| Revision as of 15:21, 14 December 2005 editHaukurth (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators26,987 edits →Examples: Another attempt at George W. Bush← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 00:27, 19 May 2022 edit undoJ947 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,945 edits rcat |
| (282 intermediate revisions by 80 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Misplaced Pages subcat guideline|naming conventions|Common names}} |
|
#REDIRECT ] |
|
{{main|Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions}} |
|
|
'''Convention:''' Use the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Redirect category shell| |
|
When choosing a name for a page ask yourself: What word would the average user of the Misplaced Pages put into the search engine? |
|
|
|
{{R to section}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{R to project namespace}} |
|
Misplaced Pages is not a place to advocate a title change in order to reflect recent scholarship. The articles themselves reflect recent scholarship but the titles should represent common usage. |
|
|
|
{{R from merge}} |
|
|
|
|
|
}} |
|
Remember that a link is the title of the page it links to. |
|
|
|
|
|
Titles should be as simple as possible without being too general. |
|
|
|
|
|
For example, the page about ] should simply be called "Jazz", not "Jazz music", because "jazz" refers in almost any context to a genre of music, and the simpler title makes linking easier. Adding the word "music" is redundant. |
|
|
|
|
|
On the other hand, Country music should be on a page called ] because the word "country" has other referents besides the musical genre. If we ignore potential ambiguity, the ideal of simplicity can be at odds with the ideal of ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
==Rationale== |
|
|
Names of articles should be the most commonly used name for the following reasons: |
|
|
* We want to maximize the likelihood of being listed in external search engines, thereby attracting more people to Misplaced Pages. For example, the pagename is ] and not "James Earl Carter, Jr."; the string "Jimmy Carter" in the page title make it easier to find: search engines will often give greater weight to the contents of the title than to the body of the page. Since "Jimmy Carter" is the most common form of the name, it will be searched on more often, and having that exact string in our page title will often mean our page shows up higher in other search engines. |
|
|
* We want to maximize the incidence that people who make a link guessing the article name, guess correctly; people guessing a different name may think there is no article yet, which may cause duplication. |
|
|
* Using a full formal name requires people to know that name, ''and'' to type more. |
|
|
|
|
|
Redirects help, but give a slightly ugly "redirected from" announcement at the top of the page. On the other hand, if someone reads or hears "]", and wonders who might be meant by that, the "redirected from King Billy" on top of the page works slightly comforting when this king turns up under his most common name: the "redirect" message indicates the system hasn't been playing tricks, and that this was the intended king. |
|
|
|
|
|
==Examples== |
|
|
Examples of common names that Misplaced Pages uses instead of the more formal or scientifically correct version include: |
|
|
*] (not <nowiki>]</nowiki>) |
|
|
*] (not <nowiki>]</nowiki>) |
|
|
*] (not: <nowiki>]</nowiki>) |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] (not <nowiki>]</nowiki>) |
|
|
*] (not <nowiki>]</nowiki>) |
|
|
*] (not: <nowiki>]</nowiki>) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Don't overdo it== |
|
|
In cases where the common name of a subject is misleading (For example: "tidal wave" would be a misleading title since these phenomena have nothing to do with tides), then it is sometimes reasonable to fall back on a well-accepted alternative (], for example). See also: ] |
|
|
|
|
|
Also, some terms are in common usage but are commonly regarded as offensive to large groups of people (Eskimo and Mormon Church, for example). In those cases use widely known alternatives (] and ]). When in doubt, check a mainstream reference work. |
|
|
|
|
|
This does not mean that we should avoid using widely known pseudonyms like ], ], ], or widely known common names of ]s and other things. But it does mean that we need to temper common usage when the commonly used term is unreasonably misleading or commonly regarded as offensive to one or more groups of people. |
|
|
|
|
|
==Subpages== |
|
|
===Policy regarding changed MediaWiki software=== |
|
|
An article with a slash (/) in its title is treated like any other page, as there are no longer any special subpage features in the main (encyclopedia) namespace. Accordingly, the use of subpage notation when naming articles is discouraged. |
|
|
|
|
|
If contributors still want to use the former "slashed" subpage naming, they have the burden of showing that a subpage-like name is necessary, otherwise articles using such names will be moved to a page in line with normal article titles. |
|
|
|
|
|
Example: use "]" or "James T. Kirk (Star Trek)", not "Star Trek/James T. Kirk", for an article on the fictional character Captain Kirk. |
|
|
|
|
|
Unnecessary subpages existing prior to this convention are in the process of being moved to their own, conventionally-named page. For discussions leading to the use of this convention see the ] page. |
|
|
|
|
|
Slashes may be used freely when present in original titles, or usual terminology. Examples: ], ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
===Subsidiary articles=== |
|
|
The present convention for articles providing more detail on a given topic is using the <nowiki>{{</nowiki>]<nowiki>|<subpage>}}</nowiki> and <nowiki>{{</nowiki>]<nowiki>|<subpage>}}</nowiki> templates, in accordance with ]; such templates are placed under a section header, each instance of these templates providing a link to a subpage. |
|
|
|
|
|
Occasionally these subsidiary pages — if containing content that is only relevant as an elaboration of a shorter paragraph on the main page — can have more complex page names, that is, if only intended to be accessed by clicking from the main article. Example: ] has as one of its pages on sub-topics: ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
However, if a "common name" for such subsidiary page is possible, that is always preferred. |
|
|
|
|
|
==Exceptions== |
|
|
Many wikipedia naming conventions guidelines contain implicit or explicit exceptions to the "common names" principle. Some of these exceptions are due to technical limitations, for example "]" while "C++" is technically not possible as a page name. |
|
|
|
|
|
Other guidelines try to give recommendations for enhanced precision, cleaner ] and/or solution of ]s, which might lead to article names that are rather "the most obvious" than strictly spoken "the most used", for example ] and not ] (which is more used on the internet). |
|
|
|
|
|
Several guidelines try to systematise certain ''types of article titles'', for example article titles using abbreviations: |
|
|
*]: ] and not ] or ] |
|
|
*]: ] and not ] or ] |
|
|
|
|
|
Many guidelines systematise titles of articles grouped ''by topic'', for example ] and not ], according to ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
For articles on people some minor practical exceptions are contained in ] - these are however hardly sufficient to cover the complexities for naming royals and other nobility: hence ], and several other nobility-related Naming Conventions guidelines, contain many detailed exceptions. |
|
|
|
|
|
==See also== |
|
|
Apart from the main ] page and the ] there are also: |
|
|
|
|
|
* ] - the encyclopedia article about naming conventions; |
|
|
* ] - the non-guideline category of articles about naming conventions; |
|
|
* ] - Search engine testing might in some cases assist in discerning which of two alternative versions of a name is ''most common''. |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|