User talk:DoyleCB: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 21:27, 13 June 2009 editStorm Rider (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,015 edits 2nd 3RR warning← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 07:58, 5 March 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk \| contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB
(59 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			If you leave a message here, I will respond here.
	Please do not remove the comments of others from the article talk page as you did , , and . The guideline can be found at ]. ] (]) 18:38, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

			== Indef ==
	I did no such thing, I have no idea how that happened. I apologize if I made a mistake. --] (]) 18:40, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

			Hi. Congratulations: your behaviour is sufficiently irritating that I've blocked you until you learn how to behave. First off, you would have a long block for yet another 3RR violation. Then I discover that you are making stupid edits such as , .
	==June 2009 warnings==
	] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:West Ridge Academy\| according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:\|{{{2}}}\|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->--<sup>]</sup>] 21:22, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

			So: its up to you really: are you prepared to give up the nonsense or not? ] (]) 21:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
	] Welcome to ]. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Misplaced Pages. However, please know that editors ] and should respect the work of their fellow contributors{{#if:West Ridge Academy\| on ]}}. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{#if:\|{{{2}}}\|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-own1 -->--<sup>]</sup>] 21:27, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

			{{unblock reviewed\|1=This is ridiculous. I have not violated the 3 revert rule. I challenged my last block, and the one before that, and all the other punitive administrative functions, like this and and done at the request of the LDS editors who refuse to entertain a perspective that is not overtly Mormon favored. I don't believe that any of my real actions constitute such a harsh consequence. This is really beyond ridiculous and conducive of censorship.\|decline=This doesn't seem to address ] and is very accusatory; since you were partially blocked for incivility, I don't see any reason why you should be unblocked. ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 04:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)}}
	] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:West Ridge Academy\| according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:\|{{{2}}}\|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->--<sup>]</sup>] 21:27, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

			Comments: I don't see any evidence that DCB has understood what he has done wrong, or is at all interested in finding out. Given that, I see every reason for his unacceptable behaviour to continue. Unless DCB expresses at the very least an interest in discovering why his behaviour is considered unacceptable I can see nothing further to do here ] (]) 07:30, 24 June 2009 (UTC)


			==Request for mediation not accepted==
			{\| class="messagebox" style="width:90%"
			\|-
			\|]
			\|A ] to which you were are a party was ] and has been delisted.<br>You can find more information on the case subpage, ].</center><br>
			::''For the Mediation Committee,'' ''']''' 02:29, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
			\|}
			<div style="text-align:center; font-size:smaller;">This message delivered by ], an automated bot account ] by the ] to perform case management.<br>If you have questions about this bot, please ].</div>

Latest revision as of 07:58, 5 March 2023

If you leave a message here, I will respond here.

Indef

Hi. Congratulations: your behaviour is sufficiently irritating that I've blocked you until you learn how to behave. First off, you would have a long block for yet another 3RR violation. Then I discover that you are making stupid edits such as , .

So: its up to you really: are you prepared to give up the nonsense or not? William M. Connolley (talk) 21:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DoyleCB (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is ridiculous. I have not violated the 3 revert rule. I challenged my last block, and the one before that, and all the other punitive administrative functions, like this and this and this done at the request of the LDS editors who refuse to entertain a perspective that is not overtly Mormon favored. I don't believe that any of my real actions constitute such a harsh consequence. This is really beyond ridiculous and conducive of censorship.

Decline reason:

This doesn't seem to address your actions and is very accusatory; since you were partially blocked for incivility, I don't see any reason why you should be unblocked. Hersfold 04:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comments: I don't see any evidence that DCB has understood what he has done wrong, or is at all interested in finding out. Given that, I see every reason for his unacceptable behaviour to continue. Unless DCB expresses at the very least an interest in discovering *why* his behaviour is considered unacceptable I can see nothing further to do here William M. Connolley (talk) 07:30, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Request for mediation not accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted.
You can find more information on the case subpage, Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/WestRidgeAcademy.

For the Mediation Committee, Ryan Postlethwaite 02:29, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.