Revision as of 23:59, 6 July 2009 editSpacemanSpiff (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators53,520 edits →Can you help?: re← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:40, 13 November 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,136,056 edits →Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
(895 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{/talkstyle}} | |||
<!-- background style - please don't edit. There's no closing /div tag, that's intentional. (MediaWiki generates one) --> | |||
<!-- anyone can copy and re-use any portion of this page but please edit below this line. The white zone is for loading and unloading only. You'll love it. It's a way of life.--> | |||
<div style="background-color: #e1f4fd; padding: 20px; -moz-border-radius: 35px;"div style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS'; font-size: 95%; text-align: justify;"> | |||
<!-- post new message message --> | |||
== arb case == | |||
{{/talkheader}} | |||
<!-- /post new message message --> | |||
Hi Pablo - I appear to have misremembered who actually got banned from participating in the case; Giano hasn't been (and Giano, if you happen across this edit, I apologize for the error.) However, Courcelles banned Viriditas from participating without specifying a particular policy violation for mocking my health and genetic mutations across a number of pages. Such a ban could have been placed under ], ], or ]. All three policies specifically cover attacks or harrassment related to disability; if I was writing a motion related to the case, I would likely stress NDP and HARASS over NPA, because NDP is a WMF board level policy (which covers harrassment due to disability and as a board level policy must be enforced by local projects and cannot be weakened by them) and HARASS, since it covers more general patterns rather than specific attacks (which is what Viriditas was banned from the case for.) I'm only posting here since I'm preparing to post evidence, which means I won't be able to use my section to respond to questions. ] (]) 02:07, 17 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Fly the flag (will need tweaks for multiple items top-right; class="topicon", for example) --> | |||
:{{ping|Giano|prefix=Thanks Kevin, and good luck with the case. (pinging |p= as I think it unlikely he is watching this page)}} ] 14:17, 17 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
<div class="metadata topicon" style="position: absolute; z-index: 100; right: 20px; top: 40px;">{{Click | |||
::Thank you for the ping Pablo. The edit thank thing does not seem not be working this evening, so I'll say 'thank you'. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]</span> ] 19:27, 17 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
| image = Flag of Edward England.svg | |||
:::You're welcome, Giano - it seemed the right thing to do. Luckily the simple and easy method of writing on another editor's talk page seems to function correctly. ] 20:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
| size = 40px | |||
| link = International Talk Like a Pirate Day|Damn ye, yellow-bellied sapsuckers, I'm a better man than all of ye milksops put together | |||
== RfC announce: Religion in infoboxes == | |||
| title = May the Devil take my soul if I ever gives quarter or asks it of ye! | |||
There is an RfC at ] concerning what should be allowed in the religion entry in infoboxes. Please join the discussion and help us to arrive at a consensus on this issue. --] (]) 22:08, 17 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
Blimey. This again. Will do. ] 23:35, 17 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
== It seems I was wrong == | |||
] | |||
Per and a thread at WO that I haven't been following, Jimmy's position on the board has to be re-affirmed every three years by the board. I'll vote for any community-nominated board candidate who vows to kick that huckster off. --] (] · ] · ]) 10:53, 27 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
: They go through the motions every three years, but effectively your original take of seat-for-life was spot on. <br /> I'll be voting for Kevin, if he maintains . ] 11:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
::I'll start a meta RfC on the usefulness of Jimbo in two and a half years. Kevin and Fae are both doing well in this instance. --] (] · ] · ]) 12:32, 27 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
::: Yup. A pleasant surprise. ] 20:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Precious anniversary == | |||
{{User QAIbox | |||
| title = Four years ago ... | |||
| image = Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg | |||
| image_upright = 0.5 | |||
| bold = twelve years | |||
| normal = ... you were recipient<br /> no. ''']''' of ],<br /> a prize of QAI! | |||
}} | }} | ||
--] (]) 06:42, 24 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
</div> | |||
: Hi Gerda! And thanks for the reminder. ] 09:29, 24 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
:: I am happily busy singing, ] on Saturday, music by ] with ], --] (]) 09:56, 24 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
::: I like Bruges. It's ]! ] 07:46, 25 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
:::: I agree. As you may have seen in the choir article, we took a break singing there, the more excited I am! (more top of my talk) --] (]) 08:03, 25 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
Five years now, so it must be 13 years of service now ;) --] (]) 07:45, 24 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
Six years. How are you? ] is connected to ], in memory of a memorable man. Ever since I meant to fill the red link. --] (]) 05:42, 24 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
seven remembered ... --] (]) 05:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
{{clear}} | |||
== This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on == | |||
This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on (2 RfCs, actually, one less than six months ago and another a year ago). The new RfC is at: | |||
''']''' | |||
Specifically, it asks that "religion = none" be allowed in the infobox. | |||
The first RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is: | |||
*15 June 2015 RfC: ''']'''. | |||
The result of that RfC was "unambiguously in favour of '''omitting the parameter altogether for 'none' "''' and despite the RfC title, additionally found that "There's no obvious reason why this would not apply to historical or fictional characters, '''institutions''' etc.", and that nonreligions listed in the religion entry should be removed when found "'''in any article'''". | |||
The second RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is: | |||
*31 December 2015 RfC: ''']'''. | |||
The result of that RfC was that the "'''in all Misplaced Pages articles, without exception''', nonreligions should not be listed in the Religion= parameter of the infobox.". | |||
Note: I am informing everyone who commented on the above RfCs, whether they supported or opposed the final consensus. --] (]) 03:11, 26 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
== Thanks == | |||
...for the thanks. There should be a button for thanking thanks. Or ] --<span style="font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;color:#004d80;"> ]</span> 10:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
: Jeez, no! That way madness lies! ] 11:34, 26 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks. --<span style="font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;color:#004d80;"> ]</span> 11:54, 26 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
:: I found a way (with help from ]) to make red categories that are tolerated by . ]. --] (]) 13:07, 28 October 2017 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2017 election voter message == | |||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Pablo X. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/09&oldid=813413978 --> | |||
==Absolutely== | |||
Hi.. you appear to have made a mistake. 'Twee' is the Scots word for too much Scottishness. Much like Americans use the word 'kitsch'. | |||
I know because I'm Scottish. It's not guess work. as proof, here's a link: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/twee | |||
] (]) 07:00, 5 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
: Neither that link (or the entry in the longer Oxford dictionary <span class="plainlinks">http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/207965?rskey=IKXAtF&result=3#eid</span>) make any mention of Scots or "Scottishness." ] 09:53, 5 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
So how is 'kitsch' any better being an American word? | |||
] (]) 22:36, 5 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
: I didn't make any comment on the word being better. Just stated a fact - it is not Scots. Which it isn't.<br />p.s. "Kitsch" is a German word and has been part of the English language since at least 1926. ] 13:31, 11 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Pablo X. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/08&oldid=866998273 --> | |||
== 2019 == | |||
<div style="margin: auto; max-width: 32em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba( 192, 192, 192, 0.75 ); border-radius: 1em; border: 1px solid #a7d7f9; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0.5em 1em 1em; color: black;" class="ui-helper-clearfix"> | |||
{{User QAIbox | |||
| title = | |||
| image = Bachsaal Schloss Koethen.jpg | |||
| image_upright = 0.75 | |||
| bold = | |||
| normal = | |||
}} | |||
<center> | |||
<br />'''Die Zeit, die Tag und Jahre macht''' | |||
<big>]</big> | |||
]<br /><br /> | |||
</center></div> | |||
Not too late, I hope ;) --] (]) 15:13, 13 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
:Gerda you are a love, but I have lost a lot of faith in this project. xx ] 19:07, 30 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
:: it's not anything to believe in, - I rather believe in music, - see my talk for the most recent memorable kind --] (]) 09:06, 4 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
== August 2019 == | |||
{{User:Pablomismo/bottomtab}} | |||
] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at ]. Your edits appear to constitute ] and have been ]. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. Repeated vandalism may result in the ]. ''It is not acceptable to misgender people in talk page comments. It is very highly offensive. If you were not a well established user I would have given you a final warning for it. Please stop. This is not a legitimate thing to try to raise.''<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> ] (]) 19:16, 30 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
