Revision as of 14:48, 31 May 2009 editSurtsicna (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users130,222 edits →Infobox Royalty: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:45, 9 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,296,116 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Kirill Lokshin/Archive 20) (bot | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{not around|3=October 2022}} | |||
{| style="margin-top: 0; margin-left: 0; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 0; border: silver solid 1px; width: 100%; background: transparent;" | |||
Note retired banner now on user page. | |||
|- | |||
| style="padding: 1em; |
{| style="float: right; padding: 0.5em; border: 1px silver solid; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;" | ||
| {{Archives|auto=short|search=yes|image=|style=background: transparent; margin: 0; text-align: center; border-color: transparent;}} | |||
* Please sign your posts with four tildes (<code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>) and add comments on a new topic in a . | |||
* I will respond on '''your''' talk page unless you request otherwise. | |||
* Threads older than five days are automatically archived. | |||
* '''''Questions, requests, criticism, and any other comments are always welcome!''''' | |||
| style="padding-top: 1em; padding-right: 1em; padding-bottom: 1em; padding-left: 5em; text-align: center; white-space: nowrap; " | | |||
'''Archives'''<br/><br/>]{{•}}]{{•}}]{{•}}]{{•}}]{{•}}]{{•}}]{{•}}]{{•}}]{{•}}] | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="2" style="padding: 1em; border-top: 1px dotted silver; " | <span id="RECALL">I am an ]. To request this, please start a ]; if the consensus there is that my conduct has been unbecoming of an administrator, I will resign.</span> | |||
|}{{User:MiszaBot/config | |}{{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
|maxarchivesize = 200K | |maxarchivesize = 200K | ||
|counter = |
|counter = 20 | ||
|algo = old(5d) | |algo = old(5d) | ||
|archive = User talk:Kirill Lokshin/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Kirill Lokshin/Archive %(counter)d | ||
}} |
}}<!-- Please do not modify the section above --> | ||
== Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
== ]<span style="display:none;">''Misplaced Pages Signpost''</span><span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: '''25 May 2009'''</span> == | |||
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 11:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
==] has been nominated for merging== | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 06:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{colbegin|2}} | |||
==] has been nominated for renaming== | |||
* License update: ] | |||
* News and notes: ] | |||
* Misplaced Pages in the news: ] | |||
* WikiProject report: ] | |||
* Discussion report: ] | |||
* Features and admins: ] | |||
* Technology report: ] | |||
* Arbitration report: ] | |||
{{colend}} | |||
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">''']''' · ] · ]</div> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 06:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
<small>Delivered by ] (]) at 03:45, 26 May 2009 (UTC)</small> | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
== Alternate Account == | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 16:03, 11 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination for merger of ] == | |||
]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ] on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> ] (]) 19:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Great work at Samaria == | |||
Hi Kirill. You did brill at Samaria voting those people off the island. Can you get Jayjg back as soon as possible orcould you make Jaakobou an administrator? That would really stuff them! ] (]) 17:44, 27 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Call for you to recuse the AMiB RFAR == | |||
<font color="0D670D" face="Georgia, Helvetica">]</font>/<font color="red" face="Georgia, Helvetica">]</font> 21:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Rejecting "Locus of dispute" as written== | |||
In the "Tang Dynasty" ArbCom case, the "locus of dispute" factfinding should be rejected as written. | |||
A new, better locus of dispute should be adduced. | |||
I write to encourage you to re-visit this because the first and last sentences are fundamentally flawed. | |||
<u>NO to 1st sentence</u>. The case originated when ] rejected any and all inquiry relating to ], ] and ], alleging ] and ] instead. This persistent ''confrontational strategy'' is endorsed and encouraged by those voting in support ]'s locus of dispute. These votes effectively disregard , and, most importantly, Teeninvestor's restatment at . This obfuscation marginalizes even the attempt to pursue a ''strategy of collaborative editing''; and for this very practical reason, I could not disagree more with this sentence | |||
<u>NO to 3rd sentence</u>. In the specific context of this case, it is procedurally unsound to adopt the expanded scope proposed by ] and ]. One of the few areas of agreement acknowledged the initially limited focus of our case when it was opened. I could not disagree more with this sentence. | |||
In support, I highlight a crucial or between "A" and "B" below: | |||
:*A. ]'s analysis and paraphrases ]'s measured language : | |||
::"We appear to confront a small scale replica of what has occurred in other, wider disputes ... informed by a four-prong examination at each and every point of this escalating drama: | |||
::* 1. "What is the quality of the sources used by both sides in the dispute? | |||
::* 2. "What is the consensus of scholars in the field; and does the source reflect that consensus? | |||
::* 3. "Are the sources actually supporting the assertions for which they are cited? | |||
::* 4. "Are unsourced assertions being used? | |||
::"As others will know better than me, these four points are, unsurprisingly, at the center of most protracted disputes <s>and are all violations of our core content policies</s>, e.g., ], ] and ]." | |||
::*B. ]'s rejection is entire and : | |||
:::'''"This guy is out of control, man."''' | |||
In this instance, ]'s paraphrase of ]'s moderating analysis was posted on the talk pages of all arguably interested participants at ]. The "out of control" accusatory phrasing was repeated in diffs on the talk pages of ] and ]. This suggests a deliberate strategy rather than a merely transient outburst. | |||
In these pivotal diffs, ] cannot ''feign'' to have misunderstood my writing. These are plainly Coren's paraphrased words; and yet, this modest effort to frame ''collaborative editing'' issues was immediately converted into a contrived hostile encounter. This destructive pattern is reflected ''ad nauseam'' on the evidence and workshop pages. Despite the cumulative attacks, the edit history confirms my participation focused on issues, but this outcome tells me clearly that I was wrong to take the high road. | |||
In voting to support this awkward ], ArbCom's judgment effectively affirms that the contributions of ] and ] were above reproach and I was not. | |||
This alchemy is difficult to digest. ArbCom rewards what is bad and denigrates what is good. --] (]) 19:03, 30 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Infobox Royalty == | |||
Hello, Kirill! I was told that you are pretty good with templates and I need help around one. The ] needs to be edited, to reduce its length. Could you please put all the succession elements (predecessor, successor, reign, regent, coronation) into a hide/show box? You can see how the Spanish did it on ]. The infobox of Eleanor of Aquitaine article, for example, has three succession parameters. If we could make them collapsable, the infobox would be significantly shorter, but nothing would be lost. ], but there is always something wrong. Thanks! ] (]) 12:13, 23 May 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 14:45, 9 December 2024
This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Kirill Lokshin has not edited Misplaced Pages since October 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Note retired banner now on user page.
|
Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Military history/Any
Template:WikiProject Military history/Any has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Category:Battles involving Bengal has been nominated for merging
Category:Battles involving Bengal has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Category:Wars involving Frisia has been nominated for renaming
Category:Wars involving Frisia has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Talk:List of battles involving Sweden for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Talk:List of battles involving Sweden is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Talk:List of battles involving Sweden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Gvssy (talk) 16:03, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for merger of Template:WPMILHIST Task force assessment level category
Template:WPMILHIST Task force assessment level category has been nominated for merging with Template:WPANIMATION assessment quality work group level. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 19:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: