts ''were'' made to coordinate business's actions with the needs of the state, particularly with regard to rearmament, and the Nazis established some state-owned concerns such as ]. The Nazis also engaged in an extensive public works program including the construction of the ] system. Independent ] were outlawed, as were ]s, much like the labour practices of ].

Since the fall of the Nazi regime, many theorists have argued that there are similarities between the government of Nazi Germany and that of ] ]. In most cases this has taken the form of arguing that both Nazism and ] are forms of ]. This view was advanced most famously by ] in '']''.

''For more information see the articles on ] and ].''

====The politics of the time====

Marxist movements in Germany - the largest of whom were the ] (SPD) and ] (KPD) - viewed the Nazis as enemies and argued that they were thinly disguised ].

Hitler despised ] and condemned Communism and Marxism as a ''Judeo-Bolshevist'' ]. He pledged to block its rise in ] and argued that the nation's downfall was due to Marxism and its Jewish influence. These political views prompted some prominent conservatives and capitalists to fund and support the Nazis because they saw them as a bulwark against Communism.

==Nazism and conservatism==
Some of the traditional ] and ] political parties of the ] accused the Nazis of being socialists citing planks in the Nazis' party program which called for nationalization of trusts and other social measures. However, the ], the most important party on the mainstream right, usually treated the Nazis as a respected potential ally.

Historians such as ] note the links between the Nazis and the German political and economic ], as well as the significance of the ] in which Hitler purged much of the ] elements (such as the ] and homosexuals) in the Nazi Party. This was done at the insistence of the military and conservatives.

The Nazis came to power through an alliance with some traditional conservative factions, though also experienced opposition from others. ], a conservative former ] and former member of the ] supported Hitler for the position of Chancellor. Events during the Hitler chancellorship led to the ] which gave the Nazis ]ial powers, passed with the support of conservative and centrist deputies in the ], over the opposition of Social Democrats and Communists. Among the conservatives who opposed Hitler, the most notable was ], who held the Chancellorship before Papen. He attempted to construct a center-right-led "cross front" that would unite anti-Hitler factions on the right and center-left in the Reichstag. His failure to do so led to Papen's rise to power, which in turn paved the way for Hitler's. Schleicher was later assassinated by the Nazis on the Night of the Long Knives.

== Nazism and race ==

Nazis claimed to scientifically measure a strict hierarchy among races; at the top was the ] (minus the ]s, who were seen as below Aryan), then lesser races. At the bottom of this hierarchy were "parasitic" races, or ]en, which were perceived to be dangerous to society. Lowest of all in the ] were the ]s.

Nazi theory said that because the nation was the expression of the race, the greatness of a race could be evaluated according to a race's ability and desire to acquire a large homeland. German accomplishments in science, weaponry, philosophy and art were interpreted as scientific evidence to support Nazi racist claims.

==Reference==
* R.D'O.Butler ''The Roots of National Socialism 1783-1933'' ,Faber&Faber , London 1941
* Edmond Vermeil ''Germany's Three Reichs'' first published London 1944


]

Latest revision as of 09:19, 17 February 2024

Redirect to:

This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect: When appropriate, protection levels are automatically sensed, described and categorized.