Revision as of 15:14, 11 August 2009 editSPCUClerkbot (talk | contribs)30,768 edits BOT updates, actions follow: (listing accounts notified)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:59, 12 August 2009 edit undoSPCUClerkbot (talk | contribs)30,768 edits Archiving Childof12AM's case | ||
(9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
⚫ | {{SPIarchive notice|Childof12AM}} | ||
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> | |||
⚫ | {{SPIarchive notice|Childof12AM |
||
===== <big>Report date August 11 2009, 14:14 (UTC)</big>===== | |||
{{SPIcat}} | |||
;Suspected sockpuppets <!-- BOTDONE_USER_NOTICE DO_NOT_MODIFY ]]]] (THIS CURRENTLY IS NOT ACTIVE, this comment is for testing only) --> | |||
* {{checkuser|1=BBBfan}} | |||
* {{checkuser|1=M599999ty}} | |||
<!--## Add further sockpuppets if any, below these ##--> | |||
* {{checkuser|1=BO2ip01}} | |||
;Evidence submitted by ] | |||
<!--## Sign below your evidence with 4 tilde characters "~~~~" ##--> | |||
Obvious socks already blocked. A new (or old?) little harassment campaign against {{user|Baseball Bugs}} apparently trying to goad him into violating a contact restriction regarding {{user|ChildofMidnight}}. I have no reason to think ChildofMidnight himself (herself?) is actually involved. Are there sleeper socks to be blocked? An underlying IP or range to block? Any other way to stop this? Thanks. <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">] ]</span> 14:14, 11 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
:BTW, Childof12AM's contributions were trapped in an unrelated abuse filter so remember to check that log... <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">] ]</span> 14:16, 11 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Odd - another harassment account, {{user|M599999ty}}, fell into the same abuse filter and I blocked that as well - except that one was trying to harass {{user|Georgewilliamherbert}}. No idea if it's related or not but probably worth checking as well. Strange coincidence that the same rarely-triggered filter gets triggered twice in such a short time. And more than one created dummy user and user talk pages to cover the scent (since deleted). <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">] ]</span> 15:03, 11 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
;Comments by accused parties <small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See ].''</span></small> | |||
;Comments by other users | |||
;Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments | |||
;Conclusions | |||
I checked this earlier, after a request on my talk page: | |||
* It's {{likely}} that Childof12AM = BBBfan. I also found an older impersonation account (BO2ip01) on one of BBBfan's IPs. I've blocked that account. | |||
* Based on technical evidence, M599999ty appears to be {{unrelated}} --]] 15:14, 11 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
---- |
Latest revision as of 16:59, 12 August 2009
Childof12AM
Childof12AM (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Childof12AM/Archive.