{{/archiveindex}} | |||
:'''You''' are not going to give me a final warning for anything. I did not "misgender" McKinnon. I can, however, correctly identify McKinnon's sex; which is male and has been from conception. Now go bother someone who might be impressed. ] 20:11, 3 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
::I'll tolerate that on your own user talk page but if you try that line pretty much anywhere else then you can look forward to warnings or a trip to one of the administrators' noticeboards. Please understand that there is nothing positive in this for you. It just makes you look petty and vindictive. Please go back to behaving constructively on other articles and just steer clear of any topics where your personal views prevent you from contributing constructively. --] (]) 20:31, 3 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
::: I’m about as interested in what you will “tolerate” (o the arrogance!) as I am in McKinnon’s subjective and self-constructed sense of “gender”. ] 06:32, 4 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2019 election voter message == | |||
<!-- /Fly the flag --> | |||
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> | |||
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Regarding ] == | |||
</td></tr> | |||
</table> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=926750232 --> | |||
== Precious anniversary == | |||
A Good Morning to you (at least it's morning here). To deny a speedy deletion it is sufficient if there are alegations of notability (which in this case were there: "...eminent.." and "...leading the institute to become one of the best self financed...". I agree that the article would probably be deleted via an ], but speedy is out of the question. Cheeers and happy editing. ] (]) 06:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Nine}} | |||
eight + eight = sixteen --] (]) 08:48, 24 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
eight years since you made ] --] (]) 15:26, 17 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
== A page in your userspace == | |||
--] (]) 06:57, 24 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
Please advise if you would have any objection to my deleting ] at this time. While I might understand the reason it was originally created, its contents are not really a proper use of userspace, and some of the "see also" links that have been added are really inappropriate for a humor page. Thank you, ] (]) 14:38, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
{{clear}} | |||
:If you think that is for the best, go ahead, (just not as a G10!). I don't think it's likely to attract a {{tl|rescue}} tag. | |||
:Note that this page was created ''before'' the arbitration case, and I would have requested deletion myself by now had it not been referred to and linked several times (not by me) in the same case. <span style="border-left: 1px solid #c30; padding: 3px;">]</span><sub style="background-color: #ffc; color: #c30;">].</sub> 16:42, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Liane Moriarty == | |||
==Naming of articles== | |||
Hello Pablo, you raised several interesting points in your email to me about naming, but I think it is best to do it in a forum where others can participate in a discussion. Perhaps ] is the palce. ] (]) 07:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC | |||
:Thanks for pointing me to this - I thought there would be an appropriate forum for it somewhere. Now I just have to trawl the archive to see if I would be resurrecting a dead horse! If not I will probably raise it over the weekend.<span style="border-left: 1px solid #c30;">]</span><sub style="background-color: #ffc; color: #c30;">].</sub> 09:04, 18 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
There was an announcement on this page that her novel would be adapted into a television series, with a source. A few times, someone changed the text to past tense: according to the new text, the series premiered this year. I reverted those edits, waiting for someone to add it again, with a source. You did just that a few days ago, so thank you. In your edit summary (which was right after mine), you simply write "eejit". I'm not sure if this is directed at me, but it really seems to be, and I just want to let you know I do not appreciate that. ] (]) 15:48, 11 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
== Always precious == | |||
Nice tidy-up; thanks. For the avoidance of doubt; I had tagged it for speedy deletion because my initial edit to remove the most blatant of spam was reverted and the purpose of the article seemed clear. Your edits are more thorough and will hopefully prevent a recurrance of the spam, but I will keep in on my watchlist. ] (]) 20:19, 18 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
:Oh it was a blatant advert alright, and I completely understand your tagging it as such. I'm still not 100% convinced about its notability, but I think it's a fairly respectable stub now. I'll be watching too. <span style="border-left: 1px solid #c30;">]</span><sub style="background-color: #ffc; color: #c30;">].</sub> 20:45, 18 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Ten years ago, ] were found precious. That's what you are, always. --] (]) 04:59, 24 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
