| Revision as of 10:07, 17 June 2009 editTheHerbalGerbil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers2,909 edits Caution: Page blanking, removal of content on Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. (TW)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:22, 15 March 2023 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,668,134 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (4x), <center> (1x)Tag: Fixed lint errors | ||
| (720 intermediate revisions by 53 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ''Even when I'm not actively editing, I will check this page for public messages from time to time. Please feel free to especially if there is a debate or discussion in which I have expressed an editorial opinion. Or send an .'' | |||
| '''Welcome!''' | |||
| <br /> | |||
| And here are a few reminders from ]: | |||
| Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for ]{{#if:|, especially what you did for ]}}. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: | |||
| *"when there are disagreements about content, referring to other editors is not always a personal attack." | |||
| *] | |||
| *"pointing out an editor's relevant ] and its relevance to the discussion at hand is not considered a personal attack" | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] your messages on ]s using four ]s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on {{#if:|]|my talk page}}, or ask your question on this page and then place <code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code> before the question. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome --> --] <sup>]</sup> 01:56, 3 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| {| | |||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| | | |||
| ] Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages{{#if:Sea Shepherd Conservation Society|, as you did to ],}} without giving a valid reason for the removal in the ]. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been ]. Please make use of the ] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> — <em>]</em><sup>(])</sup>, 10:07, 17 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| {|style="border:0; width:25%; align:right" | |||
| |} | |||
| {| class="messagebox" | |||
| | <div class="center"> Archives: ] <> ] <> ]</div> | |||
| | | |||
| |} | |||
| == Apology == | |||
| I'm writing this apology because while Beacon and I disagree on virtually all topics we've crossed swords on, at the beginning of our relationship I wronged him, thus setting a tone that has been both unpleasent and unproductive since then. I am not a person that believes in biting the newbies, or in speaking harshly to people without trying to reason with them first. Beacon provided the example of our first interaction, where he came in on the end of an argument, and rather than acknowledge that he was new to the argument and treat him with the respect he deserved I simply snapped at him and dressed him down. The issue was highly contentious and had been going on for some time, but that isn't an excuse for poor behavior on my part, only an explanation. I've given this one a lot of thought, and while I have no doubt that Beacon and I will continue to disagree, in this particular case he is absolutely correct and I admit to treating him badly when we first encountered each other. For this, PrBeacon, you have my most sincere apology. ] (]) 16:35, 20 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :Appreciated. Unfortunately your camp buddies are still flinging sticky harshmallows, if you'll pardon the strained metaphor. Fwiw, I'm still mulling over a longer response.. -<small>] ]</small> 20:13, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == RFA status == | ||
| {{User:Tangotango/RfA Analysis/Report|align=center}} | |||
| == Completely new abortion proposal and mediation== | |||
| In light of the seemingly endless disputes over their respective titles, a neutral mediator has crafted a proposal to rename the two major abortion articles (], and ]) to '''''completely''''' new names. The idea, which is located ''']''', is currently open for opinions. As you have been a contributor in the past to at least one of the articles, your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated. | |||
| The hope is that, if a consensus can be reached on the article titles, the energy that has been spent debating the titles of the articles ] and ] can be better spent giving both articles some much needed improvement to their content. Please take some time to read the proposal and weigh in on the matter. '''Even if your opinion is simple ''indifference''''', that opinion would be valuable to have posted. | |||
| To avoid concerns that this notice might violate ], this posting is being made to '''every''' non-anon editor who has edited either page (or either page's respective talk page) since 1 July 2010, irrespective of possible previous participation at the mediation page. ] (]) 20:57, 4 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==Dispute resolution survey== | |||
| {| style="background-color: #CCFFFF; border: 4px solid #3399cc; width:100%" cellpadding="5" | |||
| | ] | |||
| <big>'''Dispute Resolution – ''Survey Invite'''''</big> | |||
| ---- | |||
| Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Misplaced Pages, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. | |||
| '''Please click to participate.'''<br> | |||
| Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts. | |||
| ---- | |||
| <small>You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated ]. <span style="font-family: Verdana;">] ] <sup>]</sup></span> 23:44, 5 April 2012 (UTC)</small> | |||
| |} | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692215842 --> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692215842 -->|} | |||
Latest revision as of 14:22, 15 March 2023
Even when I'm not actively editing, I will check this page for public messages from time to time. Please feel free to Start a new section especially if there is a debate or discussion in which I have expressed an editorial opinion. Or send an email.
And here are a few reminders from WP:NPA:
- "when there are disagreements about content, referring to other editors is not always a personal attack."
- "pointing out an editor's relevant conflict of interest and its relevance to the discussion at hand is not considered a personal attack"
ApologyI'm writing this apology because while Beacon and I disagree on virtually all topics we've crossed swords on, at the beginning of our relationship I wronged him, thus setting a tone that has been both unpleasent and unproductive since then. I am not a person that believes in biting the newbies, or in speaking harshly to people without trying to reason with them first. Beacon provided the example of our first interaction, where he came in on the end of an argument, and rather than acknowledge that he was new to the argument and treat him with the respect he deserved I simply snapped at him and dressed him down. The issue was highly contentious and had been going on for some time, but that isn't an excuse for poor behavior on my part, only an explanation. I've given this one a lot of thought, and while I have no doubt that Beacon and I will continue to disagree, in this particular case he is absolutely correct and I admit to treating him badly when we first encountered each other. For this, PrBeacon, you have my most sincere apology. Rapier (talk) 16:35, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
RFA status
Completely new abortion proposal and mediationIn light of the seemingly endless disputes over their respective titles, a neutral mediator has crafted a proposal to rename the two major abortion articles (pro-life/anti-abortion movement, and pro-choice/abortion rights movement) to completely new names. The idea, which is located here, is currently open for opinions. As you have been a contributor in the past to at least one of the articles, your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated. The hope is that, if a consensus can be reached on the article titles, the energy that has been spent debating the titles of the articles here and here can be better spent giving both articles some much needed improvement to their content. Please take some time to read the proposal and weigh in on the matter. Even if your opinion is simple indifference, that opinion would be valuable to have posted. To avoid concerns that this notice might violate WP:CANVASS, this posting is being made to every non-anon editor who has edited either page (or either page's respective talk page) since 1 July 2010, irrespective of possible previous participation at the mediation page. HuskyHuskie (talk) 20:57, 4 July 2011 (UTC) Dispute resolution survey
ArbCom elections are now open!Hi, ArbCom elections are now open!Hi, |
