| Revision as of 05:44, 7 August 2009 edit70.250.42.85 (talk) Undid revision 306546392 by Dayewalker (talk) Pube Walker, you are in grave danger of the 3RR rule! This is your final warning← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:06, 27 February 2022 edit undoSuperMarioMan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators60,928 editsm Reverted edits by 45.16.168.201 (talk) to last version by The InteriorTag: Rollback | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Retired}} | |||
| Welcome to my page, and go Celtics! Leave a message for me below, and I'll respond on this page unless you ask otherwise. | |||
| It's been about eight months since I posted the reasons I've become disillusioned with this place , and in that time I think I've wandered back over here to make about a hundred edits total, and absolutely nothing of any substance. I should probably go ahead and make this official, and quit wasting my time. The problems I talked about on my user page are all still there, and things seem to have gotten worse. There's no leadership here, only chaos. And ], nor does it work to entice me to volunteer my services for free. | |||
| == Bobby Fischer == | |||
| Hi could you do me the favour of taking a further look both at the and the and give your opinion if this information belongs in the article or not. It seems to me as if it's over focusing on Fiscers anti semitism with trivial details but his antisemitism is already refereed to plenty in the article.--] (]) 19:01, 18 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| For those of you watching from over there, after more than ten thousand edits here, I've finally been immortalized at an anti-Misplaced Pages website. Finally! Some recognition from the dark side! My RFA is linked there, along with a disparaging quote from (yet another) user who commented on my RFA to rip me, refused a request for diffs, and then got indef blocked and hasn't been seen or heard from since. Thanks, guys. Those are definitely the users of vast integrity and worthy contributions who should be noted in pull quotes. Oh, and judging from the style of writing, it's posted on the site by someone who certainly appears to be the latest incarnation of a user blocked across multiple areas of the Misplaced Pages Foundation for being a nutball. | |||
| == Thank you for the revert! == | |||
| Well, that's certainly one for the resume. I can't tell you how much this means to me, to finally receive the scorn I deserve from a website that's the Gold Standard of bitterness. I can now retire happily. I am somebody, dammit! | |||
| Thanks ! — ] (]) 03:44, 22 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Love to all, and good luck in the future. | |||
| ==AfD nomination of DreamHost== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.<!-- Template:Adw --> ] (]) 17:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Sincerely, | |||
| ==Consistency== | |||
| ] (]) 04:47, 11 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| If you are going to issue me that warning, please review the other users talk page and issue the same, for consistency. ] | |||
| --] (]) 18:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :In all good faith, I'd suggest you calm down with your reverts. You seem to enjoy a fight you'll quickly lose here, the best thing to do would be to just get over your previous block and move on. ] (]) 19:12, 23 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Enjoy== | |||
| == ] == | |||
| the Summer. Kick back, watch BB15, take a break. I may run the gauntlet soon and I appreciate the warnings. Best to you. ```]<small>]</small> 18:55, 11 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Dawn Wells == | |||
| The user above is a sock of ]. Checkout the userpage for a link to the Long term abuse page. I've submitted several requests for a block.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 06:06, 25 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Remember when you were totally lying about your reasons for keeping marijuana out of the Dawn Wells article? In the end you lost, and I won. Ah, good times. ] ] 03:54, 18 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == 3RR compaint == | |||
| : Hmm. I don't remember that. I do remember you being weirdly obsessed with inserting negative detail into the page of a quasi-celebrity, so much so that even years later after I've left the project you come back as a grave-dancing asshole to trumpet how you "won." Not so good times. ] (]) 05:42, 19 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Looks like, despite your years of work here, you never understood that negative yet true information belongs in Misplaced Pages right next to the positive yet true information, ] from it as you tried to do. ] (]) 14:52, 28 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Photo consensus discussion at ]== | |||
| I was filed the 3RR complaint on ]at the same time. Do you have experience with SPI complaints? ] (]) 02:20, 26 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Hi. Can you offer your opinion regarding the Infobox photo discussion ? Thanks. ] (]) 19:16, 28 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Not really with the socks page. I'm not completely sold on the two editors being socks, but it is coincidental enough to look into. ] (]) 02:24, 26 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| *If you look, his edits and ] take place in the same articles and the same material in them. I belileve he is doing it in an attempt to dodge the 3RR. Both accounts are less than a month old and have limited themselves to the same 3 articles.] (]) 02:31, 26 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Revert of ANI == | |||
| == "no one will hold it against you." == | |||
| Hey there - I reverted your removal of the ridiculous rant by ] over at ]. While your reasons were fine, it is generally bad form to delete material at ANI. It is actually useful to the community to know of the actions of users like this, particularly when they use ANI to launch a personal attack (a DUMB thing to do, trust me). Regards ] (]) 02:48, 30 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Gotcha, I understand. Thanks for the explanation, makes sense to me. Take care! ] (]) 02:52, 30 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Oops, never mind. Turns out the author was already blocked for vandalism anyway. Best to delete it after all. ] (]) 02:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'd like to refer you to ]. Please delete any similar contributions on sight. ] (]) 21:21, 30 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Dayewalker - you have requested talk pages over email, so here it is. When an initiator and instigator of disruptive editing pre-emptively filed a plaintiff action against me, successfully manipulating Misplaced Pages admins into finishing a fight he started by having me blocked, you declared "no one will hold it against you." Now, probably the same editor using ip address verses wiki username has done the same thing. That is, initiate and instigate with hypocritical behavior and then pre-emptively start plaintiff action manipulating admins into a false sense that they are innocent actors because they are the first to file plaintiff action. Sure enough, wikipedia admin ] used the prior block to say "he/she is no stranger to controversy" proving your statement "one will hold it against you" completely and utterly wrong. | |||
| == Dreamhost customer? == | |||
| Just thought I would point out you have been proven wrong. To my surprise I find your userpage with a long diatribe using users block history to hold things for or against others. | |||
| It would be helpful to know if you are a dreamhost customer. | |||
| It is an interesting trick. Pick a fight with an editor, coax them into defending themselves the same way they are attacked, manipulate admins into punishing the defendant, and viola, editors such as Dayewalker will join in beating up the defendant. Clearly a weakness of Misplaced Pages.] (]) 08:41, 9 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| I've assumed good faith in the past regarding you but realizing that you're practicing ] with me and chasing me through this website for no apparent reason I ask are you in fact a Dreamhost customer? And could you please stop viewing my contributions.--] (]) 00:42, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm not doing anything of the sort. If you want to make accusations against me, please take it to the correct venue. As for personal questions about other editors, that's not something of any relevance on wikipedia. The edits of a WP editor should stand alone, and be judged on their own merit. ] (]) 01:07, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Seeing as you have refused my request to stop viewing my contributions I too will be taking a greater interest in your contributions from now on.--] (]) 01:39, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::Again, if you have a complaint against me, please take it to the proper board, RfC or ANI. ] (]) 01:44, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::No complaint man from now on I'll just be a fan that's all.--] (]) 01:46, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::::While you certainly seem to be making threats to hound me here, please check out this edit where I apologized for misreading your comment to Thatcher. ] (]) 01:49, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::What lead you to Thatcher, what lead you to Bobby Fischer and what lead you to me? It's all good man I now find you interesting and I want to familiarize myself more with your work here on wikipedia, nothing wrong with that.--] (]) 01:53, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| (OD) My contribution history is public, and available here . I haven't commented on Bobby Fischer in quite a while. We've both been active on the Dreamhost article, so it would stand to reason that I would also watch the discussion at Arbcom. ] (]) 02:02, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Beautiful stuff man, look forward to seeing more from you in the future.--] (]) 02:04, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == Question == | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| (Moved from user page) If you dont mind, may I ask why you follow me around reverting my edits? Thanks {{unsigned|Niex05}} | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :I am not following you around. You've now reverted your edits at ] and ] without discussing your disputed changes. If someone disagrees with your edits, please open a discussion on the talk page and try and gain a new consensus. Just reverting without discussion leads to edit warring, which results in blocks and page protection, so it's always better to talk over big changes. ] (]) 04:28, 3 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692203726 --> | |||
| == Misplaced Pages space does not requre sources== | |||
| You a change in Misplaced Pages space on the basis that it was an unsourced change. However, sources are only required for articles, not the policies, guidelines, and essays in Misplaced Pages space. --] (]) 11:43, 3 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Is there a policy for that I can read up on? Probably "unsourced" was the wrong thing to tag it, as I posted on the editor's page, I really reverted it based on the lack of discussion. There seemed to be no reason for his change, and no one else reverted further after I changed it back. If there's a policy where I can find more information, please let me know. Thanks! ] (]) 15:41, 3 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::The purpose of requiring sources is to prevent original research by Misplaced Pages editors; Misplaced Pages should be summarizing what has already been reported elsewhere. Clearly this concept has no application to those pages that start with the prefix "Misplaced Pages:" where our policies and guidelines are kept; those are things we decide on among ourselves and are intended to be original. --] (]) 22:39, 3 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::I appreciate your response, is there an official policy on this I can read up on? And how would you have suggested I handled the change to the page? Do you see my response to the editor as well-formed, or is there a better way you would suggest? Thanks! ] (]) 22:42, 3 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| If you look at ] you will see statements such as "If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Misplaced Pages should not have an '''article''' on it" and "'''Articles''' should be based upon reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" (emphasis added). The Verifiability policy applies mainly to articles (although it could be applied to false or dubious statements elsewhere, especially statements about living persons). | |||
| My impression of the change from ''Wall Street Journal'' to ''Washington Post'' was that it was an unnecessary change, but didn't hurt anything. If you think it was better with ''Wall Street Journal'', you could revert. Your preferences for how the text reads are as important as anyone else's. --] (]) 22:50, 3 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =) I'm always ready to thank users who reverted edits from a vandal who vandalized my page. ] | ] 02:09, 10 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :No problem, anytime! (but hopefully not very often) ] (]) 02:11, 10 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Keith Olbermann == | |||
| ''(moved from user page)'' If Keith Olbermann said that he does not wear horn-rimmed glasses, would you believe him?] (]) 04:34, 10 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Belief doesn't matter, it's what you can prove through ] and consensus. If you disagree, please take it up on the article's talk page and try and change the current consensus. ] (]) 04:37, 10 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| === Yet Another Keith Olbermann discussion, this time from the other side === | |||
| Please explain your claim that YouTube is not a reliable source. I posted something linked to YouTube and you removed it. Since it featured Keith Olbermann himself, how is it not relevant to an article on him? ] (]) 01:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :I commented on the Olbermann talk page, along with another editor who has also explained. If you have any other questions, make them there and I'll try and help. Thanks! ] (]) 01:11, 3 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == RE: == | |||
| Just recieved this from you: | |||
| Do not harass wikipedia editors, as you did here . If you disagree with another editor's edits, please take your discussion to the talk page of the article for further comments. This editor is not the only one reverting your edits, so consensus is against you as per WP:EL. Threatening him will not help, so please take your concerns to the proper forum. | |||
| There was never a threat of any kind, simply a request to have his (and your) supervisors contact info as we have proof of his abuse and bias in regard to external link deletion. We have been intentionally tracking and watching him for a few months and have numerous documented situations that proove these aligations. Matter of fact .. you can go back to the last deletion he did 'Anita Blond' and see where he first deleted instantly with the explination "spammy link that leads to a fake fansite, either way not appropriate", then he recieved our email and quickly went back to delete his comment after realizing he was wrong about both statements. He has now completely deleted the 'external link' section of Anita blonds page and is obviously not fit for this position. | |||
| This needs to stop Misplaced Pages--] (]) 21:50, 10 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :If you feel he's doing something inappropriate, take it to the talk page, which would be the proper venue. As for supervisors, wikipedia has none. You could open a thread at ] for administrator attention, or a ] if you'd like. However, other editors also agreed with removing your link. It's probably a matter for the talk page of the article first. Good luck. ] (]) 21:58, 10 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks for the advise. == | |||
| I understand policy better than Daedalus, he won't stop even when asked to.--] (]) 21:44, 12 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :And that's exactly the type of answer I was advising you against. ] (]) 22:05, 12 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :You don't understand policy better than I do. If that were the case, you wouldn't have vandalized that user's talk page by removing that section against policy. Secondly, you have no right to kick me off this page, the fact that you asked me to leave has nothing to do with policy. Lets see, can you even cite the policies I supposedly broke?— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 22:07, 12 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Let me state this for the record, I have no desire to see a discussion over who knows which policy better take place on my page. Victor, I've offered you good faith advise about your interaction with other editors, please stop sniping at them. If you wish to be taken seriously in your discussion on ANI, please behave as such in all your dealings on wikipedia. | |||
| ::And Daedalus, I'll just advise you to let it go. The relevant policy here is very clear on user pages, and has been reiterated to Victor by several editors. Side arguments aren't productive. | |||
| ::Let's just all go about our business, shall we? ] (]) 22:12, 12 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == 194x RFC == | |||
| I recently opened an ]. Looking back over the case, I'm not sure that I can give an example of me properly trying to resolve the dispute (failing, on the other hand...). I did link a diff of you warning 194x that his behavior was over the line: would you be willing to certify the RFC? Thanks. --] (]) 15:35, 21 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :It looked like Scjessey had already certified it, so I just signed in that I agree. If it needs to be recertified, please let me know and I'll move my name up. ] (]) 18:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Two users need to certify that they tried and failed to resolve it, so if you want to move your name, that's fine. If, on the other hand, you don't want to force the issue at the moment, that's fine too. --] (]) 19:10, 22 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Pube Walker == | |||
| why did u revert to dayewalker when ur name is pube walker? ] (]) 05:36, 7 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:06, 27 February 2022
Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.It's been about eight months since I posted the reasons I've become disillusioned with this place , and in that time I think I've wandered back over here to make about a hundred edits total, and absolutely nothing of any substance. I should probably go ahead and make this official, and quit wasting my time. The problems I talked about on my user page are all still there, and things seem to have gotten worse. There's no leadership here, only chaos. And chaos does not work for the New York Yankees, nor does it work to entice me to volunteer my services for free.
For those of you watching from over there, after more than ten thousand edits here, I've finally been immortalized at an anti-Misplaced Pages website. Finally! Some recognition from the dark side! My RFA is linked there, along with a disparaging quote from (yet another) user who commented on my RFA to rip me, refused a request for diffs, and then got indef blocked and hasn't been seen or heard from since. Thanks, guys. Those are definitely the users of vast integrity and worthy contributions who should be noted in pull quotes. Oh, and judging from the style of writing, it's posted on the site by someone who certainly appears to be the latest incarnation of a user blocked across multiple areas of the Misplaced Pages Foundation for being a nutball.
Well, that's certainly one for the resume. I can't tell you how much this means to me, to finally receive the scorn I deserve from a website that's the Gold Standard of bitterness. I can now retire happily. I am somebody, dammit!
Love to all, and good luck in the future.
Sincerely,
Dayewalker (talk) 04:47, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Enjoy
the Summer. Kick back, watch BB15, take a break. I may run the gauntlet soon and I appreciate the warnings. Best to you. ```Buster Seven Talk 18:55, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Dawn Wells
Remember when you were totally lying about your reasons for keeping marijuana out of the Dawn Wells article? In the end you lost, and I won. Ah, good times. —Prhartcom (talk) 03:54, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm. I don't remember that. I do remember you being weirdly obsessed with inserting negative detail into the page of a quasi-celebrity, so much so that even years later after I've left the project you come back as a grave-dancing asshole to trumpet how you "won." Not so good times. Dayewalker (talk) 05:42, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- Looks like, despite your years of work here, you never understood that negative yet true information belongs in Misplaced Pages right next to the positive yet true information, WP:NOTCENSORED from it as you tried to do. Prhartcom (talk) 14:52, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Photo consensus discussion at Talk:Rick Remender
Hi. Can you offer your opinion regarding the Infobox photo discussion here? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 19:16, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
"no one will hold it against you."
Dayewalker - you have requested talk pages over email, so here it is. When an initiator and instigator of disruptive editing pre-emptively filed a plaintiff action against me, successfully manipulating Misplaced Pages admins into finishing a fight he started by having me blocked, you declared "no one will hold it against you." Now, probably the same editor using ip address verses wiki username has done the same thing. That is, initiate and instigate with hypocritical behavior and then pre-emptively start plaintiff action manipulating admins into a false sense that they are innocent actors because they are the first to file plaintiff action. Sure enough, wikipedia admin User:Waggers used the prior block to say "he/she is no stranger to controversy" proving your statement "one will hold it against you" completely and utterly wrong.
Just thought I would point out you have been proven wrong. To my surprise I find your userpage with a long diatribe using users block history to hold things for or against others.
It is an interesting trick. Pick a fight with an editor, coax them into defending themselves the same way they are attacked, manipulate admins into punishing the defendant, and viola, editors such as Dayewalker will join in beating up the defendant. Clearly a weakness of Misplaced Pages.Mormography (talk) 08:41, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)