Revision as of 20:57, 4 December 2005 editFormer user 20 (talk | contribs)2,136 edits Removed spam/self-promotion (Google 2 group site belongs to WarriorScribe). Made entry more nPOV.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:52, 21 October 2024 edit undoGreenC bot (talk | contribs)Bots2,547,809 edits Reformat 2 archive links. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:URLREQ#articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com | ||
(701 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Use mdy dates|date=May 2024}}{{short description|Form of cybersquatting which relies on mistakes when inputting a website address}} | |||
] could lead to a website operated by a ].]] | |||
] | |||
'''Typosquatting''', also called '''URL hijacking''', a '''sting site''', a '''cousin domain''', or a '''fake URL''', is a form of ], and possibly ] which relies on mistakes such as ] made by Internet users when inputting a ] into a ]. A user accidentally entering an incorrect website address may be led to any URL, including an alternative website owned by a cybersquatter. | |||
The typosquatter's ] will usually be ''similar'' to the victim's site address; the typosquatting site could be in the form of: | |||
'''Typosquatting''', also called '''URL hijacking''', is a form of ] which relies on mistakes such as ]s made by internet users when inputting ] into a ]. Should a user accidentally enter an incorrect website address, they may be led to an alternative address owned by a cybersquatter. | |||
<!-- Do NOT give any examples of misspelled domain names. "examlpe.com" currently leads to a site that tries to load malware on your computer. --> | |||
*A misspelling, or foreign language spelling, of the intended site | |||
*A misspelling based on a typographical error | |||
*A plural of a singular domain name | |||
*A different ] (e.g., .com instead of .org) | |||
*An abuse of the ] (ccTLD) (.cm, .co, or .om instead of .com) | |||
Similar abuses: | |||
==Overview== | |||
<!-- Do NOT give any examples of misspelled domain names. "examlpe.com" currently leads to a site that tries to load malware on your computer. --> | |||
Generally, the victim site of typosquatting will be a frequently visited website. The typosquatter's ] will usually be one of three kinds, all similar to the victim site address: | |||
*Combosquatting – no misspelling, but appending an arbitrary word that appears legitimate, but that anyone could register. | |||
*] – omitting a period or inserting an extra period | |||
*Appending terms such as ''sucks'' or -''{{Not a typo|suckes}}'' to a domain name | |||
Once on the typosquatter's site, the user may also be tricked into thinking that they are actually on the real site through the use of copied or similar logos, website layouts, or content. Spam emails sometimes make use of typosquatting URLs to trick users into visiting malicious sites that look like a given bank's site, for instance. | |||
*A common misspelling of the intended site; for example, webadress.com | |||
*A misspelling based on typing errors; for example, wwebaddress.com or wbaddress.com | |||
*A differently phrased domain name; for example, web-address.com | |||
==Motivation== | |||
(In all previous examples, the intended website is webaddress.com.) | |||
There are several different reasons for typosquatters buying a typo domain: | |||
*To try to sell the typo domain back to the brand owner | |||
*To ] the domain through ] revenues from direct navigation misspellings of the intended domain | |||
*To redirect the typo-traffic to a competitor | |||
*To redirect the typo-traffic back to the brand itself, but through an affiliate link, thus earning commissions from the brand owner's affiliate program | |||
*As a ] scheme to mimic the brand's site, while intercepting passwords which the visitor enters unsuspectingly<ref>{{Cite web|title='Typosquatting': How 1 Mistyped Letter Could Lead to ID Theft|url=https://www.bankrate.com/finance/credit/typosquatting-identity-theft.aspx|date=17 August 2015|last=Claes|first=Bell|work=Bankrate|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150820232605/http://www.bankrate.com/finance/credit/typosquatting-identity-theft.aspx|archive-date=20 August 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
*To install drive-by ] or revenue generating ] onto the visitors' devices | |||
*To harvest misaddressed e-mail messages mistakenly sent to the typo domain | |||
*To express an opinion that is different from the intended website's opinion | |||
*By legitimate site owners, to block malevolent use of the typo domain by others | |||
*To annoy users of the intended site | |||
==Examples== | |||
Once in the typosquatter's site, the user may also be tricked into thinking that they are in fact in the real site; through the use of copied or similar logos, website layouts or content. Sometimes competitors of the victim site will do this. | |||
Many companies, including ], ], and ], have gained reputations for aggressively chasing down typosquatted names. Lego, for example, has spent roughly {{Currency|500,000|USD}} on taking 309 cases through ] proceedings.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Has Lego's $500k Spent on URDP Been a Waste?|url=https://domainnamewire.com/2011/11/01/has-legos-500k-spent-on-urdp-been-a-waste/|date=1 November 2011 |last=Allemann |first=Andrew |work=Domain Name Wire |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111102165431/http://domainnamewire.com/2011/11/01/has-legos-500k-spent-on-urdp-been-a-waste/|archive-date=2 November 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Celebrities have also pursued their domain names. Prominent examples include basketball player ] UDRP of DirkSwish.com<ref>{{Cite web|title=Dallas Mavericks Star Dirk Nowitzki Wins Dispute Over Domain Name|url=https://domainnamewire.com/2011/09/12/dallas-mavericks-dirk-nowitzki-domain/|date=12 September 2011|last=Allemann|first=Andrew|work=Domain Name Wire|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110927065945/http://domainnamewire.com/2011/09/12/dallas-mavericks-dirk-nowitzki-domain/|archive-date=27 September 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> and actress ] UDRP of EvaLongoria.org.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Eva Longoria Adds .Org to Her Collection |url=https://domainnamewire.com/2011/05/05/eva-longoria-adds-org-to-her-collection/|date=5 May 2011 |last=Allemann |first=Andrew |work=Domain Name Wire |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110507065210/http://domainnamewire.com/2011/05/05/eva-longoria-adds-org-to-her-collection/|archive-date=7 May 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Alternatively, the user will be forwarded to a site of a completely different nature to what they intended. This tactic is often used by ] and ]. | |||
Goggle, a typosquatted version of ], was the subject of a 2006 web safety promotion by ], a computer security company, which depicted the significant amounts of malware installed through ] upon accessing the site at the time. Goggle installed ]. Later, the URL was redirected to google.com;<ref>{{Cite web|title=Google Wants to Take Down Goggle.com Web Site|url=https://domainnamewire.com/2011/08/23/google-wants-to-take-down-goggle-com-web-site/|date=23 August 2011|last=Allemann|first=Andrew|work=Domain Name Wire|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110825075404/http://domainnamewire.com/2011/08/23/google-wants-to-take-down-goggle-com-web-site/|archive-date=25 August 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> a 2018 check revealed it to redirect users to ] pages, and a 2020 attempt to access the site through a private ] resolver hosted by ] resulted in the page being identified as ] and blocked for the user's ]. By mid-2022, it had been turned into a political blog. | |||
Sometimes, the typosquatters will use the false addresses to distribute ], ], ] or other ]. | |||
Another example of corporate typosquatting is yuube.com, targeting ] users by programming that URL to ] to a malicious website or page that asks users to add a malware "security check extension".<ref>{{Cite web|title=Your Spelling Errors Can Help Typosquatters Make Big Bucks|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/your-spelling-errors-can-help-typosquatters-make-big-bucks/articleshow/5884936.cms|date=5 May 2010|last=Gopalakrishnan|first=Chandu|work=The Economic Times|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110812034737/http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2010-05-05/news/28413792_1_domain-anti-cybersquatting-consumer-protection-act-website|archive-date=12 August 2011|url-status=live}}</ref> Similarly, www.airfrance.com has been typosquatted by www.arifrance.com, diverting users to a website peddling discount travel (although it now redirects to a warning from ] about malware).<ref name=slavitt>{{Cite web|title=Protecting Your Intellectual Property from Domain Name Typosquatters|url=https://corporate.findlaw.com/intellectual-property/protecting-your-intellectual-property-from-domain-name.html|date=26 March 2008|last=Slavitt|first=Kelly M.|work=FindLaw|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130726234418/http://corporate.findlaw.com/intellectual-property/protecting-your-intellectual-property-from-domain-name.html|archive-date=26 July 2013|url-status=live}}</ref> Other examples are equifacks.com (].com), experianne.com (].com), and tramsonion.com (].com); these three typosquatted sites were registered by comedian ] for his show '']''.<ref>{{cite news |last= Debter |first= Lauren |date= April 16, 2016 |title=John Oliver Takes Aim At Credit Reports In 'Last Week Tonight' |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/laurengensler/2016/04/11/john-oliver-credit-reports-last-week-tonight/amp/|work=] |location= |access-date=July 17, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Durkin |first=J. D. |date=11 April 2016 |title=John Oliver Creates Fake Web Sites to Troll Major Three Credit Bureaus |url=https://www.mediaite.com/online/john-oliver-creates-fake-web-sites-to-troll-major-three-credit-bureaus |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160414103447/http://www.mediaite.com/online/john-oliver-creates-fake-web-sites-to-troll-major-three-credit-bureaus |archive-date=14 April 2016 |website=]}}</ref> Over 550 typosquats related to the ] were detected in 2019.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Riper |first=Harrison van |date=2019-10-16 |title=Typosquatting and the 2020 U.S. Presidential election |url=https://www.digitalshadows.com/blog-and-research/typosquatting-and-the-2020-u-s-presidential-election/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210904000808/https://www.digitalshadows.com/blog-and-research/typosquatting-and-the-2020-u-s-presidential-election/ |archive-date=2021-09-04 |access-date=2021-09-04 |website=Digital Shadows |language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
==Combatting typosquatting== | |||
A victim website will usually send a ] letter to the offender at first, in attempt to quell the activity. | |||
The Magniber ] is being distributed in a typosquatting method that exploits typos made when entering domains, targeting mainly Chrome and Edge users.<ref>{{cite web |author=MalBot |date=2022-10-25 |title=Rapidly Evolving Magniber Ransomware |url=https://malware.news/t/rapidly-evolving-magniber-ransomware/64443 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240504041023/https://malware.news/t/rapidly-evolving-magniber-ransomware/64443 |archive-date=May 4, 2024 |access-date=November 16, 2022 |website=malware.news}}</ref> | |||
They may also try and purchase the website address from the typosquatter, which could have been the typosquatter's aim all along. | |||
==In United States law== | |||
Occasionally, ] will be taken against the offending site or individual. | |||
In the United States, the 1999 ] (ACPA) contains a clause (Section 3(a), amending 15 USC 1117 to include sub-section (d)(2)(B)(ii)) aimed at combatting typosquatting.<ref>{{Cite web|title=S. 1255{{snd}}Trademark Cyberpiracy Prevention Act|url=https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/senate-bill/1255/text/is|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180921113259/https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/senate-bill/1255/text/is|archive-date=21 September 2018|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Without Typo-squatters, How Far Would Google Fall?|url=https://www.theregister.com/2008/10/23/google_and_typosquatting|date=23 October 2008|last=Metz|first=Cade|work=The Register|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081024195809/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/23/google_and_typosquatting/|archive-date=24 October 2008|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
On April 17, 2006, evangelist ] failed to get the U.S. Supreme Court to review a decision allowing Christopher Lamparello to use www.fallwell.com. Relying on a plausible misspelling of Falwell's name, Lamparello's ] presents misdirected visitors with scriptural references that are intended to counter the fundamentalist preacher's scathing rebukes against ]. In '']'', the high court let stand a 2005 ] opinion that "the use of a mark in a domain name for a gripe site criticizing the markholder does not constitute cybersquatting." | |||
A company may try and preempt typosquatting by obtaining a number of websites with common misspellings and redirect them to the main, correctly spelled website. For example <nowiki> www.gooogle.com, www.goolge.com, www.gogle.com, and others, all redirect to www.google.com.</nowiki> In another example, actor and politician ] is reported to control the domains with the ten most common misspellings of his surname. | |||
==WIPO resolution procedure== | |||
==Examples of typosquatting== | |||
Under the ] (UDRP), ] holders can file a case at the ] (WIPO) against typosquatters (as with cybersquatters in general).<ref name=slavitt/> The complainant has to show that the registered domain name is identical or ] to their trademark, that the registrant has no legitimate interest in the domain name, and that the domain name is being used in ].<ref name=slavitt/> | |||
*The domain of the Web site of the ], , has two high-profile "misspellings": ], which was a pornographic Web site, and ], a satirical site. | |||
*] is also a victim of typosquatting: , , and , , are all websites which contain pop-up ads, spyware/adware downloads, and ad-generating search engines. | |||
*A related gambit is obtaining ] that correspond to misspellings; a good illustration is ]'s sudden abandonment of "1-800-OPERATOR" and replacing it with "1-800-CALL-ATT". It seems that many Americans don't know how to spell ''operator'', enough that ] was raking in a lot of business with "1-800-OPERATER", reaping the benefits of AT&T's advertising. (In both numbers, the final "R" is superfluous.) | |||
*One example of a typosquatter is , the director of a Christian organization who uses the method as a means of directing surfers away from sites of which he doesn't approve and to his own site; which contains pop-ups, pop-unders, and other mechanisms of revenue and hit-count generation. Gastrich has engaged in the purchase of a number of domains, after which he sets up away from sites such as the and to his own. He has also purchased domain names of Michael Newdow and Anthony Flew and uses them to take web surfers to sites that present his political and religious information. | |||
=="Catchall" typosquatting== | |||
Other than individual domain name purchases, several attempts have been made by larger corporations to profit off of user typos by redirecting them without their knowledge. | |||
*]'s ] automatically redirects users' mistyped URL queries to their ] page. Though a user can reconfigure their browser to use a different search tool, ], MSN's biggest rival, is not in the list. However, on their , Google has explained how to make their search engine the IE default for mistyped urls. | |||
*] registry operator ]'s ] automatically redirected traffic to URLs not registered by users. This caused a fair amount of outrage from the internet standards community, and an emergency patch to ] was issued to circumvent VeriSign's actions. | |||
*], a startup company, sells partner ]s a tool that redirects mistyped queries to a Paxfire-generated page with sponsored advertiser content related to the mistyped "hotword". Revenue generated from user clicks is split between Paxfire and the internet service provider. | |||
*Certain types of ] pose as browser ]s and redirect a user's web requests or search queries without their knowledge or consent, even if the URLs themselves are properly typed. | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*{{annotated link|Domain Name System}} (DNS) | |||
*] | |||
** ] – Phishing attacks that depend on falsifying or misrepresenting an internet domain name | |||
*] | |||
**{{annotated link|Doppelganger domain}} | |||
*] | |||
**{{annotated link|IDN homograph attack}} | |||
*] | |||
*{{slink|Misdialed call|Toll-free numbers}} – Similar attacks on vanity ]s | |||
*] | |||
*{{annotated link|Mousetrapping}} | |||
*] | |||
*{{annotated link|Phishing}} | |||
*] | |||
*{{annotated link|URL shortening}} | |||
==References== | |||
{{Reflist}} | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
*{{cite news |last=Giles |first=Jim |date=17 February 2010 |title=Typos may earn Google $500m a year |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18542-typos-may-earn-google-500m-a-year/ |work=] |location= |access-date=July 19, 2023}} (reporting research by Ben Edelman and Tyler Moore: ) | |||
* (], ], ]) - This article's author identifies new forms of typosquatting, including ]'s ] and ]. | |||
*{{cite web |url=https://www.internetcommerce.org/internet_commerce_association_announces_member_code_of_conduct_affirming_its_commitment_to_best_practices/ |url-status=dead |last=Corwin |first=Philip |date=September 13, 2007 |title=The Internet Commerce Association Code of Conduct |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160407011821/https://www.internetcommerce.org/internet_commerce_association_announces_member_code_of_conduct_affirming_its_commitment_to_best_practices/ |archive-date=April 7, 2016 |access-date=2007-09-13 |website=InternetCommerce.org |publisher=Internet Commerce Association |quote=}} | |||
*, Google Wins Typosquatting Dispute. | |||
<!--spacing--> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
{{Domain parking}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 23:52, 21 October 2024
Form of cybersquatting which relies on mistakes when inputting a website addressTyposquatting, also called URL hijacking, a sting site, a cousin domain, or a fake URL, is a form of cybersquatting, and possibly brandjacking which relies on mistakes such as typos made by Internet users when inputting a website address into a web browser. A user accidentally entering an incorrect website address may be led to any URL, including an alternative website owned by a cybersquatter.
The typosquatter's URL will usually be similar to the victim's site address; the typosquatting site could be in the form of:
- A misspelling, or foreign language spelling, of the intended site
- A misspelling based on a typographical error
- A plural of a singular domain name
- A different top-level domain (e.g., .com instead of .org)
- An abuse of the Country Code Top-Level Domain (ccTLD) (.cm, .co, or .om instead of .com)
Similar abuses:
- Combosquatting – no misspelling, but appending an arbitrary word that appears legitimate, but that anyone could register.
- Doppelganger domain – omitting a period or inserting an extra period
- Appending terms such as sucks or -suckes to a domain name
Once on the typosquatter's site, the user may also be tricked into thinking that they are actually on the real site through the use of copied or similar logos, website layouts, or content. Spam emails sometimes make use of typosquatting URLs to trick users into visiting malicious sites that look like a given bank's site, for instance.
Motivation
There are several different reasons for typosquatters buying a typo domain:
- To try to sell the typo domain back to the brand owner
- To monetize the domain through advertising revenues from direct navigation misspellings of the intended domain
- To redirect the typo-traffic to a competitor
- To redirect the typo-traffic back to the brand itself, but through an affiliate link, thus earning commissions from the brand owner's affiliate program
- As a phishing scheme to mimic the brand's site, while intercepting passwords which the visitor enters unsuspectingly
- To install drive-by malware or revenue generating adware onto the visitors' devices
- To harvest misaddressed e-mail messages mistakenly sent to the typo domain
- To express an opinion that is different from the intended website's opinion
- By legitimate site owners, to block malevolent use of the typo domain by others
- To annoy users of the intended site
Examples
Many companies, including Verizon, Lufthansa, and Lego, have gained reputations for aggressively chasing down typosquatted names. Lego, for example, has spent roughly US$500,000 on taking 309 cases through UDRP proceedings.
Celebrities have also pursued their domain names. Prominent examples include basketball player Dirk Nowitzki's UDRP of DirkSwish.com and actress Eva Longoria's UDRP of EvaLongoria.org.
Goggle, a typosquatted version of Google, was the subject of a 2006 web safety promotion by McAfee, a computer security company, which depicted the significant amounts of malware installed through drive-by downloads upon accessing the site at the time. Goggle installed SpySheriff. Later, the URL was redirected to google.com; a 2018 check revealed it to redirect users to adware pages, and a 2020 attempt to access the site through a private DNS resolver hosted by AdGuard resulted in the page being identified as malware and blocked for the user's security. By mid-2022, it had been turned into a political blog.
Another example of corporate typosquatting is yuube.com, targeting YouTube users by programming that URL to redirect to a malicious website or page that asks users to add a malware "security check extension". Similarly, www.airfrance.com has been typosquatted by www.arifrance.com, diverting users to a website peddling discount travel (although it now redirects to a warning from Air France about malware). Other examples are equifacks.com (Equifax.com), experianne.com (Experian.com), and tramsonion.com (TransUnion.com); these three typosquatted sites were registered by comedian John Oliver for his show Last Week Tonight. Over 550 typosquats related to the 2020 U.S. presidential election were detected in 2019.
The Magniber ransomware is being distributed in a typosquatting method that exploits typos made when entering domains, targeting mainly Chrome and Edge users.
In United States law
In the United States, the 1999 Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) contains a clause (Section 3(a), amending 15 USC 1117 to include sub-section (d)(2)(B)(ii)) aimed at combatting typosquatting.
On April 17, 2006, evangelist Jerry Falwell failed to get the U.S. Supreme Court to review a decision allowing Christopher Lamparello to use www.fallwell.com. Relying on a plausible misspelling of Falwell's name, Lamparello's gripe site presents misdirected visitors with scriptural references that are intended to counter the fundamentalist preacher's scathing rebukes against homosexuality. In Lamparello v. Falwell, the high court let stand a 2005 Fourth Circuit opinion that "the use of a mark in a domain name for a gripe site criticizing the markholder does not constitute cybersquatting."
WIPO resolution procedure
Under the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP), trademark holders can file a case at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) against typosquatters (as with cybersquatters in general). The complainant has to show that the registered domain name is identical or confusingly similar to their trademark, that the registrant has no legitimate interest in the domain name, and that the domain name is being used in bad faith.
See also
- Domain Name System – System to identify resources on a network (DNS)
- Domain name spoofing – Phishing attacks that depend on falsifying or misrepresenting an internet domain name
- Doppelganger domain – Form of domain name hijack
- IDN homograph attack – Visually similar letters in domain names
- Misdialed call § Toll-free numbers – Similar attacks on vanity phonewords
- Mousetrapping – Digital marketing tool
- Phishing – Form of social engineering
- URL shortening – Web technique
References
- Claes, Bell (August 17, 2015). "'Typosquatting': How 1 Mistyped Letter Could Lead to ID Theft". Bankrate. Archived from the original on August 20, 2015.
- Allemann, Andrew (November 1, 2011). "Has Lego's $500k Spent on URDP Been a Waste?". Domain Name Wire. Archived from the original on November 2, 2011.
- Allemann, Andrew (September 12, 2011). "Dallas Mavericks Star Dirk Nowitzki Wins Dispute Over Domain Name". Domain Name Wire. Archived from the original on September 27, 2011.
- Allemann, Andrew (May 5, 2011). "Eva Longoria Adds .Org to Her Collection". Domain Name Wire. Archived from the original on May 7, 2011.
- Allemann, Andrew (August 23, 2011). "Google Wants to Take Down Goggle.com Web Site". Domain Name Wire. Archived from the original on August 25, 2011.
- Gopalakrishnan, Chandu (May 5, 2010). "Your Spelling Errors Can Help Typosquatters Make Big Bucks". The Economic Times. Archived from the original on August 12, 2011.
- ^ Slavitt, Kelly M. (March 26, 2008). "Protecting Your Intellectual Property from Domain Name Typosquatters". FindLaw. Archived from the original on July 26, 2013.
- Debter, Lauren (April 16, 2016). "John Oliver Takes Aim At Credit Reports In 'Last Week Tonight'". Forbes. Retrieved July 17, 2023.
- Durkin, J. D. (April 11, 2016). "John Oliver Creates Fake Web Sites to Troll Major Three Credit Bureaus". Mediaite. Archived from the original on April 14, 2016.
- Riper, Harrison van (October 16, 2019). "Typosquatting and the 2020 U.S. Presidential election". Digital Shadows. Archived from the original on September 4, 2021. Retrieved September 4, 2021.
- MalBot (October 25, 2022). "Rapidly Evolving Magniber Ransomware". malware.news. Archived from the original on May 4, 2024. Retrieved November 16, 2022.
- "S. 1255 – Trademark Cyberpiracy Prevention Act". Archived from the original on September 21, 2018.
- Metz, Cade (October 23, 2008). "Without Typo-squatters, How Far Would Google Fall?". The Register. Archived from the original on October 24, 2008.
External links
- Giles, Jim (February 17, 2010). "Typos may earn Google $500m a year". New Scientist. Retrieved July 19, 2023. (reporting research by Ben Edelman and Tyler Moore: Measuring Typosquatting Perpetrators and Funders)
- Corwin, Philip (September 13, 2007). "The Internet Commerce Association Code of Conduct". InternetCommerce.org. Internet Commerce Association. Archived from the original on April 7, 2016. Retrieved September 13, 2007.
Domain name speculation and parking | |
---|---|
General | |
Legal | |
Technical |