Misplaced Pages

talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Interstate Highways: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:12, 29 November 2005 editRschen7754 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users123,234 edits NJ State Routes as opposed to browse state highways← Previous edit Latest revision as of 05:43, 23 January 2012 edit undoImzadi1979 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors151,606 editsm +categories 
(741 intermediate revisions by 72 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ]
]


]
== Routebox and Shields ==
]

]
I think the Routebox template would look better if the shields led the text. Scaling the shield images down to 20 px looks good, however the article for ] has them at 30 px. I've also tried them at 25 px, which may be a good compromise. I also like the layout for the Routebox currently used on the article for ].
]

]
There should also be some attempt to standardize the appearance of Interstate shields in terms of size, color and font. From what I've seen so far, there seem to have been two main sources of Interstate shields: versions initially uploaded by ] in May of 2004, and the larger, darker versions uploaded by ] last month. Both sources claim the shields to be the work of the U.S. federal government. Many shields have been replaced with Kamlung uploads, but many Interstates are still using the Denelson83 uploads. I think the shields uploaded by Kamlung are of higher quality, more readable, and more aesthetically pleasing. His source should be identified, and the rest of the Interstate shields on Misplaced Pages should be updated with this model. -- ] 01:50, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

:I never noticed the size of the shields, but you have a valid point. As far as the standardization, there is sometimes a reason why they aren't. Take ]. The whole thing is in Florida, so why not use the full shield, since it isn't showing partiality to any state. However, I was actually recently wondering how to go about making a shield for a 3di (they don't all have them)... PS: I never noticed a difference between the sheilds, with the exception of state names. --] 02:32, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
::Because of the size concerns I'd use 20px... but yeah there's a lot of things nonstandard about the routeboxes, especially with Interstate 5. For example, should the mileposts say "Oklahoma 185" or "OK 185"? What is a major junction? Some routeboxes have no images for each individual junction as well. Hmm... --'''] (] - ] - )''' 01:31, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
::I was starting to write a standard on this before the routeboxes came up. I'm sticking with 20px (] ]) for 2dis and 25px (] ]) for 3dis on my pages. The goal is to have the numbers be the same size. That said, I also need someone to make PNG versions of Illinois state shields... my current source is pretty good but the 3dis aren't correctly sized. --] 14:21, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
:::Out of curiosity (and so I can make some), what is your source? --] 23:16, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
::::This place: . Contains more about Illinois State Highways than you would ever have cared to know about, and still a good "original source" type website. --] 01:07, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

== Helpful ==

I found this site hlepful.

== elevations and grades on the nation's Interstate Highways ==

There is a need, on this site, both for truckers and those of us who travel in recreation vehicles, for a linear chart which shows highway elevations (in feet) and grades (%) for the entire Interstate system.
:You mean for each individually? If you or anyone else wants to put all of that on here, it's fine with me, but I'm not going to. Though perhaps the maximum grade (I'm guessing there is one as part of the Interstate standard) should be listed in the ] article. Besides, wouldn't the maximum grade be fine for trucks? The Interstate highway system was designed to be fine for trucks; one of the purposes back in the 1950's or whenever was military. --] 00:40, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

== USGS arial photos ==

Are they public domain? --] 02:28, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

: Yes. ]. ] | ] 00:11, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

::Thanks. --] 16:14, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

==Categories==
Should the categories called ] be renamed to ]? See ] for the why. --'''] (] - ])''' 02:51, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
:How about '''Californian members of the Interstate Highway System''' or something? That way, it could be capitalized without dispute. But it's a bit too long. I just read that thing. The whole thing seems so dumb. Does it really matter how it's capitalised? --] 05:56, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
::Well yes since ] is an interstate highway... it goes in between 2 states. However, it is not an Interstate. Also ] is not an interstate highway, but it is an Interstate Highway. But this is the most controversial thing I have ever done on Misplaced Pages. --'''] (] - ])''' 03:11, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

== MUTCD/SHS and the interstate shields on wikipedia ==

This is really wierd, but the sign I came up with by following SHS exactly leads me to have a 3di sign that looks like this ]. You'll notice that the word INTERSTATE is much bigger on that than on the others. (], ], etc) SHS says to use type E writing for 3dis. It appears that most of the other 3di signs on wikipedia use the type C, which is what ought to be used for 2dis (]). It also says that the word INTERSTATE should take up 72% of the total width of the sign. It's not a big deal; I just want to make sure that I am correctly interpreting SHS (I can't seem to find an example 3di shield anyplace in MUTCD; the dimensions are just listed beneath those for a 2di shields in M1-1.)

By the way, I plan to make signs with state names by using the dimensions from M1-2 and M1-3 (except P, which will change for each state). There doesn't really seem to be any mention of using state names in SHS, but clearly states that: "Interstate Route signs may contain the State name in white upper-case letters on a blue background.", so it is certianly OK; there just doesn't seem to be any official way of doing it. Therefore, I'll be just replacing the words LOOP and SPUR; since those are placed similarly.

As far as H201 (I mentioned it earlier.), it seems that the official shield is just a 3di shield with B lettering since "H201" won't fit as C.

I'd really appreciate your thoughts on the above. I could simply be misinterpreting the SHS book. --] 23:35, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

== NJ State Routes as opposed to browse state highways ==

The New Jersians have a nifty thing that can be put on all state routes, which might be better than trying to incorporate a state-by-state thing into an interstate routebox.
Just wanted to point that out. --] 02:48, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
:Then for I-95 we would have 15 of these boxes on the article. That's the problem. --'''] (] - ])''' 03:12, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:43, 23 January 2012

Redirect to:

Categories: