Misplaced Pages

User talk:Mintrick: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:40, 21 June 2009 editMintrick (talk | contribs)3,240 edits EN-GB-5← Previous edit Latest revision as of 00:41, 30 October 2024 edit undoUtopes (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers37,928 edits Notification: listing of List of Familiar spirits in popular culture at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle 
(123 intermediate revisions by 42 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
It is not my intent to participate excessively in community; I edit articles for their own sake. I'm not going to be a part of a community that sanctions nationalistic attacks.

]

==Welcome== ==Welcome==
<<already welcomed>> <<already welcomed>>


== ] nomination of ] ==
==That Vercingetorix thing==
]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also ] and "]").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

'''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:27, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

==Ammunition Shortage==

Saw your stub article ]. I have been gathering citations for quite a while for the same subject, and a few more as well. Glad to see you beat me to the punch and actually created it. I think the article should be expanded to include the increased purchases of firearms, particularly handguns, and the record-setting pace of concealed handgun permits. I'll probably take it upon myself to add another stub for the "Firearms Rush". Anyway, thanks for the article add. ] (]) 21:19, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

== ] nomination of ] ==
]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also ] and "]").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

'''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:19, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

== ] nomination of ] ==

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, his otters and a clue-bat • <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 18:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

== ] ==

Just wanted to let you know that I've left a comment on ] with some suggestions. I did also want to express a small grievance with how you transfered the popular culture at ]. Removing the popular culture section entirely creates more harm then help, I'm afriad, which I've expressed in more detail on ]. What I had most annoyance with was the lack of edit summary, which is a must for good practise and if you want to be taken seriously, see WP:ES. It is for this reason that I mistook your actions for vandalism. I have no intention of sounding condoning or lecturing; so I hope you don't take offense. I approve very much of what you're trying to do and understand completely that it isn't easy. May I suggest also that you leave a note at WP:Myth so editors are aware of this undertaking, and other that relate to mythology. Thanks ] (]) 12:51, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

==Revision to ] and ] articles==

I noticed that you have revised either ] or ].

I intend to revise those articles following the ]. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.

Thank you.

] (]) 12:53, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

== ] exists ==

neutral notification. ] (]) 12:36, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

==] of ]==
]

The article ] has been ]&#32; because of the following concern:
:'''Poorly written "in popular culture" article, rambling, no sources.'''

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, ] and a clue-bat • <sup>(])</sup> 18:28, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

== Nomination of ] for deletion ==

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion has begun about whether the article ], which you created or to which you contributed, should be ]. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, ] and a clue-bat • <sup>(])</sup> 16:37, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

== Nomination of ] for deletion ==

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>The article ''']''' is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, ] and a clue-bat • <sup>(])</sup> 20:34, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

== Nomination of ] for deletion ==

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>The article ''']''' is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —''']'''&nbsp;(]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;]) 00:10, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

== Nomination of ] for deletion ==

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>The article ''']''' is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ] (]) 20:26, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]

The article ] has been ]&#32; because of the following concern:
:'''No reason given for why this might be a notable chest.'''

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 22:08, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]

The article ] has been ]&#32; because of the following concern:
:'''Unencyclopedic list of fictional works in which war scythes appear. I have searched for ] which discuss the topic of how war scythes are portrayed in popular culture and found nothing.'''

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> '']'' 14:44, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]

The article ] has been ]&#32; because of the following concern:
:'''Bog standard in popular culture article, full of trivia, thin on secondary sources.'''

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>(])</sup> 04:56, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>(])</sup> 04:56, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]

The article ] has been ]&#32; because of the following concern:
:'''Unencyclopedic list of fictional works in which weapons called Fragarach appear. I have searched for ] which discuss the topic of Fragarach is portrayed in popular culture and found nothing.'''

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> '']'' 12:08, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]

The article ] has been ]&#32; because of the following concern:
:'''Unencyclopedic list of fictional works in which weapons called Tyrfing appear. I have searched for ] which discuss the topic of how Tyrfing is portrayed in popular culture and found nothing.'''

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> '']'' 20:47, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> '']'' 10:46, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

== ] of ] ==
]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 07:14, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

== ] ==

Hi,<br>
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692210171 -->
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <span style="background-color:lightblue">'''''&nbsp;]&nbsp;'''''</span><span style="background-color:lightblue">&nbsp;<sup>''] Talk ''</sup>&nbsp;</span> 21:44, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 18:37, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

== == Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ==

== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice -->
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 17:13, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 02:34, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 02:45, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 18:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 13:15, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]

The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''A disambiguation page is not a search index. All entries on the page are either ] or not actually articles. Search exists for this reason.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 13:57, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 23:19, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 12:20, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> &#8213;]&nbsp;] 17:48, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
You . Fair enough, but if you feel that way about it, do you want to add the references for all of those items in a more proper format? I mean, the information is right there. (I would do it myself, but I don't feel the need. You, I take it, do, or at least feel that it'd be the proper way to do it. And I really don't mean this in a bitchy "well, ''you'' fix the article then!" kind ofa way, I hasten to add.) -- ] (]) 11:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 12:55, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
:There is no such thing as a "self-sourcing" article; that's tantamount to original research. What is needed is sources that document those appearances. ] (]) 15:40, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
==Concern regarding ]==
::But, uh, those sources ''are'' the appearances. ] says, ''"A citation is a line of text that uniquely identifies a source. It allows a reader to find the source and verify that it supports material in Misplaced Pages."'' Now, if the material in Misplaced Pages says, for example, that James Bond appears in '']'', all the reader needs to do to verify that information is to watch the film itself. That doesn't really need any other citation, because that fact is self-contained and inarguable. In fact, no other source could really be as credible as the movie itself: that has zero margin of error. And it's nothing at all like original research -- or if it is, ''any'' source we use as a reference is going to be tantamount to original research, because then we might as well need another source that confirms the source we use really says that. (And yes, in some cases the works in question may be so obscure that they don't qualify as sources, because no one can be expected to find them. But that's definitely not the case here.)
] Hello, Mintrick. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again&#32;or ] that it be moved to your userspace.
::I realize that this logic doesn't apply to most articles, but that's because most articles include information that goes beyond this level of straightforward summary of a published work's content. Our articles typically discuss things like critical reception, or the work's production, and other related matters, for example. But with ], that's not an issue. And this doesn't necessarily apply to ''everything'' in the article, of course, as specific points may still need citing -- a sentence about the film ''Vercingétorix: la légende du druide roi'', "It was neither a critical nor a box-office success, but did far better in Europe than the United States of America", for example, is a statement in dire need of a citation. (I missed that the first time around, when I removed the tag -- otherwise I would've inserted a specific <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> tag there, while I was at it.)
::An argument can be made that the sources should be cited in a specific way, and that may be fair enough. (An argument can also be made that the article itself isn't very good or useful, for that matter, but that's kind of beside the point for the purposes of this discussion.) But the information itself is solid. We do this kind of stuff all the time: when we refer to laws or decrees, for example, we don't need another source that confirms that the information contained in the law or decree itself is true. That's not original research, that's just a way to direct the reader to the source. -- ] (]) 19:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
:::] has very strict limits on how primary sources can be used, which I think that article violates. As such, it still needs secondary references. ] (]) 20:41, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
::::Well, actually, I'm glad you brought up WP:NOR, because I'm not sure I would've had the good sense to look into that for help here! This kind of thing is what WP:NOR refers to as a primary source, and I quote ''"Primary sources that have been reliably published (for example, by a university press or mainstream newspaper) may be used in Misplaced Pages, but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them. Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation. Without a secondary source, '''a primary source may be used only to make descriptive claims, the accuracy of which is verifiable by a reasonable, educated person without specialist knowledge.''' For example, an article about a novel may cite passages from the novel to describe the plot, but any interpretation of those passages needs a secondary source. Do not make analytic, synthetic, interpretive, explanatory, or evaluative claims about information found in a primary source."'' (Emphasis mine.) So it's perfectly okay to say that Vercingetorix appears in certain works and let those works themselves be the source for that information. We can't go much beyond that, but there isn't any ''need'' to go beyond that for a list like this. Now, again, whether those sources should be expressed in another format is another thing, but based on this, I'd say that generally speaking, we don't need secondary or tertiary sources for the items on that list. -- ] (]) 19:37, 21 June 2009 (UTC)


If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
== xkcd cartoon ==


Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 02:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
M, if you want to remove the xkcd as a ref or link, you should make your case on the article talk page, instead of removing what has had a pretty good consensus among a number of otherwise pretty quarrelsome editors. ] (]) 05:02, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
== ] ==
I have reverted your recent edits to ]


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
You must respect the consensus in the ] of this template. Apparently, you were so dissatisfied with the outcome that you decided to leave Misplaced Pages as you have stated on your talk page. Feel free to do so. Do not commit vandalism.'' Cheers --] (]) 22:39, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
:Please read ]. Perhaps you'll stop making incorrect accusations once you're more familiar with policy. ] (]) 22:40, 21 June 2009 (UTC) <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 18:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 30#List of Familiar spirits in popular culture}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="background-color: #FFCFBF; font-variant: small-caps">] <sub>(''']''' / ''']''')</sub></span> 00:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:41, 30 October 2024

Welcome

<<already welcomed>>

AfD nomination of Glastonbury Tor in popular culture

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Glastonbury Tor in popular culture. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Glastonbury Tor in popular culture. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:27, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Ammunition Shortage

Saw your stub article 2008-2009_United_States_ammunition_shortage. I have been gathering citations for quite a while for the same subject, and a few more as well. Glad to see you beat me to the punch and actually created it. I think the article should be expanded to include the increased purchases of firearms, particularly handguns, and the record-setting pace of concealed handgun permits. I'll probably take it upon myself to add another stub for the "Firearms Rush". Anyway, thanks for the article add. Spectre9 (talk) 21:19, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Shax

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Shax. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Shax. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:19, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of King's Lynn in popular culture

I have nominated King's Lynn in popular culture, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/King's Lynn in popular culture (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • 18:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Greek mythology in popular culture

Just wanted to let you know that I've left a comment on Talk:Greek mythology in popular culture with some suggestions. I did also want to express a small grievance with how you transfered the popular culture at Mnemosyne. Removing the popular culture section entirely creates more harm then help, I'm afriad, which I've expressed in more detail on Talk:Greek mythology in popular culture. What I had most annoyance with was the lack of edit summary, which is a must for good practise and if you want to be taken seriously, see WP:ES. It is for this reason that I mistook your actions for vandalism. I have no intention of sounding condoning or lecturing; so I hope you don't take offense. I approve very much of what you're trying to do and understand completely that it isn't easy. May I suggest also that you leave a note at WP:Myth so editors are aware of this undertaking, and other that relate to mythology. Thanks France3470 (talk) 12:51, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Revision to Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire and Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri articles

I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.

I intend to revise those articles following the Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.

Thank you.

Vyeh (talk) 12:53, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

WP:Articles_for_deletion/Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes_(3rd_nomination)#Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes exists

neutral notification. Collect (talk) 12:36, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Killer Whales in popular culture

The article Killer Whales in popular culture has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly written "in popular culture" article, rambling, no sources.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • 18:28, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Killer Whales in popular culture for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Killer Whales in popular culture, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Killer Whales in popular culture until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • 16:37, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Harpies in popular culture for deletion

The article Harpies in popular culture is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Harpies in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • 20:34, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Japanese mythology in popular culture for deletion

The article Japanese mythology in popular culture is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Japanese mythology in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Farix (t | c) 00:10, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Neutron bomb in popular culture for deletion

The article Neutron bomb in popular culture is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Neutron bomb in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:26, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mästermyr chest

The article Mästermyr chest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reason given for why this might be a notable chest.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dkchana (talk) 22:08, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of War scythe in popular culture

The article War scythe in popular culture has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unencyclopedic list of fictional works in which war scythes appear. I have searched for references which discuss the topic of how war scythes are portrayed in popular culture and found nothing.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hut 8.5 14:44, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Qilin in popular culture

The article Qilin in popular culture has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Bog standard in popular culture article, full of trivia, thin on secondary sources.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer04:56, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Qilin in popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Qilin in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Qilin in popular culture (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer04:56, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fragarach in popular culture

The article Fragarach in popular culture has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unencyclopedic list of fictional works in which weapons called Fragarach appear. I have searched for references which discuss the topic of Fragarach is portrayed in popular culture and found nothing.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hut 8.5 12:08, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tyrfing in popular culture

The article Tyrfing in popular culture has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unencyclopedic list of fictional works in which weapons called Tyrfing appear. I have searched for references which discuss the topic of how Tyrfing is portrayed in popular culture and found nothing.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hut 8.5 20:47, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Tyrfing in popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tyrfing in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Tyrfing in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hut 8.5 10:46, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:In popular culture

Template:In popular culture has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Trackinfo (talk) 07:14, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Celtic mythology in popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Celtic mythology in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Celtic mythology in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella    21:44, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Goetic demons in popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Goetic demons in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Goetic demons in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sandstein 18:37, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

== Nomination of Killer whales in popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Killer whales in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Killer whales in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ==

Nomination of Killer whales in popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Killer whales in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Killer whales in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Genies in popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Genies in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Genies in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TTN (talk) 17:13, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Genies in popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Genies in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Genies in popular culture (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 02:34, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Japanese mythology in popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Japanese mythology in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Japanese mythology in popular culture (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 02:45, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Aztec mythology in popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aztec mythology in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Aztec mythology in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 18:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Chinese mythology in popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chinese mythology in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Chinese mythology in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 13:15, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brain Trust (disambiguation)

Notice

The article Brain Trust (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A disambiguation page is not a search index. All entries on the page are either partial title matches or not actually articles. Search exists for this reason.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 13:57, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Vercingetorix in popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vercingetorix in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Vercingetorix in popular culture (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 23:19, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Welsh mythology in the arts and popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Welsh mythology in the arts and popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Welsh mythology in the arts and popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:20, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Dagon in popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dagon in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Dagon in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Susmuffin  17:48, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Irish mythology in popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Irish mythology in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Irish mythology in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:55, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Japanese mythology in popular culture

Information icon Hello, Mintrick. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Japanese mythology in popular culture, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Egyptian influence in popular culture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Egyptian influence in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Egyptian influence in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Gabe114 (talk) 18:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

"List of Familiar spirits in popular culture" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect List of Familiar spirits in popular culture has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 30 § List of Familiar spirits in popular culture until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)