Revision as of 19:16, 12 August 2009 editNinetyone (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,591 edits cmt← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:13, 30 January 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Added missing end tags to discussion close footer to reduce Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
(10 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{#ifeq:{{#titleparts:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|2}}|Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Log|<span id="Alien Shaplay"></span>{{collapse top|bg=#F3F9FF|1=]|padding=1px}}|}} | |||
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
<!--Template:Afd top | |||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
The result was '''Delete all'''. '''\''' ] '''/''' (]) 06:24, 19 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
===]=== | ===]=== | ||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|F}} | |||
:{{la|Alien Shaplay}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Alien Shaplay}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
:({{find sources|Alien Shaplay}}) | :({{find sources|Alien Shaplay}}) | ||
A series of non-notable fictional aliens from a TV series. Many appear to be copyvios of . Included are: | A series of non-notable fictional aliens from a TV series. Many appear to be copyvios of . Included are: | ||
{{hidden|Long list| | |||
*{{la|Alien Keel}} | *{{la|Alien Keel}} | ||
*{{la|Takkong}} | *{{la|Takkong}} | ||
Line 24: | Line 31: | ||
*{{la|Antlar}} | *{{la|Antlar}} | ||
*{{la|Ace Killer}} | *{{la|Ace Killer}} | ||
}} | |||
There may be many more... ]:] 16:08, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | There may be many more... ]:] 16:08, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete''' Non-notable aliens from a non-notable tv series. Fails ] -- |
*'''Delete''' Non-notable aliens from a non-notable tv series. Fails ] --]]] 16:22, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- ] ] 19:08, 12 August 2009 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- ] ] 19:08, 12 August 2009 (UTC)</small> | ||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- ] ] 19:09, 12 August 2009 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- ] ] 19:09, 12 August 2009 (UTC)</small> | ||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- ] ] 19:11, 12 August 2009 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- ] ] 19:11, 12 August 2009 (UTC)</small> | ||
*'''Comment''' I came across the listed articles above on NPP, but now I dig deeper, there seem to be five categories full of similar articles: ], ], ] ] and ] seem to all fall into the same box. ]:] 19:16, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' I came across the listed articles above on NPP, but now I dig deeper, there seem to be five categories full of similar articles: ], ], ] ] and ] seem to all fall into the same box. ]:] 19:16, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
*"]" is not a compelling reason for deletion on a paperless encyclopedia. Sincerely, --]<sup>'']''</sup> 20:23, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
*'''Comment''' what I meant by that is that its virtually unknown outside of Japan and the only real coverage it got outside of it is a short lived run on Cartoon Network. --]]] 20:56, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
* '''Non-Notable''' — ''delete <span style="border-bottom: 1px solid Red;">all</span>.'' I've unhidden the list. Cheers, ] 05:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
* '''Delete''' all -- No claim to, or evidence of, notability; no signs of significant citations to third-party sources. --] (]) 05:49, 13 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
* '''Delete''' all - no significant third party coverage. --] (]) 14:16, 13 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
*'''merge all ''' in to either the main article ora list of characters. We should always have a redirect from such, so deletion is appropriate . Merging is the compromise for characters, and trying to delete instead is as wrong as the argument for making a separate article for each. i reject the argument that the concept of notability has no place in Misplaced Pages; i reject similarly the argument that we should not cover fiction in detail. Equal nonsense. ''']''' (]) 23:30, 16 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
{{#ifeq:{{#titleparts:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|2}}|Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Log|{{collapse bottom}}|}} |
Latest revision as of 10:13, 30 January 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete all. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 06:24, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Alien Shaplay
- Alien Shaplay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A series of non-notable fictional aliens from a TV series. Many appear to be copyvios of . Included are:
- Alien Keel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Takkong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Mini Tortoise (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Queen Tortoise (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- King Tortoise (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Alien Zelan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Alien Mates (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Sabotendar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Dino-Tank (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Detton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Cosmo Liquid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Live King (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Astromons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Verokron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Barabas (Ultra monster) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Gan-Q (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Antlar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Ace Killer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
There may be many more... ninety:one 16:08, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable aliens from a non-notable tv series. Fails WP:NME --ScythreContribs 16:22, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 19:08, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 19:09, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 19:11, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I came across the listed articles above on NPP, but now I dig deeper, there seem to be five categories full of similar articles: Category:Ultra Monsters, Category:Ultra Seven, Category:Ultra Q Category:Ultraman and Category:Ultraman Tiga seem to all fall into the same box. ninety:one 19:16, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- "Non-notable" is not a compelling reason for deletion on a paperless encyclopedia. Sincerely, --A Nobody 20:23, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Comment what I meant by that is that its virtually unknown outside of Japan and the only real coverage it got outside of it is a short lived run on Cartoon Network. --ScythreContribs 20:56, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Non-Notable — delete all. I've unhidden the list. Cheers, Jack Merridew 05:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete all -- No claim to, or evidence of, notability; no signs of significant citations to third-party sources. --EEMIV (talk) 05:49, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete all - no significant third party coverage. --Cameron Scott (talk) 14:16, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- merge all in to either the main article ora list of characters. We should always have a redirect from such, so deletion is appropriate . Merging is the compromise for characters, and trying to delete instead is as wrong as the argument for making a separate article for each. i reject the argument that the concept of notability has no place in Misplaced Pages; i reject similarly the argument that we should not cover fiction in detail. Equal nonsense. DGG ( talk ) 23:30, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.