| Revision as of 18:48, 23 June 2009 editDoyleCB (talk | contribs)215 edits →Ownership warnings← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 07:58, 5 March 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (27 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| If you leave a message here, I will respond here. | |||
| ==Witch Hunt vol. 1== | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:West Ridge Academy|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->--<sup>]</sup>] 21:22, 13 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Indef == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:West Ridge Academy|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->--<sup>]</sup>] 21:27, 13 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Hi. Congratulations: your behaviour is sufficiently irritating that I've blocked you until you learn how to behave. First off, you would have a long block for yet another 3RR violation. Then I discover that you are making stupid edits such as , . | |||
| One more violation and you will be blocked; please stop now. --<sup>]</sup>] 21:30, 13 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | So: its up to you really: are you prepared to give up the nonsense or not? ] (]) 21:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ==Witchhunt vol 2== | |||
| ] Welcome to ]. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Misplaced Pages. However, please know that editors ] and should respect the work of their fellow contributors{{#if:West Ridge Academy| on ]}}. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-own1 -->--<sup>]</sup>] 21:27, 13 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=This is ridiculous. I have not violated the 3 revert rule. I challenged my last block, and the one before that, and all the other punitive administrative functions, like this and and done at the request of the LDS editors who refuse to entertain a perspective that is not overtly Mormon favored. I don't believe that any of my real actions constitute such a harsh consequence. This is really beyond ridiculous and conducive of censorship.|decline=This doesn't seem to address ] and is very accusatory; since you were partially blocked for incivility, I don't see any reason why you should be unblocked. ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 04:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)}} | |||
| == Objection to Warnings == | |||
| Comments: I don't see any evidence that DCB has understood what he has done wrong, or is at all interested in finding out. Given that, I see every reason for his unacceptable behaviour to continue. Unless DCB expresses at the very least an interest in discovering *why* his behaviour is considered unacceptable I can see nothing further to do here ] (]) 07:30, 24 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Please do not use warnings punitively to discourage editing articles. You are abusing the wikipedia dispute resolution process and have been reported for such. In addition, an arbitration request has been filed. Thank you. --] (]) 21:46, 13 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Your edit history is easily followed and demonstrates your history of demonstrating OWN and violating 3RR. That is clear for all admins to follow. I hope you are able to improve your editing. Cheers. --<sup>]</sup>] 02:47, 14 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Abuse of warnings - June 2009== | |||
| ] Please stop abusing ]{{#if:User:Storm Rider|, as you did to ]}}. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:Uw-tempabuse3 --> | |||
| :Using warnings as a way of retaliating against those who monitor vandalism and those editors who consistently ignore Misplaced Pages policies will cause you to be blocked. You are coming very close to being blocked today. Cheers. --<sup>]</sup>] 02:48, 14 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Request for mediation not accepted== | |||
| == User notice: temporary 3RR block == | |||
| {| class="messagebox" style="width:90%" | |||
| |- | |||
| <div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;"> | |||
| |] | |||
| ==Regarding reversions made on ] ] to ]== | |||
| |A ] to which you were are a party was ] and has been delisted.<br>You can find more information on the case subpage, ].</center><br> | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{#if:|a period of '''{{{time}}}'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for violating the ]{{#if:| at ]}}. Please be more careful to ] or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|I am being blocked because I reported another user and am being retaliated against for requesting arbitration and filing a complaint.}} below, but you should read our ] first. {{#if:|] (]) 08:51, 14 June 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> The duration of the is 24 hours. ] (]) 08:51, 14 June 2009 (UTC)</div> | |||
| ::''For the Mediation Committee,'' ''']''' 02:29, 26 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| {{tlp|unblock|1=I did not violate the 3 revert rule because I was removing vandalism by ]. This editor has harassed me for ideological reasons and is retaliating for complaints filed. I seek to report this user for: 1. Removing warnings I placed on his page 2. Reporting vandalism when I made edits. }} | |||
| <div style="text-align:center; font-size:smaller;">This message delivered by ], an automated bot account ] by the ] to perform case management.<br>If you have questions about this bot, please ].</div> | |||
| Your block has already expired. ]]] 20:12, 17 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == 3RR warning == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:West Ridge Academy|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->--<sup>]</sup>] 01:20, 18 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked again == | |||
| I've blocked you again, this time for 48h, for disruptive editing at ]. | |||
| I also note that you have civility issues that aggravate the situation. For example this edit to ] ''Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --DoyleCB (talk) 04:41, 18 June 2009 '' appears to be a completely unjustified accusation of vandalism. I cannot see any evidence of vandalism there. If you care to nominate a diff there that you believe is clear and obvious evidence of vandalism, please do. | |||
| Several things seem quite clear here, so I shall offer you some advice. | |||
| Firstly, you seem to do nothing but edit WRA, about which you obviously care passionately. This ] approach leads inevitably to suspicions of ]. | |||
| Secondly, you are having problems realising that your conduct is problematic, and in interacting harmoniously with other editors (unlike me, obviously, a model of sweetness and light). I very strongly urge you to slow down and work out how this place works. Causing more friction will not advance your "cause" and will only lead to a more lengthy block. | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=I really hope you can provide at least one example of a disruptive edit that I made so that this block doesn't look entirely like retaliation for reporting user Storm Rider for abusiveness. I would really love to believe that there is a good reason for this block (other than pissing off another editor). Please "wow" me. --] (]) 18:23, 19 June 2009 (UTC) |decline=Edit warring is apparent. Consider yourself wowed. ] <small>(])</small> 21:36, 19 June 2009 (UTC)}} | |||
| == June 2009 == | |||
| <s>] This is the '''last warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits. <br> The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Misplaced Pages{{#if:West Ridge Academy|, as you did to ]}}, you '''will''' be ] from editing. <!-- Template:uw-delete4 --> ''This is specifically in reference to edit.'' ] <small>(])</small> 18:26, 23 June 2009 (UTC)</s> | |||
| :: Pardon me, but I removed a comment that was stated twice in the article. I also brought it to the talk page of the article. If this behavior, which appears to be bullying continues, I will be forced to notify the administrators. Thanks :) --] (]) 18:28, 23 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::That's why constructive editors use edit summaries. You should use them. ] <small>(])</small> 18:31, 23 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :: That's one way to say, "Oops. I made a mistake." Jesus Christ, who peed in your cheerios Todd? Maybe you should go for a walk outside. --] (]) 18:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::Consider this a final warning for ]. Comments such as are not constructive. ] <small>(])</small> 18:39, 23 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::: What nonsense. I edited your own personal attack against me! Okay Todd, you want to be a bully. ANI board here we come. I don't know why you have to be so uncivil. Certainly you are aware of WP:Civil, aren't you? I would strongly suggest a walk outside to calm down.--] (]) 18:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:58, 5 March 2023
If you leave a message here, I will respond here.
Indef
Hi. Congratulations: your behaviour is sufficiently irritating that I've blocked you until you learn how to behave. First off, you would have a long block for yet another 3RR violation. Then I discover that you are making stupid edits such as , .
So: its up to you really: are you prepared to give up the nonsense or not? William M. Connolley (talk) 21:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
DoyleCB (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is ridiculous. I have not violated the 3 revert rule. I challenged my last block, and the one before that, and all the other punitive administrative functions, like this and this and this done at the request of the LDS editors who refuse to entertain a perspective that is not overtly Mormon favored. I don't believe that any of my real actions constitute such a harsh consequence. This is really beyond ridiculous and conducive of censorship.
Decline reason:
This doesn't seem to address your actions and is very accusatory; since you were partially blocked for incivility, I don't see any reason why you should be unblocked. Hersfold 04:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Comments: I don't see any evidence that DCB has understood what he has done wrong, or is at all interested in finding out. Given that, I see every reason for his unacceptable behaviour to continue. Unless DCB expresses at the very least an interest in discovering *why* his behaviour is considered unacceptable I can see nothing further to do here William M. Connolley (talk) 07:30, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Request for mediation not accepted
|
A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the case subpage, Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/WestRidgeAcademy.
|
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.