| Revision as of 16:44, 16 July 2009 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,338 editsm Signing comment by Danwilson82 - "→STEWART DOWNING: "← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:09, 3 April 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (409 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 250K | |maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 3 | ||
| |algo = old( |
|algo = old(3d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Smashville/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Smashville/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| {{User talk}} | {{User talk}} | ||
| {{Archive box| | {{Archive box| | ||
| *] - Aug 2007 to Dec 2007<br> | *] - Aug 2007 to Dec 2007<br> | ||
| *] - Dec 2007 to |
*] - Dec 2007 to August 2009<br> | ||
| *] - August 2009 to Present | |||
| }} | }} | ||
| __TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| == Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| == NOT FAIR == | |||
| ] | |||
| Why Did My Userbox page Get Deleted It's Userboxes, U Know The Things For Your Profile? | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --> ] (]) 00:30, 1 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| WELL IT'S NOT FAIR DELETING IT FOR '''NO REASON''' ] (]) 19:24, 10 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :You created an article called ROBLOX Userboxes. If you go to ], it can give you some help on what kinds of things an article constitutes, but we don't make articles full of userboxes. --]] 19:28, 10 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| == Monicities == | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --> ] (]) 00:30, 25 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
| ⚫ | ] (]) |
||
| ] | |||
| May I ask for why our new page is deleted? And how can we add the page properly with out violating any of the rules? Many thanks =) | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->–]] 04:51, 1 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Misplaced Pages is not for advertising, but more importantly, your page made no claim to notability. Please see ] for information on what a Misplaced Pages article should consist of. --]] 21:37, 10 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Notification of automated file description generation == | |||
| ] (]) 21:56, 10 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Your upload of ] or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page. | |||
| Thank you for writing back. I have read the link you have provided. Still do not know what exactly we have to do to list our company's information on Misplaced Pages. We are not using wikipedia page as an advertising tool. But creating the page to present the existence of the company. What we do, and what we are hoping to obtain from wikipedia is just like the rest of the social network websites like facebook, myspace, and others. Thank you. | |||
| This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions ]. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill--> ''Message delivered by ] (])'' 14:43, 5 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == Kentucky Derby, SEE ALSO links == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Apparently you feel that the Kentucky Derby is not related to anything. | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692057745 --> | |||
| Even the first three finishers of the race do not seem to make your list of '''==See also== links''' even though it is consistently on many other Stakes Race pages throughout wikipedia. | |||
| Is not the * Kentucky Oaks, * Kentucky Derby Festival * Kentucky Derby Pie, * Top 3 finishers of the race, * Triple Crown Productions, * 2009, 2008 or 2007 articles about the race, * Louisville, KY attractions or * US Triple Crown on television related to the Derby. Each of these or at least some of these should be listed as =See also==. | |||
| '''What is the harm to referring any one to other information that is related to the Kentucky Derby???? ''' <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:59, 13 July 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :As you can see in the talk page and editing summary, every single one of those links is already either linked in the article in either an infobox underneath or the body actual body of the article...or was not directly related to the article. Adding links to a see also section that are already in the article goes against the spirit of ] and ]. It's not a case of being against "See Also" sections...it's the fact that after I cleaned out everything that was repeated or not directly related, it left an empty section...and we don't leave empty sections in articles. --]] 19:06, 13 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago == | |||
| == Tweebuffelsmeteenskootmorsdoodgeskietfontein == | |||
| {{User QAIbox | |||
| | title = Awesome | |||
| This seems like a ] to me. Hard to believe it has survived for years. ] (]) 04:03, 14 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| | image = Cscr-featured.svg | |||
| :Yeah...it also doesn't link to any deletion discussions, which I find surprising...it seems like a prime candidate for AfD, though. --]] 04:06, 14 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| | image_upright = 0.35 | |||
| | bold = ] | |||
| == ] == | |||
| }} | |||
| ⚫ | --] (]) 17:28, 15 September 2019 (UTC) | ||
| Thank you very much for locking the page :) I have been making every attempt to keep things civil, but a forum continues to send members over to change one individual thing. The members are increasingly aggressive and despite clearly being SPA's, excuse their actions by saying "its wiki policy". | |||
| Was wondering if you had any thoughts on this matter, if you could visit ] and comment. Thank you again, ''']''' <sup>]</sup> <sub>]</sub> 22:31, 14 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Since I protected it, I probably should stay out of the discussion...being the neutral third party and all...I just saw some heated comments coming across the recent changes, looked at the history and the talk page and realize it probably needed to be protected until it had a chance to cool down and be resolved. --]] 13:21, 15 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::True, that makes sense. It seems the edit war began 10 days sooner than I had noticed with the addition of the link. The following is the last revision prior to this: | |||
| ::So, I was wondering if we could have the link removed (As it appears to be the original revision), and the article set to semi-protected (Either now or when the current protection expires Friday) to prevent SLA's from continuing to change it back and forth? -- ''']''' <sup>]</sup> <sub>]</sub> 18:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == STEWART DOWNING == | |||
| Hello, I have read the dispute resolution page and have decided to give you the benefit of the doubt on a situation. Recently I added a new picture to the page of Stewart Downing, when he joined the team I support. This was removed and so I have removed the opriginal picture as he does not play for that team anymore. The fact his picture is there in a middlesborough is not good for sets of either fans. For some reason you have replaced it over and over and I would like to kindly ask you to either put my picture back up or leave it removed. I have absolutly no idea why you would get involved in me posting a perfectly valid image to a page with no ill intent whatsoever.{{unsigned|Danwilson82}} | |||
| :You were warned for potentially violating the 3RR rule. In fact, you actually did violate it, but I decided to make you aware of the rule before you did it again. If you do revert again, I will block you. Not only are you edit warring, you are edit warring with copyrighted material - which I see you have been warned about numerous times. --]] 16:38, 16 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Today was the first time I had used wiki edits and the way you are informed of problems is not atall obvious, I thought you were just some idiot editing the page to mess it up, I have been taking time to try and make it right so I find it very rude that you did not properly contact me and explain. As I said the picture is WRONG and needs to be removed and as you clearly say as soon as I got told about the copy right problem I removed the uploaded picture so please don't try and use that one against me. If you proceed in returning the original picture you are vandalising a page and I will have no qualms about reporting you. Perhaps you need to grow up a little, I'ts sad they are giving 12yr olds power like this... <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:42, 16 July 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
Latest revision as of 09:09, 3 April 2022
Hello, welcome to my talk page!
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xeno 04:51, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Churchill Downs 6-16-07 - Patten 025.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:43, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
 | |
| Ten years! |
|---|