Misplaced Pages

User talk:FlyingToaster: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:48, 20 June 2009 editChed (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users64,984 edits OK: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:37, 4 March 2023 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,294,286 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:FlyingToaster/Archive 3) (bot 
(138 intermediate revisions by 67 users not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
|archiveheader = {{User:FlyingToaster/Archive Header}} |archiveheader = {{User:FlyingToaster/Archive Header}}
|maxarchivesize = 150K |maxarchivesize = 150K
|counter = 2 |counter = 3
|minthreadsleft = 20 |minthreadsleft = 20
|algo = old(15d) |algo = old(15d)
Line 27: Line 27:
|- |-
| width="10%" | <center>]</center> | width="10%" | <center>]</center>
| width="90%" | Unfortunately, ] with a final tally of '''75]/38/10'''. Though it didn't succeed, I wanted to thank you for your support and I hope I can count on it in the future. Even though it didn't pass, it had a nearly 2 to 1 ratio of support and I am quite encouraged by those results. I intend to review the support, oppose, and neutral ]s and see what I can do to address those concerns that were brought up and resubmit in a few months. If you would like to assist in my betterment and/or co-nominate me in the future, please let me know on my talk page. Special thanks go to ''']''' '']'', ], and <strong>]</strong> for their co-nominations and support. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">]</span>&nbsp;<sup>]</sup></center></div> | width="90%" | Unfortunately, ] with a final tally of '''75]/38/10'''. Though it didn't succeed, I wanted to thank you for your support and I hope I can count on it in the future. Even though it didn't pass, it had a nearly 2 to 1 ratio of support and I am quite encouraged by those results. I intend to review the support, oppose, and neutral ]s and see what I can do to address those concerns that were brought up and resubmit in a few months. If you would like to assist in my betterment and/or co-nominate me in the future, please let me know on my talk page. Special thanks go to ''']''' '']'', ], and <strong>]</strong> for their co-nominations and support. ]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup></center></div>
|}</center> |}</center>


== Poll on Ireland article names ==
== ] ==


{{notice|image=Ireland_smaller.svg|A poll has been set up at ''']'''. This is a formal vote regarding the naming of the ] and ] and possibly the ] pages. The result of this poll will be binding on the affected article names for a period of two years. This poll arose from the ] and the ]. The order that the choices appear in the list has been generated randomly. Voting will end at 21:00 (UTC) of the evening of 13 September 2009 (that is 22:00 IST and BST).}}
I put the speedy deletion template in ] since it's obviously a typo and there already exists a redirect for the correctly spelled ]. Why did you remove it? ] (]) 22:27, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


== You've got mail! ==
:I've deleted it under criterion 3 of ] as it's not a likely typo. Even if someone does search for "Brooklyln accent" ] is at the top of the list of results. I presume FT misread what the title of the page was, I did initially. ] (]) 22:31, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
::Redirects from typos are useful too. Redirects are cheap, so why not? --] (]) 22:33, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
:::In this particular case keeping it would be A Bad Thing because the alphabetization code of the MediaWiki software would mean someone typing "Brookly…" into the search bar would see the mis-spelling in the popup-list before ] itself.&nbsp;–&nbsp;'''<font face="Goudy Old Style"><font color="#E45E05">]</font><font color="#C1118C">]</font></font>''' 22:36, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


{{you've got mail}}
:::(ec) Because it's not an especially likely typo, and doesn't get much (I suspect most of that is from bots etc). Nor is it necessary when "New York dialect (redirect Brooklyn accent)" is the first result that comes up when you search for "Brooklyln accent". If you feel it's worthwhile I suggest you reinstate it and perhaps add a few more such as ], ], etc. ] (]) 22:39, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


== Your leave == == New Page Patrol survey ==


{| style="background-color: #dfeff3; border: 4px solid #bddff2; width:100%" cellpadding="5"
I would just like to state that I'm totally in agreement with Roux. I hope after a cooling off period (for everyone here), you'll seriously reconsider coming back. I hope this situation serves as an example to the community of what such harassment towards one editor can lead to; a loss of a valuable contributor.
| ]
<big>'''New page patrol – ''Survey Invitation'''''</big>
----
Hello {{PAGENAME}}! The ] is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
*If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
*If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.
'''Please click to take part.'''<br>
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.
----
<small>You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see ]</small>
|}


== ''You're invited!'' Ada Lovelace Day San Francisco ==
You've handled everything these past few weeks with honest answers and general cooperativeness. That's all we could ask of you. To Central California, ] (]) 22:37, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
:Please, think about this. <font face="Trebuchet MS"><b>—&nbsp;]</b><sup><i>]</i></sup></font> 22:47, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


== New deal for page patrollers ==
== cheers! ==


Hi {{BASEPAGENAME}},
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#000000; background-color:#aa9944; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]


In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the ] is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group '''New Page Reviewer''' has been created.
–''']'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;] has bought you a pint! Sharing a pint is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the ] by buying someone else a pint, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Cheers! <br />
Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding {{tls|WikiPint}} to their talk page with a friendly message.</div><!-- Template:WikiPint -->


Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most ''current'' experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
You've behaved commendably throughout this ordeal, and I, like others, sincerely hope you return with your head clear and your chin up. You have loads of support here—from friends and complete strangers alike. –''']'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;] 23:07, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


Find out more about this exiting new user right now at ] and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. ] (]) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
:Julian manages to express it perfectly (he often does). While the allegations and the mistakes you made are grave, the way you tried to keep a cool head for so long while the community around you went berserk is commendable. I, too, hope you will return once you feel ready to. Regards ''']]''' 08:29, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Mailing2&oldid=749223519 -->


== ]: Voting now open! ==
] (]) 23:37, 21 May 2009 (UTC)]]


{{Ivmbox|Hello, FlyingToaster. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
== Good luck ==


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I'm sorry to hear that you're leaving us, at least for a while. For what its worth, even though I didn't !vote in your RfA, I still think its a raw deal that you're getting. You should ''not'' have been treated like this. All the best to you, and I hope to see you activate soon, once the drama clears. <span style="font-family:Copperplate Gothic Bold">] <sup>]</sup></span> 23:08, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
== Your break ==
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/15&oldid=750692309 -->


== A barnstar for you! ==
You said ''I'm leaving partially because I think this community needs to heal and redefine itself, and that needs to happen without me.'' Well, take a break and in the near future if you feel up to the task maybe you can help redefine the wiki. Just don't let what happened stop you from returning. ''']'''] 23:11, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
== Sorry ==
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Barnstar of Diplomacy'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | You've done some good work as a wikipedian and, being new to the site, I hope I can be too. ] (]) 22:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
|}


==thank you==
I was shocked and saddened when I heard about your "semi retirement". You're not an editor with whom I've had many interactions since we seem to have varied interests but, from your reputation, your RfA and from what I learned from other editors and whatnot, you were (are) an asset to the project. Shit happens, but I really hope you'll pick yourself up and rejoin us in the not too distant future. Kind regards, ] ] 00:00, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thank you from imboredalot! for:


== Be well ==


==] nomination of ]==
Take as much time as you need to focus on what is valuable to you, and always remember that you are welcome here. ] (]) 00:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
]
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not ] how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about ].


If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=John+Turner+%28Texas+politician%29|deleting administrator}}. <!-- Template:Db-notability-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 05:03, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
== Your semi-retirement ==


== Hello ==
Hi FT. While we have never directly engaged in dialogue, I've seen your hard work against vandalism, and I truly believe that you would have made a great administrator, hence my immediate support of your RfA. If it makes a difference, I agree with several of the other editors in that the way you were treated was unjust. From the beginning, I truly believe it was a witch hunt. You were given minimal time to defend yourself before succumbing to the calls to give up your adminship. I stand as one of the editors that watched in horror as this situation escalated, eventually forcing you to retire from editing. While i remain seriously disappointed with the wikipedia community, I want you to know that you still have friends among the editors, and that we support you now, more than ever, after the way you handled this situation. Thanks, ] (]) 02:44, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
:I couldn't agree more with what Ono has said, Misplaced Pages will be something less without you editing here, ]<sup>]</sup> 04:13, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
::I agree as well. I never interacted with you personally, but I've seen you around. I hope that you find what you're looking for and decide to come back one day. :) Either way I wish you all the best. :) --] <small>]</small> 06:57, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
:::Ditto. Come back soon! ''''']]]''''' 17:16, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Moral support. Thanks for your good contributions. Don't let setbacks, frustrations and challenges get in your way. Shit happens. ] (]) 02:06, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


Why hi there. <waves> ] (]) 06:33, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
== My respect... ==
:<waves> ''']]''' 06:36, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
::Welcome back! {{=)}} Regards ]] 14:53, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
::Hi FlyingToaster, good to see you around again. '']]<span style="color:#CC5500">Chequers</span>'' 21:13, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
...for you has just shot right up. You did the right thing by resigning adminship, in my opinion. Even if you were the witch in a very public witch hunt, your judgement in knowing now is the time to take a break is admirable and a quality I like to see in any user. Remember though: adminship is no big deal. You can still do so much for this project without a delete button. I hope we all remember that. ] 09:56, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].
:seconded. —] (] • ]) 10:44, 22 May 2009 (UTC)


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
I agree with most of the 8 threads above. A hardworking and helpful admin like yourself would have been a great benefit to our mission, both with your own improvements and as your fun and caring nature would have helped you develop the skills of journeyman editors, not of course that you wasnt already doing that without the tools. Still I now think you've made the best choice to step back. I was wrong to try and encourage you otherwise; from your steady composure at the RfA it looked like you had a higher stress threshold than is perhaps the case and Id underestimated the seriousness of the opposition.


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 08:10, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
This experience will develop your insight in a much more profound way than they teach in any school. You'll develop a deeper understanding of tragic stories and real life events – a consistent theme being how in mature organisations special interests go to great lengths to oppose promotion for thoose rare folk with a strong universal concern for helping others, especially those for whom good takes precedence over adherence to any abstract set of principles. Unless you're operating in a backwater far removed from self serving power plays , one of the few times its beneficial to have an openly good and self confident nature is in a crises. In times of crises such people can have a huge influence on events, both by leading from the front or by advising those already in high office. This holds true at all levels, all the way up to the most effective way of helping those who are struggling in life on the global scale, which is influencing economic policy. A specific example I could point to relates to the global response to the credit crunch , a few people not entirely dissimilar to yourself were able to highlight to policy makers the rare opportunity they had for fiscal socialism, and this was before the Lehman collapse which sent the markets into meltdown mode , a time where the senior consensus was still strongly free market influences , so much so that the Financial Times described the switch to the managed economy as a "stunning reversal of the orthodoxy of the past several decades". Perhaps Im making too much of this as Im gutted about whats happened, but maybe God wanted you to have this experience to give you the wisdom to do more good in other arenas later in life.
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Of course , the witch-hunt / self serving opposition motivations are only part of the picture. Were it just those , Im sure youd still be a happy toasting admin – the community here is healthy enough for that. It was our misfortune that your RfA attracted multiple consilient lines of opposition. Some motivated by genuine concern for the encyclopaedia such as the copyright issue. Then theres the political fall out from past events. Also as for some "adminship is no big deal" seems to be an empty phrase , they seem to regard promotion as a badge of honour which should only be awarded to outstanding content builders, whereas in reality the tools detract from ones ability to do the most rewarding stuff here as youre expected to spend more wiki time mopping up – tools should only be a big deal to those who want to help out in that way.


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 13:09, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
I better say that some opposers were likely entirely motivated by their perception of whats in the best interests of the community, with BigTimePeace being someone falling into that category (your good advice has been taken on board BTP). To sum up Im sure good will come of this, and thanks for the exemplary way you conducted yourself throughout , and also thanks to all the good hearted folk that spoke up for you both before and after the ordeal. ] (]) 11:15, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
== Just what you want to read... ==


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> &spades;]&spades; ] 07:23, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
...is all over this page, so I am not going to add to that. You did your part by resigning the flag, so quitting WikiPedia seems a bit hollow to me. I don't think you are quitting, just rightfully frustrated. I (and ]) find solace in things like ] and (something I saw in a recent rfa) ]. See you in a few weeks. ''']''''']'' 19:35, 22 May 2009 (UTC)


== Thanks and good luck == == ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==


{{Ivmbox|Hello, FlyingToaster. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
Hello, FlyingToaster. I think I should pop out of wikibreak mode once again given what has happened. First thank you for that lovely RfA card (your own work version!), it was one of the best I have received! I have known you for a while now and we have crossed paths a few times. The copyright issues were serious, there is no doubt about that, but I think you handled the issue fine and you have been surrounded by more drama than you in any way deserve. I respect your decision to resign your adminship, despite me supporting your RfA; I think your good attitude, which is a reason I supported your RfA in the first place, still holds true. I am sorry to hear you are semi-retiring, and like other editors above really hope you return again and show that you can get around these setbacks once you feel ready and everything has calmed down. In any case, I wish you good luck. ] <small>]</small> 20:33, 22 May 2009 (UTC)


