Talk:Sixty Watt Shaman: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 02:41, 21 September 2009 editRich Farmbrough (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors1,725,420 editsm Add listas using AWB ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 10:57, 9 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk \| contribs)Bots7,536,790 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Metal}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion
(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Old AfD multi\| date = 10 December 2009 (UTC) \| result = '''keep''' \| page = Sixty Watt Shaman (2nd nomination)}}
	{{WPBiography
			{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=C\|living=yes\|listas=Sixty Watt Shaman\|
	\|living=yes
		⚫	{{WikiProject Biography\|musician-work-group=yes}}
	\|class=Stub
			{{WikiProject Metal}}
	\|priority=
	\|auto=yes
⚫	\|musician-work-group=yes
	\|listas = Sixty Watt Shaman
	}}		}}

	{{HMM\|class=Stub\|auto=yes}}
			== Genre ==

			There is absolutely nothing that connects this band and their musical performance to the "stoner rock" style.

			Therefore, such clssifications are removed. ] (]) 22:20, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

			If you've got a pair of eyes which are in working condition you can clearly see that stoner rock was there even before my . See? It was denoted as underground rock but it was redirected at ]. But 'underground rock' isn't a valid subgenre. It's an umbrella term. ] is now sourced anyway. ] (]) 06:59, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:57, 9 February 2024

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 December 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal

Genre

There is absolutely nothing that connects this band and their musical performance to the "stoner rock" style.

Therefore, such clssifications are removed. Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 22:20, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

If you've got a pair of eyes which are in working condition you can clearly see that stoner rock was there even before my edit. See? It was denoted as underground rock but it was redirected at stoner rock. But 'underground rock' isn't a valid subgenre. It's an umbrella term. Stoner rock is now sourced anyway. Shallowmead077 (talk) 06:59, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Categories: