Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/India Napier: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:06, 14 July 2009 editEdward321 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users36,434 edits →India Napier← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:21, 26 May 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(10 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''merge to ]'''. Note that this decision is non-binding, so discussion can continue on the article's talk page. –''']'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;] 16:03, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|F}}


:{{la|India Napier}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|India Napier}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
might as well toss a few more on the barbie; non-notable fictional character with all the usual fancruft issues. a fictional baby born 3 weeks ago. delete. ] 10:32, 12 July 2009 (UTC) might as well toss a few more on the barbie; non-notable fictional character with all the usual fancruft issues. a fictional baby born 3 weeks ago. delete. ] 10:32, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- ] 10:32, 12 July 2009 (UTC)</small> *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- ] 10:32, 12 July 2009 (UTC)</small>
Line 11: Line 17:
:* Bryan Patterson: "Close Up: Elouise Mignon", page 9, 12 July 2009. ''TV Guide supplement''. '']''. :* Bryan Patterson: "Close Up: Elouise Mignon", page 9, 12 July 2009. ''TV Guide supplement''. '']''.
:* "What's On", page 7, 9 July, 2009. ''TV+ Supplement'' '']''. :* "What's On", page 7, 9 July, 2009. ''TV+ Supplement'' '']''.
Is it enough to warrant its own article? Maybe, but its probably more beneficial to '''Merge''' with ]. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 18:23, 12 July 2009 (UTC) Is it enough to warrant its own article? Maybe, but its probably more beneficial to '''Merge''' with ]. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 18:23, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
* Delete or Merge with ]. ] (]) 22:18, 13 July 2009 (UTC) * Delete or Merge with ]. ] (]) 22:18, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Another minor, unreferenced character. &ndash;] 03:35, 14 July 2009 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. Another minor, unreferenced character. &ndash;] 03:35, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' to the appropraite character list. ] (]) 13:06, 14 July 2009 (UTC) *'''Merge''' to the appropraite character list. ] (]) 13:06, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' or merge. If we go by the GNG, the presence of the articles that Matthew found are reason for a separate article, discussing not just the character but the attention paid to it--which is the oft-request RW information. Personally, I think it's better merged, as for all such characters. Matthew has it right: meeting the GNG does not compel an article--and inversely, not meeting it does not prevent one. ''']''' (]) 00:37, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
<hr style="width:50%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –''']'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;] 13:40, 19 July 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/India Napier||}}
*'''Merge''' to ]. I could not find sources establishing notability. -- ] ] ] ] &spades; 00:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' to ].--] <sup>] ]</sup> 10:29, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
*'''delete''' and redirect if needed. Articles listed above are trivial mentions at best. ] 18:01, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 12:21, 26 May 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Neighbours characters. Note that this decision is non-binding, so discussion can continue on the article's talk page. –Juliancolton |  16:03, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

India Napier

India Napier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

might as well toss a few more on the barbie; non-notable fictional character with all the usual fancruft issues. a fictional baby born 3 weeks ago. delete. Jack Merridew 10:32, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Character has already received some coverage: , , , , (from - now deleted) As well as two articles in this week's newspapers:
  • Bryan Patterson: "Close Up: Elouise Mignon", page 9, 12 July 2009. TV Guide supplement. The Sunday Telegraph.
  • "What's On", page 7, 9 July, 2009. TV+ Supplement The Cairns Post.

Is it enough to warrant its own article? Maybe, but its probably more beneficial to Merge with List of Neighbours characters. Matthewedwards :  Chat  18:23, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton |  13:40, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.