==] nomination of ]== | |||
] | |||
A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason: | |||
== ] == | |||
<blockquote>no longer needed, no incoming links</blockquote> | |||
I expanded, sourced, and added reviews. I think between the 2 of us, we have saved the article. I asked the nom to consider a withdrawal of the AfD. A rename to '']'' can follow a "keep". ''']''' '']'' 21:18, 21 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Wow! I go out for an evening of jazz and food, and that's what happens! Perhaps I should go out more often. I'm thinking of buying this film for my next horror movie spectacular evening, see how it stacks up with with ], ] and ]. Great job with the structure and the sources, the "plot" needs attention, but I haven't yet seen the film so someone else can sort that out. <span style="border-left: 1px solid #c30;">]</span><sub style="background-color: #ffc; color: #c30;">].</sub> 22:23, 21 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Keep in mind that it IS a children's film intended to teach tolerance.... so I doubt if it will send any chills up your spine. Think its now worth keeping? ''']''' '']'' 22:52, 21 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::I didn't think I would find it particularly scary. I'm always ready to watch a great film, but I have a special affection for films which, despite trying hard, are not that good, and this sounds like one. Apologies to all the cast and crew if I'm wrong, and I will kiss their collective bum when I've seen the film if so. | |||
:::Do I think it's worth keeping? Personally, yes. As far as Misplaced Pages's guidelines go, maybe/probably. <span style="border-left: 1px solid #c30;">]</span><sub style="background-color: #ffc; color: #c30;">].</sub> 23:13, 21 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::Well... it enjoy the film. And hey... that will allow a better plot section! ''']''' '']'' 00:25, 22 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Under the ], pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time. | |||
== ] == | |||
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Andhra+Pardesh|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-reason-notice --> ] (]) 12:45, 18 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
I've added a couple of refs, everything else that I've found so far just describe her as "yesteryear heroine", still trying though. If you can find a credible reference for the three movies I've posted on the talk page and Rickshawkaran 1971 (movie was on at theatres for 163 consecutive days), that might give some details. -] (]) 06:29, 24 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I noticed - I will try later, am going to the library which may yield something. It is annoying when you '''know''' that there are print references but nobody's got round to putting them on the Internet yet! <span style="border-left: 1px solid #c30;">]</span><sub style="background-color: #ffc; color: #c30;">].</sub> 06:31, 24 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
==]== | |||
Can you take a look at the page? Do you think it might be a good candidate for ARS? Since I normally don't add rescue tags, I don't know. -] (]) 19:10, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I '''never''' add rescue tags! But go ahead, there are a few fine source-miners amongst the people who monitor {{tl|rescue}}-tagged items. On a quick look, I think that this article will probably survive its AfD. I'll look in more detail later, or maybe tomorrow. <span style="border-left: 1px solid #c30;">]</span><sub style="background-color: #ffc; color: #c30;">].</sub> 19:17, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Hello, | |||
== Can you help? == | |||
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
Indian movies lacking sources, as usual. ] should pass ], but seriously lacking in sources and I haven't been able to find much other than casual mentions, but it has a very very notable Director, and a very, very, notable actor in the lead role. ] not much info other than it was a hit and remade in other languages. Can you help with sourcing, like you did on Manjula? Thx. -] (]) 18:58, 5 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I haven't been able to find much either, will look again tomorrow. <span style="border-left: 1px solid #c30;">]</span><sub style="background-color: #ffc; color: #c30;">].</sub> 22:48, 5 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
:: Do you know if these two sources would qualify as RS? - , . These are the only two non-blogs I've been able to find, and both help the case of the first movie, ''actually a pathbreaking'' one. -] (]) 23:59, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
== ] == | |||
Hello there, I'm wondering why you reverted the information I provided back to it's original, and I must say, incorrect state? | |||
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
Your ""addition of bollocks"" comment isn't helpfull either. | |||
Kind Regards, | |||
