| Revision as of 23:51, 8 June 2009 view sourceAvraham (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Administrators49,160 edits →Non Free Images: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:15, 27 December 2024 view source Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,294,326 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Nableezy/Archive 58) (bot | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <!-- {{Contentious topics/aware|a-i|blp|ap}} --> | |||
| {{archive box collapsible|auto=long}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| | algo = old(10d) | |||
| | archive = User talk:Nableezy/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| | counter = 58 | |||
| | maxarchivesize = 50K | |||
| | archiveheader = {{aan}} | |||
| | minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
| | minthreadsleft = 2 | |||
| }} | |||
| {{Archives|collapsed=yes|image=none|search=yes}} | |||
| __TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| == ] updates == | |||
| == Michael Jordan userbox == | |||
| You are receiving this message because you are on ] for ]. The drafters note that the scope of the case was somewhat unclear, and clarify that the scope is {{tqq|The interaction of named parties in the ] topic area and examination of the ] process that led to ] ] to ]}}. Because this was unclear, two changes are being made: | |||
| How do you get the Michael Jordan userbox? ] (]) 09:59, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :The userbox is {{]}} ] (]) 12:57, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for the info. ] (]) 21:34, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| First, '''the Committee will accept submissions for new parties for the next three days''', until '''23:59, 10 December 2024 (UTC)'''. Anyone who wishes to suggest a party to the case may do so by creating a new section on ], providing a reason with ] as to why the user should be added, and notifying the user. After the three-day period ends, no further submission of parties will be considered except in exceptional circumstances. Because the Committee only hears disputes that have failed to be resolved by the usual means, proposed parties should have been recently taken to AE/AN/ANI, and either not sanctioned, or incompletely sanctioned. If a proposed party has not been taken to AE/AN/ANI, evidence is needed as to why such an attempt would have been ineffective. | |||
| == challenge to wikifan12345 == | |||
| Second, the ] '''has been extended by a week''', and will now close at '''23:59, 21 December 2024 (UTC)'''. For the Arbitration Committee, <b>]]</b> (] • he/they) 03:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Since he is sure he "" I ask him to do so. If you would like me to leave please sign your name below. Good luck wikifan ] (]) 20:51, 30 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:HouseBlaster@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_5/Update_list&oldid=1260342644 --> | |||
| Me!!! -] (]) 21:04, 30 May 2009 (UTC) <small>I am kidding</small> | |||
| == Action requested on Alison Weir page == | |||
| Is there a time limit on this? Obviously I wouldn't want to make such an important decision without thinking it through. --] (]) 09:05, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :you have already made your decision, these 2 are binding signatures. Making it a lil easier on WF. ] (]) 14:01, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::You are counting that as a signature just because I posted here? Does that mean that your signature counts also? --] (]) 21:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::Yes and no. If and when my signature is included that will be my last edit to this site. ] (]) 21:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Okay so the count is, me, FfQ, Untwirl and of course Wikifan him/herself. So it is getting up there. And don't forget that your boss also wants you off of WP. --] (]) 00:47, 6 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| can we start a section on users who want nableezy's ](the australian version)? i'll sign that one! ](]) 16:32, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :you just signed this one, i wont take it personally though, my cone is full ] (]) 16:48, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::damn, i was high and fucked that up. can i refactor and start my new section, bob? (not wanting to miss out on that cone) ](]) 16:53, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Nableezy, if you are a "Confirmed-extended" editor as I assume, would you be kind enough to take a look at my requested edit of a paragraph in the protected-extended entry "Alison Weir" and take action on it? It just sits there...thanks.... kenfree ] (]) 02:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Bless young and ignorant == | |||
| Nothing new under the sun, isn't it? There was something before Durban 1 and 2, it was called United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3379. It condemned Zionism and equaled it to apartheid, racism and colonialism. Not sure you are familiar. But if you do - forget it. Regards. --] (]) 14:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :yes I was. FYI, Im done with that page for a while, just too aggravating. Stay well, ] (]) 15:29, 2 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::I liked what you did today, especially removing that horrible Cryptonio sentence 'Since the team entered ...'. Aren't you afraid of Cryptonio's aggravations? I hope you don't, but if you do - I'll try to back you up. Your addition to the 'occupation' sentence hurts, but it is true, so no objection there. I placed 2 more pictures of Rayyan on a talk page, choose whatever you seem appropriate and insert it in the infobox (I'd like to keep the original in the article too, but something says me you might oppose this). Ah, those pictures need appropriate tag, your help would be appreciated. They are taken from PALD public forum, so there shouldn't be a problem. Regards. --] (]) 07:36, 5 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Disruptive editing == | |||
| {{hat|collapse inanity}} | |||
| Deleting content based on grammatical concerns is considered disruptive editing. I request that you self revert edit, and fix the content to be written in a manner that resolves your grammar concerns.<br>Warm regards, <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>'']''</sup></font></b> 15:22, 2 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :That has nothing to do with 'grammatical concerns' it has to do with the meaning of words. I would suggest you look into a mirror before accusing others of being disruptive. ] (]) 15:25, 2 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| {{hab}} | |||
| Of course the BBC is a RS. So is the JP. However, the names have to mentioned in order to manifest the contradiction. Read the paragraph according to your edit. The whole point doesn't jive. Best, --'']] ]'' 18:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Ahh, I see. I just saw the 'according to the BBC.' fixed. Also, quick note here, your 'refuses to archive' problem was that the bot requires 2 signatures to archive, anything with just 1 will stay. ] (]) 18:48, 3 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::what do you mean "two signatures"?--'']] ]'' 18:49, 3 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::You mean it requires some sort of reply?--'']] ]'' 18:50, 3 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Yup, if there is only one signature (with a timestamp) in a section it will skip over that. ] (]) 18:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::::So what am I supposed to when some troll crawls his way to my talkpage (i.e. ] with some comment that doesn't even merit removal?--'']] ]'' 18:57, 3 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::either archive it manually or write "to archive" with your sig. or do what i do, just make fun of them for saying something dumb. but really, why dont you ... :) ] (]) 19:00, 3 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Chaps, you might already have seen this, but it's always worth rereading ]. --] (]) 09:32, 5 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Non Free Images == | |||
| Looks good to me. The others will need to be deleted, but that one is the least provocative, smallest, and probably bets quality of the bunch, so I'm glad you found the sourcing for it. Thanks! -- ] (]) 23:51, 8 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:15, 27 December 2024
Palestine-Israel articles 5 updates
You are receiving this message because you are on the update list for Palestine-Israel articles 5. The drafters note that the scope of the case was somewhat unclear, and clarify that the scope is The interaction of named parties in the WP:PIA topic area and examination of the WP:AE process that led to two referrals to WP:ARCA
. Because this was unclear, two changes are being made:
First, the Committee will accept submissions for new parties for the next three days, until 23:59, 10 December 2024 (UTC). Anyone who wishes to suggest a party to the case may do so by creating a new section on the evidence talk page, providing a reason with WP:DIFFS as to why the user should be added, and notifying the user. After the three-day period ends, no further submission of parties will be considered except in exceptional circumstances. Because the Committee only hears disputes that have failed to be resolved by the usual means, proposed parties should have been recently taken to AE/AN/ANI, and either not sanctioned, or incompletely sanctioned. If a proposed party has not been taken to AE/AN/ANI, evidence is needed as to why such an attempt would have been ineffective.
Second, the evidence phase has been extended by a week, and will now close at 23:59, 21 December 2024 (UTC). For the Arbitration Committee, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Action requested on Alison Weir page
Nableezy, if you are a "Confirmed-extended" editor as I assume, would you be kind enough to take a look at my requested edit of a paragraph in the protected-extended entry "Alison Weir" and take action on it? It just sits there...thanks.... kenfree Kenfree (talk) 02:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC)