Misplaced Pages

User talk:PasswordUsername: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:43, 14 June 2009 editAdjustShift (talk | contribs)15,507 edits →Blocked: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 14:36, 6 March 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(157 intermediate revisions by 43 users not shown)
Line 66: Line 66:
|}<!--Template:Welcomeg--> |}<!--Template:Welcomeg-->


===Mil. history assessment===
Hello, I am an American and I love democracy.
{{tb|User talk:AustralianRupert|Mil. history assessment}} — ] (]) 06:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


== Check this out == ===H. rights in the U.S.===
Thanks for your edit there that not everyone received equal treatment per the Constitution, that being reserved for landed white males in keeping with the custom of the day. I did add that the first U.S human rights group was anti-slavery, re-arranged, and indicated the evolution of rights over time to include wider classes of individuals, reflecting the content of the article. Cheers! ] <SMALL><span style="background-color:#a12830;">&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="background-color:#ffffff;">&nbsp;</span><span style="background-color:#a12830;">&nbsp;&nbsp;</span> ]</SMALL> 18:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


== Timoshenko ==
]


What goes on in the heads of the people who think "{{lang|ru|Семён}}" is best romanized "Semen", I will never understand :) I have moved the article to ], which didn't require admin rights to do. I suspect you were trying to move it to "Semyon T'''y'''moshenko", no?—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); 13:22, July&nbsp;16, 2009 (UTC)
==] and ]==
With regard to ... You came to my talk page only to call me a '''vandal''' and claim that I intentionally misrepresent sources. And you still did not provide any proof of that. You also said above that you ''intentially reverted a bunch of my edits to teach me a lesson''. Are you going to continue, to follow my edits in articles you were never interested before and revert my edits? Doing so is against WP policies. Regards, ] (]) 15:40, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
:I saw this as I am still watching this talk page. This looks like a clash of strong POVs to me, and I have no idea who is right. But one thing: We have a very restrictive, technical definition of vandalism here, which makes sense because reverting vandalism is exempt from 3RR and this exemption is not supposed to be effective in a case such as this one. It's easy for a beginner to get this wrong, especially because many of the more experienced editors abuse the word in all those contexts where they can get away with it. Vandalism warnings are not one of them. --] (]) 17:29, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
::This user apologized, and I asked him not to follow my edits. If he follows this advise, everything should be fine. I am not sure what you call my "POV". I do not hold any strong opinions about Novodvorskaya beyond following ] rules, and I do not care about ]. I edited hundreds other articles and will continue doing so. Thank you for the comment.] (]) 02:04, 14 May 2009 (UTC)


== Renominating == == Yefimov ==


The page was protected indefinitely because a vandal moved it ten months ago. That's no good. I've unprotected the page, moved to it Yefimov (because you are right, that's where it belongs), and watchlisted it, in case the vandal hits it again. Cheers,—]&nbsp;•&nbsp;(]); 00:28, July&nbsp;25, 2009 (UTC)
It's a little soon, unless you've come up with some '''''really''''' persuasive arguments that weren't touched on last time. --] &#x007C; ] 02:35, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
:There's no hard-and-fast rule; generally, though, unless the closure was so inappropriate that it should have gone to ], I've seen it suggested that six months is a good bare minimum. --] &#x007C; ] 12:28, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


==The Soviet Story==
==Reply==
You are ]ring on ''']'''. Two editors have already expressed concern over your edits; this means that you need to stop reverting, and do nothing but post messages on the talk page explaining why you think there need to be changes made. Once you convince people at the talk page and there is a consensus to make changes, ''then'' you can edit the article; but for now, you need to stop edit warring.
I would appreciate if you do not revert every my edit, even such neutral edit as formatting an image (), without even talking. Also note that you promised at the ANI do not edit war using alternative accounts, but you are doing just that.] (]) 01:26, 16 May 2009 (UTC)


You have already passed ] so you are lucky you haven't been blocked yet. If you do another revert, I will block you. So you would be well-advised to stay at the talk page now. <b class="Unicode">]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 01:58, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
:As I've explained to you on your talk page, you cited ] as a reason for removing a photograph of Valeriya Novodvorskaya, whereas WP:BLP privedes for no such thing. You did not reformat the image; you . And I am watching the Novodvorskaya page, as you seem to be the only one making the extraordinary and radical anti-consensus claims found at ]. My edit only happened under an IP as I got automatically logged out at the time of going to the Novodvorskaya page without realizing it, and I identified myself with both accounts within a minute of making the edit, as you have obviously seen at ]. Best, ] (]) 01:31, 16 May 2009 (UTC)


:I've left a ]; both you and Martintg have behaved inappropriately. True, they were wrong in trying to report you for "four reverts" when all you had was one, but seriously, you should not have even had one. I suggest you follow the ] from now on, and closely review Misplaced Pages policies (particularly ], which you misinterpreted and used to incorrectly justify your revert war yesterday); some of the edits you have been trying to make appear to be improvements, but they will never get through if you don't learn how to edit in the right way and to form consensus. Just because I didn't block you this time (mainly because I didn't happen to be at my computer when you reverted) doesn't mean I won't in the future; you know not to edit war, and even one revert is an edit war, so don't make one revert. If you do, you know what the consequences will be.
:'''No''', I did not cite BLP as a reason for removing image. Two very similar images of the same person are too much per ]. Your ''revert'' of such "gnomish" edit, without even talking, was unacceptable.] (]) 01:35, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
:You can read the message at my talk page for more information. <b class="Unicode">]</b>&nbsp;<small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 22:17, 4 September 2009 (UTC)


==]==
: MOS doesn't forbid using two images of the same person to illustrate{{ndash}} you did still cite BLP in your removal of the picture in your second edit to a version rejected by consensus(), whereas you did not cite any policy of Misplaced Pages in your "two pictures are unnecessary" summary in the first one. I don't see what the issue of MOS here is; if it's a matter of adding captions, I can easily do that should you request. Your first edit also requests that we see talk, whereas you added nothing new to the discussion (where all your previous points had been addressed) there before reverting from the previous version. ] (]) 01:45, 16 May 2009 (UTC)


The Arbitration Committee has passed a motion to open a case to investigate allegations surrounding a private Eastern European mailing list. The contents of the motion can be viewed ].
== You are right ==


You have been named as one of the ] to this case. Please take note of the explanations given in italics at the top of that section; if you have any further questions about the list of parties, please feel free to contact me on my talk page.
You are absolutely right about . I was just about to post a similar comment. (I totally disagree with ]'s claim: "since their return, Digwuren has shown good conduct, but Petri Krohn has proven unable to do so.) However, I decided to leave the board in peace and complained instead. I can only hope that the admins will take a deeper look at the issues before jumping into action. ] (]) 20:17, 24 May 2009 (UTC)


The Committee has explicitly requested that evidence be presented within one week of the case opening; ie. by September 25. Evidence can be presented on the ] of the case; please ensure that you follow the Committee instructions regarding the responsible and appropriate submission of evidence, as set out in the motion linked previously, should you choose to present evidence.
== Talkback ==


Please further note that, due to the exceptional nature of this case (insofar as it centers on the alleged contents of a private mailing list), the Committee has decided that the normal workshop format will not be used. The notice near the top of ] provides a detailed explanation of how it will be used in this case.
{{talkback|MLauba|Re: Proposed history merge for Failed States (book)}}
] (]) 13:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)


For the Arbitration Committee,<br>] (]) 01:16, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
== Volunteers ==


== ] nomination of ] ==
'''' and many others. Do you mean that you edit-warred without even trying to find out anything about the subject? Not good. ] (]) 03:04, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also ] and "]").


Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).
== Re: Explain ==


You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
This is ], as the source is not about Armenians. You may ask at any noticeboard and will learn that this is not on. Furthermore, this is a logical fallacy, the synthesis would be valid only if all Russophones were left without Estonian citizenship, which is emphatically not the case. Frankly, you don't even know for sure whether these 2,000 Armenians lived there before 1991 or they are recent immigrants. You don't even know whether they are Estonian citizens or not. This is pure original research, or rather guesswork. And in no way could the Russophones in question be "deprived" of what they had never had. Systematically? Where is this taken from? Your source doesn't use such words. ] (]) 03:22, 4 June 2009 (UTC)


'''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
==] nomination of ]==
] A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see ] for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on ] subjects and should provide references to ] that ] their content.


== Re : ] ==
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact ] to request that they ] the page or have a copy emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-nocontext-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> - ] <small>(])</small> 00:38, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


This arbitration case has been closed, and the final decision may be viewed at the link above.
== User notice: temporary 3RR block ==


*''']''' resigned the administrator tools during the case proceedings and may only seek to regain adminship by a new request for adminship or by request to the Arbitration Committee.
<div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;">
*''']''' is banned for '''three months'''. At the conclusion of his ban, a '''one year''' topic ban on articles about Eastern Europe, their talk pages, and any related process discussion, widely construed, shall take effect.
==Regarding reversions made on ] ] to ]==
*''']''' is banned for '''one year'''. He is directed to edit Misplaced Pages from only a single user account, and advise the Arbitration Committee of the name of the account that he will use. Should he not advise the committee by the end of the one year ban, he will remain indefinitely banned until a single account is chosen.
<div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{#if:|a period of '''{{{time}}}'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for violating the ]{{#if:|&#32;at ]}}. Please be more careful to ] or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our ] first. {{#if:|] (]) 11:07, 7 June 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> The duration of the is 24 hours. ] (]) 11:07, 7 June 2009 (UTC)</div>
*''']''' is placed on a '''one year''' topic ban on articles about Eastern Europe, their talk pages, and any related process discussion, widely construed. This shall take effect following the expiration of both above mentioned bans.
*The following users are topic banned from articles about Eastern Europe, their associated talk pages, and any process discussion about same, widely construed, for '''one year''':
:*''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']'''
*''']''' is topic banned from articles about Eastern Europe, their associated talk pages, and any process discussion about same, widely construed, for '''six months'''.
*''']''' is strongly admonished for having shared his account password. He is directed to keep his account for his own exclusive use, and not to allow any other person to use it under any circumstance.
*The editors sanctioned above (], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]) are prohibited from commenting on or unnecessarily interacting with ] on any page of Misplaced Pages, except for purposes of legitimate and necessary dispute resolution.
*All the participants to the mailing list are strongly admonished against coordinating on-wiki behavior off-wiki and directed to keep discussion of editing and dispute resolution strictly on wiki and in public. All editors are reminded that the editorial process and dispute resolution must take place on Misplaced Pages itself, using the article talk pages and project space for this purpose. No discussion held off-wiki can lead to a valid consensus, the basis of our editorial process. Off-wiki coordination is likely to lead to echo chambers where there is a false appearance of neutrality and consensus.


''For the Arbitration Committee'',
== Fifth revert ==
] 17:42, 22 December 2009 (UTC) -
]


==RfD nomination of ]==
I did indicate a fifth revert later on in the discussion for Sander Sade. Would appreciate it if you take a look. Thanks. ] (]) 11:05, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated {{la|Т. Т. Khryukin}} for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ]. Thank you. — <span style="font-family:gill sans;">]</span> ] 07:48, 6 January 2010 (UTC)


== ] nomination of ] ==
: Not obviously. What is it? ] (]) 11:18, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also ] and "]").


Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).
::This is revert # 5: . (This is another instance of Sade reverting my edit, not in the first four I'd indicated in the beginning. I misattributed it to a revert of Offliner's content at the reverts noticeboard.) Also, I'd say the incivility in Sade's edit summaries at ] is probably an aggravating factor. ] (])
::--''and I just found a sixth and seventh reverts:'' , . ] (]) 11:59, 7 June 2009 (UTC)


You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Yes, it seems Sander Säde has broken 3RR. See the diffs I posted . ] (]) 14:08, 7 June 2009 (UTC)


:Thanks for bringing it up{{ndash}}a swell thing on your part, Offliner. Hopefully it will catch someone's attention at ANI... Where is the grinding of those wheels of Wikijustice? ;-) ] (]) 16:00, 7 June 2009 (UTC) '''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:04, 18 April 2010 (UTC)


== ] exists ==
== Offer of a deal ==


neutral notification ] (]) 12:34, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello PasswordUsername. I've made an offer to ] to excuse him from his apparent 3RR violation if he would voluntarily agree not to edit ] for one month, and only use the talk page. I said that I would make the same offer to you. If you agree to not edit the article directly for one month, and only use the talk page, you could be unblocked. (I might need to check with the blocking admin first). What do you think? ] (]) 17:42, 7 June 2009 (UTC)