The information I've provided is in fact the origin to the phase, and therefore, I've reverted it back. The original article (yours?) states the phrase is of "uncertain origin". It isn't uncertain at all, it's well known to all living in the Preston area. | |||
] | |||
IF you want to live in ignorance and prove you're just being a cock, please change it back to it's orignal, false state. {{user|MrTiffUK}}, via e-mail | |||
<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
# Because it was untrue. The phrase was in use before 1988. | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins&oldid=27650229 --> | |||
# Agreed it may have not been helpful. Your addition was, however ]. | |||
# No it isn't— see (1). Note that the article is not "mine". | |||
# Your face. | |||
<span style="border-left: 1px solid #c30;">]</span><sub style="background-color: #ffc; color: #c30;">].</sub> 22:56, 5 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research == | |||
== Request for comment regarding conduct of ] == | |||
I have ] on the conduct of ]. As you have been involved in this dispute to some extent, I would appreciate it if you could comment. ] (]) 14:59, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Reading the instructions now. <span style="border-left: 1px solid #c30;">]</span><sub style="background-color: #ffc; color: #c30;">].</sub> 15:06, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Hello, | |||
== Sockpuppetry accusation == | |||
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ]. | |||
You have been accused of sockpuppetry at ]. Scared? ] (]) 18:03, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
:OMG! They have found me out!!!<!--note that this is what is known as a "joke"--> I will have a look when I have eaten.<span style="border-left: 1px solid #c30;">]</span><sub style="background-color: #ffc; color: #c30;">].</sub> 20:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
:What interesting company I keep in the old sock drawer! It seems it was all over before I got the chance not to bother commenting on this ridiculous allegation. <span style="border-left: 1px solid #c30;">]</span><sub style="background-color: #ffc; color: #c30;">].</sub> 22:10, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Take the survey ''''''. | |||
== Request for comment regarding conduct of ] == | |||
Kind Regards, | |||
Thanks for the note. I'm not going to comment on it (though I've tweaked a couple of technicalities), since at this stage I'm not convinced it's going to be productive. Someone apparently convinced of a broad consipiracy to delete their efforts, is likely to just see it as an extension of that conspiracy. I can never see the best way to deal with these situations, a brief look doesn't suggests they've formed any real links with other editors who they may respect enough to guide them, and it'd be difficult for anyone else to step in and help them move forward. --] (]) 20:08, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I understand, I'm not too sure how useful this will be either.<span style="border-left: 1px solid #c30;">]</span><sub style="background-color: #ffc; color: #c30;">].</sub> 20:31, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Were made by you? ] (]) 21:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::Yes - I had inadvertently logged myself out it seems. <span style="border-left: 1px solid #c30;">]</span><sub style="background-color: #ffc; color: #c30;">].</sub> 21:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::Just wanted to be sure somebody wasn't changing your comments. :) ] (]) 21:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::Nothing so sinister - plain old incompetence! <span style="border-left: 1px solid #c30;">]</span><sub style="background-color: #ffc; color: #c30;">].</sub> 21:32, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
== Talk page improvements == | |||
<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
→ Actually, it's kind of coincidental, but I happen to be writing a brand new article on a new ] game as we speak. Thought I'd let you know :) Thanks for the added cross-browser capabilities, ] 22:05, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744489 --> | |||
:No probs - a drive-by css/html gnome did the same to my page so I thought I'd pass it on! <span style="border-left: 1px solid #c30;">]</span><sub style="background-color: #ffc; color: #c30;">].</sub> 23:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:40, 13 November 2024
hither (2012) | lither (2013) | auver | dauver | dic
Please click here to post a new message. You'll be joining these people. If you leave me a message on this page, I will reply on this page; if I have left you a message on your talk page please reply there, I will be watching it. There's no need to leave one of those ugly {{talkback}} messages. |
arb case
Hi Pablo - I appear to have misremembered who actually got banned from participating in the case; Giano hasn't been (and Giano, if you happen across this edit, I apologize for the error.) However, Courcelles banned Viriditas from participating without specifying a particular policy violation for mocking my health and genetic mutations across a number of pages. Such a ban could have been placed under WP:NDP, WP:NPA, or WP:HARASS. All three policies specifically cover attacks or harrassment related to disability; if I was writing a motion related to the case, I would likely stress NDP and HARASS over NPA, because NDP is a WMF board level policy (which covers harrassment due to disability and as a board level policy must be enforced by local projects and cannot be weakened by them) and HARASS, since it covers more general patterns rather than specific attacks (which is what Viriditas was banned from the case for.) I'm only posting here since I'm preparing to post evidence, which means I won't be able to use my section to respond to questions. Kevin Gorman (talk) 02:07, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Kevin, and good luck with the case. (pinging Giano as I think it unlikely he is watching this page) pablo 14:17, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for the ping Pablo. The edit thank thing does not seem not be working this evening, so I'll say 'thank you'. Giano (talk) 19:27, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- You're welcome, Giano - it seemed the right thing to do. Luckily the simple and easy method of writing on another editor's talk page seems to function correctly. pablo 20:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for the ping Pablo. The edit thank thing does not seem not be working this evening, so I'll say 'thank you'. Giano (talk) 19:27, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
RfC announce: Religion in infoboxes
There is an RfC at Template talk:Infobox#RfC: Religion in infoboxes concerning what should be allowed in the religion entry in infoboxes. Please join the discussion and help us to arrive at a consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:08, 17 January 2016 (UTC) Blimey. This again. Will do. pablo 23:35, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
It seems I was wrong
Per this 2006 email from Erik Moeller and a thread at WO that I haven't been following, Jimmy's position on the board has to be re-affirmed every three years by the board. I'll vote for any community-nominated board candidate who vows to kick that huckster off. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 10:53, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- They go through the motions every three years, but effectively your original take of seat-for-life was spot on.
I'll be voting for Kevin, if he maintains current form. pablo 11:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)- I'll start a meta RfC on the usefulness of Jimbo in two and a half years. Kevin and Fae are both doing well in this instance. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 12:32, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Yup. A pleasant surprise. pablo 20:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- I'll start a meta RfC on the usefulness of Jimbo in two and a half years. Kevin and Fae are both doing well in this instance. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 12:32, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
twelve years | |
---|---|
... you were recipient no. 223 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:42, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Gerda! And thanks for the reminder. pablo 09:29, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- I am happily busy singing, here on Saturday, music by Reger with "his" choir, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:56, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- I like Bruges. It's like a fairy tale! pablo 07:46, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- I agree. As you may have seen in the choir article, we took a break singing there, the more excited I am! (more top of my talk) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:03, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- I like Bruges. It's like a fairy tale! pablo 07:46, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- I am happily busy singing, here on Saturday, music by Reger with "his" choir, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:56, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Five years now, so it must be 13 years of service now ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:45, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Six years. How are you? Today's music is connected to a memorable concert, in memory of a memorable man. Ever since I meant to fill the red link. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:42, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
seven remembered ... --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on
This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on (2 RfCs, actually, one less than six months ago and another a year ago). The new RfC is at:
Specifically, it asks that "religion = none" be allowed in the infobox.
The first RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:
- 15 June 2015 RfC: RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.
The result of that RfC was "unambiguously in favour of omitting the parameter altogether for 'none' " and despite the RfC title, additionally found that "There's no obvious reason why this would not apply to historical or fictional characters, institutions etc.", and that nonreligions listed in the religion entry should be removed when found "in any article".
