Misplaced Pages

Talk:Durvasa: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:00, 19 June 2009 editYobot (talk | contribs)Bots4,733,870 editsm Tagging(Plugin++) living=no. using AWB← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:03, 18 March 2024 edit undoGreenC bot (talk | contribs)Bots2,547,815 edits Add {{reflist-talk}} to #Lead section line (via reftalk bot) 
(9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|living=no|listas=Durvasa|1=
{{WPBiography
{{WikiProject Biography}}
|living=no
{{WikiProject India|importance=low|history=yes|history-importance=low|assess-date=May 2012}}
|class=
⚫ {{WikiProject Hinduism|importance=mid|krishna=yes}}
|priority=
|listas=Durvasa
}} }}

{{WP India
|class=Stub
|importance=
|auto=yes
|history=yes
|history-importance=
}}
⚫ {{WikiProject Hinduism|class=start|importance=mid|vaishnavism=yes|krishna=yes}}
---- ----


Line 20: Line 12:


] 22:05, 29 April 2007 (UTC) ] 22:05, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
==About Siva purana==
In the section 'Meeting with Ambarisha', there are two versions of the story given. One is according to Bhagavata purana, and the other is according to Siva purana. However for siva purana version, sources are not cited. Who ever has made this change, please respond by providing citations. Otherwise this can be removed.--] (]) 11:22, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

== Lead section line ==

I think that "In Hindu Puranas, Durvasa (Sanskrit: दुर्वासा) also known as Durvasas (Sanskrit: दुर्वासस्), was an ancient Rishi and the son of Anasuya and Atri" should be changed to "In Hindu mythology, Durvasa (Sanskrit: दुर्वासा) also known as Durvasas (Sanskrit: दुर्वासस्), was an legendary Rishi and the son of Anasuya and Atri". The reason being that Durvasa does not only appear in the Puranas, in fact, the majority of content in this article is from the Mahabharata and Ramayana. In addition, he should be described as legendary, rather than ancient, given the fact he is not an actual historical figure. These sources state how scholars have rejected the Puranas, Mahabharata, and Ramayana as historical documents, and that how only those Puranic characters who appear in the Vedas can be considered as historical figures. If we put ancient, then it is assuming that Durvasa was a real person, when he was not. Whereas someone like the sage Atri is an actual historical figure, and is described on his page as a "Vedic sage", which is appropriate.<ref>{{cite book|author=Ludo Rocher|title=The Purāṇas|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=n0-4RJh5FgoC|year=1986|publisher=Otto Harrassowitz Verlag|isbn=978-3-447-02522-5|pages=115-121 with footnotes}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Witzel |first=Michael E. J. |author-link=Michael E. J. Witzel |title=Autochthonous Aryans? The Evidence from Old Indian and Iranian Texts |journal=Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies |volume=7 |issue=3 |pages=69-71 |date=2001 |url= http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~witzel/EJVS-7-3.pdf}}</ref>

{{reflist-talk}}

Latest revision as of 21:03, 18 March 2024

This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
WikiProject iconIndia: History Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
Note icon
This article was last assessed in May 2012.
WikiProject iconHinduism: Krishnaism Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Krishnaism (assessed as Mid-importance).

The name

Durvasa or Durvasas? in the original Sanskrit.

Imc 22:05, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

About Siva purana

In the section 'Meeting with Ambarisha', there are two versions of the story given. One is according to Bhagavata purana, and the other is according to Siva purana. However for siva purana version, sources are not cited. Who ever has made this change, please respond by providing citations. Otherwise this can be removed.--రవిచంద్ర (talk) 11:22, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Lead section line

I think that "In Hindu Puranas, Durvasa (Sanskrit: दुर्वासा) also known as Durvasas (Sanskrit: दुर्वासस्), was an ancient Rishi and the son of Anasuya and Atri" should be changed to "In Hindu mythology, Durvasa (Sanskrit: दुर्वासा) also known as Durvasas (Sanskrit: दुर्वासस्), was an legendary Rishi and the son of Anasuya and Atri". The reason being that Durvasa does not only appear in the Puranas, in fact, the majority of content in this article is from the Mahabharata and Ramayana. In addition, he should be described as legendary, rather than ancient, given the fact he is not an actual historical figure. These sources state how scholars have rejected the Puranas, Mahabharata, and Ramayana as historical documents, and that how only those Puranic characters who appear in the Vedas can be considered as historical figures. If we put ancient, then it is assuming that Durvasa was a real person, when he was not. Whereas someone like the sage Atri is an actual historical figure, and is described on his page as a "Vedic sage", which is appropriate.

References

  1. Ludo Rocher (1986). The Purāṇas. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. pp. 115-121 with footnotes. ISBN 978-3-447-02522-5.
  2. Witzel, Michael E. J. (2001). "Autochthonous Aryans? The Evidence from Old Indian and Iranian Texts" (PDF). Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies. 7 (3): 69–71.
Categories: