| Revision as of 04:56, 29 August 2009 edit71.241.218.107 (talk) →Wage slavery← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:16, 26 September 2024 edit undoVulpesBot (talk | contribs)Bots1,027,265 edits →top: Removed stale messages from IP talkpageTag: AWB | ||
| (86 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Blanked IP talk}} | |||
| ==Your recent edits== | |||
| Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should ] by typing four ]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button ] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!<!-- Template:Tilde --> --] (]) 18:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == June 2009 == | |||
| ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The <span class="plainlinks"></span> you made to the page ] has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the ] for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative ]. You may also wish to read the ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-huggle1 --> ]<sup>]</sup> 15:34, 10 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Operation Rescue (Kansas) == | |||
| Hi there. I have reverted your edit to ] based on ]. ] (]) 15:41, 10 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :If you think that the policy that Dawn bard linked to is wrong, the onus is on you to start a discussion to change it. Stop accusing people of being "right-wing" and "not understanding what consensus is". ]]] 16:50, 10 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::The "right-wing" comment was related to something outside our exchange. But I'm sure that won't stop you from butting in and reverting my edits to that other article as well, just because you can get away with it. | |||
| ::You quite obviously don't understand what "consensus" means. It's an observation, not an accusation. Seriously, look it up. | |||
| ::And stop waving ] in my face. | |||
| :::Per , a consensus is a "general agreement". The policy that Dawn bard linked to, and indeed all policies on the site, are a result of a general agreement of most editors on Misplaced Pages. | |||
| :::IAR ends exactly where another editor disagrees with you. If you decide you want to ignore all rules, you had better be prepared to explain yourself. Especially if your actions are in explicit opposition with an existing policy. ]]] 16:59, 10 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Consensus, simply put, is when opposing views are considered and every effort is made to fold them into any decisions that are made. You clearly don't understand this. You clearly equate consensus with ]. | |||
| ::::You clearly don't understand what IAR means, either. Your description renders it meaningless. | |||
| == July 2009 == | |||
| ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The <span class="plainlinks"></span> you made to the page ] has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the ] for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative ]. You may also wish to read the ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-huggle1 --> ] (]) 18:12, 7 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did with <span class="plainlinks"></span> to the page ]. Such edits constitute ] and are ]. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the ] for testing. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-huggle2 --> ] 18:13, 7 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Reverted in one second, then less than a second. Well, at least two more neo-Nazis have been exposed. | |||
| ==Your recent edits== | |||
| ] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion{{#if:|, such as on ]}}, you should ] by typing four ]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button ] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --] (]) 06:37, 15 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Wage slavery== | |||
| ]. Please do not remove sourced information that is stable in the article without discussion on the talk page. Your edit summary sounded like an opinion or original research as to the removal. ] (]) 15:18, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :The article was perfectly "stable" before you and your fellow right-wing extremists expropriated it from its primary maintainer, which you did on ideological grounds. And now you're lacing it with right-wing apologetics for wage-slavery, much of it utterly nonsensical, such as that I removed. The summary explained the reasoning, which is perfectly sound. I didn't expect for a nanosecond that my edit would survive the deathgrip of the capitalist fundamentalists who now ] the article, but perhaps someone higher up in the WP hierarchy, or with a better connection among the Randroid nomenklatura, will see my edit and agree with it and make it stick, in spite of you and your fellow Invisible Hand worshipers. | |||
| ::Suit yourself but you pretty much have things wrong as to what is going on. Also this might be a good reference point for you, and I do not mean it negatively ]. Misplaced Pages has pretty strict criteria and also things like this ]. Name calling is not going to help things. If you have some ideas put them on the talk page for discussion. Removing reffed sourced sections of the article is not a good idea. It is an encyclopedia article... not a blog or forum. Editors are usually not considered notable and ''truth giving'' or information removal is not good, especially when a point by doing so is trying to be made, that is said to be disrupting Misplaced Pages to make a point... also not a good idea. ] (]) 04:41, 29 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| 1. I am under no obligation to grovel for permission of the ] before making edits. I am encouraged to ]. | |||
| 2. "Stability" is a ploy to intimidate would-be editors. An ] declares an article "stable," thus magically transforming would-be editors into would-be vandals who threaten "stability." It also means that the ] is perpetually ]. Moreover, the ], when enforcing the article lockdown and reverting unapproved edits, commits gross hypocrisy by disturbing the new state of stability. | |||
| 2 is an extension of 1; a justification for why I need permission from you to edit. Of course, I could simply go back to any point in the article's history and declare stability, but I'm not in a position to intimidate you, because I don't spend my time forming alliances with my ideological comrades to help me run you off those articles that expose the horrors of my ideology. | |||
Latest revision as of 11:16, 26 September 2024
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.