| Revision as of 23:58, 15 December 2005 editPitchka (talk | contribs)5,085 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:02, 18 January 2020 edit undoFastilyBot (talk | contribs)Bots239,264 edits BOT: Notify user of possible file issue(s) | ||
| (264 intermediate revisions by 62 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{softredirect|User talk:A. di M.}} | |||
| <div class="messagebox standard-talk"> | |||
| {{archive box|auto=long}} | |||
| This user has purposefully reduced his time on Misplaced Pages in order to ] from ]. Therefore you will have to wait up to one week or more for me to answer messages. --] 15:19, 13 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == File:Paperball.jpg listed for deletion == | |||
| </div> | |||
| A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] <sup>]</sup> 19:25, 18 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| {{Wikibreak|]|when I've achieved a driving licence (in several weeks).}} | |||
| ==== | |||
| Don't delete large chunks of text out of articles without discussion as to why. ]] 21:20, Sep 19, 2004 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ==Empty product== | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Hello. Your addition to the end of a paragraph in ] flatly contradicts what is stated earlier in the paragraph. If your edit is to make any sense, you would need to change those earlier parts of the paragraph as well. Howevers, you raise an issue that should perhaps be addressed. Could you bring it up on the discussion page? ] 23:28, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691987405 --> | |||
| ==Non-free rationale for File:Rieti.jpg== | |||
| ] | |||
| Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under ], but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages is acceptable. Please go to ], and edit it to include a ]. | |||
| If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in ]. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> ~ ]<sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">]</sup> 14:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :I once read somewhere that 0<sup>0</sup> is indeterminate, because 0<sup>0</sup> = 0<sup>1-1</sup> = 0<sup>1</sup>/0<sup>1</sup> = 0/0 which is indeterminate. | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| And the proof that ''n''<sup>0</sup> = 1 to which I'm most familiar is ''n''<sup>0</sup> = ''n''<sup>1-1</sup> = ''n''<sup>1</sup>/''n''<sup>1</sup> = ''n''/''n'' = 1 which of course doesn't apply if ''n'' = 0. --] 11:26, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| The file ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| The sense in which 0<sup>0</sup> is ] is that if ''f''(''x'') and ''g''(''x'') both approach 0 as ''x'' approaches something then ''f''(''x'')<sup>''g''(''x'')</sup> may approach any positive number, depending on what functions ''f'' and ''g'' are. But for many purposes, including both formal power series and convergent power series, and many of the purposes of combinatorics and probability, one should take 0<sup>0</sup> to be 1. ] 19:17, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
| <blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| ==Guitar== | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| I deleted the stuff about coins as picks and Bryan May from the intro for guitar because it doesn't really belong there. If you can add it (and as much more information as you know) to the article on ]s that'd be great though --] 16:10, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> | |||
| == Planck units == | |||
| <span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The file ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| i am deleting the note regarding musical scale and the Planck angular frequency. it's a little cute, but i don't think it's of interest to those reading the article seriously. one could make similar notes for every other Planck unit and all that would do is clutter the article. | |||
| <blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| ==]== | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| As for the "number theory" section: | |||
| Well, but in order to know which fractions are in lowest terms I have to already know the factorisation of 42, then I can evalue the Moebius function simplily using the definition. Therefore that formula is pretty useless. | |||
| Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> | |||
| :Earlier I answered thus: | |||
| <span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:02, 18 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::I find the word ''therefore'' above to be a gross non-sequitur. ] 21:59, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Now I have more time, so I will elaborate. Obviously you can evaluate (I assume you meant "evaluate") the Moebius function without using trigonometric functions. When I wrote that section, I certainly did not have in mind using trigonometric functions to evaluate the Moebius function. What I had in mind was using the connection between the Moebius function and trigonometric functions in order to apply Fourier analysis to number theory. ] 23:21, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::I understand this, but the wording could be misunderstood as implying that a primality test can be made using trigonometric functions and used in cryptanalysis to crack public key crypto, or something like that. Surely it's not what it's meant. --] 11:47, 1 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :PS: I would help to sign your comments. That way one could know without looking at the edit history that the person who wrote your comment quoted above was ''not'' the same person who wrote the paragraph that followed it. ] 23:21, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Well, next times I'll have to remember to sign my comments... :---] 11:47, 1 May 2005 (UTC)) | |||
| ::OK, I've added some comments to the article to clarify the point that you missed. ] 23:38, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Quark == | |||
| Your edit summary to ] is puzzling, as the denominators for charges were clearly 3 before. Were you having difficulty reading them? ] ] 10:23, 16 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes, my browser showed them as 2's. In general, IMO one-character vulgar fractions are better avoided. | |||
| ::Just out of interest, what is your browser and operating system? ] ] 12:10, 16 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :::IE 6.0 WinXP. Now I looked at that version again, and discovered that they were 2's only in Medium and Very Small font sizes. In Very Large, Large and Small they are 3's. I understand that very small could be too small to clearly show the 3's, but I wonder why Small shows 3's and Medium shows 2's... there must be a bug in the font, I guess. | |||
| == E flat? Sure, why not. == | |||
| If you have the data to evaluate out-of-tuneness of harmonics relative to equal temperament in the ] article, by all means edit away. I rewrote most of the surrounding text but left the list and graphic "as is". My experience as a piano technician tells me they're ALL out of tune to some extent in the physical world, and that even equal temperament itself can't be specified as an unchanging set of frequencies any more than it can be tuned with an unchanging set of beat rates. ] 03:58, 18 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :see ] | |||
| == CFerror == | |||
| Done, thanks. ]]] 14:11, August 25, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| sorry, i thought ordinary mathematics was basic mathematics | |||
| ==Category:Millennial Wikipedians== | |||
| ''Category:Millennial Wikipedians'' has been listed on categories for deletion. Since you are using it on your user page please weigh in on the vote and that of the other generational categories ]. Thanks. -] 19:58, August 26, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Riemann zet pictures == | |||
| Hi, | |||
| Thanks for taking the time to create the reimann zeta pictures, ... but ... in my browser, they look terrible; they're fading into white. I think its the image resizing, its cutting out pixels. Would it be possible to have you redraw the pictures with a heavier line weight, so that when they get resized small, they still have impact? | |||
| Also, could you make a picture of Re zeta vs. Im zeta? I find that picture quite dramatic, as it spirals around, with all of the spirals going through zero. Anyway, thanks. ] 01:15, 30 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :1. I've made it with a shareware program whose trial period expired right yesterday... (Honest!) However I can try editing the current one with Paint Shop Pro, but no promise that I'd manage to create something decent... | |||
| ::Done.--] 09:53, 30 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :2. I wouldn't even know how to. Howewer I saw one on http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RiemannZetaFunction.html, but I don't know its copyright status.--] 09:33, 30 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::F*** it... | |||
| ::http://mathworld.wolfram.com/about/faq.html#copyright--] 09:36, 30 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Italy or UK? == | |||
| Why are you listed on ] but categorized as from UK?--] 10:22, 31 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, because I was born in and grew up in Italy, yet happen now to be living in the UK. ] is meant to include wikipedians originally from Italy. ] is a little bit greyer, but I guess it is being replaced by ], which I would count as. Though only for another two weeks, after which I guess I'll have to change it. | |||
| :If you're question is to work out whether I ought to be in ], well I don't know. The page says "...or are associated with Italy", so I'd say yes. If the categorizers want to be strict and include only those who are currently living in Italy, well I guess no. I doesn't really matter to me. — ] | ] ] 10:57, 31 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Then I suggest you to include yourself in both categories (and remove yourself from the list).--] 17:46, 31 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == System of a Down edits == | |||
| Hi Army1987. I've discussed this issue at length as Pasboudin and also as 66.36.x.x when I was unregistered. The same issue has been debated at ] and ], so you may wish to check the discussions on these pages for background. ] is a particularly good discussion. ] 21:37, 22 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't dare to touch that paragraph anymore. Let's see the results of the votes. IMHO, we'd better keep the paragraph in its Rhobite version, or maybe even better in its Norvy version, until Hypnotize is released, then use the what-will-we-expect-to-read-in-year-2015 rule of thumb. --] 12:23, 23 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yup. Since you don't think the Mike version should be there any more, maybe consider a vote change? ] 21:00, 23 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :::If by "Mike version" you mean that prolix ungrammatical crap, well, I've never thought it should be there. The version in the text of the poll is the one Rhobite wrote in spite of protection. My vote is for that, but I would also consider Norvy version. In addition to that, I provided "improved" (IMVHO) versions of Norvy and Rhobite versions.--] 21:08, 23 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :::Er... The matter is about what is meant by "majorly rewrite", I changed my mind.--] 21:14, 23 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Look at all those languages! == | |||
| That's a lot of languages, how did you learn all of those?!!! I'll wait for you to come back, though. | |||
| ] 01:18, 14 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :As for English, I've been studying it for ~10 years, I used to play lots of computer games in English, to use (and still use) some computer programs in English, I listen lots of music in English, surf websites in English etc... so I'm quite fluent in it. (Last year I scored 4 out of 5 at the end of an English course in Oxford, and this year I think I'm gonna take the FCE exam.) | |||
| :I used to study French at school (since September 1998 to June 2001), but I'm no longer fluent in it. Anyway I still understand it ''well enough to use an article as a source for writings in one's own language and to ask or answer simple questions'' as WikiBabel says (and I manage to understand something in French TV news). I picked up a little Spanish by playing Spanish ] (no, I'm not joking) — however Spanish is very similar to Italian. Once you can speak Italian, French and Latin it's no problem to learn to understand Spanish at least at a basic level. | |||
| :As for ], that's not a "serious" language, I used it before even knowing it had a name (and, yes, I've had ''conversations'' in Europanto too, though only with Italian speakers). | |||
| :I study Latin at school. However, in Italy they just teach you to translate texts from Latin to Italian using a dictionary, usually at a speed of ten lines of text an hour or less; I would not be able to directly write in Latin, or would be able with some difficulty, so I decided to downgrade myself from la-2 to la-1. | |||
| :I have also some basic knowledge of Japanese and German (i.e. counting, greeting, saying simple sentences...) but I'm unable to read encyclopedic articles in these languages, so I left them out. --] 13:25, 16 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Zamnedix == | |||
| Lol thanks, dude. I realize that now. | |||
| --] 00:17, 19 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| ]Just a quick note of thanks for making the user-vocal categories, nice work, it's much appreciated. ] <sup><font color="green">]</font></sup> 12:33, 22 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Millennial Wikipedians == | |||
| If you feel like merging Millennial Wikipedians into Millennial Generation Wikipedian, I will not object—as it does not change the name but reaches the specificity that you desire. Also, please be careful about posting user cats on Cfd in the future, CFD is not as constructive an environment as Vfd. Thanks. -] 22:44, 29 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :You mean that I should recat user pages by myself? --] 20:09, 30 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :You don't have to do it alone, but there is a precedent for recating user pages when a cat has been moved (if that is your concern). -] 08:12, 6 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Where might I ask other people to help me? However when I have some time I'll recat the ones I manage. --] 13:36, 6 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == devil power == | |||
| ciao army. pensa che fortuna (per non dire altro), dovevo fare una domanda sul grafico dell'equazione z di Riemann e gia ero preoccupato di come scriverla e ho beccato l'unico\a (o uno\a dei\lle pochi\e) italiani\e di en.wiki. vorrei metterre '''Image:Criticalline.png''' nella pagina Italiana dell'Ipotesi di Riemann (vai su ] e poi nella colonna a sinistra "other languages" vai su "italiano") ma non riesco a spostare l'immagine da en.wiki a it.wiki. siccome vedo dalla cronologia dell'immagine che l'hai messa tu, potresti inserirla nella pagina italiana? grazie 1000. non mi posso firmare perchè non sono registrato su en.wiki ma se vuoi ripondermi vieni su | |||
| http://it.wikipedia.org/Utente:Red_devil_666 | |||
| P.S. scusa per le differenze maschile\femminile ma dal nickname non capisco se sei maschio o femmina... | |||
| post P.S. complimenti per l'ottima musica che ascolti e per i gusti in materia di cartoni animati | |||
| == devil power == | |||
| grazie per aver messo l'immagine comunque approfitto per chiederti una cosa: se l'hai fatta tu con un programma, mi puoi consigliare il nome di un programma che disegna le funzioni che mi serve per studiare (anche se non dovrei usare wiki per fini personali)? comunque ancora non ho capito se sei maschio o femmina... Red devil 666 | |||
| http://it.wikipedia.org/Utente:Red_devil_666 | |||
| p.s. non ho ancora capito se 6 maschio o femmina... | |||
| ==Catholic Church of Misplaced Pages== | |||
| Since you are listed as a Roman Catholic, I urge you to vote to delete this offensive article: ], which is a parody of Catholicism, at this page: ], and tell other people to do the same. --] 01:40, 9 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Can you help == | |||
| I would appreciate help with watching ] and ] both of which I feel have merit and are only being classified unencyclopedic because the "editor" has a grudge against me. ] | |||
| == Pro-life celebrities category up for deletion == | |||
| Hi, I see that you are listed as a Roman Catholic Wikipedian, well the Pro-life celebrities category is up for deletion. '''Category:Pro-life celebrities''' I think this is an interesting and worth while category. Afterall not all celebrities are pro-abortion. ] 23:58, 15 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:02, 18 January 2020
User talk:A. di M.
This page is a soft redirect.
 Archives | |||
|
|||
File:Paperball.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Paperball.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly 19:25, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Rieti.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rieti.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ~ Rob13 14:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of File:Rieti Italy.PNG
The file File:Rieti Italy.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of File:Logistic pdf (single).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The file File:Logistic pdf (single).png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Category:.png){kind=link}