Misplaced Pages

talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William M. Connolley/Workshop: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration | Requests | Case | Abd-William M. Connolley Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:55, 19 July 2009 editMathsci (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers66,107 editsm Recently arrived user← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:48, 16 September 2009 edit undoCarcharoth (talk | contribs)Administrators73,560 edits make page history, pre-blanked page, and other case pages, more accessible 
(231 intermediate revisions by 31 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{NOINDEX}}
== Sorry for harsh remarks ==


{| id="mp-topbanner" style="width:100%; -moz-border-radius: 1em; background:#fcfcfc; border:1px solid #ccc; margin-bottom: 7px;"
I'm sorry that I wrote snide remarks and uncivil words. I'm afraid that the helpful comments were written long ago and I felt that they went ignored (this will be evident when I submit my evidence this weekend), and now my frustration with Abd is making me write very harsh messages. Unfortunately, arbs don't know the context and they won't understand what I am talking about, so I'll make a serious effort to be way more neutral and clear, and not use any sarcasm. I will be grateful that people leaves a note on my talk page when they see that I am making unhelpful comments. I won't comment more until I finish the evidence, so I can support my statements properly. --] (]) 14:59, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
| style="font-size:95%; text-align: center;" |

This page has been ].<p> The version of this page before blanking is still available in the , and can be seen .<p> For the other pages in this case, including the ], please see:<p> ] <small>(])</small> — ] <small>(])</small> — ] <small>(])</small> — ] <small>(])</small>
:Thank you for your understanding and efforts, Enric. This is undoubtedly going to be a very heated case in any event, and the arbitrators and myself as case clerk would all very much appreciate everyone's commitment to keep careful watch on themselves and their comments. Should anyone notice that a comment has been made which does cross the line, please feel free to ] - I'm not as active during the week as I'd like due to work, but I will be sure to take a look and handle things as necessary as soon as I can. My talk page is similarly open, but if you feel you're being attacked, email may be a better option to reduce drama levels. Thanks again. ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 21:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
|}

== Recently arrived user ==
*{{Userlinks|Arkady Renkov}}

With only 70 edits to his name before today and no apparent experience with noticeboards/ArbCom, this recently arrived user shows complete familiarity with wikipedia jargon and processes. ] suggests that this might be a sockpuppet account. ] (]) 10:50, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:48, 16 September 2009


This page has been blanked as a courtesy.

The version of this page before blanking is still available in the page history, and can be seen here.

For the other pages in this case, including the final decision, please see:

Main case page (Talk)Evidence (Talk)Workshop (Talk)Proposed decision (Talk)