| Revision as of 19:06, 15 September 2009 editLokiiT (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,259 edits →Blocked← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:40, 20 May 2018 edit undoTheRealWeatherMan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers728 edits Notification: listing at articles for deletion of Glutamate permease. (TW) | ||
| (871 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| --- | |||
| {{semi-retired}} | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ==Blocked== | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:48 hours|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours'''|You have been '''temporarily ]''' from editing}} for {{#if:edit warring|'''edit warring'''|]}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our ] first. {{#if:yes|<b class="Unicode">]</b> <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 04:12, 15 September 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block1 --> | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::I thought it is common practice not to punish users who made ''two'' reverts in the same article. I saw this numerous times at 3RR. I debated the issues at the article talk page with YMB ''and'' Bobbani. I am really surprised how fast you jumped to the gun (in a couple of minutes!) missing a number of previous reports and not allowing me and YMB to tell anything at all at the 3RR. I am sorry for creating problems. I hope this block will still be reviewed by another administrator? Thank you.] (]) 04:41, 15 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692040667 --> | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of Template:Pfam domains == | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 18:46, 28 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| :Biophys has been edit warring recently at ] as well, where he made 3 reverts in 24h on 13 September (and more later): . I was thinking of reporting him, but now he is already blocked for edit warring elsewhere, so I won't. This should be taken into account. ] (]) 04:35, 15 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Offliner, and that is why your just started reverting my recent edits in other articles without even talking: ? ] (]) 04:55, 15 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 23:40, 20 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :What edit warring? Can sb provide the diffs were Biophys broke 3RR? Thanks. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 17:32, 15 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::One need not break the 3RR rule in order to be blocked for edit warring. ] (]) 19:06, 15 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Piotrus, I did not broke the rule and made only ''two'' reverts in the article, and I talked a lot with two other users involved. I am afraid that administrator who blocked me was not quite objective. A week ago he did not block PasswordUsername even though he made a clear 3RR violation, but he blocked me in ''two minutes'' after receiving the report. However, it is now very fashionable to blame administrators of everything, so I decided to withdraw my request to review the block as to reduce any tensions. My request to review was standing for nine hours without response by any administrator. I can request to review my block again if you recommend.] (]) 18:12, 15 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::Piotrus, I am not sure if this will make any good, especially in light of EE sanctions.] (]) 18:25, 15 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:40, 20 May 2018
---
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Pfam domains
Template:Pfam domains has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:46, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Glutamate permease for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glutamate permease is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Glutamate permease until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheRealWeatherMan (talk) 23:40, 20 May 2018 (UTC)