== Arbitration motion regarding ] ==
:I went over 3RR by one revert by pure accident, simply restoring sourced content and removing another user's insertion of ] and ]. I have a pretty decent history of using Talk pages. Meanwhile, some editors have clearly abused the project. We now have teammates of a certain party adding edit summaries in Estonian...
:I'm fine with the block - the world does work in its mysterious ways. Unblocking me would not be fair to our rules - and unacceptable since these are what is supposed to guide our project.
:I'll take the block, since it is merited - I do appreciate your offer. ] (]) 17:58, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
::So you're declining my offer? You are aware that future reverts by either you or SS may result in more sanctions. This does appear to be an unnecessary dispute, and you are both well-intentioned, but this seems to be your choice, so let it be as you wish. ] (]) 18:04, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
:::I have no intention of doing future edits to the article. But I'll take the block. ] (]) 18:05, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
===Editing restriction===
You and ] '''will not be editing the ] article''' for a month. (You can still edit the talk page). That one-month period will end at 17:12 UTC, 7 July 2009. Since you did not request unblocking, your block will stay in place until it expires. Thanks to his agreement to the restriction, Sander Säde will remain unblocked. ] (]) 01:18, 8 June 2009 (UTC)


Following a <span class="plainlinks"></span> at ]:
==Re: Stalky-stalk==
Hello Frank, thanks for the advice! I know that it is not good to go on some pages and every time I do that I have a sore belly (^__^). Anyway, I'm on Misplaced Pages because I think that every little bit of human knowledge should be shared by the entire human race, exactly like everything else. But, I am not here to do politics. Thank you once again and have a great day. –] <small>('']'' • ])</small> 08:07, 10 June 2009 (UTC)


Remedy 20 of ] ("Miacek topic banned") is lifted.
==Re: Unrelated insults by an unrelated user==
Thank you Frank once again for you support, but it is not necessary. They are young. Perhaps one day they will grow up and realize that they are wasting their time. Best regards. –] <small>('']'' • ])</small> 11:39, 10 June 2009 (UTC)


''On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,'' ] ''(])'' 00:16, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
== Your stalking allegations ==
I have had Armenia on my watchlist for a long time ever since being engaged there in the "is Armenia European or not" discussion quite some time ago. I saw the article tagged. I added a reference. I added Pjoef's talk to my watchlist. What do I find when I peruse through but <u>'''you'''</u> on their talk page pointing to your side of some argument regarding accusations <u>'''you'''</u> first lodged there as some sort of proof, indicating Digwuren or I are stalking you, you don't really care who. I am tired of your accusations against me behind my back on user and admin pages.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp; In the future, should you have any concerns regarding my conduct:<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;(A) contact me, and/or,<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;(B) file for administrative action.<br>
I request you cease and desist from further innuendo and accusations. I trust I have made myself clear. ] <SMALL><SMALL><FONT STYLE="background-color:#a12830;">&nbsp;&nbsp;</FONT><FONT STYLE="background-color:#ffffff;">&nbsp;</FONT><FONT STYLE="background-color:#a12830;">&nbsp;&nbsp;</FONT></SMALL> ]</SMALL> 01:44, 11 June 2009 (UTC)


:''']'''
== BLP ==
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
Where do you see a BLP violation in ? The sentence is based on his own statements from the interview, and it's not like it's some sort of radical minority party. In recent Europarliament elections, it got two seats of Estonia's six. ]<sub>]</sub> 13:11, 12 June 2009 (UTC)


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].
==Re:Southern Poverty Law Center a reliable organization?==


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Hi, thanks for the comment. I responded on noticed board (sorry for the delay). While I am not deeply familiar with SPLC, it seems that it is RS indeed. Have a good day, ] (]) 08:25, 13 June 2009 (UTC)


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ] (]) 00:38, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
== Thanks ==
==Category:Electricians who committed suicide==


''']''', which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. -- ] (] - ]) 18:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your backup on several Estonia/Russia related articles. I am now serving out a 6 month restriction on such articles and a 3 month block on BLP related to both countries.


==Category:Americans convicted of spying against Iran==
I think certain users, especially Digwuren, are very good at gaming the system. Obviously, adopting the same tactics (as I did) is wrong but it does seem rather unfair that they have been able to get away with this behaviour for so long. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 12:44, 13 June 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] <sup>]</sup> 11:36, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
== ] ==


== ] ==
Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. {{#if:|The thread is ]. }}{{#if:|The discussion is about the topic ].}} <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. -- ] 08:06, 14 June 2009 (UTC)


Hi,<br>
== 3RR ==
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692215842 -->


== ] ==
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Nochnoy Dozor (pressure group)|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:Please, do not constantly rename a page until ] achieved.|Please, do not constantly rename a page until ] achieved.|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 15:54, 14 June 2009 (UTC)


Hi,<br>
== Blocked ==
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692215842 -->
==] has been nominated for discussion==


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ], is the complaint department really on ] 00:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
I've blocked you for 72 hours. You've repeatedly inserted nonsense on Estonia-related articles. type of edits are unacceptable. You've also inserted other nonsense. WP is not a computer game where you can insert what ever you want. See ]. If you don't stop your anti-Estonian campaign, you may get blocked for a longer period. ] (]) 18:43, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

==] has been nominated for discussion==

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ―] 23:41, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
==] has been nominated for merging==

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''' has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 19:47, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
==] has been nominated for merging==

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''' has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 22:42, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
==] has been nominated for deletion==

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''' has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) (]) 03:21, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:36, 6 March 2023

Hello, PasswordUsername! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. We're so glad you're here! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills, the sandbox is for you. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 02:27, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Mil. history assessment

Hello, PasswordUsername. You have new messages at AustralianRupert's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— AustralianRupert (talk) 06:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

H. rights in the U.S.

Thanks for your edit there that not everyone received equal treatment per the Constitution, that being reserved for landed white males in keeping with the custom of the day. I did add that the first U.S human rights group was anti-slavery, re-arranged, and indicated the evolution of rights over time to include wider classes of individuals, reflecting the content of the article. Cheers! PētersV       TALK 18:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Timoshenko

What goes on in the heads of the people who think "Семён" is best romanized "Semen", I will never understand :) I have moved the article to Semyon Timoshenko, which didn't require admin rights to do. I suspect you were trying to move it to "Semyon Tymoshenko", no?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 13:22, July 16, 2009 (UTC)

Yefimov

The page was protected indefinitely because a vandal moved it ten months ago. That's no good. I've unprotected the page, moved to it Yefimov (because you are right, that's where it belongs), and watchlisted it, in case the vandal hits it again. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 00:28, July 25, 2009 (UTC)

The Soviet Story

You are edit warring on The Soviet Story. Two editors have already expressed concern over your edits; this means that you need to stop reverting, and do nothing but post messages on the talk page explaining why you think there need to be changes made. Once you convince people at the talk page and there is a consensus to make changes, then you can edit the article; but for now, you need to stop edit warring.

You have already passed three reverts so you are lucky you haven't been blocked yet. If you do another revert, I will block you. So you would be well-advised to stay at the talk page now. rʨanaɢ /contribs 01:58, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

I've left a response at my talkpage; both you and Martintg have behaved inappropriately. True, they were wrong in trying to report you for "four reverts" when all you had was one, but seriously, you should not have even had one. I suggest you follow the one-revert rule from now on, and closely review Misplaced Pages policies (particularly WP:BLP, which you misinterpreted and used to incorrectly justify your revert war yesterday); some of the edits you have been trying to make appear to be improvements, but they will never get through if you don't learn how to edit in the right way and to form consensus. Just because I didn't block you this time (mainly because I didn't happen to be at my computer when you reverted) doesn't mean I won't in the future; you know not to edit war, and even one revert is an edit war, so don't make one revert. If you do, you know what the consequences will be.
You can read the message at my talk page for more information. rʨanaɢ /contribs 22:17, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Arbitration case regarding the Eastern European mailing list

The Arbitration Committee has passed a motion to open a case to investigate allegations surrounding a private Eastern European mailing list. The contents of the motion can be viewed here.

You have been named as one of the parties to this case. Please take note of the explanations given in italics at the top of that section; if you have any further questions about the list of parties, please feel free to contact me on my talk page.

The Committee has explicitly requested that evidence be presented within one week of the case opening; ie. by September 25. Evidence can be presented on the evidence subpage of the case; please ensure that you follow the Committee instructions regarding the responsible and appropriate submission of evidence, as set out in the motion linked previously, should you choose to present evidence.

Please further note that, due to the exceptional nature of this case (insofar as it centers on the alleged contents of a private mailing list), the Committee has decided that the normal workshop format will not be used. The notice near the top of the cases' workshop page provides a detailed explanation of how it will be used in this case.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Daniel (talk) 01:16, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mass killings under Communist regimes

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Mass killings under Communist regimes. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Mass killings under Communist regimes. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Re : Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Eastern European mailing list

This arbitration case has been closed, and the final decision may be viewed at the link above.

  • User:Piotrus resigned the administrator tools during the case proceedings and may only seek to regain adminship by a new request for adminship or by request to the Arbitration Committee.
  • User:Piotrus is banned for three months. At the conclusion of his ban, a one year topic ban on articles about Eastern Europe, their talk pages, and any related process discussion, widely construed, shall take effect.
  • User:Digwuren is banned for one year. He is directed to edit Misplaced Pages from only a single user account, and advise the Arbitration Committee of the name of the account that he will use. Should he not advise the committee by the end of the one year ban, he will remain indefinitely banned until a single account is chosen.
  • User:Digwuren is placed on a one year topic ban on articles about Eastern Europe, their talk pages, and any related process discussion, widely construed. This shall take effect following the expiration of both above mentioned bans.
  • The following users are topic banned from articles about Eastern Europe, their associated talk pages, and any process discussion about same, widely construed, for one year:
  • User:Jacurek is topic banned from articles about Eastern Europe, their associated talk pages, and any process discussion about same, widely construed, for six months.
  • User:Tymek is strongly admonished for having shared his account password. He is directed to keep his account for his own exclusive use, and not to allow any other person to use it under any circumstance.
  • The editors sanctioned above (Piotrus, Digwuren, Martintg, Tymek, Jacurek, Radeksz, Dc76, Vecrumba, Biruitorul, Miacek) are prohibited from commenting on or unnecessarily interacting with Russavia on any page of Misplaced Pages, except for purposes of legitimate and necessary dispute resolution.
  • All the participants to the mailing list are strongly admonished against coordinating on-wiki behavior off-wiki and directed to keep discussion of editing and dispute resolution strictly on wiki and in public. All editors are reminded that the editorial process and dispute resolution must take place on Misplaced Pages itself, using the article talk pages and project space for this purpose. No discussion held off-wiki can lead to a valid consensus, the basis of our editorial process. Off-wiki coordination is likely to lead to echo chambers where there is a false appearance of neutrality and consensus.

For the Arbitration Committee, Mailer Diablo 17:42, 22 December 2009 (UTC) - Discuss this

RfD nomination of Т. Т. Khryukin

I have nominated Т. Т. Khryukin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — the Man in Question (in question) 07:48, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Teabagger

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Teabagger. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Teabagger. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

WP:Articles_for_deletion/Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes_(3rd_nomination)#Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes exists

neutral notification Collect (talk) 12:34, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Arbitration motion regarding Eastern European mailing list

Following a motion at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment:

Remedy 20 of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Eastern European mailing list ("Miacek topic banned") is lifted.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, NW (Talk) 00:16, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Discuss this

Nomination of Political Repression in Modern America from 1870 to 1976 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Political Repression in Modern America from 1870 to 1976 is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Political Repression in Modern America from 1870 to 1976 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 00:38, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Category:Electricians who committed suicide

Category:Electricians who committed suicide, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 18:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Category:Americans convicted of spying against Iran

Category:Americans convicted of spying against Iran, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust 11:36, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Category:Cold War MI5 chiefs has been nominated for discussion

Category:Cold War MI5 chiefs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Category:High school students who committed suicide has been nominated for discussion

Category:High school students who committed suicide, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Biochemistry🙴❤ 23:41, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Category:West German defectors has been nominated for merging

Category:West German defectors has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 19:47, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Category:High school students who committed suicide has been nominated for merging

Category:High school students who committed suicide has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:42, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Books about American repression has been nominated for deletion

Category:Books about American repression has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 03:21, 2 January 2022 (UTC)