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
== Damn ==


If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
FT, I'm really very sorry it had to come to this. I was hoping you'd ignore Giano and his anti-IRC crap. But maybe it's for the best. The community did treat you harshly, there's really no denying that.
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
I'm really hoping you come back soon. Best of luck. ]]] 21:52, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/04&oldid=866998073 -->


== Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago ==
* I was saddened by your note; it always dampens my editing that day when an established contributor pulls out of editing. I do hope you choose to stick around, but I respect your decision, and won't badger you; rather, let me simply say that you have my respect and backing. Best wishes and good luck. ] 16:18, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
{{User QAIbox
| title = Awesome
| image = Cscr-featured.svg
| image_upright = 0.35
| bold = ]
}}
--] (]) 06:54, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
==Orphaned non-free image File:Nagasaki peace garden pointing statue.jpg==
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:46, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
== ThankSpam ==
==Orphaned non-free image File:Glencreecentrelogo4.png==
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
{| cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" valign="top" style="width:80%; vertical-align:top; background:lightgreen;border:3px solid red;"
|-
| width="90%" | <font face="trebuchet ms"><center><font size="5pt">'''My RfA'''</font></center>

Thank you for participating in my ], which passed with a final tally of ''153/39/22''. There were issues raised regarding my adminship that I intend to cogitate upon, but I am grateful for the very many supportive comments I received and for the efforts of certain editors (], ] and ] especially) in responding to some issues. I wish to note how humbled I was when I read ]'s support comment, although a fair majority gave me great pleasure. I would also note those whose opposes or neutral were based in process concerns and who otherwise commented kindly in regard to my record.<br>I recognise that the process itself was unusual, and the format was generally considered questionable - and I accept that I was mistaken in my perception of how it would be received - but I am particularly grateful for those whose opposes and neutrals were based in perceptions of how I was not performing to the standards expected of an administrator. As much as the support I received, those comments are hopefully going to allow me to be a better contributor to the project. Thank you. Very much. ] (]) 12:38, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

~~<noinclude></noinclude>~~<noinclude></noinclude>~
| width="10%" | <center>]</center>
|}</center>

== ] nomination of ] ==

]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "]").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

'''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:22, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

== I'm so sorry ==

I was out and about last week, and I just saw this yesterday... I'm so sorry. ], when you realize your own mistakes, you become a true wikipedian. Think of this not as a failure, but as a new turn around. There will always be challenges in life but, FT, you are and always will be an admin, no matter whether you have the tools or not. ''']'''] 00:38, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

== Have you gotten this before? ==

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="top" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''Zen Garden Award for Infinite Patience'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | This is for not ] once during this whole ordeal. If you're not proud of that, I definitely am. <font style="font-family:Monotype Book Antiqua; font-size:16px;">''']]'''</font> 21:48, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
|}
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Admin coaching barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For all your help during my re-introduction to Misplaced Pages. <font style="font-family:Monotype Book Antiqua; font-size:16px;">''']]'''</font> 00:48, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
|}


== ] of ] ==
== Hey You ==
]


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
Hey, I see you dropped by last week. I'm glad you haven't totally given up on looking in from time to time. I'm keeping my fingers crossed that this may mean an indication that you're gathering your strength back. The place seems kinda empty without you here, and I hope that a return is in works. You've done such great work here, and helped so many others become better Wikipedians, and better people. Just letting you know that you are not forgotten, and you were, and hopefully are, a cherished asset to the project. Hope to see an all gala affair in the near future, as FT considers a return to family. Let me know, and I'll be the first to roll out the red carpet! Cheers. ;) — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 05:56, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
<blockquote>'''No clear topic. If converted to a dab, no clear alternate targets for the incoming links.'''</blockquote>
:Yeah seriously, come back. We need people like you on here with your newly acquired mop & bucket. Don't let the naysayers get you down. ]2] 07:45, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
: Yea :) Misplaced Pages needs more users like you :) You are the best adopter wikipedian could EVER have :D We need you at wikipedia or it will break :( We miss you! <span style="background:#0F4D92;color:white;padding:1px 4px;">]{{•}}]</span> 20:23, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
== Welcome back ==


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
<tt>:)</tt> ], hoping that your edit was not just an exception. 20:11, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->
== OK ==


'''<span style="color: red;">This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual page for details.</span>''' Thanks, ] (]) 10:00, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
tldr coming up here. I've started and canceled this post at least a dozen times over the last couple days FT. I was honestly shocked and honored that you took the time to support my RfA ... but that's not really the reason I'm here. I admit, I truly had a lump in my throat when I read your words - and it reminded me of what a great and wonderful asset we have available to us. I do understand the need to step back and reflect, I do it often myself. I am also quite aware of what a tremendous talent we have sitting on the sidelines at the moment. I am in no way trying to pressure you into stepping back into something you're not willing or wanting to do. There are people here for all different reasons. Some wish to concentrate on the technicalities, and focus on "encyclopedic content" only. That is not a bad thing, although their posts may seem hurtful, they only focus on their own what they believe to be best for "the encyclopedia". You have such tremendous abilities to offer our family FT, your focus on humanity and your realization that we are all living human beings is beyond reproach. To be perfectly blunt ... If I saw an RfA tomorrow with your name on it ... I would support in a heartbeat. Anyone who would question your work with new and young editors looking for help here ... would be a fool. I truly hope that a bit of time and reflection will give you the strength and encouragement to step back into our family circle (however dysfunctional it may be), and become the beacon of hope, encouragement, and collaboration that you have the talent to be. The concise version? ... I miss you FT, and I hope you come back soon. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 06:48, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:37, 4 March 2023

This user is not active.


linkies: cleanup tags RfA csd criteria monobook newbies needy cleanup ] request >1 year whitelist lame new users

Archive
Archives

Thank you...

Thank you for your support

Unfortunately, my RFA was closed recently with a final tally of 75½/38/10. Though it didn't succeed, I wanted to thank you for your support and I hope I can count on it in the future. Even though it didn't pass, it had a nearly 2 to 1 ratio of support and I am quite encouraged by those results. I intend to review the support, oppose, and neutral !votes and see what I can do to address those concerns that were brought up and resubmit in a few months. If you would like to assist in my betterment and/or co-nominate me in the future, please let me know on my talk page. Special thanks go to Schmidt, , TomStar81, and henrik for their co-nominations and support. — BQZip01 — 

Poll on Ireland article names

A poll has been set up at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Ireland_Collaboration/Poll on Ireland article names. This is a formal vote regarding the naming of the Ireland and Republic of Ireland and possibly the Ireland (disambiguation) pages. The result of this poll will be binding on the affected article names for a period of two years. This poll arose from the Ireland article names case at the Arbitration Committee and the Ireland Collaboration Project. The order that the choices appear in the list has been generated randomly. Voting will end at 21:00 (UTC) of the evening of 13 September 2009 (that is 22:00 IST and BST).

You've got mail!

Hello, FlyingToaster. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello FlyingToaster! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

You're invited! Ada Lovelace Day San Francisco

New deal for page patrollers

Hi FlyingToaster,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, FlyingToaster. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diplomacy
You've done some good work as a wikipedian and, being new to the site, I hope I can be too. BGH1700 (talk) 22:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

thank you

thank you from imboredalot! for:


Speedy deletion nomination of John Turner (Texas politician)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John Turner (Texas politician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 05:03, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello

Why hi there. <waves> Killiondude (talk) 06:33, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

<waves> FlyingToaster 06:36, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Welcome back! Regards SoWhy 14:53, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi FlyingToaster, good to see you around again. ϢereSpielChequers 21:13, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of John Turner (Texas politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Turner (Texas politician) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/John Turner (Texas politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 08:10, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Frederick T. Haneman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frederick T. Haneman is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Frederick T. Haneman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 13:09, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Nelapr Omebb for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nelapr Omebb is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Nelapr Omebb until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC(talk) 07:23, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, FlyingToaster. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:54, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nagasaki peace garden pointing statue.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nagasaki peace garden pointing statue.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Glencreecentrelogo4.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Glencreecentrelogo4.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ahistoricism

Notice

The article Ahistoricism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No clear topic. If converted to a dab, no clear alternate targets for the incoming links.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2023 (UTC)