| Revision as of 23:46, 16 July 2009 editJpgordon (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Administrators82,354 edits →July 2009← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:24, 5 October 2021 edit undoWladthemlat (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,807 edits cleaning up old stuffTag: Blanking | ||
| (282 intermediate revisions by 50 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| hello | |||
| == July 2009 == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <font color="green">]</font>] 22:20, 15 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;"> | |||
| :<div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{#if:|a period of '''{{{time}}}'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for violating the ]{{#if:| at ]}}. Please be more careful to ] or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our ] first. {{#if:|] (]) 08:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> The duration of the is 24 hours. are the reverts in question. | |||
| In addition, please do not use "vandalism" to refer to edits with which you disagree on content grounds ] (]) 08:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC)</div> | |||
| {{tlx|unblock|I fully undertand why I got blocked and I admit that I have lost my temper at that specific article. However, the reverts were mainly motivated by edits that contradict cited sources. I have discussed the topic on the talk page and will soon seek a dispute resolution as the frequent edits damage the article imo. I honestly did not know that 3 reverts result in a block, will be more careful next time. }} | |||
| {| width="75%" align="center" class="notice noprint" style="background: none; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;" | |||
| |- | |||
| | valign="top" style="padding: 0.5em" | ] | |||
| | style="padding: 0.1em" | | |||
| '''Your request to be unblocked''' has been '''granted''' for the following reason(s): | |||
| <br><br>Sounds like exactly what we want. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 23:46, 16 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ''Request handled by:'' ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 23:46, 16 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <small> '''Unblocking administrator''': Please check for <span class="plainlinks"> on this user after accepting the unblock request.</small> | |||
| <!-- Request accepted (after-block request) --> | |||
| |} | |||