| Revision as of 21:52, 10 December 2005 editLinuxbeak (talk | contribs)7,320 edits Keep talking← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:37, 14 July 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Removed stale messages from inactive IP talkpage. (Task 13)Tag: AWB | ||
| (120 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Blanked IP talk}} | |||
| Please do not remove references from articles. This is considered ]. Thank you. ] (that's ] to you) 01:51, 30 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| {{test3}} ] (that's ] to you) 01:58, 30 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| {{test5}} ] (that's ] to you) 03:44, 30 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == December 2005 == | |||
| Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages under the ], which states that nobody may ] an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the ''effect'' of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --] 01:04, 3 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| My legitimate edits have been continually reverted by Linuxbeak and McNeight.....perhaps they are the problem?? If you truly read the discussions you will see that I am, perhaps, a bit obnoxious---but---they are able to close down my legitimate points without regard and that seems like dictatorial arrogance to me. I am shocked at their incredibly unprofessional words. I may be abrasive but one or both of them have used cuss words and been EXTREMELY unwilling to admit that the article has factual errors. I will not waste more time---but you should take a solid look at how many times they have reverted me. I am a nobody--a novice to Misplaced Pages--they are supposedly adults who just refuse to admit fault. Look at some of the responses to OTHER people besides me. I am disgusted by the whole matter. | |||
| Please see my response at ]. --] 09:06, 5 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you all for shouting me down...no one shall question the great and powerful Oz!! | |||
| Wow--I guess I'm out numbered here. Let's make a deal--I won't visit the CAP article ever again and you look into my complaints against Linuxbeak and McNeight. They have made truly rude, personal comments about me and that is not acceptable. | |||
| == 05 December 2005 == | |||
| ALSO--since I am 68.112.201.90 and the name of this page is 68.112.201.90 I think that you are the one commiting vandalism. | |||
| If you continue to add a false name to my contributions I will file a formal complaint to whoever runs this operation. Perhaps you should consider the fact that on a public computer their may be SEVERAL different users. | |||
| My name is Major Roger Healey, CAP. You have insulted me and called me childish names. Please refrain from further personal attacks and illegal reverts! | |||
| You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. --] 23:28, 5 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Grant- | |||
| Thank you for the NEW paragraph....finally an editor who is professional. Still--I have to wonder if McNeight calling me a 'loud-mouthed bully' is truly appropriate. | |||
| No, but neither were your comments. If either of you had gotten even more insulting or persistent I'd have blocked over that, too, but I have a fairly high toleration as far as insults are concerned. --] 02:24, 6 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == 10 December 2005 == | |||
| {{test2del}} ] (that's ] to you) 20:37, 10 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| You must be SO bored!! This page belongs to me---ya know--like you want to 'own' the CAP article---so please go away and play with yourself in your own sandbox! | |||
| You whine about my deletions--but then you delete my additions to MY page!? You must be really bored! DO NOT REMOVE MY COMMENTS! | |||
| "Go away boy, you bother me." W.C. Fields | |||
| {{test4}} ] (that's ] to you) 20:50, 10 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| PS: See ] as well. | |||
| Ah--my own page---where I can be KING!! And poor little Alex has to come and vandalize, again and again......what a sad state of affairs this is. | |||
| So--why can you ADD your tagline to MY comments and call it vandalism when I restore them to the way I put them down?? | |||
| I think you are the vandal!! | |||
| Signing the posts is considered a GUIDLINE--that means you can't FORCE me to do it!! | |||
| Quote from your source: | |||
| This page is considered a guideline on Misplaced Pages. It illustrates standards of conduct, which many editors agree with in principle. However, it is not policy. Feel free to update the page as needed, but please use the discussion page to propose any major changes. | |||
| SO--you are the vandal when you add your taglines to MY posts! | |||
| :...Have you even bothered to '''read''' the policies and guidelines of Misplaced Pages? ] (that's ] to you) 20:56, 10 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| YES---it says GUIDLINE and NOT POLICY.....you are the vandal!! | |||
| Quote from your source: This page is considered a guideline on Misplaced Pages. It illustrates standards of conduct, which many editors agree with in principle. However, it is not policy. Feel free to update the page as needed, but please use the discussion page to propose any major changes. | |||
| I DO NOT HAVE TO PUT A SIGNATURE ON MY COMMENTS---your additions are not wanted and NOT required by the policy!! | |||
| If you continue to VANDALIZE my page you will PROVE that you are a disgusting vandal!! UNSIGNED! | |||
| So--you are wrong and have vandalized MY page numerous times.....why are you such a dictatorial tyrant when it comes to a 'guidline' that is 'not policy' and shows your vandalism?? | |||
| Come on--where the threats of blocking?? Perhaps your child-like attitude has been crushed by the FACT that you can not add you taglines to MY comments on MY page?! Do you want to block me because you are angry that you are wrong?? | |||
| SO--since your 'warning' was a simple threat with NO basis in 'policy' I want you to removed it!! UNSIGNED!! | |||
| Wher are the clever quips now?? You are a bully who doesn't REALLY know what the facts are. I want my post to be UNSIGNED on my page----my way--not yours. | |||
| You have been ] for disruption to Misplaced Pages. As you have proven to be disruptive in the past, an ] is likely to be opened in regards to your behavior. If you wish to contest this ban, you may do so by using ]. We are located at irc.freenode.net in the channel #wikipedia. ] (that's ] to you) 21:10, 10 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| You are WRONG and yet you get to block me---what a sad little boy you truly are!! | |||
| MY PAGE--MY WAY---you can't dictate to me here! | |||
| WOW--I'm blocked and yet I can still add comments to my page......Alex must be wrong again!! | |||
| How can I be disruptive on my own page?? You are a vandal and you should go away! | |||
| Golly---I'm posting and leaving things unsigned and Alex is SO angry he has to make hollow threats. Sad. | |||
| Gee---maybe somebody out there KNOWS that Alex is wrong and tried to illegally block me from my own page?? Perhaps he had to go for a timeout?? | |||
| So--would you like to call me a 'loud-mouthed bully' again?? Or have you realized that YOU are the bully? | |||
| Why don't you leave MY page alone and stop your petty vandalizations? Face it YOU can't force ME to do anything!!!! | |||
| It is truly a pathetic situation....you are the vandal and you threaten me with blocking. GO AWAY!! I WIN!!! | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/Stupidity | |||
| I'm NOT seeing myself being blocked----got any smart-mouth responses to me now---big shot?! | |||
| :. ] (that's ] to you) 21:22, 10 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| People who must make BIG threats usually do it as a form of compensation for some shortcomings in other areas. | |||
| I'm waiting!!! Where's the BIG threat going to find itself next?? | |||
| Linuxbeak has continued to threaten me and yet he is wrong. UNSIGNED!! | |||
| You are far too rigid in your demands that others follow what is a guidline---I will not be bullied into conforming to your dictatorial whims. | |||
| Bring on the blocking-----why haven't you followed through with your threat?? You are so wrong it must hurt your Mother to know you! | |||
| Well- it seams that you can't block this page!! You vandalized MY page and then blocked me. That truly PROVES that you are a petty, self-serving little boy!! | |||
| I WILL BE FILING A COMPLAINT AGAINST YOU---what a sad individual you must be to try to FORCE me to comply with your whims and when I won't---you block me. So, I guess this is like a little boy who can't win so he takes his balls and goes home!! | |||
| I'm waiting to hear you apology!! | |||
| :Sorry for making you rant for about 20 minutes straight... ] (that's ] to you) 21:34, 10 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| It is so cool that you can't block me here----I'll bet you are just fuming mad now!! When my complaint is processed you will be crying all the way to your sandbox!! | |||
| You blocked me on a claim of disruption---but this is my page--how can you judge me here?? Oh yeah--you can't!! You make me want to puke all over your sandbox......waahhhh!! | |||
| :Actually, I *can* prevent you from editing this page by protecting it, although I chose not to. All of your comments are potential evidence of disruptive behavior, which I'll gladly use in your RFC. ] (that's ] to you) 21:37, 10 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| OOOHHH---big threats-----You vandalized MY page and then blocked me---you are wrong and you know it!! Come on block me from my own page---I dare you!! Then all will see that you are the disgusting disruption!!! | |||
| Come on big man-----hit me with your best shot!! I"M WAITING!!!! | |||
| Why don't you follow through with your heavy-handed, dictatorial threats?? Are you afraid that you will be seen for the vandal that you really are?? | |||
| So you finally realized you were WRONG about trying to force taglines onto my comments---so you create this 'disruption' complaint....that must be like the 5' 6" police officers who give Disorderly Conduct tickets to tall guys....again...trying to make up for shortcoming!!!!!!! | |||
| What's the problem? Are you afraid to slap me agian...because you KNOW you are wrong??? | |||
| Empty threats usually come from empty minds. | |||
| I'm waiting for you to follow through with your tiny threats bigboy. You probably won't 'protect' MY page because you finally realize that you are pathetically wrong...but I hope you try!! | |||
| Well--it seems tha I was right. You are pathetically wrong and you can't admit it or do anything about it. | |||
| I hope the "RFC" board reads ALL you r comments and reviews how many time McNeight illegally added his taglines to my comments.....sad, sad, sad. | |||
| QUOTE OF THE DAY: Actually, I *can* prevent you from editing this page by protecting it, although I chose not to. All of your comments are potential evidence of disruptive behavior, which I'll gladly use in your RFC. Alex Schenck (that's Linuxbeak to you) 21:37, 10 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't need to "try" anything. While you wait for your RFC to be completed and your block to expire, I suggest you look at ]. Maybe it will help you learn more about how things are ran here. | |||
| :And I do not buy your claim that you're a Civil Air Patrol senior officer. At all. ] (that's ] to you) 21:52, 10 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:37, 14 July 2022
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.