| Revision as of 17:33, 6 July 2009 editAbce2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers23,456 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:40, 6 July 2009 edit undoPeterSymonds (talk | contribs)29,055 editsm Reverted edits by Free Hans (talk) to last version by SPCUClerkbot | ||
| (23 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | {{SPIarchive notice|Papa November}} | ||
| <noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> | |||
| ⚫ | {{SPIarchive notice|Papa November |
||
| ===== <big>Report date July 6 2009, 16:26 (UTC)</big>===== | |||
| {{SPIcat}} | |||
| ;Suspected sockpuppets <!-- BOTDONE_USER_NOTICE DO_NOT_MODIFY ]]]]] (THIS CURRENTLY IS NOT ACTIVE, this comment is for testing only) --> | |||
| * {{checkuser|1=Verbal}} | |||
| * {{checkuser|1=A Man In Black}} | |||
| * {{checkuser|1=Mangoe}} | |||
| * {{checkuser|1=Abce2}} | |||
| <!--## Add further sockpuppets if any, below these ##--> | |||
| Users commenting at the deletion review for ] | |||
| ;Evidence submitted by ] | |||
| <!--## Sign below your evidence with 4 tilde characters "~~~~" ##--> | |||
| The users ] and ] campaigned for the deletion of an article for no reason other than they did not seem to like it. They deleted up to 17 references and citation from reputable sources, and then claimed in an articles for deletion "debate" that the article was unreferenced. The article was then ] by an administrator, ], who was found afterwards in an arbitration case to be a sock puppeteer and disruptive editor. | |||
| The users Verbal and Papa November often appeared together, at the same time, to remove content. One of the users (Papa November) seemed to have more administrative capabilities than the other, and carried out the actions of the user who seemed to have fewer administrative tools (Verbal) and whose user page showed he had been warned for edit warring on other pages. | |||
| On one occasion, at the time the two users had been visiting the article ] to remove content, an anonymous IP (160.103.2.223) showed a revert of content. The revert was made only moments after Verbal, who seemed aware of 3RR (reverting content excessively), had already "used up" one his reversions. The user Verbal seemed very aware of 3RR and his user page showed a history of having been warned for making disruptive reverts before. | |||
| The users seem to be very familiar with forums and processes for carrying out disruptive discussions in the guise of forum "administrative processes" and "filing procedures". They seem more interested in removing certain types of content then in creating it. They display editorial bias, and are aggressive in their actions. They quote a lot of Misplaced Pages jargon and seem technically skilled with online tools but seem unwilling to work collaboratively to write encyclopedic content. | |||
| They seem to have all the traits of people who "game" the system, and their patterns imply multiple user accounts to bully other editors into accepting their deletions of content. | |||
| They seem to provoke and aggravate other editors by removing content and then citing Misplaced Pages "regulations" (although unable to operate themselves collaboratively within the spirit of Misplaced Pages and with good faith). They posted provocative messages on my user page. They campaign to delete articles and edit histories of articles they have "edit warred" on, neatly removing "edit war" histories that cannot by cited in evidence so long as they remain deleted. ] (]) 16:26, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ;Comments by accused parties <small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See ].''</span></small> | |||
| <!-- PLEASE NOTE: CheckUsers *will not* read excessively long arguments in this section. Please consider this when starting an argument with someone --> | |||
| Frivolous report. Please see this active ] for details of previous, similar behaviour. ] (]) 17:07, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Completely unnessecary and made up.]|<small>]]</small> 17:33, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ;Comments by other users | |||
| Sockpuppets are accounts created by one person. If true, how could they appear at the same time?]|<small>]]</small> 16:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :They edited articles at about the same time. They appeared on similar articles, with a brief time lag between edits and comments - enough for a user to have switched accounts (which the reversion by the anonymous IP suggested). ] (]) 16:52, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ;CheckUser requests | |||
| {{RFCU| B | C | New }} <small>Requested by ] (]) 16:26, 6 July 2009 (UTC) </small> | |||
| <!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter and Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##--> | |||
| <!--## Codeletters are: | |||
| A - arbcom ban/remedy evasion | |||
| B - Ongoing serious pattern vandalism | |||
| C - Vote fraud, please wait until after vote closes | |||
| D - 3RR with socks | |||
| E - Evasion of community based bans or blocks | |||
| F - Other, please explain why a check should be run --> | |||
| <!--## Make sure your evidence explains why CheckUser is appropriate ##--> | |||
| {{decline}}. As I explained on ], the evidence is far from sufficient to justify checkuser attention for any of these accounts. <font face="Arial"> ] (])</font> 16:28, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :A lot of the evidence is contained in the history of the article that was deleted. This cannot be linked to, as it has been deleted. A description of what happened, with links to relevant discussion, is the best I can do in this case. Also, I had not finished tidying up my request before it was declined. ] (]) 16:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ;Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments | |||
| <!-- TEMPLATE:User:SPCUClerkbot/moreinfo-RFCU Do not remove this comment! -->] '''Additional information needed''': Please provide a ]. ] (]) 16:26, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Code letters added. ] (]) 16:50, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ;Conclusions | |||
| ---- | |||
Latest revision as of 22:40, 6 July 2009
Papa November
Papa November (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Papa November/Archive.