The second RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:
- 31 December 2015 RfC: RfC: Religion in infoboxes.
The result of that RfC was that the "in all Misplaced Pages articles, without exception, nonreligions should not be listed in the Religion= parameter of the infobox.".
Note: I am informing everyone who commented on the above RfCs, whether they supported or opposed the final consensus. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:11, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks
...for the thanks. There should be a button for thanking thanks. Or maybe not... -- Begoon 10:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- Jeez, no! That way madness lies! pablo 11:34, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. -- Begoon 11:54, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- I found a way (with help from Black Falcon) to make red categories that are tolerated by . Miss him. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:07, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Pablo X. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Absolutely
Hi.. you appear to have made a mistake. 'Twee' is the Scots word for too much Scottishness. Much like Americans use the word 'kitsch'. I know because I'm Scottish. It's not guess work. as proof, here's a link: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/twee
Dava4444 (talk) 07:00, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- Neither that link (or the entry in the longer Oxford dictionary http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/207965?rskey=IKXAtF&result=3#eid) make any mention of Scots or "Scottishness." pablo 09:53, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
So how is 'kitsch' any better being an American word?
Dava4444 (talk) 22:36, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- I didn't make any comment on the word being better. Just stated a fact - it is not Scots. Which it isn't.
p.s. "Kitsch" is a German word and has been part of the English language since at least 1926. pablo 13:31, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Pablo X. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
2019
Die Zeit, die Tag und Jahre macht
Not too late, I hope ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:13, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Gerda you are a love, but I have lost a lot of faith in this project. xx pablo 19:07, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- it's not anything to believe in, - I rather believe in music, - see my talk for the most recent memorable kind --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:06, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
August 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Talk:Rachel McKinnon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. It is not acceptable to misgender people in talk page comments. It is very highly offensive. If you were not a well established user I would have given you a final warning for it. Please stop. This is not a legitimate thing to try to raise. DanielRigal (talk) 19:16, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- You are not going to give me a final warning for anything. I did not "misgender" McKinnon. I can, however, correctly identify McKinnon's sex; which is male and has been from conception. Now go bother someone who might be impressed. pablo 20:11, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
- I'll tolerate that on your own user talk page but if you try that line pretty much anywhere else then you can look forward to warnings or a trip to one of the administrators' noticeboards. Please understand that there is nothing positive in this for you. It just makes you look petty and vindictive. Please go back to behaving constructively on other articles and just steer clear of any topics where your personal views prevent you from contributing constructively. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:31, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
- I’m about as interested in what you will “tolerate” (o the arrogance!) as I am in McKinnon’s subjective and self-constructed sense of “gender”. pablo 06:32, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- I'll tolerate that on your own user talk page but if you try that line pretty much anywhere else then you can look forward to warnings or a trip to one of the administrators' noticeboards. Please understand that there is nothing positive in this for you. It just makes you look petty and vindictive. Please go back to behaving constructively on other articles and just steer clear of any topics where your personal views prevent you from contributing constructively. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:31, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Precious anniversary
Nine years! |
---|
eight + eight = sixteen --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:48, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
eight years since you made a good comment to much missed Br'er Rabbit --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:26, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:57, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Liane Moriarty
There was an announcement on this page that her novel would be adapted into a television series, with a source. A few times, someone changed the text to past tense: according to the new text, the series premiered this year. I reverted those edits, waiting for someone to add it again, with a source. You did just that a few days ago, so thank you. In your edit summary (which was right after mine), you simply write "eejit". I'm not sure if this is directed at me, but it really seems to be, and I just want to let you know I do not appreciate that. Laurier (talk) 15:48, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Always precious
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 04:59, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Andhra Pardesh
A tag has been placed on Andhra Pardesh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done for the following reason:
no longer needed, no incoming links
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Arjunaraoc (talk) 12:45, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,